Implementation of preventive and predictive BRCA testing in patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer: a position paper of Italian Scientific Societies.

Constitutional BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) are associated with an increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancers. Current evidence indicates that BRCA1/2 PVs are also associated with pancreatic cancer, and that BRCA2 PVs are associated with prostate cancer risk. The identification of carriers of constitutional PVs in the BRCA1/2 genes allows the implementation of individual and family prevention pathways, through validated screening programs and risk-reducing strategies. According to the relevant and increasing therapeutic predictive implications, the inclusion of BRCA testing in the routine management of patients with breast, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate cancers represent a key requirement to optimize medical or surgical therapeutic and prevention decision-making, and access to specific anticancer therapies. Therefore, accurate patient selection, the use of standardized and harmonized procedures, and adherence to homogeneous testing criteria, are essential elements to implement BRCA testing in clinical practice. This consensus position paper has been developed and approved by a multidisciplinary Expert Panel of 64 professionals on behalf of the AIOM-AIRO-AISP-ANISC-AURO-Fondazione AIOM-SIAPEC/IAP-SIBioC-SICO-SIF-SIGE-SIGU-SIU-SIURO-UROP Italian Scientific Societies, and a patient association (aBRCAdaBRA Onlus). The working group included medical, surgical and radiation oncologists, medical and molecular geneticists, clinical molecular biologists, surgical and molecular pathologists, organ specialists such as gynecologists, gastroenterologists and urologists, and pharmacologists. The manuscript is based on the expert consensus and reports the best available evidence, according to the current eligibility criteria for BRCA testing and counseling, it also harmonizes with current Italian National Guidelines and Clinical Recommendations.

Hypothesis on the possible relevance of the immunogenic cell death in the treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasms.

The genetic background and the antigenic landscape of cancer cells play a critical role in the response to immunotherapies. A high tumor antigenicity, together with an increased adjuvanticity potentially induced by a peculiar type of cell death, namely immunogenic cell death (ICD), could foster the response to immunogenic therapies. The gestational trophoblastic neoplasm (GTN) is a one-of-a-kind cancer in the oncological landscape due to its exclusive genomic makeup. The prognosis of GTN is significantly better than non-gestational trophoblastic neoplasm (nGTN). Due to its peculiar genetic inheritance, GTN potentially constitutes a singular archetype in the immuno-oncological field.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma development in a patient with a novel BAP1 germline mutation and low exposure to asbestos.

BRCA1 associated protein-1 (BAP1) germline mutations define a novel hereditary cancer syndrome, namely BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome (BAP1-TPDS), characterized by an increased susceptibility to develop different cancer types, including mesothelioma, uveal and cutaneous melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. Currently, the role of BAP1 germline mutations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) pathogenesis is less known. Here we report the first clinical case of a female patient who developed an iCCA when she was 47-years-old and was found to carry a novel germline mutation at a splicing site of exon 4 in BAP1 gene (NM_004656.4: c.255_255+6del). An accurate anamnesis revealed the absence of risk factors linked to iCCA development, except for a low occupational exposure to asbestos. In tumor tissue, BAP1 sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and immunoistochemistry showed the loss of heterozygosity and lack of nuclear expression, suggesting that BAP1 wild-type allele and functional protein were lost in cancer cells, in line with the classical two-hit model of tumor suppressor genes. Further studies are needed to confirm whether iCCA may be included into BAP1-TPDS cancer phenotypes and whether minimal asbestos exposure may facilitate the development of this malignancy in individuals carrying BAP1 germline mutations.

Photophysical and Theoretical Interpretation of the Insensitive Emission to Temperature of a Metallopolymer Containing Europium Ions.

The luminescence and thermochromic properties of a europium-containing metallopolymer were investigated in experimental and theoretical aspects using the same polymer backbone complexed with two different contents of europium ions (25 and 65% molar). The polymer presented an emission insensitive to temperature variation which was attributed to a balance between two factors: the first is the "stiffening effect" on the polymer backbone brought about by ion complexation, and the second is the interconnection of the alkyl chains because of the rotation of the bipyridine sites required for the complexation.

CDKN2A and BAP1 germline mutations predispose to melanoma and mesothelioma.

BAP1 germline mutations predispose to a cancer predisposition syndrome that includes mesothelioma, cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma and other cancers. This co-occurrence suggests that these tumors share a common carcinogenic pathway. To evaluate this hypothesis, we studied 40 Italian families with mesothelioma and/or melanoma. The probands were sequenced for BAP1 and for the most common melanoma predisposition genes (i.e. CDKN2A, CDK4, TERT, MITF and POT1) to investigate if these genes may also confer susceptibility to mesothelioma. In two out of six families with both mesothelioma and melanoma we identified either a germline nonsense mutation (c.1153C > T, p.Arg385*) in BAP1 or a recurrent pathogenic germline mutation (c.301G > T, p.Gly101Trp) in CDKN2A. Our study suggests that CDKN2A, in addition to BAP1, could be involved in the melanoma and mesothelioma susceptibility, leading to the rare familial cancer syndromes. It also suggests that these tumors share key steps that drive carcinogenesis and that other genes may be involved in inherited predisposition to malignant mesothelioma and melanoma.

Performance of BOADICEA and BRCAPRO genetic models and of empirical criteria based on cancer family history for predicting BRCA mutation carrier probabilities: a retrospective study in a sample of Italian cancer genetics clinics.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in current practice the performance of BOADICEA and BRCAPRO risk models and empirical criteria based on cancer family history for the selection of individuals for BRCA genetic testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The probability of BRCA mutation according to the three tools was retrospectively estimated in 918 index cases consecutively undergone BRCA testing at 15 Italian cancer genetics clinics between 2006 and 2008. RESULTS: 179 of 918 cases (19.5%) carried BRCA mutations. With the strict use of the criteria based on cancer family history 173 BRCA (21.9%) mutations would have been detected in 789 individuals. At the commonly used 10% threshold of BRCA mutation carrier probability, the genetic models showed a similar performance [PPV (38% and 37%), sensitivity (76% and 77%) and specificity (70% and 69%)]. Their strict use would have avoided around 60% of the tests but would have missed approximately 1 every 4 carriers. CONCLUSION: Our data highlight the complexity of BRCA testing referral in routine practice and question the strict use of genetic models for BRCA risk assessment.

Mowat-Wilson syndrome: facial phenotype changing with age: study of 19 Italian patients and review of the literature.

Mowat-Wilson syndrome (MWS; OMIM #235730) is a genetic condition caused by heterozygous mutations or deletions of the ZEB2 gene, and characterized by typical face, moderate-to-severe mental retardation, epilepsy, Hirschsprung disease, and multiple congenital anomalies, including genital anomalies (particularly hypospadias in males), congenital heart defects, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and eye defects. Since the first delineation by Mowat et al. [Mowat et al. (1998); J Med Genet 35:617-623], approximately 179 patients with ZEB2 mutations, deletions or cytogenetic abnormalities have been reported primarily from Europe, Australia and the United States. Genetic defects include chromosome 2q21-q23 microdeletions (or different chromosome rearrangements) in few patients, and ZEB2 mutations in most. We report on clinical and genetic data from 19 Italian patients, diagnosed within the last 5 years, including six previously published, and compare them with patients already reported. The main purpose of this review is to underline a highly consistent phenotype and to highlight the phenotypic evolution occurring with age, particularly of the facial characteristics. The prevalence of MWS is likely to be underestimated. Knowledge of the phenotypic spectrum of MWS and of its changing phenotype with age can improve the detection rate of this condition.

An oncologist-based model of cancer genetic counselling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: We describe a multistep model of cancer genetic counselling designed to promote awareness, and disease surveillance and preventive measures for hereditary and familial breast and ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Step T0 of the model entails information giving; this is followed by pedigree analysis and risk estimation (T1), risk communication and genetic testing (T2), and genetic test result communication (T3). User consent was required to proceed from one step to the next. Surveillance and preventive measures are proposed to at-risk users. Of the 311 subjects who requested cancer genetic counselling, consent data to each counselling step were available for 295: 93 were disease-free, 187 had breast cancer, 12 had ovarian cancer and three had breast plus ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Consent was high at T0 (98.39%), T1 (96.40%) and T2 (99.65%). Consent decreased at the crucial points of counselling: T2 (87.71%) and T3 [genetic test result communication (85.08%), and extension of counselling to and testing of relatives (65.36%)]. CONCLUSIONS: The model fosters the user's knowledge about cancer and favours identification of at-risk subjects. Furthermore, by promoting awareness about genetic testing and surveillance measures, the algorithm enables users to make a fully informed choice of action in case of predisposing or familial cancer risk.

Hereditary risk of breast cancer: not only BRCA.

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are involved in genetic susceptibility to breast cancer (BC). Nevertheless, in a relevant number of families displaying a disease pattern suggesting an inherited susceptibility to BC, mutational analysis fails to detect any defect in the BRCA genes. Therefore, women belonging to such families should be considered eligible for programs aimed at BC control in individuals at hereditary risk. A clinico-mammographic surveillance program for women at high genetic risk, as defined on the basis of pedigree, has been carried out at our centre for ten years, leading to the diagnosis of 19 new BC cases. Only in 13% of the families analysed, the underlying genetic defect was evidenced in BRCA1 or 2. Here we describe two BC prone families where, although no mutations were detected in BRCA genes, follow-up confirmed an increased BC incidence. In three women belonging to these families clinico-mammographic surveillance resulted to be successful in detecting early-stage BC, supporting the usefulness of screening women from high-risk families, irrespective of whether a mutation was found.

Usefulness of breast MRI in a patient with genetic risk.

We describe an interesting case-report represented by a patient carrying BRCA1 mutation, recruited for the study "Multicenter evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in early diagnosis and prevention of breast cancer in high risk population", diagnosed with breast cancer on the basis of MRI findings but not with conventional mammography and ultrasound (US). She was already affected at 53 years of age by a multifocal Ductal Infiltrating Carcinoma (DIC) in the left breast; then, she had an axillary and sovraclavear nodal recurrence of the disease, three years after the initial diagnosis. Since other relatives were affected by breast cancer (mother, sister and niece) and two arose at early age (< 40 years), BRCA1 mutational analysis was offered to the patient, identifying a nonsense mutation on the exon 13. Furthermore, this patient was recruited to study contralateral breast and at the second round, two little foci, suspicious of malignancy, were identified only with MRI, but not with mammography and ultrasonography. The final diagnosis was multifocal Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS); the major focus measured 3 mm. In our patient MRI has shown a major sensitivity with respect to conventional radiology and US and has provided a very early diagnosis in this woman at genetic risk.

BRCA1 mutations and clinicopathological features in a sample of Italian women with early-onset breast cancer.

Breast cancer in young women is uncommon and often presents with unfavourable biopathological features. Although early age at onset could suggest a genetic susceptibility to cancer, the appropriateness of BRCA1 testing for women with early-onset breast cancer and modest family history (FH) is controversial. 40 Women diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 35 years or less, unselected for FH, were screened for germ line BRCA1 mutations by automated sequencing of exons 2, 5, 6, 11, 13 and 20. Overall, deleterious mutations were evidenced in 6 (15%) patients. With regard to FH, mutations were detected in 14%, 11% and 29% of women with none, weak and strong FH, respectively. Large tumour size, grade 3, lack of oestrogen receptors and high proliferation rate were significantly more common in mutation carriers (MC). Our data support both the appropriateness of testing young breast cancer patients and the frequency of unfavourable features in BRCA1-related breast cancer. It is hypothesised that BRCA1 mutations partially justify the high rate of aggressive breast cancer in young patients and that combining age and breast cancer phenotype could help to identify probable MC.

Comparison between genotype and phenotype identifies a high-risk population carrying BRCA1 mutations.

Hereditary breast carcinomas constitute about 10% of all malignant mammary tumors, but the selection criteria to identify a high-risk population carrying BRCA1 mutations are not yet well-defined. We have collected 51 pedigrees of familial breast cancer, 16 pedigrees of familial breast and ovarian cancer, and 30 cases of early-onset breast cancer (<35 years of age) without any family history of breast cancer. The index cases of the 97 selected families were further subdivided into three groups based on histopathological parameters: group A (n = 19) was characterized by tumor grade III, negative estrogen and progesterone receptors, and high proliferative rate; group B (n = 20) was characterized by grade I-II tumors, positive hormonal receptors, and low proliferative rate; and group C (n = 58) was not homogeneous for the histopathological criteria. The aim of our study was to evaluate, in patients with a family history of breast cancer or with early diagnosis of breast cancer, the incidence of BRCA1 mutation on the basis of tumor phenotype. We found the highest rate of BRCA1 mutations in group A (53%), and low frequencies in groups B (5%) and C (0%). Our data strongly indicate that an aggressive tumor phenotype in patients with a positive family history or early diagnosis identifies a population with high probability of carrying BRCA1 mutations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 27:130-135, 2000.

Identification of families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer for clinical and mammographic surveillance: the Modena Study Group proposal.

Hereditary factors play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of breast cancer (BC). Approximately 15-20% of all BCs have been reported to show familial clustering. In spite of the recent demonstration and chromosomal localization of BC predisposing genes, clinical clues and careful inspection of pedigree still remain major instruments in HBC diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to develop minimum operational criteria for the selection of family groups at high risk of developing BC. Following a stepwise procedure, families were stratified into four clusters with increasing probability of genetic involvement. So far, 317 BC-prone families have been identified and distributed in the four groups, and 151 high risk women underwent our clinical and mammographic surveillance program. Among these, after a mean follow-up of 24 months, six BCs and one OC were diagnosed (one BC and one OC occurred in the same woman) and one 'interval' BC was observed. Since the prevalence rate so far detected is dramatically higher than that seen at the first round of Italian population-screening programs, our preliminary data support the usefulness of the proposed procedure in selecting high risk individuals.