Human DNA polymerase α interacts with mismatch repair proteins MSH2 and MSH6.

High fidelity of genome duplication is ensured by cooperation of polymerase proofreading and mismatch repair (MMR) activities. Here, we show that human mismatch recognizing proteins MutS homolog 2 (MSH2) and MSH6 copurify and interact with replicative Pol α. This enzyme also is the replicative primase and replicates DNA with poor fidelity. We show that MSH2 associates with known human replication origins with different dynamics than DNA polymerase (Pol α). Furthermore, we explored the potential functional role of Pol α in the mismatch repair reaction using an in vitro mismatch repair assay and observed that Pol α promotes mismatch repair. Taken together, we show that human Pol α interacts with MSH2-MSH6 complex and propose that this interaction occurs during the mismatch repair reaction.

Efficient long DNA gap-filling in a mammalian cell-free system: a potential new in vitro DNA replication assay.

In vitro assay of mammalian DNA replication has been variously approached. Using gapped circular duplex substrates containing a 500-base single-stranded DNA region, we have constructed a mammalian cell-free system in which physiological DNA replication may be reproduced. Reaction of the gapped plasmid substrate with crude extracts of human HeLaS3 cells induces efficient DNA synthesis in vitro. The induced synthesis was strongly inhibited by aphidicolin and completely depended on dNTP added to the system. In cell extracts in which PCNA was depleted step-wise by immunoprecipitation, DNA synthesis was accordingly reduced. These data suggest that replicative DNA polymerases, particularly pol delta, may chiefly function in this system. Furthermore, DNA synthesis is made quantifiable in this system, which enables us to evaluate the efficiency of DNA replication induced. Our system sensitively and quantitatively detected the reduction of the DNA replication efficiency in the DNA substrates damaged by oxidation or UV cross-linking and in the presence of a potent chain terminator, ara-CTP. The quantitative assessment of mammalian DNA replication may provide various advantages not only in basic research but also in drug development.

Segregation of replicative DNA polymerases during S phase: DNA polymerase ε, but not DNA polymerases α/δ, are associated with lamins throughout S phase in human cells.

DNA polymerases (Pol) α, δ, and ε replicate the bulk of chromosomal DNA in eukaryotic cells, Pol ε being the main leading strand and Pol δ the lagging strand DNA polymerase. By applying chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and quantitative PCR we found that at G(1)/S arrest, all three DNA polymerases were enriched with DNA containing the early firing lamin B2 origin of replication and, 2 h after release from the block, with DNA containing the origin at the upstream promoter region of the MCM4 gene. Pol α, δ, and ε were released from these origins upon firing. All three DNA polymerases, Mcm3 and Cdc45, but not Orc2, still formed complexes in late S phase. Reciprocal ChIP of the three DNA polymerases revealed that at G(1)/S arrest and early in S phase, Pol α, δ, and ε were associated with the same nucleoprotein complexes, whereas in late S phase Pol ε and Pol α/δ were largely associated with distinct complexes. At G(1)/S arrest, the replicative DNA polymerases were associated with lamins, but in late S phase only Pol ε, not Pol α/δ, remained associated with lamins. Consistently, Pol ε, but not Pol δ, was found in nuclear matrix fraction throughout the cell cycle. Therefore, Pol ε and Pol α/δ seem to pursue their functions at least in part independently in late S phase, either by physical uncoupling of lagging strand maturation from the fork progression, or by recruitment of Pol δ, but not Pol ε, to post-replicative processes such as translesion synthesis or post-replicative repair.

Distinctive activities of DNA polymerases during human DNA replication.

The contributions of human DNA polymerases (pols) alpha, delta and epsilon during S-phase progression were studied in order to elaborate how these enzymes co-ordinate their functions during nuclear DNA replication. Pol delta was three to four times more intensely UV cross-linked to nascent DNA in late compared with early S phase, whereas the cross-linking of pols alpha and epsilon remained nearly constant throughout the S phase. Consistently, the chromatin-bound fraction of pol delta, unlike pols alpha and epsilon, increased in the late S phase. Moreover, pol delta neutralizing antibodies inhibited replicative DNA synthesis most efficiently in late S-phase nuclei, whereas antibodies against pol epsilon were most potent in early S phase. Ultrastructural localization of the pols by immuno-electron microscopy revealed pol epsilon to localize predominantly to ring-shaped clusters at electron-dense regions of the nucleus, whereas pol delta was mainly dispersed on fibrous structures. Pol alpha and proliferating cell nuclear antigen displayed partial colocalization with pol delta and epsilon, despite the very limited colocalization of the latter two pols. These data are consistent with models where pols delta and epsilon pursue their functions at least partly independently during DNA replication.

DNA polymerase epsilon associates with the elongating form of RNA polymerase II and nascent transcripts.

DNA polymerase epsilon co-operates with polymerases alpha and delta in the replicative DNA synthesis of eukaryotic cells. We describe here a specific physical interaction between DNA polymerase epsilon and RNA polymerase II, evidenced by reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments. The interacting RNA polymerase II was the hyperphosphorylated IIO form implicated in transcriptional elongation, as inferred from (a) its reduced electrophoretic mobility that was lost upon phosphatase treatment, (b) correlation of the interaction with phosphorylation of Ser5 of the C-terminal domain heptapeptide repeat, and (c) the ability of C-terminal domain kinase inhibitors to abolish it. Polymerase epsilon was also shown to UV crosslink specifically alpha-amanitin-sensitive transcripts, unlike DNA polymerase alpha that crosslinked only to RNA-primed nascent DNA. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed partial colocalization of RNA polymerase IIO and DNA polymerase epsilon, and immunoelectron microscopy revealed RNA polymerase IIO and DNA polymerase epsilon in defined nuclear clusters at various cell cycle stages. The RNA polymerase IIO-DNA polymerase epsilon complex did not relocalize to specific sites of DNA damage after focal UV damage. Their interaction was also independent of active DNA synthesis or defined cell cycle stage.