Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischemia and heart rate variability: results of a 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has analgesic properties and may be used to treat pain in patients with therapeutically refractory angina who are unsuitable for myocardial revascularization. Some studies have also demonstrated an anti-ischemic effect. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term persistence of the effects of SCS on myocardial ischemia and on heart rate variability. METHODS: Fifteen patients (9 males, 6 females, mean age 76 +/- 8 years, range 58-90 years) with severe refractory angina pectoris (Canadian class III-IV), on optimal pharmacological therapy, unsuitable for myocardial revascularization and treated with SCS for a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 27 months (range 9-92 months) were studied. Eleven patients had had a previous myocardial infarction and 5 a coronary artery bypass graft. The mean ejection fraction was 54 +/- 7% (range 36-65%). All patients underwent 48-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and were randomly assigned to 24 hours without SCS (off period) and 24 hours with SCS (on period). The primary endpoints were: number of ischemic episodes, total duration of ischemic episodes (min), and total ischemic burden (mV*min). RESULTS: The heart rate was not statistically different during the off and on SCS periods (median 64 and 67 b/min respectively). The number of ischemic episodes decreased from a median of 6 (range 0-29) during the off period to 3 (range 0-24) during the on period (p < 0.05). The total duration of ischemic episodes decreased from a median of 29 min (range 0- 186 min) during the off period to 16 min (range 0-123 min) during the on period (p < 0.05). The total ischemic burden decreased from a median of 2.5 mV*min (range 0-19.5 mV*min) during the off period to 0.8 mV*min (range 0-13 mV*min) during the on period (p = NS). The heart rate variability parameters were similar during the on and off periods. CONCLUSIONS: SCS exerts long-term anti-ischemic effects.

Effects of transdermal nitroglycerin on left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction.

Progressive left ventricular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction patients is associated with a poor prognosis. It has been shown that some therapeutic measures which have the potential for limiting the infarct size and preserving ventricular function, are also able to reduce the incidence of congestive heart and improve survival. The aim of this protocol was to assess the effects of transdermal nitroglycerin administered within 72 hours after the onset of acute myocardial infarction and for the following 6 months, on left ventricular function. A total of 98 consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients were randomly allocated, within 72 hours of onset of symptoms, to a double-blind 6-month-therapy with either 10 mg/24 hour transdermal nitroglycerin or placebo. Patients underwent two-dimensional echocardiography at entry, after 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. In the nitroglycerin group, end-diastolic volume increased during the follow-up (+6.7%, p < 0.05) while end-systolic volume remained nearly unchanged; ejection fraction and stroke volume increased progressively (+6.3%, p < 0.05, +14.2%, p < 0.05, respectively) and a important reduction of percent of dyssynergic segments was present (-19.2%, p < 0.005). In the placebo group end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume slightly increased during the follow-up (+2% and +4.9% respectively); ejection fraction and stroke volume remained nearly unchanged during the study; percent of dyssynergic segments showed an important decrease after 2 weeks and 6 months (-21.3%, p < 0.005). A clinically relevant increase (> 20%) in ejection fraction was present more frequently in the nitroglycerin than in the placebo group (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the early (within 72 hours) and prolonged (6 months) administration of transdermal nitroglycerin in acute myocardial infarction improves ejection fraction and stroke volume but does not modify ventricular remodeling.