Quality of in-hospital care in traumatic spinal column and cord injuries (TSC/SCI) in I.R Iran.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to implement the Quality of Care (QoC) Assessment Tool from the National Spinal Cord/Column Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) to map the current state of in-hospital QoC of individuals with Traumatic Spinal Column and Cord Injuries (TSCCI). METHODS: The QoC Assessment Tool, developed from a scoping review of the literature, was implemented in NSCIR-IR. We collected the required data from two primary sources. Questions regarding health system structures and care processes were completed by the registrar nurse reviewing the hospital records. Questions regarding patient outcomes were gathered through patient interviews. RESULTS: We registered 2812 patients with TSCCI over six years from eight referral hospitals in NSCIR-IR. The median length of stay in the general hospital and intensive care unit was four and five days, respectively. During hospitalization 4.2% of patients developed pressure ulcers, 83.5% of patients reported satisfactory pain control and none had symptomatic urinary tract infections. 100%, 80%, and 90% of SCI registration centers had 24/7 access to CT scans, MRI scans, and operating rooms, respectively. Only 18.8% of patients who needed surgery underwent a surgical operation in the first 24 h after admission. In-hospital mortality rate for patients with SCI was 19.3%. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the current in-hospital care of our patients with TSCCI is acceptable in terms of pain control, structure and length of stay and poor regarding in-hospital mortality rate and timeliness. We must continue to work on lowering rates of pressure sores, as well as delays in decompression surgery and fatalities.

The Diagnostic Process of Spinal Post-traumatic Deformity: An Expert Survey of 7 Cases, Consensus on Clinical Relevance Does Exist.

STUDY DESIGN: Survey of cases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the opinion of experts in the diagnostic process of clinically relevant Spinal Post-traumatic Deformity (SPTD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SPTD is a potential complication of spine trauma that can cause decreased function and quality of life impairment. The question of when SPTD becomes clinically relevant is yet to be resolved. METHODS: The survey of 7 cases was sent to 31 experts. The case presentation was medical history, diagnostic assessment, evaluation of diagnostic assessment, diagnosis, and treatment options. Means, ranges, percentages of participants, and descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Seventeen spinal surgeons reviewed the presented cases. The items' fracture type and complaints were rated by the participants as more important, but no agreement existed on the items of medical history. In patients with possible SPTD in the cervical spine (C) area, participants requested a conventional radiograph (CR) (76%-83%), a flexion/extension CR (61%-71%), a computed tomography (CT)-scan (76%-89%), and a magnetic resonance (MR)-scan (89%-94%). In thoracolumbar spine (ThL) cases, full spine CR (89%-100%), CT scan (72%-94%), and MR scan (65%-94%) were requested most often. There was a consensus on 5 out of 7 cases with clinically relevant SPTD (82%-100%). When consensus existed on the diagnosis of SPTD, there was a consensus on the case being compensated or decompensated and being symptomatic or asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong agreement in 5 out of 7 cases on the presence of the diagnosis of clinically relevant SPTD. Among spine experts, there is a strong consensus to use CT scan and MR scan, a cervical CR for C-cases, and a full spine CR for ThL-cases. The lack of agreement on items of the medical history suggests that a Delphi study can help us reach a consensus on the essential items of clinically relevant SPTD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Complete Versus Incomplete Surgical Resection in Intramedullary Astrocytoma: Systematic Review with Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic reviewBackground: Considering the infiltrative nature of intramedullary astrocytoma, the goal of surgery is to have a better patient related outcome. OBJECTIVE: To compare the overall survival (OS) and neurologic outcomes of complete vs incomplete surgical resection for patients with intramedullary astrocytoma. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL and EMBASE was conducted by two independent reviewers. Individual patient data (IPD) analysis and multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard Model was developed to measure the effect of surgical strategies on OS, post-operative neurological improvement (PNI), and neurological improvement in the last follow up (FNI). RESULTS: We included 1079 patients from 35 studies. Individual patient data of 228 patients (13 articles) was incorporated into the integrative IPD analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed complete resection (CR) significantly improved OS in comparison with the incomplete resection (IR) (log-rank test, P = .004). In the multivariate IPD analysis, three prognostic factors had significant effect on the OS: (1) Extent of Resection, (2) pathology grade, and (3) adjuvant therapy. We observed an upward trend in the popularity of chemotherapy, but CR, IR, and radiotherapy had relatively stable trends during three decades. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that CR can improve OS when compared to IR. Patients with spinal cord astrocytoma undergoing CR had similar PNI and FNI compared to IR. Therefore, CR should be the primary goal of surgery, but intraoperative decisions on the extent of resection should be relied on to prevent neurologic adverse events. Due to significant effect of adjuvant therapy on OS, PNI and FNI, it could be considered as the routine treatment strategy for spinal cord astrocytoma.

Spinal Post-traumatic Deformity: An International Expert Survey Among AO Spine Knowledge Forum Members.

STUDY DESIGN: Survey among spine experts. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the different views and opinions of clinically relevant spinal post-traumatic deformity (SPTD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no clear definition of clinically relevant SPTD. This leads to a wide variation in characteristics used for diagnosis and treatment indications of SPTD. To understand the current concepts of SPTD a survey was conducted among spine trauma surgeons. METHODS: Members of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma participated in an online survey. The survey was divided in 4 domains: Demographics, criteria to define SPTD, risk factors, and management. The data were collected anonymously and analyzed using descriptive statistics, absolute, and relative frequencies. Consensus on dichotomous outcomes was set to 80% of agreement. RESULTS: Fifteen members with extensive experience in treatment of spinal trauma participated, representing the 5 AO Spine Regions. Back pain was the only criterion for definition of SPTD with complete agreement. Consensus (≥80%) was reached for kyphotic angulation outside normative ranges and impaired function. Eighty-seven percent and 100% agreed that a full-spine conventional radiograph was necessary in diagnosing and treating SPTD, respectively. The "missed B-type injury" was rated at most important by all but 1 participant. There was no agreement on other risk factors leading to clinically relevant SPTD. Concerning the management, all participants agreed that an asymptomatic patient should not undergo surgical treatment and that neurological deficit is an absolute surgical indication. For most of the participants the preferred surgical treatment of acute injury in all spine regions but the subaxial region is posterior fixation. CONCLUSION: Some consensus exists among leading experts in the field of spine trauma care concerning the definition, diagnosis, risk factors, and management of SPTD. This study acts as the foundation for a Delphi study among the global spine community.

Cognitive appraisals of disability in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: a scoping review.

STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. OBJECTIVES: To describe the meaning of cognitive appraisals, their relation with outcome. measures, and adapted appraisal scales after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in the existing literature. METHODS: This review was performed according to the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) framework that consisted of five steps: setting the review question, searching the literature, selecting and classifying the studies, charting the data, and summarizing the results. Published articles from 1990 to 16 May 2020 related to cognitive appraisal, persons with traumatic SCI (TSCI), and persons older than 18 years were identified by searching by key terms in four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase). RESULTS: The included studies (n = 26) were categorized into three categories. Categories focused on the meanings of cognitive appraisals following TSCI (i.e., appraisals being complex and context-related, or in general definition how persons with TSCI interpret their disability and how they evaluate the resources available to respond to it), the relationship between cognitive appraisals and physical/psychological/social/ outcomes, and appraisals of disability (including the use of appraisals as a predictor of subsequent positive or negative consequences). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that a cognitive appraisal of TSCI is critical to longer-term rehabilitation outcomes. A combination of physical and psychological-based interventions can help to modify negative or dysfunctional appraisals. Cognitive appraisal in TSCI seems to vary from person to person. To predict it and develop a rehabilitation plan, future research needs to focus on the relationship between cognitive appraisal and person-related factors, including demographic characteristics.

Does Interbody Cage Lordosis and Position Affect Radiographic Outcomes After Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if the degree of interbody cage lordosis and cage positioning are associated with changes in postoperative sagittal alignment after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Ideal sagittal alignment and lumbopelvic alignment have been shown to correlate with postoperative clinical outcomes. TLIF is one technique that may improve these parameters, but whether the amount of cage lordosis improves either segmental or lumbar lordosis (LL) is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent single-level TLIF with either a 5-degree or a 12-degree lordotic cage. LL, segmental lordosis (SL), disk height, center point ratio, cage position, and cage subsidence were evaluated. Correlation between center point ratio and change in lordosis was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Secondary analysis included multiple linear regression to determine independent predictors of change in SL. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included in the final analysis, with 51 patients receiving a 5-degree cage and 75 patients receiving a 12-degree cage. There were no differences in the postoperative minus preoperative LL (∆LL) (12-degree cage: -1.66 degrees vs. 5-degree cage: -2.88 degrees, P =0.528) or ∆SL (12-degree cage: -0.79 degrees vs. 5-degree cage: -1.68 degrees, P =0.513) at 1-month follow-up. Furthermore, no differences were found in ∆LL (12-degree cage: 2.40 degrees vs. 5-degree cage: 1.00 degrees, P =0.497) or ∆SL (12-degree cage: 1.24 degrees vs. 5-degree cage: 0.35 degrees, P =0.541) at final follow-up. Regression analysis failed to show demographic factors, cage positioning, or cage lordosis to be independent predictors of change in SL. No difference in subsidence was found between groups (12-degree cage: 25.5% vs. 5-degree cage: 32%, P =0.431). CONCLUSION: Lordotic cage angle and cage positioning were not associated with perioperative changes in LL, SL, or cage subsidence after single-level TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Evaluating prehospital care of patients with potential traumatic spinal cord injury: scoping review.

PURPOSE: To gain insight into current research regarding prehospital care (PHC) in patients with potential traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and to disseminate the findings to the research community. METHODS: In March 2019, we performed a literature search of publications from January 1990 to March 2019 indexed in PubMed, gray literature including professional websites; and reference sections of selected articles for other relevant literature. This review was performed according to Arksey and O'Malley's framework. RESULTS: There were 42 studies selected based on the inclusion criteria for review; 18 articles regarding immobilization; 12 articles regarding movement, positioning and transport; four for spinal clearance; three for airway protection; and two for the role of PHC providers. There were some articles that covered two topics: one article was regarding movement, positioning and transport and airway protection, and two were regarding spinal clearance and the role of PHC providers. CONCLUSION: There was no uniform opinion about spinal immobilization of patients with suspected TSCI. The novel lateral trauma position and one of two High Arm IN Endangered Spine (HAINES) methods are preferred methods for unconscious patients. Controlled self-extrication for patients with stable hemodynamic status is recommended. Early and proper identifying of potential TSCI by PHC providers can significantly improve patients' outcomes and can result in avoiding unwanted spinal immobilization. Future prospective studies with a large sample size in real-life settings are needed to provide clear and evidence-based data in PHC of patients with suspected TSCI.

Growth Factor Gene-Modified Cells in Spinal Cord Injury Recovery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Numerous preclinical studies have been performed in recent years on the effects of the administration of growth factor gene-modified cells in spinal cord injury (SCI). However, findings of these studies are contradictory. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies evaluating the effects of administration of growth factor gene-modified cells on locomotion recovery after SCI. METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted, including all animal studies until the end of 2020. Two researchers screened search results, summarized relevant studies and assessed risk of bias, independently. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were included in the final analysis. Transplantation of growth factor gene-modified cells in the injured spinal cord resulted in a significant improvement in locomotion of animals compared with nontreated animals (standardized mean difference = 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-2.33; P < 0.0001)] and non-genetically modified cell-treated animals (standardized mean difference = 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.79; P < 0.0001). Transplantation efficacy of these cells failed to achieve significance in moderate lesions (P = 0.091), when using modified neural stem/progenitor cells (P = 0.164), when using synthetic neurotrophins (P = 0.086) and when the number of transplanted cells was less than 1.0 × 105 cells per animal (P = 0.119). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that transplantation of growth factor gene- modified cells significantly improved locomotion in SCI animal models. However, there is a major concern regarding the safety of transplantation of genetically modified cells, in terms of overexpressing growth factors. Further studies are needed before any effort to perform a translational and clinical study.

Patient Factors Impacting Baseline Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery for Myelopathy or Radiculopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 2532 adults who underwent elective surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy with intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) between 2017 and 2019. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate attainability of monitorable MEPs across demographic, health history, and patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: When baseline IONM responses cannot be obtained, the value of IONM on mitigating the risk of postoperative deficits is marginalized and a clinical decision to proceed must be made based, in part, on the differential diagnosis of the unmonitorable MEPs. Despite known associations with baseline MEPs and anesthetic regimen or preoperative motor strength, little is known regarding associations with other patient factors. METHODS: Demographics, health history, and PROM data were collected preoperatively. MEP baseline responses were reported as monitorable or unmonitorable at incision. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the odds of having at least one unmonitorable MEP from demographic and health history factors. RESULTS: Age [odds ratio (OR)=1.031, P <0.001], sex (male OR=1.572, P =0.007), a primary diagnosis of myelopathy (OR=1.493, P =0.021), peripheral vascular disease (OR=2.830, P =0.009), type II diabetes (OR=1.658, P =0.005), and hypertension (OR=1.406, P =0.040) were each associated with increased odds of unmonitorable MEPs from one or more muscles; a history of thyroid disorder was inversely related (OR=0.583, P =0.027). P atients with unmonitorable MEPs reported less neck-associated disability and pain ( P <0.036), but worse SF-12 physical health and lower extremity (LE) and upper extremity function ( P <0.016). Compared with radiculopathy, unmonitorable MEPs in myelopathy patients more often involved LE muscles. Cord function was monitorable in 99.1% of myelopathic patients with no reported LE dysfunction and no history of hypertension or diabetes. CONCLUSION: Myelopathy, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and/or symptomatic LE dysfunction increased the odds of having unmonitorable baseline MEPs. Unmonitorable baseline MEPs was uncommon in patients without significant LE weakness, even in the presence of myelopathy.

Indicators of Quality of Care in Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review. OBJECTIVES: To identify a practical and reproducible approach to organize Quality of Care Indicators (QoCI) in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Date: May 2018), MEDLINE (1946 to May 2018), and EMBASE (1974 to May 2018). Two independent reviewers screened 6092 records and included 262 full texts, among which 60 studies were included for qualitative analysis. We included studies, with no language restriction, containing at least 1 quality of care indicator for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury. Each potential indicator was evaluated in an online, focused group discussion to define its categorization (healthcare system structure, medical process, and individuals with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury related outcomes), definition, survey options, and scale. RESULTS: A total of 87 indicators were identified from 60 studies screened using our eligibility criteria. We defined each indicator. Out of 87 indicators, 37 appraised the healthcare system structure, 30 evaluated medical processes, and 20 included individuals with TSCI related outcomes. The healthcare system structure included the impact of the cost of hospitalization and rehabilitation, as well as staff and patient perception of treatment. The medical processes included targeting physical activities for improvement of health-related outcomes and complications. Changes in motor score, functional independence, and readmission rates were reported as individuals with TSCI-related outcomes indicators. CONCLUSION: Indicators of quality of care in the management of individuals with TSCI are important for health policy strategists to standardize healthcare assessment, for clinicians to improve care, and for data collection efforts including registries.

The Role of Family-wise Error Rate in Determining Statistical Significance.

The threshold for statistical significance is determined by the maximum allowable probability of Type I error (α). For studies that test multiple hypotheses or make multiple comparisons, the probability of at least 1 Type I error (family-wise error rate; FWER) increases as the number of hypotheses/comparisons increase. It is generally best practice to set the acceptable threshold for FWER to be less than or equal to α. Bonferroni correction and Tukey honestly significant difference test are 2 of the more common methods to control for FWER. When doing exploratory analysis or evaluating secondary outcomes of a study, it may not be necessary or desirable to control for FWER, which reduces the power of the study. However, deciding to control for FWER should be decided during the design of the study.

Power Analysis for Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.

Before conducting a scientific study, a power analysis is performed to determine the sample size required to test an effect within allowable probabilities of Type I error (α) or Type II error (ß). The power of a study is related to Type II error by 1-ß. Most scientific studies set α=0.05 and power=0.80 as minimums. More conservative study designs will decrease α or increase power, which will require a larger sample size. The third and final parameter required for a power analysis is the effect size (ES). ES is a measure of the strength of the observation in the outcome of interest (ie, the dependent variable). ES must be estimated from pilot studies or published values. A small ES will require a larger sample size than a large ES. It is possible to detect statistically significant findings even for very small ES, if the sample size is sufficiently large. Therefore, it is also essential to evaluate whether ES is sufficiently large to be clinically meaningful.

A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes for a 2-Level Posterolateral Fusion Augmented With Single Versus 2-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single institution, multisurgeon case control series. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are differences in reoperation rates or outcomes for patients undergoing 2-level posterolateral fusion (PLF) augmented by a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at only one of the levels or at both. METHODS: A total of 416 patients were identified who underwent 2-level PLF with a TLIF at either one of those levels (n = 183) or at both (n = 233) with greater than 1-year follow-up. Demographic, surgical, radiographic, and clinical data was reviewed for each patient. These included age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking status, Charleston Comorbidity Index, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Each cohort underwent 24 reoperations. Although the number of overall reoperations was not significantly different (P > .05), among the reoperation types, there were significantly more reoperations for adjacent segment disease in the 2-level group compared to the 1-level group (19 vs 12, P = .04). There was no difference in reoperation for pseudarthrosis between the groups (P > .05). Although both groups experienced significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index (P < .001) and Short Form-12 health questionnaire (P < .001), there were no differences between improvements for 1- versus 2-level cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing 2-level PLF in the setting of a TLIF, using a TLIF at one versus both levels does not seem to influence reoperation rates or outcomes. However, reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease are increased in the setting of a 2-level PLF augmented by a 2-level TLIF.

The case for surgery of the injured spine in the management of traumatic cord injuries.

Spinal cord injury can be a life-altering trauma for patients and can be costly to patients and society alike. Generally recognized as biphasic, these injuries have both primary and secondary drivers. Although the primary insult is largely unavoidable, prevention of secondary injury mechanisms-and the resultant cascade-has been a target of substantial research. Continued spinal cord compression has been recognized as one of several deleterious secondary mechanisms, and decompressive and stabilization surgery has been routinely used for neuroprotection in this setting. Numerous biomechanical and animal studies have confirmed its potential utility. More recently, several high-quality randomized trials have concluded that early surgery for spinal cord injury improves rates of recovery when compared with delayed or nonoperative management. Herein, we argue that early surgery for spinal cord injury with continued cord compression offers significant benefit and should be undertaken when not contraindicated.

Surgical Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries in Polytrauma Patients.

The management of thoracolumbar spine injuries in patients with multiple traumatic injuries is a challenge complicated by multiple competing medical and surgical demands. Safe and effective treatment of polytrauma patients with a thoracolumbar spine injury requires a multidisciplinary approach that involves surgical and critical care teams. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score, which was developed to facilitate consistent surgical decision making in patients with a thoracolumbar spine injury, provides objective criteria for the classification and management of thoracolumbar spine injuries. The AOSpine study group recently developed a comprehensive thoracolumbar injury classification system that was subsequently used to create the Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score, which helps guide thoracolumbar spine injury management via objective criteria. These scoring systems have been effectively used in clinical practice and allow for a focused and objective assessment of thoracolumbar spine injuries. Both the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score and the Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score should be routinely used in treatment decision making to optimize outcomes and avoid unnecessary surgical treatment in polytrauma patients with a thoracolumbar spine injury.

Can anatomic level of injury on MRI predict neurological level in acute cervical spinal cord injury?

BACKGROUND: Determining neurological level of injury (NLI) is of paramount importance after spinal cord injury (SCI), although its accuracy depends upon the reliability of the neurologic examination. Here, we determine if anatomic location of cervical cord injury by MRI (MRI level of injury) can predict NLI in the acute traumatic setting. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of SCI patients with macroscopic evidence of cervical cord injury from non-penetrating trauma, all of whom had undergone cervical spine MRI and complete neurologic testing. The recorded MRI information included cord lesion type (intra-axial edema, hemorrhage) and MRI locations of upper and lower lesion boundary, as well as lesion epicenter. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess the relationship between MRI levels of injury and NLI. RESULTS: All five MRI parameters, namely (1) upper and (2) lower boundaries of cord edema, (3) lesion epicenter, and (4) upper and (5) lower boundaries of cord hemorrhage demonstrated statistically significant, positive correlations with NLI. The MRI locations of upper and lower boundary of hemorrhage were found to have the strongest correlation with NLI (r = 0.72 and 0.61, respectively; p < 0.01). A weaker (low to moderate) correlation existed between lower boundary of cord edema and NLI (r = 0.30; p < 0.01). Upper boundary of cord hemorrhage on MRI demonstrated the best agreement with NLI (mean difference 0.03 ± 0.73; p < 0.01) by Bland-Altman analysis. CONCLUSIONS: MRI level of injury has the potential to serve as a surrogate for NLI in instances where the neurologic examination is either unavailable or unreliable.

Traumatic thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures: operative or nonoperative treatment: comparison of two treatment strategies by means of surgeon equipoise.

STUDY DESIGN: A center parallel cohort study with blinded inclusion based on clinical equipoise. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of nonoperative and operative treatment strategies in terms of quality of life and neurologic and functional status. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite a considerable body of literature, sound evidence regarding the optimal treatment for traumatic thoracic and lumbar spine fractures is lacking. METHODS: Medical records of patients hospitalized for traumatic spinal fractures between 1991 and 2002 were identified in 2 trauma centers in the same country with established and different treatment strategies. Eligibility was retrospectively assessed for each case by a panel of orthopaedic surgeons who were representative of the 2 medical centers, and who were blinded to the treatment actually administered. Patients were included in the study when there was disagreement on the suggested treatment method. Thus, 2 comparable groups were identified undergoing nonoperative or operative treatment. Outcome assessment and comparison across groups focused on quality of life, residual pain, neurologic recovery, and employment in the middle-long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Discordance in regards to choice of treatment was identified in 190 (95 treated nonoperative, 95 operative) of 636 potentially eligible patients. Patients were comparable regarding baseline characteristics, except for a somewhat higher proportion of males and neurologic impairment in the operative group. Seventeen percent of the nonoperative and 21% of the operative group developed complications and 3 patients displayed neurologic deterioration for which a treatment change was considered necessary. Follow-up was complete in 79%; mean follow-up time was 6.2 years with a minimum of 2 years. Pain scores, disability indexes, and general health outcome were comparable at follow-up. Compared with matched population norms, outcomes were poorer regardless of treatment method. Neurologic recovery was better in the operative group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that female gender and neurologic impairment were independent predictors of poor functional outcome. Eighty-eight and 83% of the nonoperatively and operatively treated patients were employed at some point after a rehabilitation period. CONCLUSION: Overall outcome of nonoperative and operative treatment in middle-long-term follow up is comparable, although there seems to be a difference in neurologic recovery patterns. Studies on the cost-effectiveness of treatment options and the patterns of recovery within 2 years after injury would assist in guideline development and stimulate interest for future research.

Posterior longitudinal ligament status in cervical spine bilateral facet dislocations.

OBJECTIVE: It is generally accepted that cervical spine bilateral facet dislocation results in complete disruption of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The goal of this study was to evaluate the integrity of numerous spine-stabilizing structures by MRI, and to determine if any associations between injury patterns exist with respect to the posterior longitudinal ligament status. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS: A retrospective review was performed of 30 cervical spine injury subjects with bilateral facet dislocation. Assessment of 1.5T MRI images was carried out for: intervertebral disc disruption, facet fracture, and ligamentous disruption. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate for associations between various injury patterns and posterior longitudinal ligament status. RESULTS: The frequency of MRI abnormalities was: anterior longitudinal ligament disruption (26.7%), disc herniation or disruption (90%), posterior longitudinal ligament disruption (40%), facet fracture (63.3%) and disruption of the posterior column ligament complex (97%). There were no significant associations between injury to the posterior longitudinal ligament and other structures. Compared to surgical reports, MRI was accurate for determining the status for 24 of 26 ligaments (three of three anterior longitudinal ligament, seven of nine posterior longitudinal ligament, and 14 of 14 posterior column ligament complex) but generated false negatives in two instances (in both MRI showed an intact posterior longitudinal ligament that was torn at surgery). CONCLUSIONS: In contradistinction to the existing concept, the posterior longitudinal ligament can remain intact in a substantial proportion of hyperflexion injuries that produce bilateral cervical facet dislocation. Posterior longitudinal ligament integrity is not associated with any other injury pattern related to the anterior longitudinal ligament, intervertebral disc or facet fracture.