Effect of Compressive Shoulder Draping With Adhesive Incise Drape on Soft Tissue Swelling in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Background: Soft tissue swelling in shoulder arthroscopy is common and may lead to complications. Measures aimed at reducing this phenomenon are routinely used with limited efficacy. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to assess (1) soft tissue swelling of the shoulder (the operated site) and (2) soft tissue swelling of the neck, chest, and arm (the surrounding tissue) in patients with versus without compressive draping during shoulder arthroscopy. It was hypothesized that compressive draping of the shoulder with adhesive incise drape would reduce soft tissue swelling during shoulder arthroscopy. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 50 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively randomized to either the study group (in which the shoulder was draped with adhesive incise drape tightened around the shoulder) or the control group (in which a standard shoulder arthroscopy drape was used). The circumferences of the shoulder, arm, chest, and neck were measured preoperatively and postoperatively and compared between the groups. Results: The shoulder circumference in the standard draping group increased by 16% during the procedure (from 21.2 ± 1.5 cm preoperatively to 24.5 ± 1.7 cm postoperatively) compared with only 6% in the compressive draping group (from 21.0 ± 1.3 cm preoperatively to 22.3 ± 1.1 cm postoperatively) (P < .01). No serious postoperative complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: Compressive shoulder draping with adhesive incise drape was effective in reducing soft tissue swelling around the shoulder in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair compared with standard arthroscopic draping and was not associated with any adverse reactions. Registration: NCT03216590 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Acute disc herniation following surgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparison of mini-open and minimally invasive techniques.

BACKGROUND: Disc herniation following decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis is a less familiar surgical complication. Previous studies suggested that open lumbar decompression techniques, associated with relative segmental instability especially in the presence of degenerated disc in older patients, are more likely to result in disc herniation compared to minimally invasive techniques. The current study compares the incidence of acute disc herniation following mini-open and minimally invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective study reviewing 563 patients who underwent spinal decompression for symptomatic lumbar stenosis by mini-open bilateral partial laminectomy technique or minimally invasive laminotomy utilizing a tubular system. Demographic and clinical data were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Postoperative disc herniation rate was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group with 2 of 237 cases (0.8%) versus 19 of 326 cases (5.8%) in the mini-open group (p = 0.002). This finding was more noticeable following multi-level procedures with no case of postdecompression disc herniation in the minimally invasive group compared to 8 of 39 cases (20.5%) in the mini-open group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The incidence of postoperative disc herniation following spinal decompression for symptomatic lumbar stenosis was 5.8% following mini-open bilateral partial laminectomy compared to only 0.8% after minimally invasive laminotomy (p = 0.002). These findings highlight the more extensive nature of mini-open surgery associated with relative segmental instability that poses a greater risk for postoperative disc herniation.

Age-related Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Lumbar Discectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar discectomy is a common and effective treatment for symptomatic disk herniation. It has been suggested that lumbar discectomy in older patients may result in poorer clinical outcomes and lesser satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to assess age-related difference in patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing lumbar discectomy for chronic low back and radicular pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy without neurological deficit underwent non-urgent single level lumbar discectomy in our institution between 2014 and 2017. Pain level (using VAS score), Oswestry Disability Index, and SF-12 scores were retrospectively reviewed and compared between younger patients (<60 years, group 1) and older patients (>60 years, group 2). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients, aged between 34-76 years participated in this study. VAS, ODI, and SF-12 scores improved significantly after the surgery for each group (P < .01). When comparing between the groups, no significant differences in the outcomes measured were found after the surgery in both early post-operative follow-up and late post-operative follow-up (P > .05). DISCUSSION: Elderly patients undergoing lumbar discectomy report a significant reduction in VAS, ODI, and SF-12 scores justifying the procedure. CONCLUSION: Lumbar discectomy improved function and decreased pain level to similar extent in both younger and older patients suffering from radicular symptoms related to lumbar disc herniation.

Bilateral traumatic C6-C7 facet dislocation with C6 spondyloptosis and large disk sequestration in a neurologically intact patient.

Traumatic cervical spondyloptosis is an uncommon and severe form of facet joint dislocation that commonly leads to severe neurological damage. Decision making regarding the reduction and fixation technique is challenging, especially when a patient is neurologically intact, since an undiagnosed prolapsed disk at the involved level may lead to severe neurological consequences during reduction. A 24-year-old male was admitted after sustaining a severe direct axial blow to his head. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed an acute C6C7 fracture dislocation with spondyloptosis of C6 vertebra and a large disk fragment posterior to C6 vertebral body. The patient was neurologically intact, apart from mild bilateral numbness over C6 distribution. The patient underwent C6 corpectomy to avoid acute cord compression related to the large sequestered disk behind C6 vertebra. Following C6 corpectomy, we were unable to exert enough axial pull to reduce the facet dislocation through the anterior approach. Therefore, the reduction was performed through a posterior approach with C5T1 posterior fusion, followed by anterior cage placement and C5-7 anterior fusion (front-back-front approach). At postoperative follow-up of 24 months, the patient demonstrated a full and pain-free cervical range-of-motion and remained neurologically intact. Follow-up radiographs of the cervical spine demonstrated good instrumental alignment with solid fusion at 6-month follow-up.

A Novel Spine Fixation System Made Entirely of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced PEEK Composite: An In Vitro Mechanical Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Semirigid spine fixation systems utilizing nonmetallic materials have emerged as a promising innovation to overcome the inherent disadvantages of metal instrumentation in spine surgery. This study tests the mechanical properties of a novel spine fixation system made entirely of carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFR-PEEK) composite material (CarboClear System, CarboFix Orthopedics Ltd., Israel). METHODS: An in vitro mechanical evaluation of the CFR-PEEK CarboClear system was conducted in compliance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F1717, F2193, and F543 standards. RESULTS: The mean bending yield load, bending ultimate load, and bending stiffness of the construct were 322 N, 363 N, and 45 N/mm, respectively. All tested samples completed 5 × 106 dynamic cycles successfully, with no evidence of fatigue failure at increasing load levels, up to 83% of ultimate bending load. The mean torsional stiffness was 1.0 Nm/deg and the mean screw axial pull-out strength was 2,037 N. CONCLUSION: The CarboClear Pedicle Screw System has mechanical properties comparable to those of other commonly used titanium-made systems, with superior fatigue properties. The fatigue resistance, modulus of elasticity which is very similar to that of bone, radiolucency, and CT/MRI artifact-free feature of this spine fixation system made entirely of CFR-PEEK may offer advantages over traditional spine fixation systems made of metal alloys.

A Reimbursement System Based on a 48-Hour Target Time for Surgery Shortens the Waiting Time for Hip Fracture Fixation in Elderly Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a pay-for-performance reimbursement system, aimed at expediting surgical fixation of hip fractures in elderly patients, has, in fact, succeeded in shortening the waiting time for surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Academic Level II trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty patients older than 70 years with femoral neck fractures (OTA/AO 31 A1-A3). INTERVENTION: Implementation of a reimbursement system which incentivizes meeting a 48-hour target time for surgical fixation of hip fractures in elderly patients. METHODS: Medical records of 75 consecutive patients operated on 1 year before the implementation of the reimbursement system were compared with records of 75 consecutive patients operated on 1 year after the implementation of the reimbursement system. The collected data included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, time from injury to hospital admission, time from admission to surgery, reason for surgical delay beyond 48 hours, perioperative complication rate, and length of postoperative hospitalization. RESULTS: Patients' mean age, sex distribution, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, and time from injury to hospital admission were similar in both groups. The average waiting time for surgery shortened from a mean of 77 hours before implementing the reimbursement system to 28 hours after the implementation (P < 0.001). Before the reimbursement system implementation, 41% of the surgeries were delayed beyond 48 hours due to medical causes, compared with 20% only after the implementation (P < 0.001). Fewer patients developed perioperative complications in the postimplementation group in comparison with the preimplementation group (9% vs. 13%, respectively); however, because the study was not powered to examine differences in complication rate, the significance of this difference remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS: A reimbursement system which incentivizes meeting a 48-hour target time for surgery has led to a substantial shortening in the waiting time for surgical fixation of hip fractures in elderly patients in our institution.

[WAITING TIME FOR SURGICAL FIXATION OF FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES: DOES A DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUP PAYMENT METHOD MATTER?]

BACKGROUND: Early surgical fixation of femoral neck factures in elderly patients has been suggested to decrease morbidity and mortality and to improve treatment outcome. This study evaluates the effect of the implementation of a diagnosis-related group payment method in our hospital on waiting time for surgery and the short-term outcomes of elderly patients following surgical fixation of hip fractures. METHODS: Demographic and clinical characteristics of 75 consecutive patients, who underwent surgery for hip fracture in our hospital, before the implementation of a diagnosis-related group payment method, were compared with those of 75 consecutive patients, who were operated on after the implementation of the payment system. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar for both groups. Before the implementation of a diagnosis-related group payment method, 84% of the patients waited longer than 48 hours for surgery, compared to only 24% of patients after the implementation (p<0.001). Medical considerations and operation room availability were the main reasons for delaying surgery in both groups. Mortality and morbidity rates during the hospital stay remained similar, regardless of the implementation of the payment method. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a diagnosis-related group payment method shortened the waiting time for surgical hip fixation in elderly patients treated in our hospital, with no effect on the mortality and complication rate during the hospital stay.

Local implantation of autologous adipose-derived stem cells increases femoral strength and bone density in osteoporotic rats: A randomized controlled animal study.

BACKGROUND: Deficient osteogenic capacity of bone marrow stem cells plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have emerged as a promising source of skeletal progenitor cells. The capacity of ADSCs to undergo osteogenic differentiation and induce mineralized tissue formation may be beneficial in the treatment of osteoporosis. We question whether administration of autologous ADSCs into the proximal femur of osteoporotic rats will induce osteogenesis and enhance bone quality and strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty ovariectomized female rats were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups: (1) percutanous implantation of autogenous ADSCs-seeded scaffold into the proximal femur and (2) percutanous implantation of non-seeded scaffold. The contralateral untreated femur served as control. The effect of treatment on bone characteristics was assessed at 12-week follow-up by micro-computed tomography analysis, mechanical testing, and histological analysis. RESULTS: The mean cortical thickness, total bone volume density, and bone load to failure in femora injected with autologous ADSCs-seeded scaffold was significantly higher compared to femora injected with non-seeded scaffold and compared to the untreated control femora ( p < 0.01). Histological examination of the injected specimens revealed complete osseo-integration of the scaffolds with direct conversion of the ADSCs into osteoblasts and no inflammatory response. CONCLUSIONS: Autogenous ADSCs implantation into the proximal femur of rats with ovariectomy-related osteoporosis promoted bone regeneration and increased bone strength at short-term follow-up. These findings highlight the potential benefit of autogenous ADSCs in the treatment of osteoporosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial, animal study.

Primary shoulder arthroplasty using a custom-made hip-inspired implant for the treatment of advanced glenohumeral arthritis in the presence of severe glenoid bone loss.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis with severe glenoid bone loss poses a unique challenge for shoulder surgeons. Current surgical solutions are limited and associated with high complication rates. We hypothesized that a custom-made computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) total shoulder replacement (TSR; Stanmore Implants Worldwide, Elstree, UK) resembling a total hip prosthesis could offer a reliable alternative for this challenging subset of patients. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with rotator cuff-deficient end-stage glenohumeral arthritis and severe glenoid bone loss (assessed as not amenable to treatment with standard anatomic or reverse total shoulder implants) were treated with the CAD-CAM TSR between 2006 and 2013. Clinical data were collected prospectively and analyzed at a mean follow-up of 5 years. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the pain level with activity decreased from 9.2 ± 1.7 to 2.4 ± 2.9 (P < .001). The Oxford Shoulder Score improved from 11 ± 8 points to 27 ± 11 points (P < .001), and the Subjective Shoulder Value (on a 0%-100% scale) improved from 23% ± 14% to 60% ± 24% (P < .001). Active forward elevation improved from 39° ± 23° to 63° ± 38° (P < .001), and external rotation improved from 6° ± 16° to 15° ± 17° (P = .001). Component revision was required in 6 of 37 patients (16%) (glenoid loosening in 1, humeral stem loosening in 3, periprosthetic fracture in 1, and prosthesis dislocation in 1). CONCLUSION: The CAD-CAM TSR offers a reliable alternative for the treatment of end-stage glenohumeral arthritis with severe glenoid deficiency not amenable to standard anatomic or reverse total shoulder implants, with maintenance of significant pain relief and clinical-functional improvement at 5-year postoperative follow-up.

Staged Correction of Severe Thoracic Kyphosis in Patients with Multilevel Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Study Design Technical report. Objective Multilevel osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures may lead to considerable thoracic deformity and sagittal imbalance, which may necessitate surgical intervention. Correction of advanced thoracic kyphosis in patients with severe osteoporosis remains challenging, with a high rate of failure. This study describes a surgical technique of staged vertebral augmentation with osteotomies for the treatment of advanced thoracic kyphosis in patients with osteoporotic multilevel vertebral compression fractures. Methods Five patients (average age 62 ± 6 years) with multilevel osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and severe symptomatic thoracic kyphosis underwent staged vertebral augmentation and surgical correction of their sagittal deformity. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed retrospectively at a mean postoperative follow-up of 34 months. Results Patients' self-reported back pain decreased from 7.2 ± 0.8 to 3.0 ± 0.7 (0 to 10 numerical scale; p < 0.001). Patients' back-related disability decreased from 60 ± 10% to 29 ± 10% (0 to 100% Oswestry Disability Index; p < 0.001). Thoracic kyphosis was corrected from 89 ± 5 degrees to 40 ± 4 degrees (p < 0.001), and the sagittal vertical axis was corrected from 112 ± 83 mm to 38 ± 23 mm (p = 0.058). One patient had cement leakage without subsequent neurologic deficit. Decreased blood pressure was observed in another patient during the cement injection. No correction loss, hardware failure, or neurologic deficiency was seen in the other patients. Conclusion The surgical technique described here, despite its complexity, may offer a safe and effective method for the treatment of advanced thoracic kyphosis in patients with osteoporotic multilevel vertebral compression fractures.

Diagnosis and treatment of a rectal-cutaneous fistula: a rare complication of coccygectomy.

BACKGROUND: Coccygectomy may be indicated for the treatment of debilitating coccygodynia unresponsive to non-operative treatment. Perineal contamination and postoperative wound infection following coccygectomy remains a major concern. We present a rare post-coccygectomy complication of rectal-cutaneous fistula. To our knowledge no such case has been previously described. CASE PRESENTATION: A 24-year-old woman presented with recurrent wound infections 1 year after coccygectomy at another institution, which persisted despite two surgical debridements and antibiotic treatment. Wound cultures showed non-specific poly-microbial bacterial growth. MRI scan of the spine and pelvis revealed a sinus track and soft tissue edema with no evidence of abscess or osteomyelitis. Methylene blue injection to the sinus tract confirmed the presence of a rectal-cutaneous fistula. The patient underwent further debridement, fistulectomy and synchronous defunctioning colostomy and resection of the involved colon segment. The wound healed by secondary intention with complete resolution of the infection. Re-anastomosis and closure of the colostomy was performed 6 months later. At 2-year follow-up, the patient had no signs of infection and her initial coccygeal symptoms had improved. CONCLUSION: Postoperative infection following coccygectomy remains a major concern. A discharging sinus at the surgical site may suggest the presence of a rectal-cutaneous fistula, which requires a combined approach of spinal and colorectal surgeons. Methylene blue injection to the sinus tract may facilitate the diagnosis of a rectal-cutaneous fistula.

Upper limb kinematics after arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder joint stability mediated by proprioception is often quantified by arm repositioning tests (i.e., static end-position accuracy), overlooking ongoing movement quality. This study assessed movement quality by adopting smoothness-related kinematic descriptors. We compared performance of healthy controls with that of patients in arthroscopic shoulder stabilization and open shoulder stabilization groups. We hypothesized that arm kinematics after arthroscopic intervention would more closely resemble healthy movements compared with patients after open shoulder stabilization surgery. METHODS: Healthy controls (N = 14) were compared with patients after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization (N = 10) and open shoulder stabilization (N = 12). Right-hand dominant subjects (the affected side in patients) performed 135 unconstrained 3-dimensional pointing movements toward visual targets (seen through pinhole goggles; i.e., no arm vision). Arm kinematic data were recorded and offline analyzed to obtain hand tangential velocity profiles further used to compute the acceleration-to-movement time ratio, peak-to-mean velocity ratio, and number of velocity peaks ("symmetry," "proportion," and "fragmentation" features, respectively). Parametric and nonparametric statistics were used for comparisons (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: Control and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization groups presented similar acceleration-to-movement time ratio and peak-to-mean velocity ratio. Both groups differed from the open shoulder stabilization group (P = .001). Distributions of velocity peaks for control and arthroscopic shoulder stabilization groups were similar, whereas open shoulder stabilization and control subjects differed significantly (P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Movement quality mediated by proprioception in arthroscopic shoulder stabilization patients matches that of healthy controls, whereas performance in open shoulder stabilization patients seems inferior compared with that in healthy controls, as assessed by smoothness-related measures (less symmetrical, more fragmented movements).

Bilateral reconstructive costoplasty for razorback deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Correcting the chest wall deformity is an important goal of scoliosis surgery. A prominent rib hump deformity may not be adequately addressed by scoliosis correction alone. It has been shown that costoplasty in conjugation with scoliosis correction and instrumented spinal fusion is superior to spinal fusion alone in addressing the chest wall deformity. In cases of severe rib hump deformity unilateral convex side costoplasty alone might not adequately restore thoracic cage symmetry necessitating for additional concave side rib cage reconstruction. CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old male with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and a sharp, cosmetically unacceptable, prominent rib hump (razorback deformity) underwent scoliosis correction with posterior spinal fusion and bilateral costoplasty. The convex-sided ribs were resected and used for concave-sided rib reconstruction. The rib hump height was reduced from 70 mm before the procedure to 10 mm after the procedure and the apical trunk rotation was reduced from 36° to 5°, respectively. Solid spinal fusion and ribs union was achieved. The patient remained very satisfied with no loss of correction at 2-year postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSION: Bilateral costoplasty in conjugation with scoliosis correction may provide a safe and effective method for the treatment of severe rib cage deformities associated with thoracic scoliosis. It should be considered in the presence of prominent rib hump deformity, where scoliosis correction alone or with unilateral costoplasty is unlikely to provide adequate correction.

No gender-related bias in acute musculoskeletal pain management in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Patients' gender remains a contributor for bias in pain management. Implementation of standardised analgesic protocols has been shown to minimise bias in analgesic care. The purpose of this study was to assess whether gender-related bias in pain management exists in our emergency department (ED) setting, where a standardised pain management protocol based on patients' subjective pain rating is routinely used. METHODS: Pain management measures (ie, analgesia administration, waiting time for analgesia, pain relief and patients' satisfaction) were prospectively assessed in 328 patients (150 women and 178 men, average age 36±18 years) who were treated in our ED for acute musculoskeletal pain. RESULTS: Patients' subjective pain rating on arrival were similar for men and women (59±24 mm vs 61±26 mm, respectively; p=0.47). Interestingly, physicians using the same scale assessed the women's pain level to be higher than that of men (75±25 mm vs 63±22 mm, respectively; p<0.001) and higher than that of women's subjective pain rating (75±25 mm vs 61±26 mm respectively; p<0.001). Nevertheless, the rates of analgesia administration, waiting time for analgesia, pain relief and patient satisfaction were similar for both genders. Physicians' own gender did not affect analgesic care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a standardised pain management protocol based on patients' subjective pain rating may reduce gender-related bias in acute musculoskeletal pain management.

Posterior-only correction of Scheuermann kyphosis using pedicle screws: economical optimization through screw density reduction.

INTRODUCTION: Posterior-only approach using pedicle screws' fixation has emerged as the preferred surgical technique for Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) correction. Insertion of multiple pedicle screws while increasing stability increases also the risk of complications related to screw malpositioning and surgical cost. The optimal screw density required in surgical correction of SK remains unclear. This study compares the safety and efficacy of low screw density (LSD) versus high screw density (HSD) technique used in posterior-only correction of SK. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent surgical correction of SK between 2007 and 2011 and were reviewed after a mean of 29 months. HSD technique (i.e., 100 % of available pedicles, averaged 25.2 ± 4 screws) was used in 10 cases and LSD technique (i.e., 54-69 % of available pedicles in a pre-determined pattern, averaged 16.8 ± 1.3 screws; p < 0.001) was used in 11 cases. Kyphosis correction was assessed by comparing thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Cost saving analysis was performed for each group. RESULTS: Preoperative thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance were similar for both groups. The average postoperative kyphosis correction was similar in both HSD and LSD groups (29° ± 9° vs. 34° ± 6°, respectively; p = 0.14). Complication occurred in four patients (19 %) in the HSD group and in two patients (9 %) in the LSD group (p = 0.56). Three patients required re-operation. Compared to HSD using LSD saves 4,200 pounds sterling per patient in hardware and 88,200 pounds sterling for the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: LSD technique is as safe and effective as HSD technique in posterior-only correction of SK. Implant-related cost could be reduced by 32 %.

Clinical outcome after reconstruction for sternoclavicular joint instability using a sternocleidomastoid tendon graft.

BACKGROUND: Anterior instability of the sternoclavicular joint is uncommon and usually follows a benign course, although symptomatic patients may require surgical intervention. The optimal treatment for symptomatic instability of the sternoclavicular joint remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome after reconstruction of the sternoclavicular joint with use of a sternocleidomastoid tendon graft to treat chronic debilitating anterior instability of the sternoclavicular joint. METHODS: Thirty-two patients underwent surgical reconstruction of the sternoclavicular joint for chronic debilitating anterior instability using the tendon of the sternal head of the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle and were followed for a mean of forty-four months. The etiology of instability was posttraumatic in fourteen patients, generalized hyperlaxity in seven patients, and degenerative instability in eleven patients. Outcome measures included the Oxford instability shoulder score, subjective shoulder value, pain rating, and postoperative grading of sternoclavicular joint stability. RESULTS: Clinical scores and pain rating were similar for the three groups before surgery and improved significantly in all of the groups to the same extent after the surgery. At the time of the latest follow-up, eleven of fourteen patients in the posttraumatic group, six of seven patients in the generalized hyperlaxity group, and eight of eleven patients in the degenerative group reported the sternoclavicular joint as stable with no functional limitation. Two patients reported that the joint remained unstable. No other complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Sternoclavicular joint reconstruction using a sternocleidomastoid tendon graft is safe and offers reliable pain relief and functional improvement for patients with chronic debilitating anterior instability of the sternoclavicular joint.

Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss. Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Glenoid reconstruction and inverted glenoid re-implantation is strongly advocated in revisions of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Nevertheless, severe glenoid deficiency may preclude glenoid reconstruction and may dictate less favorable solutions, such as conversion to hemiarthropasty or resection arthropasty. The CAD/CAM shoulder (Stanmore Implants, Elstree, UK), a hip arthroplasty-inspired implant, may facilitate glenoid component fixation in these challenging revisions where glenoid reconstruction is not feasible. We questioned (1) whether revision arthroplasty with the CAD/CAM shoulder would alleviate pain and improve shoulder function in patients with failed RSA, not amenable to glenoid reconstruction, (2) whether the CAD/CAM hip-inspired glenoid shell would enable secure and durable glenoid component fixation in these challenging revisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 11 patients with failed RSAs and unreconstructable glenoids underwent revision with the CAD/CAM shoulder and were followed-up for mean 35 (28-42) months. Clinical outcomes included the Oxford shoulder score, subjective shoulder value, pain rating, physical examination, and shoulder radiographs. RESULTS: The average Oxford shoulder score and subjective shoulder value improved statistically significantly after the revision from 50 to 33 points and from 17% to 48% respectively. Pain rating at rest and during activity improved significantly from 5.3 to 2.3 and from 8.1 to 3.8 respectively. Active forward flexion increased from 25 to 54 degrees and external rotation increased from 9 to 21 degrees. 4 patients required reoperation for postoperative complications. No cases of glenoid loosening occurred. INTERPRETATION: The CAD/CAM shoulder offers an alternative solution for the treatment of failed RSA that is not amenable to glenoid reconstruction.

Increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of failed post-traumatic humeral head replacement.

BACKGROUND: Late complications after humeral head replacement (HHR) for comminuted proximal humeral fractures are common and may necessitate revision surgery. This study evaluated the outcome of revision surgery of failed post-traumatic HHR with a less medialized reverse shoulder prosthesis. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with failed post-traumatic HHR due to rotator-cuff insufficiency and glenoid erosion, but with sufficient preservation of the glenoid bone stock to permit primary stability of an inverted glenoid implant, underwent revision using the Bayley-Walker reverse shoulder prosthesis (Stanmore Implants, Elstree, UK) and were monitored up for a mean of 31 months. Outcome measures included the Oxford Shoulder Score, subjective shoulder value, pain rating, active range of motion, and shoulder radiographs. RESULTS: The average postrevision Oxford Shoulder Score and subjective shoulder value improved from 50 ± 6 to 29 ± 11 and from 23 ± 19 to 51 ± 23, respectively (P < .001). Pain level decreased from 6.2 ± 2.1 to 1.4 ± 2.0 (P < .001). Active forward flexion increased from 34° ± 22° to 63° ± 30° and external rotation from 11° ± 14° to 20° ± 16°(P < .01). More patients were able to use their affected arm to reach a functional triangle consisting the mouth, opposite armpit, and ipsilateral buttock after revision (24% vs 73%; P < .001). Seven patients (21%) had postrevision complications. No glenoid loosening or scapular notching occurred. CONCLUSION: Revision of failed post-traumatic HHR with the Bayley-Walker shoulder offers reliable pain relief and improvement in shoulder function with a complication rate similar to other reverse prostheses. Nevertheless, revision shoulder arthroplasty remains challenging with a high rate of complications.

Revision arthroplasty with a hip-inspired computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing implant for glenoid-deficient shoulders.

BACKGROUND: Revision arthroplasty for failed post-traumatic humeral head replacement associated with rotator cuff and glenoid deficiency is challenging. Current surgical solutions are fraught with complications, and no best-practice strategy has been established. We hypothesized that the computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) shoulder (Stanmore Implants, Elstree, UK), a total shoulder design resembling a total hip prosthesis, can offer a reliable alternative in this surgically challenging subset of patients with rotator cuff deficiency and advanced glenoid bone loss. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with failed post-traumatic humeral head replacement associated with rotator cuff and glenoid deficiency underwent revision with CAD/CAM shoulders between 2005 and 2010. Clinical data were collected prospectively and analyzed at a mean follow-up of 3 years. RESULTS: After revision, the pain rating at rest (on a 0-10 numerical scale) decreased from 5.6 ± 1.3 to 1.1 ± 1.3 (P < .001) and pain during activity decreased from 7.4 ± 1.2 to 2.1 ± 1.8 (P < .001). The Oxford shoulder score improved from 47 ± 6 to 31 ± 9 (P < .001), and the subjective shoulder value (on a 0%-100% scale) improved from 22% ± 14% to 45% ± 18% (P < .001). Active shoulder range of motion was similar before and after revision. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients and included 1 infection, 2 periprosthetic fractures, 2 prosthetic dislocations, and 4 fixation screw fractures. No case of glenoid loosening occurred. CONCLUSION: The CAD/CAM shoulder offers a reliable method of securing a glenoid component in shoulders with advanced glenoid deficiency and should be considered as an alternative to other surgical methods in these challenging cases. At 3 years' follow-up, pain and clinical scores improved significantly and no case of glenoid loosening occurred.

Anxiolytic medication as an adjunct to morphine analgesia for acute low back pain management in the emergency department: a prospective randomized trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-blinded, and randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the added benefit of promethazine administration as an anxiolytic adjunct to morphine analgesia in reducing acute low back pain (LBP) compared with morphine alone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Acute LBP is one of the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits. The optimal analgesic treatment for acute LBP remains controversial. Anxiety relief has been shown to improve pain management in the ED setting. We hypothesized that administration of the antihistamine promethazine as an anxiolytic adjunct to morphine analgesia will improve LBP management compared with morphine alone. METHODS: Fifty-nine adults, who were treated in our ED for severe acute LBP (visual analogue scale ≥ 70 mm), were randomly enrolled in the study. Thirty patients received slow infusion of intravenous (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg in normal saline and 29 patients received an analgesic regimen of IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg with promethazine 25 mg administered similarly. Pain and anxiety levels were subjectively assessed by the patients on a 100-mm visual analogue scale before and after treatment. Adverse event related to analgesia were recorded in real time. RESULTS: After analgesia administration patients' pain rating decreased by 43 mm in the morphine group and by 39 mm in the morphine/promethazine group (P = 0.26). Similarly, patients' anxiety decreased by 19 mm in the morphine group and by 13 mm in the morphine/promethazine group (P = 0.37). The average ED stay was 78 minutes longer in the morphine/promethazine group (P = 0.01), due to the strong sedative effect of promethazine. Patients' satisfaction and the rate of adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: IV administration of morphine-promethazine regimen for pain and anxiety relief associated with acute LBP showed no advantage compared with IV morphine alone and significantly lengthened the overall ED stay. Thus, we think that promethazine has no place in acute LBP management in the adult ED setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.