Efficacy of lateral lymph node dissection for local control of rectal cancer: A multicenter study.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer by comparing the local control in patients with and without pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). Methods: We included 189 patients with rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision and LLND at 13 institutions between 2017 and 2019. Patients with and without pathological LLNM were defined as the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. Propensity score-matching helped to balance the basic characteristics of both groups. The incidences of local recurrence (LR) and lateral lymph node recurrence (LLNR) were compared between the groups. Results: In the entire cohort, 39 of the 189 patients had pathological LLNM. The 3-year LR and LLNR rates were 18.3% and 4.0% (p = 0.01) and 7.7% and 3.3% (p = 0.22) in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the data from 62 patients were analyzed. No significant differences in LR or LLNR were observed between both groups. The 3-year LR and LLNR rates were 16.4% and 9.8% (p = 0.46) and 9.7% and 9.8% (p = 0.99) in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups, respectively. Conclusion: LLND would lead to comparable local control in the pLLNM (+) and (-) groups if the clinicopathological characteristics except for LLNM are similar.

Risk factors and development of machine learning diagnostic models for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic criteria for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer have not been established. This research aimed to investigate the risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis and develop machine learning models combining these risk factors to improve the diagnostic performance of standard imaging. METHOD: This multicentre prospective study included patients who underwent lateral lymph node dissection without preoperative treatment for rectal cancer between 2017 and 2019 in 15 Japanese institutions. First, preoperative clinicopathological factors and magnetic resonance imaging findings were evaluated using multivariable analyses for their correlation with lateral lymph node metastasis. Next, machine learning diagnostic models for lateral lymph node metastasis were developed combining these risk factors. The models were tested in a training set and in an internal validation cohort and their diagnostic performance was tested using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: Of 212 rectal cancers, 122 patients were selected, including 232 lateral pelvic sides, 30 sides of which had pathological lateral lymph node metastasis. Multivariable analysis revealed that poorly differentiated/mucinous adenocarcinoma, extramural vascular invasion, tumour deposit and a short-axis diameter of lateral lymph node ≥ 6.0 mm were independent risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (139 sides) and a test cohort (93 sides) and machine learning models were computed on the basis of a combination of significant features (including: histological type, extramural vascular invasion, tumour deposit, short- and long-axis diameter of lateral lymph node, body mass index, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, cT, cN, cM, irregular border and mixed signal intensity). The top three models with the highest sensitivity in the training cohort were as follows: support vector machine (sensitivity, 1.000; specificity, 0.773), light gradient boosting machine (sensitivity, 0.950; specificity, 0.918) and ensemble learning (sensitivity, 0.950; specificity, 0.917). The diagnostic performances of these models in the test cohort were as follows: support vector machine (sensitivity, 0.750; specificity, 0.667), light gradient boosting machine (sensitivity, 0.500; specificity, 0.852) and ensemble learning (sensitivity, 0.667; specificity, 0.864). CONCLUSION: Machine learning models combining multiple risk factors can contribute to improving diagnostic performance of lateral lymph node metastasis.

Long-term Outcome After Surgical Resection of Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The significance of resection of paraaortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the prognosis of colorectal cancer after paraaortic lymph node metastasis resection. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. SETTINGS: Thirty-six institutions in Japan participated in this study. PATIENTS: Patients with resected and pathologically proven paraaortic lymph node metastasis of CRC between 2010 and 2015. DATA SOURCES: Database and medical records at each institution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival after paraaortic lymph node metastasis resection, recurrence-free survival, and recurrence patterns after R0 resection of paraaortic lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were included in the primary analysis population in this study. The 5-year overall survival rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 41.0% (32.0, 49.8), and the median survival (95% CI) was 4.1 (3.4, 4.7) years. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were the pathological T stage (pT4 vs. pT1- 3, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.91, p = 0.006), other organ metastasis (present vs. absent, aHR: 1.98, p = 0.005), time to metastases (synchronous vs. metachronous, aHR: 2.02, p = 0.02), and number of paraaortic lymph node metastasis (≥3 vs. <3, aHR: 2.13, p = 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (95% CI) was 21.1% (13.5, 29.7), with a median (95% CI) of 1.2 (0.9, 1.4) years. The primary tumor location (left- vs. right-sided colon, aHR: 4.77, p = 0.01; rectum vs. right-sided colon, aHR: 5.27, p = 0.006), other organ metastasis (present vs. absent, aHR: 1.90, p = 0.03), number of paraaortic lymph node metastasis (≥3 vs. <3, aHR: 2.20, p = 0.001), and hospital volume (<10 vs. ≥10, aHR: 2.18, p = 0.02) were identified as independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. Paraaortic lymph node recurrence was the most common at 33.3%. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias cannot be ruled out because of the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Less than three paraaortic lymph node metastasis was a favorable prognostic factor for both overall survival and recurrence-free survival. However, paraaortic lymph node metastases were considered to be a systemic disease and the significance of resection was limited. See Video Abstract.

Short- and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for inguinal lymph node metastasis in rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma.

AIM: The significance of lymphadenectomy and its indications in patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis (ILNM) of anorectal adenocarcinoma is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of inguinal lymphadenectomy for ILNM. METHOD: This study included patients who underwent surgical resection for ILNM of rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma with pathologically positive metastases between 1997 and 2011 at 20 participating centres in the Study Group for Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer organized by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: In total, 107 patients were included. The primary tumour was in the rectum in 57 patients (53.3%) and in the anal canal in 50 (46.7%). The median number of ILNMs was 2.34. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher were observed in five patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 38.8%. Multivariate analysis identified undifferentiated histological type (P < 0.001), pathological venous invasion (P = 0.01) and pathological primary tumour depth T0-2 (P = 0.01) as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: The 5-year overall survival after inguinal lymph node dissection was acceptable, and it warrants consideration in more patients. Further larger-scale studies are needed in order to clarify the surgical indications.

TLK1 Inhibition Enhances the Anticancer Effect of Deep UV Irradiation Through CHK1 Activation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A deep ultraviolet (DUV) light-emitting diode (LED) is a device that can irradiate electromagnetic waves from 250 nm to 350 nm. Tousled-like kinase 1 (TLK1) encodes a nuclear serine/threonine kinase, which is thought to influence the effects of DUV irradiation in cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the interaction of TLK1 with DUV irradiation-induced DNA damage in cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pancreatic cancer cell lines were treated with or without DUV. TLK1 expression and phosphorylation in the two groups were examined. Then, these cancer cell lines were treated with thioridazine (THD), DUV or both. Thereafter, cytomorphology and apoptosis were assessed. Several proteins related to DNA damage, were analyzed in cancer cells treated with DUV and THD. Tumors in a subcutaneous xenograft model were treated with THD, DUV, or both for six weeks. RESULTS: DUV irradiation induced the phosphorylation of TLK1 in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Cytomorphology was significantly changed in pancreatic cancer cells treated with DUV and THD. TLK1 inhibition enhanced DUV irradiation-induced apoptosis in cancer cells. Interestingly, CHK1 and pCHK1 expression was suppressed after TLK1 inhibition. In addition, inhibition of MRE11 led to a decrease in the expression of CHK1 and pCHK1, accompanied by a notable increase in apoptosis. In the subcutaneous xenograft models, the tumor volume in the DUV and THD groups was lower than that in the other groups. CONCLUSION: TLK1 phosphorylation is an important event in DUV irradiation. DUV irradiation combined with TLK1 inhibition has therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer cells.

Significance of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer After Stent Placement: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To explore the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) managed by self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement as a bridge to surgery (BTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine patients with pathological stage II/III OCRC who underwent BTS using a SEMS were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Patients were divided into the no-adjuvant chemotherapy group (No-Adj group) (n=52) and adjuvant chemotherapy group (Adj group) (n=77), and relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared. RESULTS: The No-Adj group had more fragile patient background factors, such as higher age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and lower preoperative albumin compared with the Adj group. The 3-year RFS rates for the overall cohort were significantly different between the No-Adj and Adj groups (56.4% and 78.5%, respectively; p=0.003). Significant RFS benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy were observed in both pathological stage II and III cancer. Characteristics of more advanced cancer, such as high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), pathological T4, and lymphovascular invasion, were associated with survival improvement by adjuvant chemotherapy. T4 and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with RFS in the multivariate Cox proportional analysis. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with OCRC undergoing BTS using a SEMS. Adjuvant chemotherapy is basically recommended regardless of the cancer stage and is strongly recommended with more advanced characteristics, such as high CEA, T4, and lymphovascular invasion.

The benefits of interval appendectomy and risk factors for nonoperative management failure in the therapeutic strategy for complicated appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Emergency surgery (ES) for complicated appendicitis (CA) is associated with high morbidity. Interval appendectomy (IA) decreases this rate; however, nonoperative management (NOM) is not always successful. Some patients require unplanned ES due to NOM failure (IA failure: IA-F). This study aimed to verify the benefits of IA and to evaluate the risk factors for NOM failure. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with CA who underwent surgery between January 2012 and December 2021 were included in this study. We compared the surgical outcomes of the ES group with those of the IA success (IA-S) and IA-F groups. We also analyzed 14 factors that predicted NOM failure. RESULTS: Among 302 patients, the rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) was significantly higher in the ES group (N = 165) than in the IA-S group (N = 102). The rates were equal between the ES (N = 165) and IA-F (N = 35) groups. NOM was successful in 110 patients and failed in 27. Lack of abscesses, comorbidities, high WBC count, and free air were independent risk factors for NOM failure. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the benefits of IA and the non-inferior surgical outcomes of IA-F compared to ES, IA is a good therapeutic strategy for CA. However, in patients exhibiting four independent risk factors for NOM failure, careful monitoring of unplanned ES is necessary.

Oncologic investigation of the interval from stent placement to surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used as a bridge to surgery (BTS) procedure for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, evidence regarding the optimal interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery is lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients with BTS between January 2013 and October 2021. Inverse probability treatment-weighted propensity score analyses were used to compare short- and long-term outcomes between the short-interval (SI) and long-interval (LI) groups, using a cutoff of 20 days. RESULTS: In total, 138 patients were enrolled in this study (SI group, n = 63; LI group, n = 75). In the matched cohort, the patients' backgrounds were well balanced. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications was not significantly different between the SI and LI groups (19.0% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the SI and LI groups in the 3-year recurrence-free survival (68.0% vs. 76.4%, P = 0.73) or 3-year overall survival rates (86.0% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: A longer interval did not deteriorate the oncological outcomes. Individual perioperative management with an appropriate interval to improve the patient's condition is required to ensure safe surgery.

Prediction model of the risk for lateral local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer without enlarged lateral lymph nodes: Lessons from a Japanese multicenter pooled analysis of 812 patients.

Aim: Although the oncological impact of lateral lymph node dissection on enlarged lateral lymph nodes has been gradually accepted over the last decade, that on lateral lymph nodes without swelling remains doubtful. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for the future risk of lateral local recurrence and to clarify the value of adding lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer without enlarged lateral lymph nodes. Methods: This retrospective, multi-institutional study recruited 812 patients with cStage II/III low rectal cancer without enlarged lateral lymph nodes <7 mm. Total lateral local recurrence was a hypothetical value of future risk of lateral local recurrence when lateral lymph node dissection was never performed. Results: Overall, total lateral local recurrences were observed in 67 patients (8.3%). In the multivariate analyses, the strongest risk factor for total local recurrences was no preoperative chemoradiotherapy (odds ratio [OR][95%Cl]: 33.2 [4.56-241.7], P < 0.001), followed by tumor distance ≤40 mm (OR [95%Cl]: 2.71 [1.51-4.86], P < 0.001) and lateral lymph node 5-7 mm (OR[95%Cl]: 2.38 [1.26-4.48], P = 0.007). In patients with lateral lymph nodes of 5-7 mm, the total lateral recurrence rate was 4.8% after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Lateral lymph node dissection could reduce from a total lateral local recurrence of 21.6% to an actual lateral local recurrence of 8.0% in patients without preoperative treatment. Conclusion: We introduce a novel prediction model of future risk of lateral local recurrences, which has the potential to enable us to indicate lateral lymph node dissection selectively according to the patients' risks.

Impact of resection for ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer and clinicopathologic analysis: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan.

Aim: The aim of this study was to clarify the significance of resection of ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer and to identify the clinicopathologic characteristics. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated data on ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer obtained from patients at 20 centers in Japan between 2000 and 2014. We examined the impact of resection on the prognosis of patients with ovarian metastases and examined prognostic factors. Results: The study included 296 patients with ovarian metastasis. The 3-y overall survival rate was 68.6% for solitary ovarian metastases. In all cases of this cohort, the 3-y overall survival rates after curative resection, noncurative resection, and nonresection were 65.9%, 31.8%, and 6.1%, respectively (curative resection vs noncurative resection [P < 0.01] and noncurative resection vs nonresection [P < 0.01]). In the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, tumor size of ovarian metastasis (P < 0.01), bilateral ovarian metastasis (P = 0.01), peritoneal metastasis (P < 0.01), pulmonary metastasis (P = 0.04), liver metastasis (P < 0.01), and remnant of ovarian metastasis (P < 0.01) were statistically significantly different. Conclusion: The prognosis after curative resection for solitary ovarian metastases was shown to be relatively favorable as Stage IV colorectal cancer. Resection of ovarian metastases, not only curative resection but also noncurative resection, confers a survival benefit. Prognostic factors were large ovarian metastases, bilateral ovarian metastases, the presence of extraovarian metastases, and remnant ovarian metastases.

Pks-positive Escherichia coli in tumor tissue and surrounding normal mucosal tissue of colorectal cancer patients.

A significant association exists between the gut microbiome and colorectal carcinogenesis, as well as cancer progression. It has been reported that Escherichia coli (E. coli) containing polyketide synthetase (pks) island contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis by producing colibactin, a polyketide-peptide genotoxin. However, the functions of pks+ E. coli in initiation, proliferation, and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unclear. We investigated the clinical significance of pks+ E. coli to clarify its functions in CRC. This study included 413 patients with CRC. Pks+ E. coli of tumor tissue and normal mucosal tissue were quantified using droplet digital PCR. Pks+ E. coli was more abundant in Stages 0-I tumor tissue than in normal mucosal tissue or in Stages II-IV tumor tissue. High abundance of pks+ E. coli in tumor tissue was significantly associated with shallower tumor depth (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.3-11.3, p < 0.001) and absence of lymph node metastasis (HR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.8-5.1, p < 0.001) in multivariable logistic analyses. Pks+ E. coli-low and -negative groups were significantly associated with shorter CRC-specific survival (HR = 6.4, 95% CI = 1.7-25.6, p = 0.005) and shorter relapse-free survival (HR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.3-7.3, p = 0.01) compared to the pks+ E. coli-high group. Pks+ E. coli was abundant in Stages 0-I CRC and associated with CRC prognosis. These results suggest that pks+ E. coli might contribute to carcinogenesis of CRC but might not be associated with tumor progression.