Vancomycin dosing in chronic high-flux haemodialysis: a systematic review.

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate whether non-weight-based dosing (non-WBD) or weight-based dosing (WBD) of vancomycin leads to a higher proportion of patients achieving the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target. Studies from January 1985 to February 2017 were identified through Cochrane, MEDLINE and Embase databases. Those conducted in adults with end-stage renal disease receiving high-flux haemodialysis (HD) and intravenous vancomycin were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a pre-HD vancomycin concentration of 15-20 mg/L and/or an area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio ≥400. Of the 3948 studies screened, 5 met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients with pre-HD concentrations between 15-20 mg/L were 35% (non-WBD) and 13% (WBD) post-loading dose. During maintenance dosing, the proportion of patients with pre-HD concentrations between 15-20 mg/L were 37% (non-WBD) and 50-67% (WBD). The proportion of pre-HD concentrations <15 mg/L was greater in the non-WBD group post-loading dose but was similar between the non-WBD and WBD group during maintenance dosing. One study reported that all patients had an AUC/MIC ≥ 400 for micro-organisms with an MIC ≤ 1 mg/L for weight-based maintenance dosing. The limited data suggest that WBD may be preferential as there was a smaller proportion of pre-HD concentrations falling below 15 mg/L. However, larger well-designed studies of higher quality are required to provide guidance for vancomycin dosing in the high-flux HD setting. Future research should focus on reporting AUC/MIC ratios and exploring clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Measuring antimicrobial prescribing quality in Australian hospitals: development and evaluation of a national antimicrobial prescribing survey tool.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes have been developed with the intention of reducing inappropriate and unnecessary use of antimicrobials, while improving the quality of patient care and locally helping prevent the development of antimicrobial resistance. An important aspect of AMS programmes is the qualitative assessment of prescribing through antimicrobial prescribing surveys (APS), which are able to provide information about the prescribing behaviour within institutions. Owing to lack of standardization of audit tools and the resources required, qualitative methods for the assessment of antimicrobial use are not often performed. The aim of this study was to design an audit tool that was appropriate for use in all Australian hospitals, suited to local user requirements and included an assessment of the overall appropriateness of the prescription. METHODS: In November 2011, a pilot APS was conducted across 32 hospitals to assess the usability and generalizability of a newly designed audit tool. Following participant feedback, this tool was revised to reflect the requirements of the respondents. A second pilot study was then performed in November 2012 across 85 hospitals. RESULTS: These surveys identified several areas that can be targets for quality improvement at a national level, including: documentation of indication; surgical prophylaxis prescribed for >24 h; compliance with prescribing guidelines; and the appropriateness of the prescription. CONCLUSIONS: By involving the end users in the design and evaluation, we have been able to provide a practical and relevant APS tool for quantitative and qualitative data collection in a wide range of Australian hospital settings.

Oseltamivir adherence and tolerability in health care workers treated prophylactically after occupational influenza exposure.

This survey of health care workers who were prescribed oseltamivir prophylaxis after occupational exposure to 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) documents their adherence, adverse effects, development of influenza-like illness, and knowledge and beliefs about the treatment and transmission of influenza. Adverse effects occurred in 15 of 36 participants evaluated (41.6%). The majority of the participants understood that influenza is highly infective and would take oseltamivir again, although 40.5% (15 of 37) thought they had not been given sufficient information about adverse effects.