Role of fusional convergence amplitude in postoperative phoria maintenance in children with intermittent exotropia.

PURPOSE: To examine the role of fusional convergence amplitude in postoperative phoria maintenance in childhood intermittent exotropia [X(T)]. METHODS: The medical records of 29 children aged 15 years or younger (mean age, 10.8 ± 2.4 years) and treated with monocular recession-resection for X(T) were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' fusional convergence amplitude (break point/total amplitudes), physiologic diplopia, and phoria maintenance (presence/absence of phoria maintenance and ability to maintain phoria) were assessed. The presence of phoria maintenance was confirmed by a cover test, and the ability to maintain phoria was quantified using the Bagolini red filter bar. Correlations of the amplitude size with the presence and ability of phoria maintenance were investigated. RESULTS: A significant correlation was seen between fusional amplitude (break point/total) and ability to maintain phoria at near and at far (break point: P < .05 at near/P < .01 at far; total: P < .05 at near/far). Neither the break point amplitude nor the total amplitude significantly differed between the patients with phoria maintenance and those without it (break point: P = .71 at near, P = .29 at far; total: P = .98 at near, P = .85 at far). Phoria maintenance correlated with the suppression of physiologic diplopia during phoria (P < .01). The deviation angle did not significantly correlate with fusional amplitude either at near (P = .58) or at far (P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: In childhood X(T), fusional amplitude plays a role in enforcing the patient's ability to maintain phoria. However, sufficient fusional amplitude does not guarantee fully functioning fusion if suppression is present during phoria.

Influence of Test Distance on Stereoacuity in Intermittent Exotropia.

AIMS: To investigate influence of test distance on stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia (X[T]) using the same test conditions for both near and far distances. METHODS: Subjects were 38 consecutive patients with X(T). All the patients were between ages 6 and 15 years and had decimal visual acuity of 1.0 or better. Another inclusion criterion was presence of phoric condition at near and far distances. Stereoacuity was measured at a near distance of 40 cm and at a far distance of 5 m. The following test conditions were used for both test distances: separation of the two eyes using polarized glasses, and a target with a random dot pattern. All the stereograms had the same subtended angle of 2.5º, and binocular disparity of 480, 240, 120, and 60 arcsec. We used two stereogram types with crossed and uncrossed disparities. RESULTS: Far stereoacuity of 38 subjects measured with the crossed disparity was significantly worse than near stereoacuity (P<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test), although 30 (78.9%) of the 38 subjects showed no differences in stereopsis between the near and far distances. Far stereoacuity of 38 cases measured with the uncrossed disparity was significantly worse than at near (P<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test), although 20 (52.6%) of the 38 subjects showed no differences between stereoacuity at near and far. In comparison of stereoacuity with crossed disparity and uncrossed disparity, stereoacuity with crossed disparity was significantly better than that with uncrossed disparity both at near and far (P<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test). CONCLUSIONS: Stereoacuity in X(T) was different according to test distance when measured controlling subtended angle of stereogram at both distances. Far stereoacuity was significantly worse than near stereoacuity when measured using test targets with both crossed and uncrossed disparities. Additionally, stereoacuity measured with crossed disparity was better than that with uncrossed disparity at both distances.