Biomarkers to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among borderline QuantiFERON results.

BACKGROUND: Screening for tuberculosis (TB) infection often includes QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT) testing. Previous studies showed that two-thirds of patients with negative QFT results just below the cut-off, so-called borderline test results, nevertheless had other evidence of TB infection. This study aimed to identify a biomarker profile by which borderline QFT results due to TB infection can be distinguished from random test variation. METHODS: QFT supernatants of patients with a borderline (≥0.15 and <0.35 IU·mL-1), low-negative (<0.15 IU·mL-1) or positive (≥0.35 IU·mL-1) QFT result were collected in three hospitals. Bead-based multiplex assays were used to analyse 48 different cytokines, chemokines and growth factors. A prediction model was derived using LASSO regression and applied further to discriminate QFT-positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected patients from borderline QFT patients and QFT-negative patients RESULTS: QFT samples of 195 patients were collected and analysed. Global testing revealed that the levels of 10 kDa interferon (IFN)-γ-induced protein (IP-10/CXCL10), monokine induced by IFN-γ (MIG/CXCL9) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in the antigen-stimulated tubes were each significantly higher in patients with a positive QFT result compared with low-negative QFT individuals (p<0.001). A prediction model based on IP-10 and MIG proved highly accurate in discriminating patients with a positive QFT (TB infection) from uninfected individuals with a low-negative QFT (sensitivity 1.00 (95% CI 0.79-1.00) and specificity 0.95 (95% CI 0.74-1.00)). This same model predicted TB infection in 68% of 87 patients with a borderline QFT result. CONCLUSIONS: This study was able to classify borderline QFT results as likely infection-related or random. These findings support additional laboratory testing for either IP-10 or MIG following a borderline QFT result for individuals at increased risk of reactivation TB.

Trends in diagnostic methods and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in a tertiary care center from 2000 to 2017.

Screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is indicated before immunosuppressive therapies but is complicated by lack of a gold standard and limited by, e.g., immunosuppression. This study aimed to investigate a series of patients diagnosed with LTBI during screening before immunosuppressive therapy, describing how the use of diagnostic tests and treatment evolved over time. This retrospective cohort study included all individuals diagnosed with LTBI during screening before intended immunosuppressive therapy in a tertiary care hospital between January 2000 and December 2017. Evidence for LTBI, including history, tuberculin skin test (TST), QuantiFERON (QFT) result and suggestive lesions on chest radiography (CXR), and CT scan if available, was analyzed. The study included 295 individuals with LTBI, with median follow-up of 3.8 years (IQR 1.7-7.4 years). During screening, TST, QFT, and CXR were positive in 80.8%, 53.4%, and 22.7%, respectively. Chest CT revealed lesions associated with past tuberculosis infection in around 70%, significantly more frequent than CXR. In patients diagnosed with LTBI, we observed that the use of TST declined over time whereas the use of QFT increased, and that isoniazid was replaced with rifampicin as preferential treatment. Preventive treatment was started in 82.3%, of whom 88.6% completed treatment. During follow-up, no individuals developed active tuberculosis. The diagnosis of LTBI was based on history, TST, QFT, and/or CXR in nearly every possible combination, but mostly on TST and QFT. The most striking trends were the decreased use of TST, increased use of QFT, and the replacement of isoniazid with rifampicin for treatment.

Abnormalities suggestive of latent tuberculosis infection on chest radiography; how specific are they?

BACKGROUND: Several radiological features have been reported in association with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) but it has not been studied which are specific. The aim of this study was to evaluate allegedly characteristic abnormalities on chest radiography (CXR) in patients with LTBI compared to uninfected controls. METHODS: From 236 patients tested with QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT), the CXR was re-evaluated in a blinded fashion for fibrotic scarring, (non-)calcified nodules and pleural thickening. LTBI was defined as presence of a positive QFT result and/or positive tuberculin skin test result stratified by Bacille Calmette-Guérin-vaccination status. RESULTS: Any predefined abnormality of LTBI was observed in 116/236 (49.2%) patients, the frequency not being different between groups. However, the specificity for LTBI of a fibrotic scar ≥ 2 cm2 was 100% [95% CI: 92.0%-100%] and of a calcified nodule ≥1.5 mm was 95.7% [95% CI: 85.2%-99.5%]. The frequency of non-calcified nodules and pleural thickening did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Only a fibrotic scar ≥ 2 cm2 and/or a calcified nodule ≥1.5 mm were significantly associated with LTBI. This finding is clinically relevant mainly in patients who are at significant risk of TB reactivation and in whom indirect diagnostic tests may be unreliable.

Radiological Signs of Latent Tuberculosis on Chest Radiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines recommend screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) with a tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA), or both. Many also recommend chest radiography (CXR), although its added value is uncertain. This systematic review assessed the prevalence of abnormalities suggestive of LTBI on CXR (LTBI-CXR lesions) and evaluated the strength of the association. METHOD: We searched 4 databases up to September 2017 and systematically reviewed cross-sectional and cohort studies reporting LTBI-CXR lesions in individuals with a positive TST or IGRA, or both, result. Prevalence estimates were pooled using random effects models and odds ratios (ORs) were used to calculate risk estimates. RESULTS: In the 26 included studies, the pooled proportion of individuals with LTBI having LTBI-CXR lesions was 0.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.18]. In 16 studies that reported on individuals with LTBI and uninfected controls, LTBI-CXR lesions were associated with a positive TST result ≥ 5 mm or ≥ 10 mm (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.00-5.99; and OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.38-3.09, respectively) and with a positive QuantiFERON result (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.17-3.39) compared to CXR in uninfected controls. Although few studies reported specified lesions, calcified nodules were most frequently reported in individuals with LTBI (proportion, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Lesions on CXR suggestive of previous infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis were significantly associated with positive tests for LTBI, although the sensitivity was only 15%. This finding may have added value when detection of past LTBI is important but immunodiagnostic tests may be unreliable.

Borderline QuantiFERON results and the distinction between specific responses and test variability.

BACKGROUND: QuantiFERON (QFT) results near the cut-off are subject to debate. We aimed to investigate which borderline QFT results were due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)-specific responses or to test variability. METHODS: In a contact investigation, tuberculin skin test (TST), QFT and T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) were performed in 785 BCG-unvaccinated contacts. Contacts with a low-negative (<0.15), borderline (0.15-0.35), low-positive (0.35-0.70) or high-positive QFT (≥0.70 IU/mL) were compared with respect to exposure, TST and T-SPOT results. Development of active tuberculosis was assessed. RESULTS: Borderline QFT results occurred in threefold excess over test variability (p = 0.0027). In contacts with low-negative, borderline or positive QFT results, a positive TST occurred in 24.9%, 62.1% and 91.4% (p < 0.0001) and a positive T-SPOT result in 6.3%, 41.3% and 86.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Two-third (20/29) of contacts with a borderline and 14/16 (88%) with a low-positive QFT had a positive TST and/or T-SPOT, indicating probable Mtb-infection. During 12 years of follow-up, seven patients were diagnosed with active tuberculosis, two of whom after a low-positive QFT. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most borderline and low-positive QFT results were Mtb-specific, showing the biological significance of a borderline QFT. The clinical relevance, however, will be most distinct in patients who are or will be immunocompromised.