Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vaccine ; 29 Suppl 1: A29-33, 2011 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21684425

RESUMO

In 2005, a year after highly pathogenic avian influenza outbreaks in Thailand, the Thai Government issued a National Strategy Plan for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness, a major objective of which was the domestic production of seasonal influenza vaccine. It was considered that sustained influenza vaccine production was the best guarantee of a pandemic vaccine in the event of a future pandemic. The Government decided to provide funds to establish an industrial-scale influenza vaccine production plant, and gave responsibility for this challenging project to the Government Pharmaceutical Organization (GPO). In 2007, with support from the World Health Organization (WHO), the GPO started to develop egg-based, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in a renovated pilot plant. In early 2009, during the second year of the project, the GPO turned its attention to develop a pandemic live attenuated influenza vaccine (PLAIV) against the influenza A (H1N1) virus. By December 2010, the H1N1 PLAIV had successfully completed Phase II clinical trials and was awaiting registration approval from the Thai Food and Drug Administration (TFDA). The GPO has also started to develop an H5N2 PLAIV, which is expected to enter clinical trials in January 2011. The next step in 2011 will be the development and clinical evaluation of seasonal LAIV. To meet the needs of the national seasonal influenza vaccination programme, the GPO aims to produce 2 million doses of trivalent IIV in 2012 and progressively increase production to the maximum annual capacity of 10 million doses. This article relates how influenza vaccine production capacity was developed and how major challenges are being met in an expeditious manner, with strong local and global commitment.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/provisão & distribuição , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/organização & administração , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Aprovação de Drogas , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Organização Mundial da Saúde
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17120967

RESUMO

HIV-1 viral load is a basic marker to evaluate the severity of HIV-1 related diseases and to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. A method based on real-time RT-PCR technology has been developed to quantify HIV-1 RNA using self-quenched fluorogenic primers known as LUX primers. They were used in this study to recognize a low variable gag region of subtype E and B consensus sequences. Specificity was verified by amplicon melting temperatures. An external standard curve was constructed with 10 fold serial dilutions of synthetic HIV-gag RNA. A broad range linear relationship (10 to 10(6) copies/ml) was observed between the number of PCR cycles needed to detect a fluorescent signal and the number of RNA copies. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 0.72 to 2.54% and 3.14 to 8.83%, respectively, thus indicating good reproducibility. Thirty out of fifty HIV-infected individual plasma samples were quantified by this method and compared with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 Monitor assay, which is widely considered the reference technique for HIV-RNA viral load measurement. The results indicate that the AMPLICOR HIV-1 Monitor assay and real-time RT-PCR using LUX primers are in good agreement (mean difference in log10 copies/ml+/-2 standard deviations = 0.21+/-1.34).


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/sangue , HIV-1 , RNA Viral/sangue , Carga Viral , Humanos , Padrões de Referência , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Tailândia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA