A retrospective analysis of haematological side effects of olaparib in excess-weight and normal BMI patients with ovarian cancer.

Background: Olaparib is the first poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved in Europe for the treatment of platinum-sensitive patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer with a confirmed BRCA mutation or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Epidemiological studies have shown an incompatible association between ovarian cancer and obesity, but there have also been scientific reports indicating that obesity, especially severe obesity, increases the risk of ovarian cancer. Olaparib has a wide range of side effects, especially anaemia and neutropenia, which may lead to dose reduction or therapy discontinuation. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended. The aim of the study was a retrospective analysis of threshold value of the trough concentration of olaparib (Ctrough) and haematological adverse reactions after olaparib treatment (300 mg/12 h) in excess-weight and normal body mass index (BMI) patients with ovarian cancer. Materials and methods: The pilot study was conducted on 38 ovarian cancer patients who were divided into two groups: I - normal BMI patients (BMI = 18.5-24.9 kg/m2; n = 14), II - excess-weight patients, i.e. overweight and obese patients (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2; n = 24). The severity of neutropenia and anaemia was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). The values of the mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) parameters were also taken into account. HPLC-UV method (λ = 254 nm) was applied to measure olaparib plasma concentrations. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in olaparib Ctrough between the groups - 1602.86 vs. 1567.40 ng/mL (p = 0.9156). However, the overweight and obese patients had slightly higher dose/kg-adjusted olaparib Ctrough - 204.17 vs. 159.32 ng/mL/mg/kg. The incidence of grade 1 anaemia in the groups was as follows: I - 42.86%, II - 41.67%. Grade 2 and 3 anaemia was observed only in group II - 4.17% and 8.33%, respectively. The incidence of neutropenia in the groups of patients was as follows: grade 1: group I - 21.43%, group II - 20.83%; grade 2: group I - 7.14%, group II - 4.17%. Conclusions: The incidence of haematological adverse reactions to olaparib, such as neutropenia and grade 1 anaemia in the group of overweight and obese patients was the same as in the normal BMI group. The overweight and obese patients were characterised by higher severity of haematological adverse reactions to olaparib and slightly higher dose/kg-adjusted olaparib Ctrough. After one month of treatment with olaparib the overweight and obese patients had significantly lower red blood cells (RBC) and haemoglobin (Hgb) levels than the patients with normal BMI, which may indicate that anaemia develops faster in this group of patients.

The oxidation and hypoglycaemic effect of sorafenib in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes reduces the activity of CYP3A4 and may increase the exposure for the drugs metabolized by the isoenzyme. Sorafenib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), used for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and radioactive iodine resistant thyroid carcinoma. The TKI undergoes CYP3A4-dependent oxidative transformation, which may be influenced by hyperglycaemia. The aim of the study was to compare the oxidation for sorafenib between healthy and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Additionally, the effect of sorafenib on glucose levels was investigated. METHODS: The rats were assigned to the groups: streptozotocin-induced diabetic (DG, n = 8) or healthy (HG, n = 8). The rats received sorafenib orally as a single dose of 100 mg/kg. The plasma concentrations of sorafenib and its metabolite N-oxide were measured with the validated high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. RESULTS: The difference between groups in Cmax and AUC0-t values for sorafenib were significant (p = 0.0004, p = 0.0104), and similarly for the metabolite (p = 0.0008, p = 0.0011). Greater exposure for the parent drug and analysed metabolite was achieved in diabetic group. However, the Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ ratios between the metabolite and sorafenib were similar in both groups. The significant reduction of glycaemia was observed only in the diabetic animals. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study provide evidence that diabetes significantly influence on the exposition for sorafenib and its metabolite, but similar ratios N-oxide/sorafenib for AUC and Cmax in healthy and diabetic animals suggest that oxidation of the TKI is rather unchanged. Additionally, sorafenib-associated hypoglycaemia was confirmed in diabetic animals.

The influence of a single and chronic administration of venlafaxine on tramadol pharmacokinetics in a rabbit model.

BACKGROUND: The combined use of tramadol with selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors e.g. venlafaxine may be associated with serotonin syndrome. No previous studies exist examining the influence of a weak CYP2D6 inhibitor venlafaxine on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of a single and chronic administration of venlafaxine on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol using a rabbit model. METHODS: Adult New Zealand white rabbits of both sexes (n=21) were used. Animals received 100mg of tramadol per os (one slow release tablet) and 75mg of venlafaxine (one prolonged release capsule), and were divided into four groups: control group - a single dose of tramadol alone, 1day group - a single dose of tramadol and venlafaxine, 7 and 14days groups - seven and fourteen days administration of venlafaxine once daily plus a single dose of tramadol on the last day of the study. RESULTS: Venlafaxine administration over a period of 7 and 14days resulted in faster elimination of tramadol compared to the control group: significantly higher values of k el, and lower values of t1/2kel and MRT for the 7 and 14days group were observed. Although no differences in bioavailability of tramadol were obtained. CONCLUSION: Using a rabbit model, there is no evidence that the combined administration of tramadol and venlafaxine may increase the plasma exposure of tramadol and therefore increase the risk of serotonin syndrome.

Effects of Low-Dose Escherichia coli Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Endotoxemia on Morphine Pharmacokinetics in an Animal Model.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic inflammation may change the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of opioids. However, there are insufficient data on morphine pharmacokinetics in mild inflammatory conditions. This study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of morphine during low-dose endotoxemia in rabbits. DESIGN: In two experiments (separated by a 14-day washout period), 10 rabbits received intravenous morphine at a dose of 3 mg/kg. In the second set of experiments, morphine infusion was preceded by low-dose endotoxemia induced with lipopolysaccharide (Escherichia coli 0111: B4) at a dose of 5 µg/kg. The kinetics of systemic morphine concentrations and chosen physiological parameters were measured at specific time intervals up to 6 hours after morphine administration. RESULTS: In endotoxemia, decreased elimination half-life (P = 0.017), mean residence time (P = 0.022), and volume of distribution (P = 0.037) as well as an increased elimination rate constant (P = 0.013) and total body clearance (P = 0.023) were noted. The inverse linear correlation between morphine clearance versus the percentage (%) change in body temperature and pulse rate observed under control conditions was abolished under endotoxemia. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose endotoxemia is correlated with significant alterations in morphine pharmacokinetics in rabbits, leading to the faster elimination of the drug. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These findings may have important implications in patients with low-grade inflammation and imply the need to modify morphine dosing regimens to ensure optimal analgesia. The issue warrants further experimental and clinical investigation.

In vitro - in vivo evaluation of a new oral dosage form of tramadol hydrochloride--controlled-release capsules filled with coated pellets.

The aim of this study was an in vitro - in vivo evaluation of a new oral dosage form of tramadol hydrochloride (TH), controlled-release capsules filled with coated pellets, 100 mg (TC), compared to the sustained release tablets, Tramal Retard, 100 mg (TR). In vitro release study of both formulations showed a similar release profile of TH over 8 h (f2 was 52). In vivo study (single oral, 100 mg dose administration in 8 rabbits) showed that the amount of TH absorbed into the systemic circulation after TC and TR administration was also similar (90% CI for AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity) were 90-124% and 97-109%, respectively). However, a comparison of AUC(0-t) of pharmacokinetics of TC and TR indicates significantly prolonged absorption and elimination processes of TH when the drug is given in controlled-release capsules filled with coated pellets. It was manifested by longer: mean absorption time (p = 0.0016), mean residence time (p = 0.0268), absorption half-life (p = 0.0016), elimination half-life (p = 0.0493) and lower: absorption rate constant (p = 0.0016), elimination rate constant (p = 0.0148) and total body clearance Cl/F (p = 0.0076). It may be concluded that the new TH formulation could be expected to have a more prolonged analgesic activity than commercial sustained release tablets.

Stability of calcium folinate (Teva) in concentrate after re-use and in dilute infusions in 0.9% NaCl in polyethylene bags.

The study concerned the stability of calcium folinate in concentrate in glass vials and diluted in polyethylene (PE) bags stored at 15-25 degrees C and 2-8 degrees C for up to 34 days. Original vials of calcium folinate injection (10 mg/mL, Teva) were stored at room and refrigerator temperatures and subjected to re-piercing at 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 22, 28, 30 and 34 days following the initial piercing. Calcium folinate infusions at nominal concentrations of 0.12 mg/mL were prepared in 0.9% sodium chloride (250 mL) in PE bags. Chemical stability was measured with a stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Physical stability was assessed by visual inspection in normal light. The concentration of calcium folinate at each sampling time in the analyzed solutions remained > 90% of the initial concentration, regardless of the container. No changes in color or turbidity were observed in any of the vials or in the prepared solutions. Calcium folinate, both undiluted in glass containers and diluted with NaCl 0.9% in PE bags, remains stable (< 10% degradation) for at least 30 days at room and refrigerator temperatures when protected from light.

The physical and chemical stability of cisplatin (Teva) in concentrate and diluted in sodium chloride 0.9%.

AIM OF THE STUDY: The subject of study was the stability of cisplatin in concentrate in glass vials and diluted in polyethylene (PE) bags stored at 15-25°C for up to 30 days. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Original vials of cisplatin injection (1 mg/ml, Teva) were stored at room temperature and subjected to re-piercing after 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 30 days following the initial piercing. Cisplatin infusions at nominal concentrations of 0.1 mg/ml were prepared in 0.9% sodium chloride (1000 ml) in PE bags. Chemical stability was measured by means of a stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Physical stability was assessed by visual inspection in normal light. RESULTS: The concentration of cisplatin at each sampling time in the analysed solutions remained within 92.0-100.7% of initial concentration, regardless of the container. No changes in colour or turbidity were observed in any of the vials or prepared solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin, both undiluted in glass containers and diluted with NaCl 0.9% in PE bags, remains stable (< 10% degradation) for at least 30 days at room temperature when protected from light.

Sunitinib in combination with clarithromycin or azithromycin - is there a risk of interaction or not?

BACKGROUND: Macrolides are the most widely prescribed antibiotics. Clarithromycin is a well-known inhibitor of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 and causes numerous drug interactions that are not found for azithromycin. CYP3A4 is involved in the metabolism of the new oral multikinase inhibitor sunitinib and its active N-desethyl metabolite (SU012662). This study investigated the effects of oral single dose of clarithromycin or azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib. METHODS: Rabbits were subjected to one of three study drug groups: sunitinib + clarithromycin (n = 6), sunitinib + azithromycin (n = 6), or sunitinib (n = 6). The rabbits were treated with sunitinib in the oral dose of 25 mg. Plasma concentrations of sunitinib were measured with validated HPLC method with UV detection. RESULTS: Comparison of the sunitinib C(max) for the sunitinib + clarithromycin group with that of the sunitinib group gave a ratio of 94.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) (76.1, 117.1)]; for the sunitinib + azithromycin group, the ratio was 106.2% (90% CI 85.5, 131.7). Comparison of the sunitinib AUC(0-t) of the sunitinib + clarithromycin and sunitinib + azithromycin groups with that of the sunitinib group showed ratios of 86.86% (90% CI 69.7, 108.3) and 99.8% (90% CI 80.1, 124.5), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant effect of the coadministration of clarithromycin or azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib in rabbits was found in this study.