Novel method of noninvasive ventilation supported therapeutic lavage in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis proves to relieve dyspnea, normalize pulmonary function test results and recover exercise capacity: a short communication.

Whole lung lavage (WLL) under general anesthesia with a double-lumen endobronchial intubation has remained standard treatment option for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) for over fifty years now. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as an innovative alternative, which enables safe and effective treatment. NIV support enabled cost-effective lavage of the most affected segments and resulted in restoration and long-term maintenance of exercise capacity and diffusion, without WLL related hypoxaemia, volume overload, intubation, or mechanical ventilation related complications. The study presents all details of performed procedure, including anesthesia, NIV technique and bronchoscopy, therefore this may be easily implemented into clinical practice at other centers conducting PAP treatment. We assume that presented technique of therapeutic lung lavage (TLL) with NIV support may be considered a novel PAP treatment method, however, target population who will benefit the most from such therapy modification must be assessed in large scale prospective trials.

[Comparison of technical aspects of colonoscopy in various gastroenterologic centres]. / Porównanie aspektów technicznych kolonoskopii w róznych osrodkach gastrologicznych.

There are ongoing multicenter European trials analyzing, among other factors, technical aspects of colonoscopy in various countries. The aim of the study was to compare the techniques of preparation and performance of colonoscopy in the Department of Gastroenterology at Medical University of Silesia in Katowice and other gastroenterology centers throughout Europe. The trial was conducted between January 1st 2001 and May 30th 2001 in 18 centers in 9 European countries. 307 consecutive patients, who signed consent forms, were recruited in Katowice, while 5697 patients were enrolled in other centers. The data were collected in a dedicated sheet, prepared in the coordinating center in Lausanne (Switzerland). The part concerning methods of bowel preparation was filled in before colonoscopy and the remaining questions (sedation, number of persons involved, duration, completeness, diagnosis, complications) were answered after the procedure. The data from all centers were analyzed in Lausanne and the results were sent back to the participants. The comparison of results from Katowice and other centers was performed in Katowice. We found out, that the type of cleansing the gut did not influence the quality of bowel preparation. Colonoscopy was performed under deep sedation (in the presence of anesthesiologist and anesthesiology nurse) more frequently in Katowice than in other centers. Differences between Katowice and the rest of centers in the other technical aspects of colonoscopy were of minor importance.

[Estimation of appropriateness of colonoscopy using RAND/UCLA method]. / Ocena zasadnosci przeprowadzania kolonoskopii z wykorzystaniem metody RAND/UCLA.

Multicenter European trials estimating appropriateness of colonoscopy are one of the hot topics in gastroenterology. The aim of the study was the estimation of appropriateness of colonoscopy and usefulness of panel experts criteria (elaborated according to RAND/UCLA method) in Department of Gastroenterology of Medical University of Silesia in Katowice and other gastroenterology centers throughout Europe. The trial was conducted between January 1st 2001 and May 30th 2001 in 18 centers in 9 European countries. 307 patients, who signed informed consent, were recruited in Katowice, while 5697 patients were enrolled in the other centers. The data have been collected in a prospective manner on a dedicated sheet, prepared in the coordinating centre in Lausanne (Switzerland). The part of the sheet with evaluation of appropriateness of colonoscopy was filled in before the procedure. The endoscopic (and histopathologic if necessary) diagnosis was collected after the procedure. The data from all centers were analyzed in Lausanne and the results were sent to the participants. The comparison of results from Katowice and of all the other centers was performed in Katowice. We found out, that self-estimation (made by colonoscopist), but also what is much more important the estimation done according to objective criteria of the panel of experts were significantly higher in our department, than in the other participating centers. The overestimation of self-judgment has been significantly higher in the other centers, than in our department. The higher percentage of therapeutic colonoscopies in our department can be responsible for such results.