Progesterone receptor status in determining the prognosis of estrogen receptor positive/ HER2 negative breast carcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of progesterone receptor (PR) status on estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 1673 operable breast cancer patients, diagnosed from June 1984 to June 2011 were retrospectively reviewed and 400 patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors were identified and evaluated. ER-positive and HER2-negative patients were classified into two groups: group A: ER+/PR-/HER2- and group B : ER+/PR+/HER2- according to PR status. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 14.2 years (range 10.1-18.2). The ratio of postmenopausal patients was significantly higher in group A (68.2%, p=0.015). Grade 1 tumor and stage I disease were significantly higher in group B (15%, p=0.007 and 15%, p=0.005, respectively). Mean overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were significantly better in group B (15.3±1.5 years vs 8.7±0.8 years, p=0.032; 10.5±1.6 years vs 5.7±0.5 years, p=0.022) as compared with group A. Relative risk for recurrence and death were two-fold higher in group A (p=0.05 and p=0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: PR status exerts a significant impact on prognosis of ER+/HER2- breast cancer.

Sequential therapy and prognostic factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: single centre experience.

PURPOSE: In advanced stage renal cell cancer (RCC), overall survival (OS) of patients has been prolonged due to targeted therapies. To date, there are several prognostic risk models that have been developed for metastatic RCC (mRCC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the sequential therapy (IFN-α, tyrosine kinase inhibitors/TKIs, m-TOR inhibitor) and prognostic factors in patients with mRCC, especially those with bone metastasis. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the data of 82 patients with pathologically proven mRCC who were followed-up and treated at the Medical Oncology Clinic of the Dr A.Y Oncology Hospital between 2005 and 2013. RESULTS: Median OS was 23 months in all patients with mRCC and 20 months in patients treated with TKIs. According to MSKCC and HENG risk classifications, median OS differed between the groups (p=0.02, p<0.001, respectively). Median OS was lower in patients with isolated bone metastasis compared to those with lung metastasis (16 vs 24 months, p=0.25). Median OS improved with increasing number of sequential therapies (p=0.08). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the correlation between MSKCC and HENG risk models and survival data. Additionally, it was shown that increase of the number of therapeutic lines in sequential therapy prolonged survival and that bone metastases were negative prognostic factors.

The clinical and pathological features of 133 colorectal cancer patients with brain metastasis: a multicenter retrospective analysis of the Gastrointestinal Tumors Working Committee of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).

Brain metastasis in colorectal cancer is highly rare. In the present study, we aimed to determine the frequency of brain metastasis in colorectal cancer patients and to establish prognostic characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with brain metastasis. In this cross-sectional study, the medical files of colorectal cancer patients with brain metastases who were definitely diagnosed by histopathologically were retrospectively reviewed. Brain metastasis was detected in 2.7 % (n = 133) of 4,864 colorectal cancer patients. The majority of cases were male (53 %), older than 65 years (59 %), with rectum cancer (56 %), a poorly differentiated tumor (70 %); had adenocarcinoma histology (97 %), and metachronous metastasis (86 %); received chemotherapy at least once for metastatic disease before brain metastasis developed (72 %), had progression with lung metastasis before (51 %), and 26 % (n = 31) of patients with extracranial disease at time the diagnosis of brain metastasis had both lung and bone metastases. The mean follow-up duration was 51 months (range 5-92), and the mean survival was 25.8 months (95 % CI 20.4-29.3). Overall survival rates were 81 % in the first year, 42.3 % in the third year, and 15.7 % in the fifth year. In multiple variable analysis, the most important independent risk factor for overall survival was determined as the presence of lung metastasis (HR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.27-4.14; P = 0.012). Brain metastasis develops late in the period of colorectal cancer and prognosis in these patients is poor. However, early screening of brain metastases in patients with lung metastasis may improve survival outcomes with new treatment modalities.

Treatment decision plans matter in elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer: suboptimal or optimal?

PURPOSE: Aging is an important risk factor for cancer. Molecular changes and defective immunity associated with aging result in increased susceptibility to many carcinogens of the gastrointestinal system (GIS). Comorbidities and changes in drug metabolism in elderly patients make the treatment of GIS cancers difficult. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2012, a total of 790 patients diagnosed with GIS cancers were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 357 patients aged ≥ 65 years constituted the study population in which the patient characteristics, disease location, TNM stage, ECOG PS, co-morbidities, chemotherapy regimens and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: The patient median age was 71 years (range 65-94). Cancer localizations were colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer, and the pancreaticobiliary system (PBS) cancer in 178 (49.9%), 124 (34.7%), and 55 (15.4%) patients, respectively. A total of 260 (69%) patients underwent chemotherapy: 167 (64.3%) patients received optimal chemotherapy, and 93 (35.7%) suboptimal chemotherapy. The median OS was 47, 14, and 11 months in CRC, gastric, and PBS cancers, respectively. OS was better in the optimally-treated group than in the suboptimally-treated group among patients with all types of cancer. OS was 67 vs 19 months (p<0.001), 17 vs 8 months (p=0.004), and 12 vs 10 months (p=0.46) in CRC, gastric, and PBS cancers in the optimal and suboptimal chemotherapy groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the disease stage in all cancer types and optimal chemotherapy in the CRC group were important predictors of survival (p<0.001 and p=0.021, respectively). CONCLUSION: Cancer is usually in advanced stage at the time of diagnosis in these elderly patients and screening programs might improve outcomes in this age group. Patients with GIS cancers (especially CRC and gastric cancer) should be encouraged to receive optimal chemotherapy regimens.

Awareness of cancer screening during treatment of patients with renal failure: a physician survey in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Today, survival rate of patients with chronic renal failure/hemodialysis has increased so that chronic illnesses are more likely to occur. Cancer is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in such patients. AIM: In this study, physician attitudes were examined about cancer screening in patients with renal failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done by face to face questionnaire in the 27th National Nephrology Congress to determine if the physicians dealing with chronic renal failure, hemodialysis or renal transplanted patients, recommend cancer screening or not and the methods of screening for cervix, prostate, breast and colon cancer. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty six physicians were included in the survey. A total of 105 (67%) participants were male and the age of responders was 48 ± 9 years. About 29% were specialists in nephrology, 28% internal medicine, and 5% were other areas of expertise. Some 48% of participants were hemodialysis certified general practitioners. Patients were grouped as compensated chronic renal failure, hemodialysis or renal transplanted. Of the 156 responders, 128 (82%) physicians recommended breast cancer screening and the most recommended subgroup was hemodialysis patients (15%). The most preferred methods of screening were combinations of mammography, self breast examination and physician breast examination. 112 (72%) physicians recommended cervix cancer screening, and the most preferred method of screening was pap-smear. Colon cancer screening was recommended by 102 (65%) physicians and prostate screening by 109 (70%) physicians. The most preferred methods of screening were fecal occult blood test and PSA plus rectal digital test, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is not obvious whether cancer screening in renal failure patients is different from the rest of society. There is a variety of screening methods. An answer can be found to these questions as a result of studies by a common follow-up protocol and cooperation of nephrologists and oncologists.

Multicenter evaluation of patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma in Turkey: MELAS study.

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma is a cancer that demonstrates rapid progression and atypical clinically features with a poor prognosis. AIM: This study was performed to determine the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with malignant melanoma in Turkey. METHODS: The medical records of 98 patients between 2007- 2012 at our centers were retrieved from the patient registry. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In our study, with the median follow-up of all patients with cutaneous MM of 46.3 months, the median OS rate of all cases was 43.6 months and 5-year OS was 48.6%. However, five-year OS rates of patients with localized disease (stage I-II) and node involvement (stage III) were 60.3% and 39.6%, respectively. The median OS of stage IV patients was 8.7 months and 1-year OS rate was 26.2%. We showed that advanced stage, male gender, and advanced age in all patients with MM were significant prognostic factors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the results of current studies from Western countries, we found similar findings concerning demographical features, histological variables and survival analyses for our patients with cutaneous MM in Turkey.