Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy for Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Cancers: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone versus IMRT + brachytherapy (BT) in patients with T1-T2N0M0 oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Patients with stage I and II OPSCC were considered for IMRT to a dose of 50 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks in phase I followed by randomization (1:1) to further treatment with IMRT (20 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks) or BT (192Ir high dose rate, 21 Gy/7 fractions/2 fractions per day). The primary endpoint of the trial was the reduction in xerostomia at 6 months evaluated using 99mTc salivary scintigraphy. Severe salivary toxicity (xerostomia) was defined as posttreatment salivary excretion fraction ratio <45%. Secondary endpoints were local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Between November 2010 and February 2020, 90 patients were randomized to IMRT (n = 46) alone or IMRT + BT (n = 44). Eleven patients (8 residual/recurrent disease, 2 lost to follow-up, 1 second primary) in the IMRT arm and 9 patients (8 residual/recurrence, 1 lost to follow-up) in the BT arm were not evaluable at 6 months for the primary endpoint. At 6 months, xerostomia rates using salivary scintigraphy were 14% (5/35: 95% CI, 5%-30%) in the BT arm while it was seen in 44% (14/32: 95% CI, 26%-62%) in the IMRT arm (P = .008). Physician-rated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 xerostomia at any time point was observed in 30% of patients (9/30) in the IMRT arm and 6.7% (2/30) in the BT arm (P = .02). At a median follow-up of 42.5 months, the 3-year local control in the IMRT arm was 56.4% (95% CI, 43%-73%) while it was 66.2% (95% CI, 53%-82%) in the BT arm (P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of BT to IMRT for T1-T2N0M0 OPSCC results in a significant reduction in xerostomia. This strongly supports the addition of BT to IMRT in suitable cases.

Implementation and Challenges of International Atomic Energy Agency/American Association of Physicists in Medicine TRS 483 Formalism for Field Output Factors and Involved Uncertainties Determination in Small Fields for TomoTherapy.

PURPOSE: International Atomic Energy Agency published TRS-483 to address the issues of small field dosimetry. Our study calculates the output factor in the small fields of TomoTherapy using different detectors and dosimetric conditions. Furthermore, it estimates the various components of uncertainty and presents challenges faced during implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beam quality TPR20,10(10) at the hypothetical field size of 10 cm × 10 cm was calculated from TPR20,10(S). Two ionization chambers based on the minimum field width required to satisfy the lateral charge particle equilibrium and one unshielded electron field diode (EFD) were selected. Output factor measurements were performed in various dosimetric conditions. RESULTS: Beam quality TPR20,10(10) has a mean value of 0.627 ± 0.001. The maximum variation of output factor between CC01 chamber and EFD diode at the smallest field size was 11.80%. In source to surface setup, the difference between water and virtual water was up to 9.68% and 8.13%, respectively, for the CC01 chamber and EFD diode. The total uncertainty in the ionization chamber was 2.43 times higher compared to the unshielded EFD diode at the smallest field size. CONCLUSIONS: Beam quality measurements, chamber selection procedure, and output factors were successfully carried out. A difference of up to 10% in output factor can occur if density scaling for electron density in virtual water is not considered. The uncertainty in output correction factors dominates, while positional and meter reading uncertainty makes a minor contribution to total uncertainty. An unshielded EFD diode is a preferred detector in small fields because of lower uncertainty in measurements compared to ionization chambers.

Interobserver Variability in the Delineation of Gross Tumour Volume and Specified Organs-at-risk During IMRT for Head and Neck Cancers and the Impact of FDG-PET/CT on Such Variability at the Primary Site.

PURPOSE: To assess interobserver variability (IOV) in the delineation of structures during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and the impact of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on such variability at the primary site. METHODS: Three experienced head-neck radiation oncologists, blinded to each other, delineated the primary site gross tumour volume (GTV) and specified organs-at-risk (OARs) viz parotid gland, spinal cord, and cochlea in 10 patients with pharyngolaryngeal cancers suited for definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy. IOV was assessed by concordance index (CI), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Fleiss' kappa. Subsequently, the observers refined their corresponding GTVs incorporating information from FDG-PET/CT. The impact of FDG-PET/CT on variability of GTV was assessed by comparing the overlap indices with and without FDG-PET/CT using paired 't' test. RESULTS: There was moderate IOV in the delineation of GTV as evidenced by mean CI, DSC, and Fleiss' kappa of 0.41, 0.57, and 0.56, respectively. The use of FDG-PET/CT improved consistency of target volume delineation with resultant improvement in the overlap indices (mean CI, DSC, and Fleiss' kappa of 0.54, 0.69, and 0.69, respectively) that was statistically significant (P < .001). There was good agreement between the three observers for delineation of spinal cord and parotid glands. Concordance was worst for the cochlea. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the presence of moderate IOV between three experienced head and neck radiation oncologists in an academic institutional setting for the delineation of GTV. The use of FDG-PET/CT for target volume delineation results in significant reduction of such variability.

Characterization of commercial MOSFET detectors and their feasibility for in-vivo HDR brachytherapy.

AIM: The present study was to investigate the use of MOSFET as an vivo dosimeter for the application of Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MOSFET was characterized for dose linearity in the range of 50-1000 cGy, depth dose dependence from 2 to 7 cm, angular dependence. Signal fading was checked for two weeks. RESULT AND DISCUSSION: Dose linearity was found to be within 2% in the dose range (50-1000 cGy). The response varied within 8.07% for detector-source distance of 2-7 cm. The response of MOSFET with the epoxy side facing the source (0 degree) is the highest and the lowest response was observed at 90 and 270 degrees. Signal was stable during the study period. CONCLUSION: The detector showed high dose linearity and insignificant fading. But due to angular and depth dependence, care should be taken and corrections must be applied for clinical dosimetry.

Superficial ocular malignancies treated with strontium-90 brachytherapy: long term outcomes.

PURPOSE: The incidence of conjunctival malignancies is less than 1%. Though surgical excision remains the mainstay of treatment, the incidence of positive surgical margins and local recurrence rates are high, which is approximately up to 33% in negative margins and 56% in positive margins. Radiotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence in these cases. Brachytherapy using ß emitters such as strontium-90 ((90)Sr) is an ideal treatment technique for these tumors with the advantage of treating only a few millimeters of tissue while sparing the underlying normal eye. We report the long term outcomes in the form of local control and late sequelae of patients with conjunctival malignancies treated with (90)Sr applicator brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During 1999-2013, 13 patients with conjunctival tumors, treated using (90)Sr brachytherapy were analyzed. Brachytherapy was either in a post-operative adjuvant or in a recurrent setting. Local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and late sequelae were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age at presentation was 47 years (range: 11-71 years). Thirteen patients with 15 tumors were treated. The commonest histology was squamous cell carcinoma. The median dose was 44 Gy over 11 fractions. The median follow up of all the patients was 51 months (range: 3-139 months). The median follow up of patients with carcinoma only was 64 months with a LC and DFS of 90.9% at 5 years. None of the patients developed ≥ grade II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute toxicities. One patient developed a focal scar and another developed corneal opacification at the limbus. Vision was not impaired in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Strontium-90 brachytherapy used in early invasive conjunctival malignancies as an adjunct to surgery in primary and recurrent settings, results in optimal disease control and ocular functional outcomes.

Quantitative estimation of doses to salivary glands from using brachytherapy in head and neck cancers.

PURPOSE: To quantify the percentage doses received by salivary glands (SGDs) in head and neck interstitial brachytherapy (BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 43 patients who underwent high-dose rate iridium-192 implant for oral cavity and oropharyngeal lesions treated with BT as a boost. BT dose varied with disease stage and external radiation dose, with the total mean dose of 66±4Gy. Patients were divided into two groups, midline and lateralized, based on anatomic implant location. Different dose parameters such as D(max), D(mean), DV(30%) of individual glands were derived from dose volume histogram representing the percentage maximum dose, mean dose, and dose received by 30% volume of individual SGDs, respectively. For better perception of the impact of BT on individual SGDs, the doses received are extrapolated to radical BT dose of 60Gy. RESULTS: For lateralized implants, the highest dose received by ipsilateral parotid (PTD) was 12.3% seen in tonsillar implants. The contralateral PTD receives minimal doses. As expected, the ipsilateral submandibular gland (SMG) received high doses in the range of 80% of the total prescribed dose, whereas contralateral SMG received 10% of ipsilateral dose. For the midline implants, the mean dose range for PTD was 7-11% of the total prescribed dose and for SMG between 17% and 56%, depending on the location. CONCLUSIONS: The study quantifies the percentage doses received by the individual SGDs in interstitial head and neck BT for use in future planning of the BT procedures and for salivary functional studies, prediction of damage, and quality-of-life parameters.

Characterizing and configuring motorized wedge for a new generation telecobalt machine in a treatment planning system.

A new generation telecobalt unit, Theratron Equinox-80, (MDS Nordion, Canada) has been evaluated. It is equipped with a single 60-degree motorized wedge (MW), four universal wedges (UW) for 15°, 30°, 45° and 60°. MW was configured in Eclipse (Varian, Palo Alto, USA) 3D treatment planning system (TPS). The profiles and central axis depth doses (CADD) were measured with radiation field analyzer blue water phantom for MW. These profiles and CADD for MW were compared with UW in a homogeneous phantom generated in Eclipse for various field sizes. The absolute dose was measured for a field size of 10 × 10 cm2 only in a MEDTEC water phantom at 10 cm depth with a 0.13 cc thimble ion chamber (Scanditronix Wellhofer, Uppsala, Sweden) and a NE electrometer (Nuclear Enterprises, UK). Measured dose with ion chamber was compared with the TPS predicted dose. MW angle was verified on the Equinox for four angles (15°, 30°, 45° and 60°). The variation in measured and calculated dose at 10 cm depth was within 2%. The measured and the calculated wedge angles were in well agreement within 2°. The motorized wedges were successfully configured in Eclipse for four wedge angles.