Simultaneous Robotic-Assisted Bilateral Native Nephrectomy and Kidney Transplantation for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease in Recipients With High Body Mass Index: Report of 2 Cases.

Robotic kidney transplantation is a safe, reproducible, and less morbid technique in high body mass index and end-stage renal disease. Polycystic kidney disease is a relative contraindication to robotic-assisted kidney transplantation because of the mass effect of the native kidneys on the patient's pelvis that prevents ideal exposure. We report the first 2 cases of robotic-assisted simultaneous bilateral nephrectomy and kidney transplantation for patients with obesity and adult polycystic kidney disease. The recipients were 2 males, 50 and 53 years old, with a body mass index of 35.1 41.6 kg/m2 and 41.6 kg/m2, respectively. Both recipients had suitable living donors. The average operating time was 395 minutes and the estimated blood loss was on average 250 mL. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patients were discharged home on days 4 and 5. Performing robotic nephrectomies simultaneously with kidney transplantation can be done safely, allowing patients with obesity and polycystic kidney disease needing bilateral nephrectomy, to take full advantage of minimally invasive kidney transplantation.

Robotic Assisted Living Donor Nephrectomies: A Safe Alternative to Laparoscopic Technique for Kidney Transplant Donation.

OBJECTIVE: To review outcomes after laparoscopic, robotic-assisted living donor nephrectomy (RLDN) in the first, and largest series reported to date. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Introduction of minimal invasive, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has increased live kidney donation, paving the way for further innovation to expand the donor pool with RLDN. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 1084 consecutive RLDNs performed between 2000 and 2017. Patient demographics, surgical data, and complications were collected. RESULTS: Six patients underwent conversion to open procedures between 2002 and 2005, whereas the remainder were successfully completed robotically. Median donor age was 35.7 (17.4) years, with a median BMI of 28.6 (7.7) kg/m2. Nephrectomies were preferentially performed on the left side (95.2%). Multiple renal arteries were present in 24.1%. Median operative time was 159 (54) minutes, warm ischemia time 180 (90) seconds, estimated blood loss 50 (32) mL, and length of stay 3 (1) days. The median follow-up was 15 (28) months. Complications were reported in 216 patients (19.9%), of which 176 patients (81.5%) were minor (Clavien-Dindo class I and II). Duration of surgery, warm ischemia time, operative blood loss, conversion, and complication rates were not associated with increase in body mass index. CONCLUSION: RLDN is a safe technique and offers a reasonable alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery, in particular in donors with higher body mass index and multiple arteries. It offers transplant surgeons a platform to develop skills in robotic-assisted surgery needed in the more advanced setting of minimal invasive recipient operations.

Robotic Kidney Transplant: The Modern Era Technical Revolution.

Since the mid 20th century, transplantation has been a fast-developing field of contemporary medicine. The technical aspects of transplant operations were developed in the 1950s, with little significant change for >50 y. Those techniques allowed completion of various organ transplants and successful patient outcomes, but they also carried the inherent disadvantages of open surgery, such as postoperative pain, wound complications and infections, and prolonged length of hospital stay. The introduction and adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the early 1990s to various surgical specialties including general, gynecologic, and urologic surgery led to significant improvements in postoperative patient care and outcomes. Organ transplantation, with its precision demanding vascular anastomoses, initially had been considered infeasible to accomplish with conventional laparoscopic devices. The institution of robotic surgical technology in the late 1990s and its subsequent wide utilization in fields of surgery changed its accessibility and acceptance. With the steady camera, 3D views, and multidirectional wrist motions, surgical robotics opened new horizons for technically demanding surgeries such as transplantation to be completed in a minimally invasive fashion. Furthermore, the hope was this technique could find a niche to treat patients who otherwise are not deemed surgical candidates in many fields including transplantation. Here in, robotics in kidney transplantation and its ability to help provide equity through access to transplantation will be discussed.

Robotic kidney transplantation in the obese patient: 10-year experience from a single center.

Despite increasing obesity rates in the dialysis population, obese kidney transplant candidates are still denied transplantation by many centers. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of a robotic-assisted kidney transplant (RAKT) cohort from January 2009 to December 2018. A total of 239 patients were included in this analysis. The median BMI was 41.4 kg/m2 , with the majority (53.1%) of patients being African American and 69.4% of organs sourced from living donors. The median surgery duration and warm ischemia times were 4.8 hours and 45 minutes respectively. Wound complications (mostly seromas and hematomas) occurred in 3.8% of patients, with 1 patient developing a surgical site infection (SSI). Seventeen (7.1%) graft failures, mostly due to acute rejection, were reported during follow-up. Patient survival was 98% and 95%, whereas graft survival was 98% and 93%, at 1 and 3 years respectively. Similar survival statistics were obtained from patients undergoing open transplant over the same time period from the UNOS database. In conclusion, RAKT can be safely performed in obese patients with minimal SSI risk, excellent graft function, and patient outcomes comparable to national data. RAKT could improve access to kidney transplantation in obese patients due to the low surgical complication rate.

Obesity in kidney transplantation.

The prevalence of obesity among patients with chronic kidney disease continues to increase as a reflection of the trend observed in the general population. Factors affecting the access to the waiting list and the transplantability of this specific population will be analysed. From observational studies, kidney transplantation in obese patients carries an increased risk of surgical complications compared to the nonobese population; therefore, many centres have been reluctant to proceed with transplantation, despite this treatment modality confers a survival advantage over dialysis. As a consequence, obese patients continue to face decreased access to the waiting list, with a lower likelihood of being transplanted and higher waiting times when compared to the nonobese candidates. In this review will be described the current strategies for treatment of obesity in different settings (pretransplant, at transplant and post-transplant). Obesity represents a risk factor for surgical complications but not a contraindication for kidney transplantation; outcomes could be greatly improved with its multidisciplinary and multimodal treatment. The modern technology with minimally invasive techniques, mainly using robotic platform, allows a reduction in the surgical complications rate, with graft and patient survival rates comparable to the nonobese counterpart.

Indications of Intestinal Transplantation.

"The intestinal transplantation is reserved for patients with life-threatening complications of permanent intestinal failure or underlying gastrointestinal disease. The choice of the allograft for a particular patient depends on several factors and the presence of concurrent organ failure, and availability of the donor organs, and specialized care. Combined liver and intestinal transplant allows for patients who have parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease a possibility of improved quality of life and nutrition as well as survival. Intestinal transplantation has made giant strides over the past few decades to the present era where current graft survivals are comparable with other solid organ transplants."

The utility of robotic assisted pancreas transplants - a single center retrospective study.

The prevalence of obesity within the diabetic population is on the rise. This development poses unique challenges for pancreas transplantation candidates as obese individuals are often denied access to transplant. The introduction of robotic approach to transplant has been shown to improve outcomes in obese patients. A single center retrospective review of pancreas transplant cases over a 4-year period ending December 2018 was performed. Patients undergoing robotic surgery were compared to their counterparts undergoing open transplant. 49 patients (10 robot, 39 open) received pancreas transplants over the study period. Mean age was 43.1 ± 7.5 vs. 42.8 ± 9.7 years. There were no significant differences in demographics except body mass index (33.7 ± 5.2 vs. 27.1 ± 6.6, P = 0.005). Operative duration (7.6 ± 1.6 vs. 5.3 ± 1.4, P < 0.001), and warm ischemia times [45.5 (IQR: 13.7) vs. 33 (7), P < 0.001] were longer in the robotic arm. There were no wound complications in the robotic approach patients. Graft (100% vs. 88%, P = 0.37) and patient survival (100% vs. 100%, P = 0.72) after 1 year were similar. Our findings suggest that robotic pancreas is both safe and effective in obese diabetic patients, without added risk of wound complications. Wide adoption of the technique is encouraged while long term follow-up of our recipients is awaited.

Living Donor Intestinal Transplantation.

Living donor intestinal transplantation (LDIT) has been improved leading to results comparable to those obtained with deceased donors. LDIT should be limited to specific indications and patient selection. The best indication is combined living donor intestinal/liver transplantation in pediatric recipients with intestinal and hepatic failure; the virtual elimination of waiting time may avoid the high mortality experienced by candidates on the deceased waiting list. Potentially, LDIT could be used in highly sensitized recipients to allow the application of de-sensitization protocols. In the case of available identical twins or HLA-identical sibling, LDIT has a significant immunologic advantage and should be offered.

Robotic Pancreas Transplantation.

Obesity is considered a relative contraindication to pancreas transplantation due to an overall increased risk in wound-related complications and surgical site infections. The rationale for performing pancreas transplantation in a minimally invasive fashion is to reduce these risks, which can be associated with inferior patient and graft survival following pancreas transplantation in morbidly obese patients. At the University of Illinois at Chicago, the initial series of robotic-assisted pancreas transplantation in obese patient with type 1 and 2 diabetes has been performed. In this article, surgical technique and world experience in robotic pancreas transplantation are described.

Successful living donor intestinal transplantation in cross-match positive recipients: Initial experience.

Sensitized patients tend to have longer waiting times on the deceased donor list and are at increased risk of graft loss from acute or chronic rejection compared to non-sensitized candidates. Desensitization protocols are utilized to decrease the levels of alloantibodies and to convert an initial positive cross-match to prospective donors into a negative crossmatch. These procedures are mostly available in the setting of living donation. Due to the elective nature of the procedure, desensitization protocols can be extended until the desire result is obtained prior to transplantation. We present two cases of successful desensitization protocol applied to living donor intestinal transplant candidates that converted to negative cross-match to their donors. We present two cases of intestinal transplant candidates with a potential living donor to whom they are sensitized. Both cases underwent successful transplantation after desensitization protocol. No evidence of humoral rejection has occurred in either recipient. Living donor intestinal transplantation in sensitized recipients against the prospective donors provides the ability to implement a desensitization protocol to convert to negative cross-match.

Simultaneous Living Donor Kidney and Parathyroid Allotransplantation: First Case Report and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Congenital hypoparathyroidism can be severely debilitating for patients, leading to renal failure at young age. Parathyroid transplantation may represent a permanent parathyroid replacement therapy. In patients already on immunosuppression for other organ transplant, there is little additional risk involved with parathyroid allotransplantation. METHODS: Robotic assisted transaxillary single parathyroidectomy is performed on a living donor also donating a kidney to her sibling. RESULTS: Recipient total serum PTH levels became detectable after 3 days from the procedure and maintained for 9 months after transplant with minimal calcium supplementation after the procedure. Literature review and previous results are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining a parathyroid gland and a kidney from the same donor reduces the exposure to different HLA antigens. The combined procedure using minimally invasive surgery is safe, with the additional cosmetic advantage and convenience for the willing donor. In the setting of need for immunosuppression, additional transplantation to treat the cause is safe and justified in the recipients.

Experimental protocol of a randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the effects of personalized exercise rehabilitation on kidney transplant recipients' outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will investigate the effects of a personalized exercise rehabilitation regimen on return to work and find work rate, vascular health, functional capacity, quality of life, kidney function, and body composition in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. METHODS/DESIGN: This RCT will recruit 120 men and/or women who have had a KT to participate in a 12 month exercise intervention or control (standard clinical care only) group. The 12 month exercise intervention will consist of one-on-one, progressive exercise rehabilitation sessions twice a week, for 60 min each session. The control group will continue standard clinical care as recommended by their post-transplant medical team without any intervention. The primary outcomes will be assessments of vascular structure and function, walking and strength measures to assess functional capacity, blood markers to assess kidney function, questionnaires to assess quality of life, DXA body scan to assess body composition, and a 1-week free living physical activity assessment. Additionally, employment status will be assessed. These assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. DISCUSSION: This investigation will increase the understanding of the role exercise rehabilitation has on managing the physiological and psychological health of the individual as well as on the individual's personal economic impact (via employment status). This study design has the potential to assist in constructing an effective exercise rehabilitation program that can be incorporated into part of standard post-transplant care.

Long-term follow-up in adult living donors for combined liver/bowel transplant in pediatric recipients: a single center experience.

Pediatric candidates for combined liver/bowel transplant (LBTx) experience a very high mortality on the cadaver waiting list. Our transplant center has successfully used adult living donors to treat pediatric candidates for LBTx. We report the long-term follow-up of this unique cohort of organ donors. The charts of six adult donors for LBTx performed between 2004 and 2007 were reviewed. All the pertinent clinical data were carefully reviewed and integrated with phone interviews of all donors. A total of six children (average age 13.5 months) received living donor LBTx. Average follow-up for the donors was 42 months (range 29-51). The donors' median age was 25 yr (19-32); five women and one man. The average median hospital stay was nine days. There were no peri-operative complications. At present all donors remain in good health. Three of the five mothers became pregnant after donation. Five of the six children are currently alive and well whereas one died with functioning grafts six months post-transplant due to plasmoblastic lymphoma. Living donor LBTx is an effective therapy for combined hepatic and intestinal failure in children less than five yr. The donor operation can be performed with minimal morbidity.

Current status of living donor small bowel transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the current status of living donor intestinal transplantation (LDIT) as a treatment option for intestinal failure. RECENT FINDINGS: Long-term outcomes from LDIT and combined living donor intestinal/liver transplantation (CLDILT) are comparable with those from transplantation using deceased donors. In certain life-threatening situations, especially in pediatric patients, this strategy may offer potential advantages. SUMMARY: According United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data children with intestinal failure affected by liver disease secondary to parenteral nutrition have the highest mortality on a waiting list compared with all candidates for solid organ transplantation. Elective nature of CLDILT offers multiple advantages for this patient population. LDIT also could be life-saving option for patients with intestinal failure who run out of venous access. Optimal timing, short ischemia time and good human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching may contribute to lower postoperative complications. Current literature suggests that living intestinal donors experience very low morbidity and high level of satisfaction.

Interleukin-2 receptor blockade with humanized monoclonal antibody for solid organ transplantation.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Induction therapy has reduced the incidence of acute rejection compared with historical standards. The potency of currently available induction immunosuppression is not without risk and should be carefully considered. Induction with daclizumab, an IL-2 receptor antagonist, has been used safely and effectively for over 10 years across different transplant types. As a result of daclizumab use, transplant centers are able to implement steroid-sparing or calcineurin minimization protocols. Unfortunately, the manufacturing costs have resulted in withdrawal of this agent from the market reducing the options for patients undergoing transplantation. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: This review will update the reader on recently published daclizumab studies in adult solid organ transplant recipients, focusing on comparative studies with other induction agents. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: This paper will provide a summary of comparative studies between daclizumab and other induction therapies focusing on their efficacy and safety. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Novel applications, such as long-term use in combination with calcineurin-inhibitor dose reduction and its value in the treatment of acute or chronic rejection have yet to be explored. Since daclizumab has been withdrawn from the market, future IL-2 receptor blockade will have to be achieved with basiliximab, which is a chimeric, monoclonal antibody directed against the same epitope.

Lessons learned in pediatric small bowel and liver transplantation from living-related donors.

BACKGROUND: Children are the primary candidates for intestinal transplant with more than 70% requiring a combined liver-bowel transplant. We report our single-center experience with living donor intestinal transplantation (LDITx) and combined living donor intestinal and liver transplant (CLDILTx) in pediatric patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2002 and June 2006, 13 living donor intestinal grafts were transplanted in 10 recipients. In five cases CLDILTx was performed. The intestinal grafts consisted of a 150-cm segment of ileum, whereas the liver transplant was completed using standard left lateral grafts. RESULTS: No complications occurred in any donors. In CLDILTx recipients, the patient survival at 1 and 2 years was 100%, the liver graft survival 100%, and the bowel graft survival 80%; the patient who lost the initial intestinal graft was successfully retransplanted. In LDITx recipients, the patient and graft survival at 1 and 3 years were 60% and 50%, respectively. Two isolated LDITx recipients, both 6 months of age and low body weight (mean, 6 vs. 9 kg) died within 4 months posttransplant. One LDITx recipient developed chronic rejection 3.5 years after the original transplant and died after retransplant. All patients who are alive with functioning grafts are currently on full enteral feeding without need for any intravenous supplementation, except for a recipient of CLDILTx, currently on total parenteral nutrition for late fistula. CONCLUSIONS: The early outcomes of intestinal transplantation from living donors are promising, particularly for candidates in need of CLDLITx. In this subgroup, the elimination of the high mortality on the cadaver waiting list (approximately 30%) represents a substantial advantage.

Living donor kidney transplantation across positive crossmatch: the University of Illinois at Chicago experience.

BACKGROUND: To increase living donation for kidney transplantation, we investigated desensitization of recipients with positive crossmatch against a potential living donor. METHODS: Between June 2001 and March 2007, 57 consecutive sensitized candidates for kidney transplantation, with crossmatch positive potential living donors, were treated with various desensitization protocols. All patients received plasmapheresis every other day with intravenous immune globulin 100 mg/kg starting 1 week before the scheduled transplant. Postoperatively, the recipients continued to receive every other day plasmapheresis with intravenous immune globulin for the initial week. Immunosuppression therapy consisted of induction with thymoglobulin and a combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Six patients failed to convert with pretransplant immunomodulation and were not transplanted; 51 underwent live donor kidney transplant. Mean follow-up was 23 months and 36 patients have more than 1-year follow-up. One-year patient and graft survivals were 95% and 93%, respectively. There were 25 episodes of biopsy-proven or clinically presumed rejection in 22 patients in the first year. Of the 17 biopsy-proven episodes, 12 were antibody-mediated rejection and five were acute cellular rejection. Of the patients with antibody-mediated rejection (biopsy proven or empiric), two patients (12%) lost their graft by 1 year. The median modification of diet in renal disease at 6 and 12 months was 55 mL/min (range 9-104 mL/min) and 48 mL/min (range 8-99), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased rejection rates, graft and patient survivals indicate that desensitization of positive crossmatch patients is a reasonable alternative for a sensitized patient who could potentially wait 10 or more years for a suitable cadaveric kidney.