What Is a Plant Cell Type in the Age of Single-Cell Biology? It's Complicated.

One of the fundamental questions in developmental biology is how a cell is specified to differentiate as a specialized cell type. Traditionally, plant cell types were defined based on their function, location, morphology, and lineage. Currently, in the age of single-cell biology, researchers typically attempt to assign plant cells to cell types by clustering them based on their transcriptomes. However, because cells are dynamic entities that progress through the cell cycle and respond to signals, the transcriptome also reflects the state of the cell at a particular moment in time, raising questions about how to define a cell type. We suggest that these complexities and dynamics of cell states are of interest and further consider the roles signaling, stochasticity, cell cycle, and mechanical forces play in plant cell fate specification. Once established, cell identity must also be maintained. With the wealth of single-cell data coming out, the field is poised to elucidate both the complexity and dynamics of cell states.

DRMY1 promotes robust morphogenesis by sustaining translation of a hormone signaling protein.

Robustness is the invariant development of phenotype despite environmental changes and genetic perturbations. In the Arabidopsis flower bud, four sepals initiate at robust positions and times and grow to equal size to enclose and protect the inner floral organs. We previously characterized the mutant development related myb-like1 (drmy1), where 3-5 sepals initiate at irregular positions and variable times and grow to different sizes, compromising their protective function. The molecular mechanism underlying this loss of robustness was unclear. Here, we show that drmy1 has reduced TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN (TOR) activity, ribosomal content, and translation. Translation reduction decreases the protein level of ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATOR7 (ARR7), a rapidly synthesized and degraded cytokinin signaling inhibitor. The resultant upregulation of cytokinin signaling disrupts the robust positioning of auxin signaling, causing variable sepal initiation. Our work shows that the homeostasis of translation, a ubiquitous cellular process, is crucial for the robust spatiotemporal patterning of organogenesis.

Can the French flag and reaction-diffusion models explain flower patterning? Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the French flag model.

It has been 50 years since Lewis Wolpert introduced the French flag model proposing the patterning of different cell types based on threshold concentrations of a morphogen diffusing in the tissue. Sixty-seven years ago, Alan Turing introduced the idea of patterns initiating de novo from a reaction-diffusion network. Together these models have been used to explain many patterning events in animal development, so here we take a look at their applicability to flower development. First, although many plant transcription factors move through plasmodesmata from cell to cell, in the flower there is little evidence that they specify fate in a concentration-dependent manner, so they cannot yet be described as morphogens. Secondly, the reaction-diffusion model appears to be a reasonably good description of the formation of spots of pigment on petals, although additional nuances are present. Thirdly, aspects of both of these combine in a new fluctuation-based patterning system creating the scattered pattern of giant cells in Arabidopsis sepals. In the future, more precise imaging and manipulations of the dynamics of patterning networks combined with mathematical modeling will allow us to better understand how the multilayered complex and beautiful patterns of flowers emerge de novo.

The TCP4 Transcription Factor Directly Activates TRICHOMELESS1 and 2 and Suppresses Trichome Initiation.

Trichomes are the first line of defense on the outer surface of plants against biotic and abiotic stresses. Because trichomes on leaf surfaces originate from the common epidermal progenitor cells that also give rise to pavement cells and stomata, their density and distribution are under strict genetic control. Regulators of trichome initiation have been identified and incorporated into a biochemical pathway wherein an initiator complex promotes trichome fate in an epidermal progenitor cell, while an inhibitor complex suppresses it in the neighboring cells. However, it is unclear how these regulator proteins, especially the negative regulators, are induced by upstream transcription factors and integrated with leaf morphogenesis. Here, we show that the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) class II TCP proteins activate TRICHOMELESS1 (TCL1) and TCL2, the two established negative regulators of trichome initiation, and reduce trichome density on leaves. Loss-of-function of these TCP proteins increased trichome density whereas TCP4 gain-of-function reduced trichome number. TCP4 binds to the upstream regulatory elements of both TCL1 and TCL 2 and directly promotes their transcription. Further, the TCP-induced trichome suppression is independent of the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN LIKE family of transcription factors, proteins that also reduce trichome density at later stages of plant development. Our work demonstrates that the class II TCP proteins couple leaf morphogenesis with epidermal cell fate determination.

The TCP4 transcription factor regulates trichome cell differentiation by directly activating GLABROUS INFLORESCENCE STEMS in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Trichomes are the first cell type to be differentiated during the morphogenesis of leaf epidermis and serve as an ideal model to study cellular differentiation. Many genes involved in the patterning and differentiation of trichome cells have been studied over the past decades, and the majority of these genes encode transcription factors that specifically regulate epidermal cell development. However, the upstream regulators of these genes that link early leaf morphogenesis with cell type differentiation are less studied. The TCP proteins are the plant-specific transcription factors involved in regulating diverse aspects of plant development including lateral organ morphogenesis by modulating cell proliferation and differentiation. Here, we show that the miR319-regulated class II TCP proteins, notably TCP4, suppress trichome branching in Arabidopsis leaves and inflorescence stem by direct transcriptional activation of GLABROUS INFLORESCENCE STEMS (GIS), a known negative regulator of trichome branching. The trichome branch number is increased in plants with reduced TCP activity and decreased in the gain-of-function lines of TCP4. Biochemical analyses show that TCP4 binds to the upstream regulatory region of GIS and activates its expression. Detailed genetic analyses show that GIS and TCP4 work in same pathway and GIS function is required for TCP4-mediated regulation of trichome differentiation. Taken together, these results identify a role for the class II TCP genes in trichome differentiation, thus providing a connection between organ morphogenesis and cellular differentiation.