Graft versus host disease-related eosinophilic fasciitis: cohort description and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) simulating eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is an underdiagnosed and challenging complication due to the lack of knowledge about its pathogenesis, refractoriness to traditional immunosuppressive agents and their negative impact on the physical function and quality of life. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical-biological characteristics and response to treatment of a case series and to provide a comprehensive literature review on cGVHD related EF involvement. METHODS: Prospective observational study to describe the clinical and diagnostic evaluation characteristics of patients with EF-like follow-up as part of our multidisciplinary cGVHD consultations. In addition, the literature on joint and/or fascial musculoskeletal manifestations due to cGVHD was comprehensively reviewed. RESULTS: 118 patients were evaluated in multidisciplinary cGVHD consultations, 39 of whom (33%) developed fasciitis. Notably, 11 patients had isolated joint contractures without sclerotic skin. After a median of three lines of treatment, the vast majority of patients achieved some degree of response. 94 potentially eligible articles were identified by the search strategy, with 17 of them, the majority isolated case reports, making the final selection. The validated staging scales used for the assessment were the Joint and Fascial Score and the Photographic Range of Motion. CONCLUSION: Fascial/articular involvement needs to be recognized and evaluated early. To our knowledge, our cohort is the second largest series to have been reported. Literature addressing fascial/joints complications related to cGVHD is scarce. The search for new biomarkers, the use of advanced imaging techniques and multidisciplinary approach may help improve the prognosis of patients with cGVHD.

Population pharmacokinetics of a posaconazole tablet formulation in transplant adult allogeneic stem cell recipients.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is an antifungal agent extensively used as a prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. Low posaconazole concentrations have been associated with reduced clinical response. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model of a posaconazole tablet formulation in allogeneic SCT adult recipients for supporting model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). MATERIALS AND METHOD: Prospective observational study performed in adult allogeneic SCT recipients receiving posaconazole as prophylaxis for IFIs and followed up by a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program. Posaconazole plasma concentrations were quantified using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) with UV detector. A popPK model was developed using NONMEM v.7.4.0. Deterministic and stochastic simulations were carried out with the final model to evaluate the differences across physiological variables with impact on drug exposure. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with sequential absorption (zero and first order) and first order elimination described adequately 55 posaconazole concentrations from 36 patients. Higher doses of posaconazole were found to be required by males and patients with lower values of total serum proteins. A nomogram to estimate the posaconazole daily dose based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) criterion for males and females for different values of total proteins was developed. CONCLUSIONS: Gender and total serum proteins have been identified as covariates influencing posaconazole CL/F in adult allogeneic SCT recipients receiving the delay-released tablet formulation. Additional studies are required to better characterize the absorption of posaconazole and implications on dosage recommendations together with potential safety concerns.

Recommendations for screening, monitoring, prevention, and prophylaxis of infections in adult and pediatric patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy: a position paper.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is one of the most promising emerging treatments for B-cell malignancies. Recently, two CAR T-cell products (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel) have been approved for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia; many other CAR-T constructs are in research for both hematological and non-hematological diseases. Most of the patients receiving CAR-T therapy will develop fever at some point after infusion, mainly due to cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The onset of CRS is often indistinguishable from an infection, which makes management of these patients challenging. In addition to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy and CAR T cells, the treatment of complications with corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab increases the risk of infection in these patients. Data regarding incidence, risk factors and prevention of infections in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy are scarce. To assist in patient care, a multidisciplinary team from hospitals designated by the Spanish Ministry of Health to perform CAR-T therapy prepared these recommendations. We reviewed the literature on the incidence, risk factors, and management of infections in adult and pediatric patients receiving CAR-T cell treatment. Recommendations cover different areas: monitoring and treatment of hypogammaglobulinemia, prevention, prophylaxis, and management of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections as well as vaccination prior and after CAR-T cell therapy.

Assessing the impact on intestinal microbiome and clinical outcomes of antibiotherapy optimisation strategies in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: study protocol for the prospective multicentre OptimBioma study.

INTRODUCTION: Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a life-saving treatment for a number of haematological diseases. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is its main complication and hampers survival. There is strong evidence that intestinal microbiota diversity of the recipient may increase the risk of GVHD worsening survival. Antibiotic regimens used during the early phase of the transplant may influence clinical outcomes by reducing intestinal microbiota diversity. Present guidelines of European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia exhort to optimising antibiotic use in haematological patients including HSCT recipients. The present study aims to investigate if, in HSCT recipients, the optimisation of antibacterial use may preserve intestinal microbiota composition reducing the incidence and severity of acute GVHD and improving relevant clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective longitudinal observational study of two cohorts of HSCT recipients: (1) the intervention cohort includes patients treated in centres in which a predefined strategy of antibiotherapy optimisation is implemented, with the objective of optimising and reducing antibiotic administration according to clinical criteria and (2) the control cohort includes patients treated in centres in which a classic permissive strategy of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment is used. Adult patient receiving a first HSCT as a treatment for any haematological condition are included. Clinical variables are prospectively recorded and up to five faecal samples are collected for microbiota characterisation at prestablished peritransplant time points. Patients are followed since the preconditioning phase throughout 1-year post-transplant and four follow-up visits are scheduled. Faecal microbiota composition and diversity will be compared between both cohorts along with acute GVHD incidence and severity, severe infections rate, mortality and overall and disease-free survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved between 2017 and 2018 by the Ethical Committees of participant centres. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and national and international scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03727113.

Optimisation of empirical antimicrobial therapy in patients with haematological malignancies and febrile neutropenia (How Long study): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 4 trial.

BACKGROUND: Continuation of empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for febrile neutropenia in patients with haematological malignancies until neutrophil recovery could prolong the therapy unnecessarily. We aimed to establish whether EAT discontinuation driven by a clinical approach regardless of neutrophil recovery would optimise the duration of therapy. METHODS: We did an investigator-driven, superiority, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 4 clinical trial in six academic hospitals in Spain. Eligible patients were adults with haematological malignancies or haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients, with high-risk febrile neutropenia without aetiological diagnosis. An independent, computer-generated randomisation sequence was used to randomly enrol patients (1:1) to the experimental or control group. Investigators were masked to assignment only before randomisation. EAT based on an antipseudomonal ß-lactam drug as monotherapy (ceftazidime or cefepime, meropenem or imipenem, or piperacillin-tazobactam) or as combination therapy (with an aminoglycoside, fluoroquinolone, or glycopeptide) was started according to local protocols and following international guidelines and recommendations. For the experimental group, EAT was withdrawn after 72 h or more of apyrexia plus clinical recovery; for the control group, treatment was withdrawn when the neutrophil count was also 0·5 × 109 cells per L or higher. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of EAT-free days. Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01581333. FINDINGS: Between April 10, 2012, and May 31, 2016, 157 episodes among 709 patients assessed for eligibility were included in analyses. 78 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group and 79 to the control group. The mean number of EAT-free days was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (16·1 [SD 6·3] vs 13·6 [7·2], absolute difference -2·4 [95% CI -4·6 to -0·3]; p=0·026). 636 adverse events were reported (341 in the experimental group vs 295 in the control group; p=0·057) and most (580 [91%]; 323 in the experimental group vs 257 in the control group) were considered mild or moderate (grade 1-2). The most common adverse events in the experimental versus the control group were mucositis (28 [36%] of 78 patients vs 20 [25%] of 79 patients), diarrhoea (23 [29%] of 78 vs 24 [30%] of 79), and nausea and vomiting (20 [26%] of 78 vs 22 [28%] of 79). 56 severe adverse events were reported, 18 in the experimental group and 38 in the control group. One patient died in the experimental group (from hepatic veno-occlusive disease after an allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation) and three died in the control group (one from multiorgan failure, one from invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and one from a post-chemotherapy intestinal perforation). INTERPRETATION: In high-risk patients with haematological malignancies and febrile neutropenia, EAT can be discontinued after 72 h of apyrexia and clinical recovery irrespective of their neutrophil count. This clinical approach reduces unnecessary exposure to antimicrobials and it is safe. FUNDING: Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Economy (PI11/02674).

Posicionamiento y actitudes de manejo sobre la profilaxis antifúngica en el paciente hematológico (proyecto PROMIC) / Consensus opinion on antifungal prophylaxis in haematologic patients: Results of the PROMIC project

Introducción. La enfermedad fúngica invasora (EFI) es una importante causa de morbimortalidad en pacientes hematológicos. La profilaxis antifúngica (PAF) está indicada en muchos episodios de este grupo de pacientes. El objetivo de este trabajo fue alcanzar un consenso sobre el abordaje profiláctico de las EFI en el paciente hematológico con el fin de optimizar su manejo. Métodos. Un comité de expertos en hematología y enfermedades infecciosas planteó un cuestionario de 79 ítems con aspectos controvertidos sobre la profilaxis antifúngica en el paciente hematológico. El cuestionario fue evaluado en dos rondas por un panel de expertos siguiendo una metodología Delphi modificada. Resultados. El cuestionario fue respondido por 44 expertos en hematología y enfermedades infecciosas. Tras dos rondas de evaluación se consensuaron 48 ítems en el acuerdo (60,7%) y 19 en el desacuerdo (24%) por lo que hubo consenso en 67 de los 79 ítems planteados (84,8%). Se consensuaron los perfiles de pacientes candidatos a profilaxis y se dilucidaron cuestiones relacionadas con indicaciones, mecanismos de acción, espectro de actividad, toxicidad e interacciones de los antifúngicos. Se analizó particularmente la utilidad de micafungina como profilaxis de EFI. Se consensuó que micafungina es un antifúngico a considerar en este contexto. Puede presentar ventajas sobre otros antifúngicos por su seguridad y menor potencial de interacciones. Conclusiones. Se encontró un alto nivel de consenso en el manejo de la profilaxis de la EFI en el paciente hematológico. Este consenso ofrece indicaciones prácticas sobre su manejo óptimo y puede ayudar a determinar el perfil de los pacientes idóneos a recibir este tipo de intervención (AU)

Introduction. Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in haematological patients. Antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) is indicated for a number of clinical scenarios in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on IFD prophylaxis in haematological patients in order to optimize their management. Methods. A committee of experts in haematology and infectious diseases compiled a survey of 79 items with controversial aspects about antifungal prophylaxis in haematological patients. The survey was evaluated in two rounds by a panel of experts following a modified Delphi methodology. Results. Forty-four experts in haematology and infectious diseases answered the survey. After two evaluation rounds, consensus was reached in 67 of the 79 items (84.8%), specifically 48 items were consensually agreed on (60.7%) and 19 were disagreed on (24.0%). Consensus was reached on prophylaxis candidates profiles and questions related to indications, mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, toxicity and interactions of antifungal were elucidated. The usefulness of micafungin in IFD prophylaxis was particularly analysed. The consensus reached was that micafungin is an antifungal to be considered in this context as its safety profile and lower interaction potential may be advantageous. Conclusions. A broad consensus was found in the management of IFD prophylaxis in the haematological patient. This consensus provides practical indications about its optimal management and can help determine the profile of patients eligible for this type of intervention (AU)

[Bacteraemia and infection of the vascular catheter in the haematology patient: positioning and management based on the Delphi method]. / Bacteriemia e infección del catéter vascular en el ámbito hematológico: posicionamiento y actitudes de manejo basados en el método Delphi.

OBJECTIVE: Infectious complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in haematological patients with febrile neutropenia. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus document of recommendations to optimize the management of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological or vascular catheter infections in areas where there is no solid scientific evidence. METHODS: After reviewing the scientific evidence, a scientific committee composed of experts in haematology and infectious diseases developed a survey with 55 statements. A two- round modified Delphi method was used to achieve consensus. RESULTS: The online survey was answered by 52 experts in the field of haematology and infectious diseases. After two rounds of evaluation, a consensus was possible in 43 of the 55 statements (78.2%): 40 in agreement and 3 in disagreement. Recommendations are given related to empirical antibiotic treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia, mechanisms of action, toxicity and synergism of antibiotics in this context, modifications of antibiotic treatment in the course of febrile neutropenia, and the management of central vascular catheter infections in the haematological setting. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high degree of agreement among experts on some controversial issues concerning the management of febrile neutropenia and catheter infection in hematologic patients. This agreement has resulted in recommendations that may be useful in clinical practice.

Bacteriemia e infección del catéter vascular en el ámbito hematológico: posicionamiento y actitudes de manejo basados en el método Delphi / Bacteraemia and infection of the vascular catheter in the haematology patient: positioning and management based on the Delphi method

Introducción. Las complicaciones infecciosas son una causa importante de morbi-mortalidad en los pacientes hematológicos con neutropenia febril. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue desarrollar un documento de recomendaciones consensuado para optimizar el manejo del paciente hematológico con neutropenia febril o infecciones por catéteres vasculares en áreas en las que no se dispone de una sólida evidencia científica. Material y métodos. Tras la revisión de las evidencias científico-médicas, un comité científico formado por especialistas expertos en hematología y enfermedades infecciosas elaboró una encuesta con 55 aseveraciones. Para el consenso se utilizó un método Delphi modificado con dos rondas de evaluación. Resultados. La encuesta fue respondida online por 52 especialistas en hematología y en enfermedades infecciosas. Tras las dos rondas de evaluación fue posible el consenso en 43 de los 55 ítems planteados (un 78,2%): 40 en el acuerdo y 3 en el desacuerdo. Con ello, se proporcionan una serie de recomendaciones relativas al tratamiento antibiótico empírico del paciente con neutropenia febril, a cuestiones relacionadas con mecanismos de acción, toxicidad y sinergia de los antibióticos en este contexto, a las modificaciones del tratamiento antibiótico en el curso de la neutropenia febril y al manejo de las infecciones de catéter vascular central en el ámbito hematológico. Conclusiones. Existe un alto grado de acuerdo entre los expertos consultados sobre algunos aspectos controvertidos relativos al manejo de la neutropenia febril y la infección por catéter en pacientes hematológicos. Este acuerdo se ha traducido en unas recomendaciones que pueden ser de utilidad en la práctica clínica (AU)

Introduction. Infectious complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in haematological patients with febrile neutropenia. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus document of recommendations to optimize the management of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological or vascular catheter infections in areas where there is no solid scientific evidence. Materials and Methods. After reviewing the scientific evidence, a scientific committee composed of experts in haematology and infectious diseases developed a survey with 55 statements. A two- round modified Delphi method was used to achieve consensus. Results. The online survey was answered by 52 experts in the field of haematology and infectious diseases. After two rounds of evaluation, a consensus was possible in 43 of the 55 statements (78.2%): 40 in agreement and 3 in disagreement. Recommendations are given related to empirical antibiotic treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia, mechanisms of action, toxicity and synergism of antibiotics in this context, modifications of antibiotic treatment in the course of febrile neutropenia, and the management of central vascular catheter infections in the haematological setting. Conclusions. There is a high degree of agreement among experts on some controversial issues concerning the management of febrile neutropenia and catheter infection in hematologic patients. This agreement has resulted in recommendations that may be useful in clinical practice (AU)

Recommendations for the treatment of invasive fungal infection caused by filamentous fungi in the hematological patient

El tratamiento antifúngico del paciente hematológico ha alcanzado una gran complejidad con la llegada de nuevos antifúngicos y pruebas diagnósticas que han dado lugar a diferentes estrategias terapéuticas. La utilización del tratamiento más adecuado en cada caso es fundamental en infecciones con tanta mortalidad. La disponibilidad de recomendaciones como éstas, realizadas con la mejor evidencia por un amplio panel de 48 expertos, en las que se intenta responder a cuándo está indicado tratar y con qué hacerlo considerando diferentes aspectos del paciente (riesgo de infección fúngica, manifestaciones clínicas, galactomanano, TC de tórax y profilaxis realizada), puede ayudar a los clínicos a mejorar los resultados(AU)

Antifungal treatment in the hematological patient has reached a high complexity with the advent of new antifungals and diagnostic tests, which have resulted in different therapeutic strategies. The use of the most appropriate treatment in each case is essential in infections with such a high mortality. The availability of recommendations as those here reported based on the best evidence and developed by a large panel of 48 specialists aimed to answer when is indicated to treat and which agents should be used, considering different aspects of the patient (risk of fungal infection, clinical manifestations, galactomanann test, chest CT scan and previous prophylaxis) may help clinicians to improve the results(AU)

Hepatitis B reactivation in a hepatitis B surface antigen-negative patient after allogeneic bone marrow transplant: successful treatment with lamivudine and seroconversion.

Hepatitis B reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and anti-HBsAg antibodies-positive patients is an infrequent complication of chemotherapy, usually with fatal evolution. Here we report an HBsAg-negative patient with a myelodysplastic syndrome, who developed hepatitis B reactivation after chemotherapy and evolved favorably after lamivudine treatment, allowing seroconversion.

Potencial de anidulafungina en el paciente hematológico / Potential of anidulafungin in hematological patients

Hasta hace relativamente poco tiempo, el tratamiento disponible para las infecciones fúngicas invasoras (IFI) en pacientes hematológicos constaba de anfotericina B y azoles. Cada uno de estos grupos presentaba sus limitaciones y efectos secundarios. Las equinocandinas son una nueva clase de antifúngicos que han demostrado resultados prometedores en el tratamiento de numerosas IFI. Anidulafungina es una nueva equinocandina que, además de presentar una potente actividad in vitro contra Aspergillus spp. y Candida spp. (incluidos los microorganismos resistentes a fluconazol o anfotericina B), tiene algunas ventajas respecto a las otras candinas. Su degradación en el ser humano es a través de un proceso de biotransformación, en vez de un proceso metabólico, y no presenta interacciones farmacológicas. En concreto, en el paciente hematológico la anidulafungina tendría un papel «potencial» como tratamiento empírico en la neutropenia febril, tal como lo tiene caspofungina. Además, y dada la epidemiología de la infección candidiásica en el paciente hematológico, podría usarse como tratamiento inicial en la candidemia para desescalar a fluconazol oral, si ello fuese posible según el fungigrama. También estaría indicada en el tratamiento de las infecciones fúngicas invasoras por Aspergillus spp. en pacientes con insuficiencia hepática o renal o con medicaciones concomitantes. Por los estudios in vitro, también tendría un papel importante en las combinaciones de antifúngicos. Dado su excelente perfil de seguridad y la falta de interacciones, la anidulafungina será sin duda una ayuda valiosa en el manejo de las infecciones micóticas de difícil tratamiento en pacientes hematológicos

Until relatively recently, the treatment available for invasive fungal infections in hematological patients consisted of amphotericin B and azoles. Each of these groups had limitations and secondary effects. The echinocandins are a new class of antifungal agent that has shown promising results in the treatment of numerous invasive fungal infections. Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin that, in addition to showing potent in vitro activity against Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. (including fluconazole- and amphotericin B-resistant microorganisms), also provides some advantages over other candins. In humans, these drugs are degraded through biotransformation rather than a metabolic process. No drug interactions have been found. In hematological patients, anidulafungin would play a «potential» role as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia, as is the case of caspofungin. Given the epidemiology of Candida infection in these patients, anidulafungin could be used as initial therapy in candidemia before starting treatment with oral flucozanole, if indicated by the fungigram. This drug would also be indicated in the treatment of invasive Aspergillus spp. infections in patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency or in those taking concomitant medications. The available in vitro studies also suggest an important role for this drug in combinations of antifungal agents. Given the excellent safety profile and absence of interactions of anidulafungin, this drug will undoubtedly be of great utility in the management of difficult-to-treat mycotic infections in hematological patients

[Potential of anidulafungin in hematological patients]. / Potencial de anidulafungina en el paciente hematológico.

Until relatively recently, the treatment available for invasive fungal infections in hematological patients consisted of amphotericin B and azoles. Each of these groups had limitations and secondary effects. The echinocandins are a new class of antifungal agent that has shown promising results in the treatment of numerous invasive fungal infections. Anidulafungin is a new echinocandin that, in addition to showing potent in vitro activity against Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. (including fluconazole- and amphotericin B-resistant microorganisms), also provides some advantages over other candins. In humans, these drugs are degraded through biotransformation rather than a metabolic process. No drug interactions have been found. In hematological patients, anidulafungin would play a "potential" role as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenia, as is the case of caspofungin. Given the epidemiology of Candida infection in these patients, anidulafungin could be used as initial therapy in candidemia before starting treatment with oral flucozanole, if indicated by the fungigram. This drug would also be indicated in the treatment of invasive Aspergillus spp. infections in patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency or in those taking concomitant medications. The available in vitro studies also suggest an important role for this drug in combinations of antifungal agents. Given the excellent safety profile and absence of interactions of anidulafungin, this drug will undoubtedly be of great utility in the management of difficult-to-treat mycotic infections in hematological patients.