Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Health Phys ; 114(5): 507-510, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29505431

RESUMO

The Health Physics Society (HPS) provided comment to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on options to consider when developing an action plan for President Trump's Executive Order to evaluate regulations for repeal, replacement, or modification. The HPS recommended that the EPA reconsider their adherence to the linear no-threshold (LNT) model for radiation risk calculations and improve several documents by better addressing uncertainties in low-dose, low dose-rate (LDDR) radiation exposure environments. The authors point out that use of the LNT model near background levels cannot provide reliable risk projections, use of the LNT model and collective-dose calculations in some EPA documents is inconsistent with the recommendations of international organizations, and some EPA documents have not been exposed to the public comment rule-making process. To assist in establishing a better scientific basis for the risks of low dose rate and low dose radiation exposure, the EPA should continue to support the "Million Worker Study," led by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement.


Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , Física Médica , Proteção Radiológica/legislação & jurisprudência , Proteção Radiológica/normas , Sociedades Médicas , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Humanos , Doses de Radiação , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
3.
Health Phys ; 102(5): 563-9, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22469933

RESUMO

During the spring of 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used its national radiation monitoring and sampling system, RadNet, to detect, identify, and inform the public about radioactive material in the United States resulting from Japan's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant release. The RadNet system monitors ambient air, drinking water, precipitation, and pasteurized milk for radionuclides. To supplement its existing stationary (fixed) continuous air monitoring system, EPA deployed additional air monitors to Saipan, Guam, and locations in the western United States. The Agency also accelerated the regular quarterly sampling of milk and drinking water and collected an additional round of samples. For two months, staff located at EPA's Headquarters Emergency Operations Center, west coast regional offices, and National Air and Radiation Environmental Lab worked seven days a week to handle the increased radiochemical sample analysis from air filters, precipitation, drinking water, and milk; provide interagency scientific input; and answer press and public inquiries. EPA's data was consistent with what was expected from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant release. The levels of radioactivity were so low that the readings from the near-real-time RadNet air monitors stayed within normal background ranges. Detailed sample analyses were needed to identify the radionuclides associated with the release. Starting at the end of April and continuing through May 2011, levels of radioactive material decreased as expected.


Assuntos
Terremotos , Centrais Nucleares , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Tsunamis , Japão , Monitoramento de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 8(10): 1145-51, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12396930

RESUMO

During an investigation conducted December 17-20, 2001, we collected environmental samples from a U.S. postal facility in Washington, D.C., known to be extensively contaminated with Bacillus anthracis spores. Because methods for collecting and analyzing B. anthracis spores have not yet been validated, our objective was to compare the relative effectiveness of sampling methods used for collecting spores from contaminated surfaces. Comparison of wipe, wet and dry swab, and HEPA vacuum sock samples on nonporous surfaces indicated good agreement between results with HEPA vacuum and wipe samples. However, results from HEPA vacuum sock and wipe samples agreed poorly with the swab samples. Dry swabs failed to detect spores >75% of the time when they were detected by wipe and HEPA vacuum samples. Wipe samples collected after HEPA vacuum samples and HEPA vacuum samples collected after wipe samples indicated that neither method completely removed spores from the sampled surfaces.


Assuntos
Bacillus anthracis/isolamento & purificação , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Serviços Postais , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Esporos Bacterianos/isolamento & purificação , District of Columbia , Exposição Ambiental , Microbiologia Ambiental , Monitoramento Ambiental/instrumentação , Monitoramento Ambiental/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Manejo de Espécimes/instrumentação , Manejo de Espécimes/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...