Oncology clinical practice guidelines usage among physicians in Nepal.

OBJECTIVE: Oncology clinical practice guidelines (OCPGs) are systematically developed evidence-based recommendations aimed to guide practitioners in decision making during the diagnosis, management, and treatment of cancer patients under specific circumstances, thereby optimizing clinical outcomes. However, little is known about the implementation of those guidelines in low and middle-income countries including Nepal. This research aimed to identify the type of OCPGs used by Nepalese physicians working in oncology departments and to explore barriers and facilitators affecting their use. METHODS: Using the total population sampling technique, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey from June 2020 to January 2021 among physicians working in the oncology departments of Nepal. Descriptive analyses were conducted to summarize the research findings. RESULTS: Out of 171 physicians approached for the study, 102 (59.6%) responded to the questionnaire. The sizable proportions of the participants were a senior group of physicians with 27.5% being consultants, 14.7% senior consultants, and 16.7% professors. The most commonly used guideline was the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline of the United States (75.5%) followed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline (44.7%). While only 22.6% of physicians reported using OCPGs every time, more than half (56.9%) highlighted that OCPGs are not feasible to implement in Nepal. Insufficient facilities/equipment, physicians' unwillingness to change their usual practice, inability to discuss research with knowledgeable colleagues, and lack of time were commonly cited barriers. CONCLUSION: Findings of our study highlighted that the OCPGs developed in high-income countries may not be feasible for low resource settings like Nepal. Comprehensive local OCPGs should be developed considering the available resources, feasibility, and financial constraints of patients. Furthermore, a constant sharing and learning environment should be created to enhance the knowledge of practicing physicians and to promote the proper implementation of evidence-based findings.

Anxiety evaluation in Nepalese adult patients awaiting cardiac surgery: A prospective observational study.

Perioperative anxiety could negatively affect surgery outcomes, and cardiac diseases have long been known to be an independent risk factor for anxiety development. However, little is known about preoperative anxiety in Nepalese adult cardiac patients waiting for surgery. The primary objectives of this study were to: (1) clarify the levels of preoperative anxiety in Nepalese adult cardiac patients waiting for open heart surgery; (2) identify factors associated with preoperative anxiety; and (3) evaluate any possible factors associated with patients' desire to obtain information related to their heart surgery.This is a prospective observational study for patients already scheduled for cardiac surgery at a core medical institution in Kathmandu, Nepal. We collected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients from their medical charts, and assessed their preoperative anxiety using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale. We performed descriptive analyses of the collected data. Further, we employed regression models to assess to the objectives of the study.In total, 140 patients participated, and data of 123 (87.9%) were used for analysis. 58.5% of the participants had preoperative anxiety. Female gender (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.65, P < .001) and past anesthesia exposure (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.01-5.62, P < .05) were identified as risk factors for developing anxiety before cardiac surgery. Further, female gender (IRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.94, P < .001), higher education levels (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.40, P < .05), and higher preoperative anxiety (IRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21-1.73, P < .001) could lead to higher levels of desire to acquire information related to the procedure.The study concluded that more than a half of the cardiac surgery patients experiences preoperative anxiety; female gender and having past anesthesia exposure are the risk factors. Anxious patients have more desire to acquire knowledge about the procedure. Thus, the evaluation and adequate management of preoperative anxiety should be proposed in high-risk groups.

Long-term trends of hospital admissions among patients with cancer following the 2015 earthquake: a single institution observational study in Kathmandu, Nepal.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding how natural disasters affect patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of the 2015 Nepal earthquake on the admission of patients with cancer at a core medical institution in Kathmandu. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We considered all 3520 cancer patient admissions to Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, from 25 April 2013 to 24 April 2017 (2 years before and 2 years after the earthquake). OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of cancer patient admissions was calculated for each month. Using a negative binomial model, we estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for admission numbers each month after the earthquake compared with the pre-earthquake baseline and investigated chronological change. RESULTS: The total admission number in the first month after the earthquake was decreased compared with that of the predisaster baseline (IRR=0.66, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.00), which largely reflected decreased admissions of patients from outside of the most disaster-affected districts. From the second month, the admission number consistently exceeded the predisaster baseline for the remaining postdisaster period. In contrast to the month of the disaster, the continuation of increased admissions was most prominent among those from outside of the most affected districts. CONCLUSIONS: After a transient decrease immediately following the 2015 Nepal earthquake, there was a long-term increase in cancer patient admissions in a core hospital in Kathmandu. These changes were seen most prominently in patients from outside the most disaster affected areas.