Estimating COVID-19 recovery time in a cohort of Italian healthcare workers who underwent surveillance swab testing.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting a huge strain on the provision and continuity of care. The length of sickness absence of the healthcare workers as a result of SARS-CoV-2 infection plays a pivotal role in hospital staff management. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the timing of COVID-19 recovery and viral clearance, and its predictive factors, in a large sample of healthcare workers. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: The analysis was conducted on data collected during the hospital health surveillance programme for healthcare staff at the University Hospital of Verona; healthcare workers were tested for SARS-CoV-2 through RT-PCR with oronasopharyngeal swab samples. The health surveillance programme targeted healthcare workers who either had close contact with SARS-CoV-2-infected patients or were tested as part of the screening-based strategy implemented according to national and regional requirements. Recovery time was estimated from the first positive swab to two consecutive negative swabs, collected 24 h apart, using survival analysis for both right-censored and interval-censored data. Cox proportional hazard was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: During the health surveillance programme, 6455 healthcare workers were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and 248 (3.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-4.3) reported positive results; among those who tested positive, 49% were asymptomatic, with a median age of 39.8 years, which is significantly younger than symptomatic healthcare workers (48.2 years, P < 0.001). Screening tests as part of the health surveillance programme identified 31 (12.5%) of the positive cases. Median recovery time was 24 days (95% CI: 23-26) and 21.5 days (95% CI: 15.5-30.5) in right- and interval-censoring analysis, respectively, with no association with age, sex or presence of symptoms. Overall, 63% of participants required >20 days to test negative on two consecutive swabs. Hospitalised healthcare workers (4.8%) were older and had a significantly longer recovery time compared with non-hospitalised healthcare workers in both analyses (33.5 vs 24 days, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Recovery from COVID-19 and viral clearance may take a long time, especially in individuals who are hospitalised. To detect asymptomatic cases, screening programmes for healthcare workers is recommended.

Recombinant alpha-interferon and vinblastine in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: efficacy of low doses.

Twenty-six patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were treated in a phase I-II trial with recombinant interferon alpha-2b (alpha-IFN) and vinblastine (VBL) in combination. Patients received IFN at a starting dose of 3 x 10(6) IU/m2 subcutaneously three times a week and VBL 0.1 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks, with dose modification for toxicity. All patients were evaluable for toxicity; 18 patients were evaluable for efficacy. An objective response rate of 44% was observed (eight of 18 patients, with one complete response and seven partial responses). The median duration of response was 5 months. The actuarial survival of responding patients was significantly longer than that of nonresponding patients. In general, the toxicity was tolerable; the subjective toxicity and fever were similar to that reported for the same doses of IFN alone. Only a mild neurotoxicity, usually mixed polyneuropathy, occurred with increased frequency. Alpha-IFN and VBL administered at low doses in combination demonstrated the highest response rate so far reported in RCC without significant toxicity.