Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Diabetes ; 37(1): 57-64, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30705498

RESUMO

IN BRIEF Glucose variability is a potential independent risk factor of poor clinical outcome among people with diabetes, with adequate measurement technically difficult and cumbersome. For this study, a novel 14-day continuous sensor was used to assess glucose variability among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim was to characterize glucose profiles for up to 2 weeks in T2D and to survey device utilization in a standard clinical setting and its potential to collect clinically meaningful data.

3.
J Fam Pract ; 64(9): 517-8, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26546958

RESUMO

It frightens me to think what might have happened during my hospital stay if I hadn't provided information that wasn't required by the EMR.


Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Anamnese , Exame Físico , Relações Médico-Paciente , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , California , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/normas , Humanos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde
4.
Diabetes Ther ; 2(1): 29-39, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22127767

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) has been the focus of considerable research activity in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) because the incretin effect is significantly reduced or absent in individuals with T2DM. Thus, pharmacologic efforts to develop medications that mimic the actions of GLP-1 have become a target for improving or reversing chronic hyperglycemia. Two GLP-1 receptor agonists are commercially available: exenatide twice daily (b.i.d.) and liraglutide once daily (q.d.). Targeted and individualized intensification of diabetes management can best be accomplished with a thorough understanding of these new medications. METHODS: Information was gathered through a search of MEDLINE and PubMed for GLP-1 and glycemic management in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Activation of the GLP-1 receptors on the ß-cells results in enhanced levels of insulin biosynthesis, ß-cell proliferation, resistance to ß-cell apoptosis, and enhanced ß-cell survival in both humans and rodents; yet, the risk of hypoglycemia is minimized because insulin production and exocytosis occurs in a glucose-dependent manner. The efficacy and safety of the two commercially available GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide and exenatide, in managing postprandial glycemia have been well documented in numerous clinical trials, in which reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of -0.79% to -1.12% have been demonstrated. Weight reduction/maintenance and improvements in blood pressure and lipidemia have also been reported. CONCLUSION: Because GLP-1 receptor agonists work in a glucose-dependent manner, they are likely to reduce hyperglycemia safely, without a marked fluctuation toward hypoglycemia. In the process of acutely restoring ß-cell function, GLP-1 agonists may allow patients to achieve HbA(1c) <7% without experiencing weight gain or hypoglycemia. The ability of GLP-1 receptor agonists to improve blood pressure and postprandial lipidemia in the context of weight neutrality or weight loss may have the potential to ameliorate some of the cardiovascular risks observed in patients with T2DM.

5.
Headache ; 47(4): 519-30, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17445101

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether time-based early treatment, independent of pain intensity, is superior to a pain intensity-based treatment, where patients are asked to treat at least moderate intensity headaches, resulting in a reduction of overall migraine headache duration. BACKGROUND: Retrospective and prospective trials have reported improved outcomes when triptans were used early or to treat mild migraine headache pain. However, tolerability as well as efficacy may be 2 of several key issues that have prevented this new treatment paradigm from becoming universally accepted. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, cluster-randomized study, patients with IHS-defined migraine were instructed to treat 2 sequential migraine headaches with almotriptan 12.5 mg using either Early Treatment (ET, ie, treat at earliest onset of headache pain, within 1 hour) or Standard Treatment (ST, ie, treat when headache pain intensity is moderate or severe). The novel trial design uses total migraine headache pain duration as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Results are presented for the first headache and include an ITT population of 757 ET and 693 ST patients. Median headache duration (time from onset of headache pain until no pain) was significantly shorter in ET patients compared to ST patients (3.18 vs 5.53 hours, P < .001). An analysis of the ET subgroup treating headache pain within 1 hour of onset revealed pain intensity, ie, treating mild or moderate versus severe pain, was significantly correlated with treatment outcomes defined by total headache duration, 2-hour pain free, sustained pain free, and use of rescue medication. Multivariate analyses comparing ST subgroups that treated within 1 hour versus greater than 1 hour after headache onset, demonstrate that both pain intensity, ie, treating moderate versus severe headache pain, and treating early versus late, were significantly correlated with total headache duration, 2-hour pain free, sustained pain free, and use of rescue medication. The overall incidence of adverse events was low; nausea and dizziness were the only adverse events with an incidence > or =1% in either treatment group (nausea: 2.5% and 1.7% and dizziness 1.1% and 0.7%, in the ET and ST groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: Total headache duration was significantly shorter in the early treatment group compared to the standard treatment group. Considering time to treatment within a relatively early range of 1 hour or less, efficacy results when treating mild versus moderate pain were similar and both were associated with better outcomes than treatment of severe pain. When considering the prognostic variables of time to treatment and headache pain intensity (limited to moderate vs severe), both were independent predictors, with time to treatment a better predictor of headache duration and rescue medication use, and pain intensity a better predictor of 2-hour pain free and sustained pain free.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/fisiopatologia , Agonistas do Receptor de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Triptaminas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Análise por Conglomerados , Método Duplo-Cego , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Medição da Dor/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA