The prevalence of bilateral and ipsilateral radiographic osteoarthritis is high in White, Asian and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders presenting for unilateral knee or hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that one-third of patients presenting with unilateral joint pain have contralateral osteoarthritis (OA) at first presentation. Most studies have primarily examined White patient cohorts. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of contralateral joint OA for patients presenting for unilateral total knee (TKA), unicompartmental knee (UKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) among Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White patients. METHODS: Bilateral radiographic reports at initial presentation of 2,312 subjects who underwent unilateral arthroplasties (332 UKAs, 933 TKAs and 1,047 THAs) were reviewed. The presence of contralateral OA was recorded and compared by racial group and type of arthroplasty performed. Parametric statistical analyses were performed to determine differences between groups. Multivariable analyses were completed for each arthroplasty group to determine the influence on the presence of contralateral OA, presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Contralateral joint OA was present in 86.7%, 90.4% and 70.4% of UKA, TKA and THA patients, respectively. Concurrent hip OA was present in 41.6% and 59.5% of UKA and TKA patients. No racial differences in the prevalence of contralateral knee OA were found for knee arthroplasty patients. White patients (74.6%) had a greater prevalence of contralateral hip OA compared to Asians (66.5%, p = 0.037) amongst THA recipients. Increased age and body mass index were significantly associated with the presence of contralateral knee OA. Increased age, being male and being White were significant contributors for the presence of contralateral hip OA. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of contralateral joint OA and concurrent hip OA is high in all three racial groups. Due to the extensive prevalence of contralateral and concurrent knee and hip OA, bilateral radiographic evaluation should be considered for all patients presenting with unilateral hip or knee pain due to OA.

Influence of obesity and intra-operative imaging guidance technology on acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be improved with intra-operative imaging but may be influenced by body mass index (BMI). This study assessed the influence of BMI (kg/m2) on cup accuracy when using intra-operative fluoroscopy (IF) alone or supplemented with a commercial product. METHODS: This retrospective review included four consecutive cohorts of patients having undergone anterior approach THA with IF alone (2011-2015), IF and Overlay (2015-2016) (Radlink Inc., Los Angeles, CA), IF and Grid (2017-2018) (HipGrid Drone™, OrthoGrid Systems Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) and IF and Digital (2018-2020) (OrthoGrid Phantom®, OrthoGrid Systems, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT). Component placement accuracy was measured on 6-week post-operative weight bearing radiographs and compared between four BMI patient groups (BMI ≤ 25, 25 < BMI ≤ 30, 30 < BMI ≤ 35, and 35 < BMI). Total fluoroscopy times were also recorded directly from the fluoroscopy unit. RESULTS: Abduction angle significantly increased as BMI increased (p = 0.003) with IF alone but no difference was present in groups with guidance technology. Anteversion was significantly different between BMI groups for IF alone (p = 0.028) and Grid (p = 0.027) but was not different in Overlay (p = 0.107) or Digital (p = 0.210). Fluoroscopy time was significantly different between BMI categories for IF alone (p = 0.005) and Grid (p = 0.018) but was not different in Overlay (p = 0.444) or Digital (p = 0.170). CONCLUSION: Morbid obesity (BMI > 35) increases risk for malpositioning of acetabular cups and increases surgical time with IF alone or the Grid. Additional IF guidance technology (Overlay or Digital) increased cup positioning accuracy without decreasing surgical efficiency.

True "outpatient discharge" following single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty may be unrealistic for most.

BACKGROUND: Single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BUKA) has shown post-operative function and cost benefits over staged bilateral procedures, without increased complications. A rapid discharge protocol at the current study site has reported outpatient discharge for the unilateral procedure exceeding 97%. However, the feasibility of outpatient discharge following BUKA remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the success of achieving outpatient (< 24 h) discharge following BUKA, and identify patient variables associated with failure. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for 104 BUKA patients. All patients with bilateral, symptomatic unicompartmental knee arthritis were offered the single-stage procedure. Data collection included patient demographics, discharge status, and disposition location. Independent t tests (continuous) and Chi-squared tests (categorical) determined differences between discharge (outpatient/inpatient) and disposition (home/other) groups. Variables associated with discharge status and location were assessed with multivariable regression. RESULTS: While 96 (92.3%) patients discharged within 24 h, only 63.5% were able to discharge directly home. Patients requiring a longer hospital stay (> 24 h) were more likely to require a pre-operative assistive device (62.5% and 25.0%, p = 0.037) and live alone (37.5 vs 8.3%, p = 0.033). For those discharged within 24 h, living alone significantly increased the risk (odds ratio: 5.800, p = 0.038) of requiring an acute inpatient facility prior to transition home. CONCLUSION: Achieving "true" outpatient discharge is only modestly successful for most BUKA patients, as many required an acute inpatient or short-term rehabilitation facility prior to returning home. BUKA should be differentiated from the unilateral procedure regarding outpatient discharge expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Case-control study; Retrospective comparative study.

Impact of intraoperative fluoroscopic beam positioning relative to the hip and pelvis on perceived acetabular component position.

Background: Parallax is poorly understood and can mislead surgeons using intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF) to guide cup placement during anterior approach (AA) total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to examine how changes in fluoroscopic beam positioning in relation to the hip and pelvis affects the projected acetabular image. Methods: An acetabular component was positioned in an anatomic pelvis model in 45° and 20° of abduction and anteversion, respectively using a computer assisted cup targeting system. Fluoroscopic images were taken at various caudal and cranially directed angles with the fluoroscopic beam centered over the hip then pelvis. In each position, four independent observers measured the abduction and anteversion angles of the projected cup image using the same computer targeting system. Results: Cup abduction and anteversion measured 43.5° and 19.5° when IF was centered over the hip and 40.5 and 27.5° when centered over the pelvis in the neutral position. Increasing the caudal direction of the beam 20° increased the projected abduction/anteversion angles by approximately 7°/12° and 9°/16° when centered over the hip and pelvis respectively. Increasing the cranial direction of the beam 20° decreased the measured abduction/anteversion angles by roughly 4°/20° and 4°/24° when centered over the hip and pelvis, respectively. Conclusion: The projected image of the acetabular component can change dramatically depending on fluoroscopic beam position relative to the hip and pelvis. Recognizing the approximate direction and magnitude of change with differing fluoroscopy positions may help surgeons avoid cup malpositioning.

Hip Offset and Leg Length Equalization in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty without Preoperative Templating.

The standard practice of preoperative templating may be less important for direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) with intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF). However, this has yet to be tested. The purpose of this retrospective review was to report the hip offset (HO) and leg length (LL) equalization accuracy following 304 consecutively performed DAA THA with IF and no preoperative templating. A supplemental fluoroscopic gridding tool was used to assess hip symmetry. Operative and fluoroscopic times were also documented to assess for surgical efficiency. The mean HO and LL difference was 3.5 ± 2.6 mm (range: 0.0-9.3) and 2.9 ± 2.2 mm (range: 0.0-9.9), respectively. Hip offset and LL equalization within 10 mm was achieved in all patients. The mean operative time for unilateral THA was 72.2 ± 12.0 minutes, and the mean fluoroscopy time per hip was 10.5 ± 4.5 seconds. These results suggest that for surgeons with adequate experience performing DAA THA with IF, preoperative templating may not be necessary to reliably and efficiently achieve clinically acceptable HO and LL.