Open-label, prospective, phase II descriptive pilot trial of belimumab therapy for refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: study protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of belimumab given for 24 months in patients persistently positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) with clinical features attributable to aPL [refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)]. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, single-centre, open-label, prospective, phase II descriptive pilot trial, belimumab will be administered in 15 patients attending San Giovanni Bosco Hospital (Turin) showing refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of APS. Subjects will receive belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (in addition to their ongoing APS treatment) with regimen at 0, 2, 4 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter (up to week 104). Study endpoints determined at 4, 16, 24, 36, 52 and 104 weeks will include: primary (safety and adverse events) and secondary outcomes, such as changes in clinical outcomes (recurrent thromboses, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, cardiovascular events, skin ulcer, aPL-related nephropathy and cognitive dysfunction), laboratory outcomes (routine tests, aPL, ENA and anti-dsDNA tests, thrombin generation assay, interferon-signature analysis, lymphocytes immunophenotyping, BLyS determination) and QoL evaluation. RESULTS: Study endpoints determined at 4, 16, 24, 36, 52 and 104 weeks will include: primary (safety and adverse events) and secondary outcomes, such as changes in clinical outcomes (recurrent thromboses, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, cardiovascular events, skin ulcer, aPL-related nephropathy and cognitive dysfunction), laboratory outcomes (routine tests, aPL, ENA and anti-dsDNA tests, thrombin generation assay, interferon-signature analysis, lymphocytes immunophenotyping, BLyS determination) and QoL evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting B-cells is emerging as an appealing strategy for patients with APS. Preliminary observations showed aPL negativisation after starting therapy with belimumab. The clinical relevance of these findings will be investigated in this prospective study. If confirmed, the current 'anti-thrombotic' approach to APS patients could be complemented, at least in selected cases, with an 'immunomodulatory' strategy.

Massive cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 serum: case report of a successful multidisciplinary approach.

We report a case of massive cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in the contest of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia that required the rapid coordination of many specialists from different departments, notably emergency, neurology, neuroradiology, hematology, and neurosurgery. The patient was rapidly treated with steroids, immunoglobulin, and fondaparinux. She underwent within 6 h after hospital admission a mechanical thrombectomy in order to allow flow restoration in cerebral venous systems. Neuroendovascular treatment in cerebral venous thrombosis related to VITT has never been described before. It can represent a complementary tool along with the other therapies and a multidisciplinary approach.

Incidence of a First Thrombo-Embolic Event in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin Antibodies: A Prospective Study.

Objective: This study aimed to prospectively investigate the incidence of first thromboembolic events (TEs) in a cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. The patients were positive for anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies and tested negative for anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies [regardless of their Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) status]. Methods: Inclusion criteria included: (a) SLE with no previous TEs; (b) no concomitant anti-thrombotic therapy; (c) isolated confirmed positive test for aPS/PT. Results: From the total of 52 SLE patients (42, 80.8% women), 18 patients (34.6%) were found to be positive for aPS/PT (IgG/IgM). During a mean follow-up (3.9 ± 1.1 years), 3 TEs occurred (1.3%/year). The overall cumulative incidence of TEs was 5.8% after 2 years, and up to 16.7% when focusing on aPS/PT positive patients. All the TEs events (two cerebrovascular events and one thrombotic kidney microangiopathy) occurred in the aPS/PT positive group. When focusing on IgG aPS/PT, we found that patients who tested positive were at a significantly higher risk for TEs (crude HR 19.6, 95%; CI 1.1 to 357.6; p < 0.05) compared to patients with negative aPS/PT. Conclusion: This study observed a rate of TEs of 1.3%/year, in aPS/PT positive only patients. Our prospective data suggest that aPS/PT might confer an increased risk for the development of TEs in SLE patients.

Identifying phenotypes of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: results from a cluster analysis in a large cohort of patients.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the aggregation of patients with aPL into different subgroups sharing common features in terms of clinical and laboratory phenotypes. METHODS: We applied a hierarchical cluster analysis from the multiple correspondence analysis to determine subgroups of patients according to clinical and laboratory characteristics in a cohort of subjects with confirmed aPL positivity who presented to our outpatient clinics from 2006 to 2018. RESULTS: A total of 486 patients [403 women; age 41.7 years (26)] were included, resulting in five clusters. Cluster 1 (n= 150) presented with thrombotic events (65.3% with venous thrombosis), with triple aPL positivity found in 34.7% of them (the highest rate among the different clusters). All the patients from cluster 2 (n = 91) had a confirmed diagnosis of SLE and the highest rate of anti-dsDNA positivity (91.7%). Cluster 3 included 79 women with pregnancy morbidity. Triple positivity was present in 3.8%, significantly lower when compared with Cluster 1 (34.7% versus 3.8%, P <0.01). Cluster 4 included 67 patients, 28 (41.8%) of whom with APS. Thrombotic events were observed in 23.9% patients. Cluster 4 had the highest rate of cytopenia, with thrombocytopenia as high 41.8% with no anti-dsDNA antibodies. Cluster 5 included 94 asymptomatic aPL carriers. CONCLUSION: While clusters 1, 2, 3 and 5 corresponded to well-known entities, cluster 4 might represent a bridging condition between pure primary APS and defined SLE, with lower thrombotic risk when compared with primary APS but higher general features such as ANA and cytopenia (mainly thrombocytopenia).

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance: Clinical and Histological Efficacy of a Bortezomib-Based Regimen.

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS) is a group of heterogeneous disorders characterized by renal dysfunction secondary to the production of a monoclonal immunoglobulin by a nonmalignant B cell or plasma cell clone. We report the clinical and histological outcomes of two patients with biopsy-proven MGRS: one patient showed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal k-light chain and C3 deposits, the second patient showed immunotactoid glomerulopathy. Both patients were treated with a 9-month chemotherapy protocol including bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone. Renal biospy was repeated after 1 year. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased from 22.5 (baseline) to 40 ml/min per 1.73 m2 after 12 months, then to 51.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 after 24 months; proteinuria decreased from 4.85 (baseline) to 0.17 g/day after 12 months, then to 0.14 g/day after 24 months. Repeat renal biopsies showed a dramatic improvement of the glomerular proliferative lesions and near complete disappearance of the immune deposits. A bortezomib-based treatment proved very effective and was well-tolerated in the two patients presenting with clinically and histologically aggressive MGRS.

Reliability of Lupus Anticoagulant and Anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin Autoantibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Multicenter Study.

Background: Is it well-known that one of the major drawbacks of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) test is their sensitivity to anticoagulant therapy, due to the coagulation based principle. In this study we aimed to assess the reproducibility of LA testing and to evaluate the performance of solid assay phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. Methods: We included 60 patients that fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (I) diagnosis of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS); (II) patients with thrombosis and (a) inconstant previous LA positivity and/or (b) positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) at low-medium titers [defined as levels of anti-ß2Glycoprotein-I or anticardiolipin (IgG/IgM) 10-30 GPL/MPL] with no previous evidence of LA positivity. aPL testing was performed blindly in 4 centers undertaking periodic external quality assessment. Results: The 60 patients enrolled were distributed as follows: 43 (71.7%) with thrombotic APS, 7 (11.7%) with thrombosis and inconstant LA positivity and 10 (16.7%) with low-medium aPL titers. Categorical agreement for LA among the centers ranged from 0.41 to 0.60 (Cohen's kappa coefficient; moderate agreement). The correlation determined at the 4 sites for aPS/PT was strong, both quantitatively (Spearman rho 0.84) and when dichotomized (Cohen's kappa coefficients = 0.81 to 1.0). Discordant (as defined by lack of agreement in ≥3 laboratories) or inconclusive LA results were observed in 27/60 (45%) cases; when limiting the analysis to those receiving vitamin K antagonist (VKA), the level of discordant LA results was as high as 75%(15/20). Conversely, aPS/PT testing showed an overall agreement of 83% (up to 90% in patients receiving VKA), providing an overall increase in test reproducibility of +28% when compared to LA, becoming even more evident (+65%) when analyzing patients on VKA. In patients treated with VKA, we observed a good correlation for aPS/PT IgG testing (Cohen's kappa coefficients = 0.81-1; Spearman rho 0.86). Conclusion: Despite the progress in the standardization of aPL testing, we observed up to 45% of overall discrepant results for LA, even higher in patients on VKA. The introduction of aPS/PT testing might represent a further diagnostic tool, especially when LA testing is not available or the results are uncertain.

Diagnosis of del(5q) MDS, 14 Years after JAK-2 Positive PV Appearance: Complete Remission of both Diseases with Lenalidomide Monotherapy.

This is the report of the clinical case of a patient who presents the association of a JAK-2 positive chronic myeloproliferative neoplasia to a subsequent 5q- myelodysplastic syndrome, developed after about 14 years from the first diagnosis. Patient's symptoms had rapidly worsened, and she became transfusion-dependent. Therapy with low-dose Lenalidomide quickly reduced the splenomegaly and completely brought white cells counts, haemoglobin, and platelets back to normal. After more than one year from the start, blood cell count is still normal. As far as we know, this is the first case of an effective treatment with Lenalidomide reported in this clinical setting.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: Results of an International Registry.

IMPORTANCE: Little information is available on the long-term clinical outcome of patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence rates of bleeding, thrombotic events, and mortality in a large international cohort of patients with SVT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted beginning May 2, 2008, and completed January 30, 2014, at hospital-based centers specialized in the management of thromboembolic disorders; a 2-year follow-up period was completed January 30, 2014, and data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2014, to February 28, 2015. Participants included 604 consecutive patients with objectively diagnosed SVT; there were no exclusion critieria. Information was gathered on baseline characteristics, risk factors, and antithrombotic treatment. Clinical outcomes during the follow-up period were documented and reviewed by a central adjudication committee. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Major bleeding, defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; bleeding requiring hospitalization; thrombotic events, including venous and arterial thrombosis; and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of the 604 patients (median age, 54 years; 62.6% males), 21 (3.5%) did not complete follow-up. The most common risk factors for SVT were liver cirrhosis (167 of 600 patients [27.8%]) and solid cancer (136 of 600 [22.7%]); the most common sites of thrombosis were the portal vein (465 of 604 [77.0%]) and the mesenteric veins (266 of 604 [44.0%]). Anticoagulation was administered to 465 patients in the entire cohort (77.0%) with a mean duration of 13.9 months; 175 of the anticoagulant group (37.6%) received parenteral treatment only, and 290 patients (62.4%) were receiving vitamin K antagonists. The incidence rates (reported with 95% CIs) were 3.8 per 100 patient-years (2.7-5.2) for major bleeding, 7.3 per 100 patient-years (5.8-9.3) for thrombotic events, and 10.3 per 100 patient-years (8.5-12.5) for all-cause mortality. During anticoagulant treatment, these rates were 3.9 per 100 patient-years (2.6-6.0) for major bleeding and 5.6 per 100 patient-years (3.9-8.0) for thrombotic events. After treatment discontinuation, rates were 1.0 per 100 patient-years (0.3-4.2) and 10.5 per 100 patient-years (6.8-16.3), respectively. The highest rates of major bleeding and thrombotic events during the whole study period were observed in patients with cirrhosis (10.0 per 100 patient-years [6.6-15.1] and 11.3 per 100 patient-years [7.7-16.8], respectively); the lowest rates were in patients with SVT secondary to transient risk factors (0.5 per 100 patient-years [0.1-3.7] and 3.2 per 100 patient-years [1.4-7.0], respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most patients with SVT have a substantial long-term risk of thrombotic events. In patients with cirrhosis, this risk must be balanced against a similarly high risk of major bleeding. Anticoagulant treatment appears to be safe and effective in most patients with SVT.

Systemic lupus erythematosus and thrombosis.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an acquired, multiorgan, autoimmune disease. Clinical presentation is extremely variable and heterogeneous. It has been shown that SLE itself is an independent risk factor for developing both arterial and venous thrombotic events since SLE patients have an Odds Ratio (OR) for thrombosis that varies depending on the clinical and laboratory characteristics of each study cohort. The risk of developing a thrombotic event is higher in this setting than in the general population and may further increase when associated with other risk factors, or in the presence of inherited or acquired pro-thrombotic abnormalities, or trigger events. In particular, a striking increase in the number of thrombotic events was observed when SLE was associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The presence of aPLs has been described in about 50% of SLE patients, while about 20% of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients have SLE. While APS patients (with or without an autoimmune disease) have been widely studied in the last years, fewer studies are available for SLE patients and thrombosis in the absence of APS. Although the available literature undoubtedly shows that SLE patients have a greater prevalence of thrombotic events as compared to healthy subjects, it is difficult to obtain a definite result from these studies because in some cases the study cohort was too small, in others it is due to the varied characteristics of the study population, or because of the different (and very copious) laboratory assays and methods that were used. When an SLE patient develops a thrombotic event, it is of great clinical relevance since it is potentially life-threatening. Moreover, it worsens the quality of life and is a clinical challenge for the clinician.

8-isoprostane, prostaglandin E2, C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A as markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in antiphospholipid syndrome: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the inflammation and oxidative stress hypothesis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients and to identify possible associations with clinical and laboratory features of the disease. METHODS: Serum amyloid A (SAA), C-reactive protein (CRP), 8-isoprostane and prostaglandin E2 (PGE) were assayed in the sera of 45 APS patients and then compared to control groups made up of 15 antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) negative patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 15 aPL negative subjects with pregnancy-related morbidity, 15 aPL negative patients with thrombosis, 15 subjects with persistently positive aPL with no signs or symptoms of APS, and 15 healthy volunteers from among the hospital staff. RESULTS: APS patients showed significantly higher CRP (p = 0.01), SAA (p < 0.01), 8-isoprostane (p = 0.05) and PGE2 (p = 0.001) plasma levels as compared to controls. Among APS subjects, significantly higher 8-isoprostane and PGE2 levels were observed in patients with triple positivity for aPL (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies) compared to APS patients with single or double aPL positivity. CONCLUSION: Both inflammation and oxidative stress, as measured by SAA, CRP, 8-isoprostane and PGE2, occur in APS and seem to be related to triple positivity for aPL.

A retrospective study on 226 polycythemia vera patients: impact of median hematocrit value on clinical outcomes and survival improvement with anti-thrombotic prophylaxis and non-alkylating drugs.

The clinical impact of polycythemia vera (PV) diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines is still undetermined. In particular, the recommended target of hematocrit (Hct) <0.45 has been recently questioned and alkylating drugs are still used for elderly patients. We revised, according to WHO criteria, 300 PV diagnosis and evaluated the impact on clinical outcome of median Hct and of the strategy to administer anti-thrombotic prophylaxis and to avoid alkylating chemotherapy in almost all patients. Of 226 patients with WHO-confirmed diagnosis (median age 66), 91.3% survived at the median follow-up of 5.84 years and 77.5% are projected alive at 13 years. Eighteen percent had major thrombosis and 2.7% acute myeloid leukemia. Twenty-two percent of patients maintained an Hct <0.45: their overall and thrombosis-free survival are similar to those of patients with a 0.45-0.48 value. Conversely, an Hct >0.48 and a "high thrombotic risk" according to ECLAP criteria were both significantly associated to shorter survival and higher thrombosis risk. Chemotherapy reduced thrombotic events without affecting survival. Our study revealed suboptimal compliance to published guidelines. However, in our casistic characterized by wide use of anti-platelet- and avoidance of alkylating drugs, patients' survival, although analyzed retrospectively, seemed to have improved compared to old literature data. The optimal Hct target was not clearly defined, although a value <0.48 looks highly advisable.

Presence of low titre of antiphospholipid antibodies in cancer patients: a prospective study.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) represent a well-defined risk factor for thrombotic events. aPL have been observed in the plasma of cancer patients, but the role and clinical relevance of aPL in this clinical setting is still unclear. This is a prospective cohort study whose aims were to: (1) compare the prevalence of aPL antibodies in cancer patients at diagnosis to matched control subjects; (2) compare thrombosis-free survival and overall survival in aPL positive and aPL negative cancer patients. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled upon a diagnosis of cancer, and were screened for lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies (IgG and IgM). Two years of follow-up were scheduled. Low-titre aPL antibody positivity was found in 33 patients (24%), and in 6 controls (4.3%; P < 0.0001). During follow-up, nine patients developed a symptomatic, objectively confirmed, thromboembolic event. One thrombotic event was observed among the 33 aPL positive patients (3%), and 8 among the 104 aPL negative ones (7.6%) (P = NS). During follow-up, 21 patients died, and among them, 3 (9.1%) were aPL positive and 18 (17.3%) were aPL negative (P = 0.39; C.I. 0.28-0.05). In conclusion, a high prevalence of low-titre aPL was found in cancer patients at diagnosis, but no statistical difference in thrombosis-free survival or in overall survival was observed between aPL positive and aPL negative patients.