Urgent endovascular aorta repair for a rupture of a traumatic infrarenal aortic dissection: Case report and review of literature.

Traumatic aortic injury is a life-threatening condition usually followed by blunt trauma with damage at the thoracic aorta. Abdominal aortic injuries are rare and usually seen with seatbelt trauma. Timing and approach of treatment are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This case concerns a 66-year-old man with a high impact trauma after a fall from height. Upon presentation in our level two trauma center, he was conscious but hemodynamically unstable. Computer Tomography scan revealed multiple rib, spine and pelvic fractures with bilateral lung contusions warranting a transfer to a level one trauma center. However, an infrarenal aortic dissection with a retroperitoneal rupture and active bleeding necessitated acute surgical intervention. He was treated endovascularly with an off-the-shelf aortic stent graft which is meant for aortic aneurysm repair. Surgery was performed percutaneously under local anesthetic. Other fractures were treated conservatively. Postoperatively, the patient made a swift recovery without any complications in follow-up. As this case demonstrates, urgent endovascular repair of a traumatic infrarenal aortic injury can be done quickly with a minimally invasive approach with conventional stent graft systems thereby reducing the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with this life-threatening condition.

Venous Side Branch Ligation as a First Step Treatment for Haemodialysis Access Induced Hand Ischaemia: Effects on Access Flow Volume and Digital Perfusion.

OBJECTIVE: Haemodialysis access induced distal ischemia (HAIDI) induced by an autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is caused by loss of blood pressure somewhere along the arterial blood supply of the arm. In some patients, side branches of the access' venous outflow tract may contribute to this blood pressure loss. Beneficial effects of side branch ligation (SBL) as a first step approach to ischemic symptoms have been reported. However, effects on access flow and AVF function after prolonged follow up are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prior to SBL, HAIDI patients with a brachial artery based AVF were studied using a questionnaire quantifying hand ischemia, digital brachial index (DBI, finger plethysmography), and Duplex analysis. Access flow volume, patency rates, hand perfusion, and complications were determined during a 12 month observation period following SBL. RESULTS: In 9 years, SBLs were performed in 20 haemodialysis patients, either as a single operative procedure (n = 10) or supplemented (n = 10) with additional surgical techniques during the same procedure (banding, n = 5; basilic vein transposition, n = 4; DRIL, n = 1). Follow up data after 12 months were available in 18 patients. One patient with progressive hand ischemia required access ligation 3 months after SBL. Hand ischemia was attenuated or abolished in the remaining 17 patients (94% clinical success rate). DBI improved from 0.51 ± 0.05 (pre-operative) to 0.68 ± 0.04 (immediate post-operative) and 0.83 ± 0.07 (at 1 year follow up). One year primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 67% (12/18), 83% (15/18), and 94% (17/18), respectively, while mean access flows remained acceptable at 710 ± 70 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Ligation of non-functional venous side branches of an autogenous brachial artery AVF causing hand ischemia leads to prolonged attenuation of hand ischemia whereas access flow volumes are maintained after 1 year of follow up. Side branch ligation must be considered prior to embarking on more invasive surgery for HAIDI.

Side branch ligation for haemodialysis-access-induced distal ischaemia.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic hand ischaemia is occasionally observed in haemodialysis patients with a brachiocephalic fistula using the Gracz technique. Open venous side branches of the access may contribute to lower peripheral perfusion pressures. This study reports on the effects of access side branch ligation (SBL) on ischaemia in patients with haemodialysis access induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI). DESIGN, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hand ischaemia was quantified using a published questionnaire (HIQ, minimal 0 points: no ischaemia, maximal 500: excruciating ischaemia). Finger pressures (P(dig), mmHg), digital brachial index (DBI) and access flow were measured before and after SBL. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were operated for grade 2-4 HAIDI during 7 years, and 12 underwent SBL (as single procedure n = 5, preceeding banding/DRIL n = 7). Hand ischaemia was attenuated after SBL only (n = 5, HIQ 216 ± 39 vs. 73 ± 26, P = 0.04). A 25% increase was observed in both P(dig) (n = 12, before SBL: 57 ± 8 mmHg, after: 72 ± 8 mmHg, P = 0.012) and DBI (before SBL: 0.49 ± 0.06, after: 0.61 ± 0.04, P = 0.006). Access flow did not change. All patients successfully resumed dialysis. CONCLUSION: SBL may be effective as single or adjunctive surgical procedure in the treatment of HAIDI in the presence of a Gracz fistula.