RESUMO
Melanoma is a relatively rare malignancy with a highly aggressive biological behavior. Metastases to other sites, like lymph nodes and liver are common, but primary hepatic melanoma is a rarity with poor survival ranging from months to few years. Diagnosis of primary hepatic melanoma via clinical features and imaging technology is difficult because of its ambiguous features. Here, we present a 26-year-old North Indian woman admitted in the department of gastrointestinal surgery at our tertiary care hospital with the complaint of pain in the abdomen for a month associated with the loss of appetite and subsequent weight loss. The liver function tests were within normal limits and viral markers were negative. The triple-phase computed tomography scan of abdomen showed significant hepatomegaly and two well-defined lesions in both lobes of the liver. Histopathological evaluation was performed on the core liver biopsies submitted from the liver lesions. A malignant tumor with abundant black intracytoplasmic pigment was identified. Immunohistochemistry proved the tumor to be melanoma. The detailed clinical history, laboratory, and radiological investigations were acquired and analyzed to rule out a metastatic lesion of the same. A final diagnosis of primary hepatic melanoma was thus rendered. Primary hepatic melanoma is extremely uncommon and has been rarely reported. Preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to low index of suspicion and nonspecific clinical features. In this case report, we discuss the clinicopathological features of primary hepatic melanoma and review the literature so as to increase the awareness and improve our understanding of the disease.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Renal cell carcinoma is the most lethal malignancy of urinary tract. Invasion of right lobe of liver by Renal cell carcinoma is rare and possess a treatment challenge. Simultaneous nephrectomy with right hepatectomy has been proposed as a part of multi-modality treatment approach. But its safety and feasibility is not well established. CASE PRESENTATION: We herein discuss a case of 30-year old female patient who underwent simultaneous nephrectomy with right hepatectomy along with single peritoneal metastasectomy for a huge Renal cell carcinoma of right kidney and infiltrating the right lobe of liver. Intra-operatively a single peritoneal nodule was present which came positive for malignancy on frozen section. Considering young age, good performance status and oligometastatic disease definitive procedure in the form of combined right nephrectomy and right hepatectomy was performed. She was discharged from the hospital on 6th post-operative day with an uneventful post-operative course. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patients with locally advanced Renal cell carcinoma with involvement of adjacent organs require en block surgical resection in combination with targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The surgical management of patients with direct liver infiltration requires a right nephrectomy with some form of liver resection based on the extent of liver involvement to achieve a margin negative resection. In our case a plan of formal right hepatectomy was made as the tumor was infiltrating into segment VI, VII, and VIII. CONCLUSION: The combined nephrectomy and right hepatectomy is safe and feasible for this type of huge RCC invading right hepatic lobe.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy for corrosive stricture of the oesophagus (CSE) is rarely performed due to high risk of iatrogenic complications. The aims of this study were to review our experience of transhiatal oesophagectomy (THE) in patients with CSE as well as to compare results of open and laparoscopic methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data of patients with CSE who underwent open transhiatal oesophagectomy (OTE) or laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal oesophagectomy (LATE) by a single surgical team from 2012 to 2016. All study patients had either failed endoscopic dilatation or had a long stricture which was not amenable to endoscopic dilatation. RESULTS: Totally, 35 patients were included in the study, of which 19 (54.3%) were female. OTE was performed in 20 (57%) patients, and LATE was performed in 15 (43%) patients. Gastric and colonic conduits were used in 23 (65.7%) and 10 (34.3%) patients, respectively. Demographic and clinical parameters were comparable between LATE and OTE groups (P > 0.05). Median intra-operative blood loss, post-operative requirement of analgesic and hospital stay were lower in LATE group (P ≤ 0.05). There was no hospital mortality (30 days), but three patients (8.6%) died during a median follow-up of 36 months. CONCLUSION: THE is a safe procedure for patients with CSE, and LATE may be an alternative approach in selected patients.
RESUMO
Perforation of abdominal viscera and protrusion of the distal end of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) through natural orifice is well known but rare complication. We report a case of a transanal protrusion of distal end of VPS through appendix perforation without any symptomatology of prior appendicitis. To the best of our knowledge, no case of such kind has been reported in literature yet. The management plan of these patients should be looked in a different way because they may have underlying inflammation of the appendix and distal end of shunt removal should be done by proper surgical exploration followed by added appendicectomy.