Assessment of suitable antihypertensive therapies: Combination with high-dose amlodipine/irbesartan vs triple combination with amlodipine/irbesartan/indapamide (ASAHI-AI study).

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) plus calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a widely used combination therapy for hypertensive patients. In order to determine which combination was better as the next-step therapy for standard-dose combination of ARBs and CCBs, a combination with high-dose CCBs or a triple combination with diuretics, the authors conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label trial to determine which of the following combination is better as the next-step treatment: a combination with high-dose CCBs or a triple combination with diuretics. Hypertensive outpatients who did not achieve their target blood pressure (BP) with usual dosages of ARBs and amlodipine 5 mg were randomly assigned to treatment with irbesartan 100 mg/amlodipine 10 mg (Group 1: n = 48) or indapamide 1 mg in addition to ARBs plus amlodipine 5 mg (Group 2: n = 46). The primary end point was changes in the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) after the 12-week treatment period, while secondary end points were changes in BP after the 24-week treatment period and laboratory values. At 12 weeks, the SBP/DBP significantly decreased from 152.1/83.4 mm Hg to 131.5/76.1 mm Hg in Group 1 and 153.9/82.1 mm Hg to 132.7/75.9 mm Hg in Group 2. Although both groups produced a similar efficacy in reducing the SBP/DBP (-19.2/-9.2 mm Hg in Group 1 and -21.6/-8.8 mm Hg in Group 2; SBP P = .378, DBP P = .825), high-dose CCBs combined with ARBs controlled hypertension without elevation of serum uric acid. These results will provide new evidence for selecting optimal combination therapies for uncontrolled hypertensive patients.

[Assessment of pathophysiology based on the left ventricular shape in five patients with midventricular obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy].

OBJECTIVES: The pathophysiology of midventricular obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (MVO) is unknown. Patients with MVO and MVO-like cardiomyopathy were classified into three groups based on the cardioimaging morphological characteristics of the left ventricle to investigate their complications and treatment. METHODS: Four patients with MVO and one patient with disease-like MVO were admitted in our hospital from 1999 to 2005. Group A consisted of one patient with indications of pressure gradient at mid-ventricle without apical aneurysm, Group B consisted of three patients with indications of pressure gradient and apical aneurysm, and Group C consisted of one patient with hour-glass appearance with apical aneurysm and decreased left ventricular systolic function without pressure gradient. RESULTS: The diagnosis was established during examination for sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT, three patients), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (one patient), and coronary artery disease (one patient). Cardiogenic embolization was observed in all cases which originated from atrial fibrillation (one case) and apical aneurysm (two cases). No embolic event occurred in any patient after warfarin therapy. SVT occurred in patients in Groups B and C. SVT refractory to beta-blocker and mexiletine was treated by amiodarone. Apical aneurysmectomy and cryoablation could prevent recurrent SVT with drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Four of the five patients with MVO had arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, SVT) and three had cardiogenic embolization. MVO could be classified into three groups depending on the morphological characteristics and complications. Treatment of MVO should be based on these characteristics.

Cervical and intracranial atherosclerosis and silent brain infarction in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of cervical and intracranial atherosclerosis and silent brain infarction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Cervical and intracranial atherosclerotic lesions on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and silent brain infarctions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were investigated in comparison with the findings of coronary angiography in 133 consecutive patients with CAD. RESULTS: The mean severity scores of cervical and intracranial MRA lesions were significantly higher in the three-vessel CAD (0.40 and 0.53, respectively) than in the zero-vessel CAD group (0.04 and 0.11). The mean scores of the maximal size and multiplicity of MRI lesion were also significantly greater in the two-vessel (1.00 and 1.44) and three-vessel CAD (0.94 and 1.26) than in the zero-vessel CAD group (0.27 and 0.50). The incidence of MRA lesion was markedly higher in patients with brain MRI lesion than in those without (51.1 vs. 6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Serious coronary artery lesions were commonly accompanied by latent atherosclerotic lesions in the cervical and intracranial arteries besides silent brain infarction in patients with CAD.