RESUMO
Background: COVID-19, the most destructive pandemic of this century, caused the highest mortality rate among ICU patients. The evaluation of these patients is insufficient in lower-middle-income countries with limited resources during pandemics. As a result, our primary goal was to examine the characteristics of patients at baseline as well as their survival outcomes, and propose mortality predictors for identifying and managing the most vulnerable patients more effectively and quickly. Methods: A prospective analysis of COVID-19 ICU-admitted patients was conducted in our healthcare centre in Iran, from 1 April until 20 May 2020. Ninety-three patients were included in the study, and all were unvaccinated. A multi-variate logistic regression was conducted to evaluate mortality-associated factors. Results: There were 53 non-survivors among our ICU-admitted patients. The mean duration from symptoms' onset to hospitalization was 6.92 ± 4.27 days, and from hospitalization to ICU admission was 2.52 ± 3.61 days. The average hospital stay for patients was 13.23 ± 10.43 days, with 8.84 ± 7.53 days in the ICU. Non-survivors were significantly older, had significantly lower haemoglobin levels and higher creatine phosphokinase levels compared to survivors. They had marginally lower SpO2 levels at admission, higher vasopressor administrations, and were intubated more significantly during their ICU stay. The use of immunosuppressive drugs was also significantly higher in non-survivors. Logistic regression revealed that a one-point increase in APACHE II score at ICU admission increased mortality by 6%, and the presence of underlying diseases increased mortality by 4.27 times. Conclusion: The authors presented clinical mortality prediction factors for critically ill patients infected with COVID-19. Additional studies are necessary to identify more generalized mortality indicators for these patients in lower-middle-income countries.
RESUMO
Since numerous studies have stated that there may be a relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and because of the high prevalence of both conditions worldwide, this study investigated the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients infected with H. pylori. Following a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase, and a search in Google Scholar using MeSH terms such as H. pylori and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, the relevant papers up to November 2020 were reviewed. All cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies that examined the risk of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients infected with H. pylori entered this study. A meta-analysis was conducted in STATA 11. This systematic review examined 22 papers with 117 117 participants (33 711 patients infected with H. pylori and 83 406 participants as control) and 20 studies were subjected to meta-analysis The results indicated a 22% to 27% increase in the risk of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients infected with H. pylori (crude odds ratio: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17-1.33; and adjusted odds ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.09-1.35). According to the subgroup analysis, the study region, sample size, and the method of diagnosing H. pylori were the factors contributing to the high heterogeneity. The meta-analysis revealed the increased risk of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients infected with H. pylori. This indicates that H. pylori is a serious risk factor in patients susceptible to NAFLD.
