Stroke prevention strategies in Africa: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to map the existing strategies on methods and interventions for primary and secondary stroke prevention in Africa. INTRODUCTION: Stroke is among the leading causes of disability globally. African nations have higher stroke mortality and case fatality rates than the industrialized world, leading to significant social and financial costs, which necessitates efficient preventative methods. Despite the high prevalence of stroke in Africa, the scope of stroke-prevention strategies in Africa is unknown. Consequently, mapping diverse approaches to preventing stroke in Africa could provide direction for future research into stroke prevention in Africa. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will incorporate studies that report methods or strategies used for stroke prevention in Africa. All primary and gray literature will be considered for inclusion. No language or date restrictions will be applied. METHODS: The JBI methodological framework for scoping reviews will be adopted for this scoping review. A 3-step search strategy consisting of an initial limited search, a full search, and a screening of the reference lists of all included articles will be undertaken. Databases such as CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, PEDRo, DORIS, Global Health, Web of Science, and Open Access Thesis and Dissertations will be searched. All search results will be screened, and relevant data extracted by 2 independent reviewers. The findings will be presented in the final scoping review and illustrated in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21679904.v1.

Clinical and demographic predictors of unilateral spatial neglect recovery after prism therapy among stroke survivors in the sub-acute phase of recovery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN) affects the rehabilitation process and leads to poor outcomes after stroke. Factors that influence USN recovery following prism adaptation therapy have not been investigated. This study investigated predictors of USN recovery after prism therapy at the sub-acute phase of recovery. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial. USN was assessed with the Behavioural Inattention Test and Catherine Bergego scale. Seventy-four patients with USN were divided into control and intervention group (prism). The prism group used 20 dioptre prism lenses for repeated aiming for 12 sessions while the control group used neutral lenses for aiming training. Regression analysis was conducted to establish clinical and sociodemographic factors that influence USN recovery. RESULTS: Gender, age, years of education, race, employment status, handedness, type of stroke, time since stroke and site of stroke (p > 0.005) showed no significant influence on USN recovery following PA treatment. Higher Cognitive function (OR = 1.52, CI = 1.08-2.14, p = 0.016) and group allocationng (being in the prism group) (OR = 63.10, CI = 9.70-410.59, P < 0.001) were found to significantly influence USN recovery following PA treatment session. CONCLUSIONS: A significant modulating effect on general cognitive ability was found in this study. This suggests that prism adaptation therapy's effect on neural activity and spatial neglect depends on the cognitive function of stroke survivors.Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry identifier: PACTR201903732473573.