Appraising failure of surgical and percutaneous revascularization: long term outcomes from an observational registry.

AIM: Many randomized trials have compared coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in terms of efficacy, but data comparing outcomes of patients in which these two techniques have failed are lacking. METHODS: We included patients undergoing PCI at our center between July 2002 and December 2004. Subjects were distinguished in 2 groups: those with at least one occluded or stenotic saphenous vein graft (CABG failure), and those with at least one stent with angiographically documented restenosis (PCI failure). The primary endpoint was the long-term rate of major adverse clinical events. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirthy four patients were included, with a medium follow up of 61±13 months; 134 were assigned to the CABG failure group, and 104 to the PCI failure group, sharing high rates of baseline risk factors. At long term rates of death were higher in post CABG group (22.1% vs. 9.9%; P=0.015, RR 2.24 C.I. 95% 1.14-4.40) while death rates in patients with diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (24.0% vs. 23.5%; P=0.969, RR 1.020 C.I. 95% 0.38-2.74) were not different CONCLUSION: PCI can be safely offered to both these kinds of patients: as recently demonstrated post CABG outcomes seem to be more favorable in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Short and long-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft.

AIM: Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) represent a sizable portion of those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): in many instances, it is unclear whether performing PCI on the bypass graft or in the native coronary vessels can offer the best risk-benefit balance. METHODS: We included patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI at our center between July 2002 and June 2004 and we distinguished them in three groups. Those in whom PCI was performed on stenotic saphenous vein graft (SVG group), those in whom PCI was performed on native vessels despite the presence of potentially treatable SVG disease (optional native group), and those in whom PCI had to be performed mandatorily in the native vessels because of chronic SVG occlusions or disease in non-bypassed segments (mandatory native group). The primary end-point was long-term rate of major adverse clinical events (MACE, i.e. death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). RESULTS: We identified 109 patients: 28 were in the SVG group, 25 in the optional native group, and 56 in the mandatory native group. Early major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred with similar frequency in the three groups (respectively, 9.1%, 0% and 5.7%, P=0.35). After more than three years of follow-up, MACE occurred in 39.3% vs. 28 and 39.4% (P=0.59), death occurred in 27.2 vs. 24.0% vs. 13.5% (P=0.30), and TVR in 27.3% vs. 8.0% vs. 28.8% (P=0.14). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, PCI of native coronary vessels despite the presence of apparently treatable SVG lesions can be envisioned.