Diagnosis and Management of Infected Total Ankle Replacements.

As the number of primary total ankle replacements increases for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis, failures are also expected to rise. Periprosthetic joint infection is among the causes of failures and has been reported to be as high as 5%. Diagnosis is usually made by a combination of clinical examination findings, imaging, laboratory, and microbiological workup. Management is generally separated into limb salvage or amputation. Limb salvage can be challenging and may involve a single versus staged approach. Options include revision arthroplasty or arthrodesis procedures (ankle versus tibiotalocalcaneal), and a multidisciplinary approach is sought to eradicate infection before definitive management.

Intramedullary Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Ankle fractures pose a unique challenge to the treating orthopedic surgeon. Intramedullary (IM) distal fibula fixation is a relatively newer entity offering a viable option to minimize wound complications while providing similar outcomes. Our study utilizes an IM nail featuring proximal fixation via IM talons ensuring maintenance of fracture reduction this is the largest case series utilizing this novel device assessing time to weight-bearing (WB) and fracture union in addition to the safety and reproducibility of percutaneous reduction. METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted on 51 ankle fractures treated with a single IM device for lateral malleolar fixation. Postoperative radiographs were assessed, qualifying reductions as good, fair, or poor based on a reduction classification. Patient charts were reviewed for fracture characteristics, reduction method, fracture union, time to WB, and complications. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 32.2 weeks; 47 fracture reductions (92%) were classified as good, and 4 (8%) were fair. All but 1 fracture (98%) went onto union. Average time to union was 10.3 weeks. Average time to WB with and without a walking boot was 6.8 and 11.2 weeks, respectively. Two patients experienced painful hardware. One patient had a superficial wound infection. CONCLUSION: When evaluating this novel IM device, fracture union and time to union were found to be acceptable, with minimal wound or other complications. Percutaneous reduction permitted good fracture reduction quality. Consistent time to WB for a variety of fractures was reliably demonstrated following operative fixation with this device, including those in the elderly population. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Clinical case series.

Early Results of a Novel Intramedullary Fixation Device for Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are commonly treated surgically due to their poor healing capacity. While intramedullary screws may be the most popular operative treatment choice, newer fixation methods continue to develop. We present a case series utilizing a novel intramedullary fixation device for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. To our knowledge, no other study in the literature has assessed the safety and efficacy of this fixation method. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for 16 patients with proximal fifth metatarsal fractures who underwent fixation with the same novel intramedullary device. Patient charts were reviewed for fracture union, plantar fracture gapping, time to weight-bearing, refracture, perioperative complications, and secondary surgeries. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with an average age of 43.3 years underwent fixation with this novel device from 2015 to 2020. Mean follow-up was 32.4 weeks. Fifteen of the 16 patients achieved radiographic union at a mean of 8.9 weeks. One patient suffered a nonunion. Mean time to full weight-bearing in, and out of, a walking boot was 6.4 and 9.8 weeks, respectively, for healed fractures. Mean plantar fracture gap improved from 1.22 mm to 0.88 mm following surgery. There were zero infections, refractures, or hardware complications. Three patients suffered iatrogenic fracture during implant insertion. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of early results for this novel intramedullary device. Excellent union rates, acceptable time to weight-bearing, and a low complication profile can be achieved. Based on our findings, we propose a safe and effective treatment option for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Clinical case series.

Accuracy of CT-Derived Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: The Impact of the Severity of Preoperative Varus Ankle Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Significant preoperative varus tibiotalar deformity was once believed to be a contraindication for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Our primary goal was to evaluate the influence of increasing preoperative varus tibiotalar deformity on the accuracy of final implant positioning using computed tomography (CT)-derived patient-specific guides for TAA. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with varus ankle arthritis underwent TAA using CT-derived patient-specific guides. Patients were subcategorized into varying degrees of deformity based on preoperative tibiotalar angles (0°-5° neutral, 6°-10° mild, 11°-15° moderate, and >15° severe). Postoperative weightbearing radiographs were used to measure coronal plane alignment of the tibial implant relative to the target axis determined by the preoperative CT template. Average follow-up at the time of data collection was 36.8 months. RESULTS: Average preoperative varus deformity was 6.06° (range: 0.66°-16.3°). Postoperatively, 96.9% (30/31) of patients demonstrated neutral implant alignment. Average postoperative tibial implant deviation was 1.54° (range: 0.17°-5.7°). Average coronal deviation relative to the target axis was 1.61° for the neutral group, 1.78° for the mild group, 0.94° for the moderate group, and 1.41° for the severe group (P = .256). Preoperative plans predicted 100% of tibial and talar implant sizes correctly within 1 size of actual implant size. Conclusion. Our study supports the claim that neutral postoperative TAA alignment can be obtained using CT-derived patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). Furthermore, final implant alignment accuracy with PSI does not appear to be impacted by worsening preoperative varus deformity. All but one patient (96.9%) achieved neutral postoperative alignment relative to the predicted target axis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Clinical Case Series.

Use of the External Fixator Calcaneus Pin: Using the TRIMANO to Its Full Potential.

Joint-spanning external fixation in acute ankle trauma is a means to provide temporary stability and restoration of length, alignment, and articular congruency. This allows for soft-tissue consolidation before definitive fixation to decrease the risk of wound complications. Traction is commonly used during definitive fixation to aid in fracture reduction and to maintain reduction during placement of internal hardware. Ankle arthroscopy for ankle fractures is also becoming increasingly popular to identify and treat intra-articular injury and uses traction for visual assistance and increased working space for instruments. We present a technique that uses a previously placed calcaneus external fixation pin and the TRIMANO (Arthrex, Naples, FL) external positioning arm to apply skeletal traction during arthroscopic and open definitive fixation procedures. This technique is extremely simple, can be used in both the supine and prone positions, and can be used during arthroscopic and open procedures.

Accuracy of Weightbearing CT Scans for Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a popular and viable option for end-stage ankle arthritis. Posttraumatic arthritis is the most common etiology of ankle arthritis, which creates the additional challenge of osseus deformity. Accuracy and reproducibility in placing the implant on the mechanical axis has been shown to be paramount in all joint arthroplasty including total ankle replacement. Patient-specific preoperative navigation is a relatively new technology for TAA, and up until this past year has been based off of nonweightbearing (NWBCT) or simulated weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT). Our institution has created a protocol to use WBCT in the preoperative patient-specific navigation for TAA using the Prophecy system. The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of implant alignment and size using WBCT vs prior studies using NWBCT for the Prophecy reports. METHODS: All patients from July 2019 through October 2020 who underwent TAA were evaluated. Inclusion criteria consisted of primary TAA using patient-specific preoperative navigation who had postoperative radiographs in the 4-6-week time frame. Prophecy predictions and measurements were then compared to actual implant placement and size. RESULTS: Ten patients met our inclusion criteria of WBCT Prophecy preoperative planning using 2 different implant systems. Preoperative deformities in this cohort were small. The average postoperative coronal alignment was 0.84 degrees, range 0.19 to 2.4 degrees. Average postoperative sagittal plane deformity was 1.9 degrees, range 0.33 to 5.05 degrees. Tibial component size was properly predicted in all patients, talar component in 9 of 10. CONCLUSION: This initial report supports accuracy and reproducibility in preoperative patient-specific navigation when using WBCT for TAA with these implants. All TAAs were within the intended target of less than 5 degrees varus or valgus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative analysis.