Are drain essentials in kidney transplantation? Analysis of risk factors affecting the postoperative drainage.

OBJECTIVE: The routine drain placement following renal transplantation is currently under debate. Its benefit is uncertain and may cause complications, particularly infectious ones. Some renal transplant patients have low-productive drains, that might be unnecessary. The objective of this study is to bring to light factors influencing drain volume in kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All kidney transplant patients in Tours between 2019 and 2020 were included. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed: patients with low-productive redons (quantification less than 100mL/24h,) and patients with productive redons (≥ 100mL/24h). Univariate and multivariate analyses by logistic regression were performed to look for risk factors associated with productive drainage. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-nine patients were included (67 in the low-productive group and 122 in the productive group). The results in the productive group showed a significantly higher proportion of retransplantation (P=0.015), overweight (P=0.012), low residual diuresis (P=0.041), and a significantly lower proportion of preemptive transplantation (P=0.008) and peritoneal dialysis (P=0.037). After an adjustment, the following variables remained significantly associated with greater drainage: overweight (OR=2.42, P=0.014; 95% CI [1.2-4.94]); retransplantation (OR=3.98, P=0.027; 95% CI [1.27-15.45]), and preemptive transplant (OR=0.22, P=0.013; 95% CI [0.06-0.7]). CONCLUSION: The non-implementation of a redon in renal transplantation could be considered, in a selected population of non-overweight patients, with significant residual diuresis for a first transplantation which should be preemptive. This could lead to a randomized controlled trial to determine the real benefits of a routine drain replacement in kidney transplantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

PET Imaging in Bladder Cancer: An Update and Future Direction.

Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography is a powerful tool in bladder cancer management. In this review, we aim to address the current place of the PET imaging in bladder cancer care and offer perspectives on potential future radiopharmaceutical and technological advancements. A special focus is given to the following: the role of [18F] 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the clinical management of bladder cancer patients, especially for staging and follow-up; treatment guided by [18F]FDG PET/CT; the role of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, the other PET radiopharmaceuticals beyond [18F]FDG, such as [68Ga]- or [18F]-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor; and the application of artificial intelligence.