The peculiar dermatoscopic pattern of scalp melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Melanomas developing on anatomic sites other than the trunk and extremities have a special pathogenetic and mutational profile, morphologic characteristics and biologic behaviour. OBJECTIVE: By retrospectively screening the databases of our centres, we aimed to investigate the dermatoscopic morphology of early scalp melanoma, including in situ and invasive tumours with a Breslow thickness up to 1 mm. METHODS: The databases of three specialized centres for skin cancer diagnosis and management in Greece were retrospectively evaluated to retrieve dermatoscopic images of scalp melanomas. Patients' age and sex were recorded, as well as the precise location of the tumour, using 6 possible sub-locations: frontal, parietal, occipital, temporal, nuchal scalp and vertex. The dermatoscopic images were evaluated by 3 independent investigators for the presence of pre-defined criteria. The dermatoscopic criteria included in the evaluation were selected based on available literature and were categorized in 2 groups: 'classic melanoma criteria' and 'lentigo maligna (LM) criteria'. RESULTS: Of 38 melanomas, 37 (97.4%) displayed brown colour and 23 (60.5%) displayed additional grey or blue colour. The most frequent dermatoscopic criteria were regression (18/38, 47.4%), grey dots/globules (17/38, 44.7%), atypical network (16/38, 42.1%), obliterated follicles (16/38, 42.1%) and angulated lines (15/38, 39.5%). Of 38 melanomas, 28 (73.7%) displayed at least 1 classic melanoma criterion plus at least 1 LM criterion. Of the remaining melanomas, 8 (21.1%) displayed only classic melanoma criteria, 1 (2.6%) only LM criteria and 1 (2.6%) did not exhibit any of the evaluated criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that early scalp melanoma combines classic with LM criteria in terms of colours and structures.

Delayed localized hypersensitivity reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: a 6-month retrospective study.

Several individuals have developed delayed localized cutaneous vaccine reactions to the two novel mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. Clinical and histopathologic results of this case series study confirm that the localized injection-site reactions to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are delayed hypersensitivity reactions that, unlike immediate hypersensitivity reactions, are not a contraindication to vaccination.

Is apremilast for psoriasis as effective and safe as reported in clinical trials? Five-year experience from a Greek tertiary hospital: long-term real-life efficacy and safety of apremilast in Greece.

Apremilast has been approved as an effective and safe treatment for psoriasis, but clinical trial results may differ from real-life data. This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in a Greek cohort of adult patients with psoriasis who had received at least one dose of apremilast between March 2016 and January 2021. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who achieved 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75) at Week 16. Absolute PASI, PASI90 (90% reduction) and adverse events were also recorded at various timepoints. In total, 102 patients (29.4% women, 70.6% men) with a mean ± SD age 55.94 ± 15.21 years were included. PASI75 and PASI90 were achieved by 20.8% and 1.98% of patients, respectively, at Week 16. According to our results, PASI90 achievement was significantly lower than that reported in clinical trials. The efficacy of apremilast increased gradually until Week 24, with further improvement noted in good responders up to Week 52.

European S1 guidelines on the management of lichen planus: a cooperation of the European Dermatology Forum with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory and immune-mediated disease that affects the skin, hair, nails and mucous membranes. Although there is a broad clinical spectrum of lichen planus manifestations, the skin and oral cavity remain the major sites of involvement. A group of European dermatologists with a long-standing interest and expertise in lichen planus has sought to define therapeutic guidelines for the management of patients with LP. The clinical features, diagnosis and possible medications that clinicians can use, in order to control the disease, will be reviewed in this manuscript. The revised final version of the lichen planus guideline was passed on to the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) for a final consensus with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV).

Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): an expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society.

BACKGROUND: Over the last few years, several articles on dermoscopy of non-neoplastic dermatoses have been published, yet there is poor consistency in the terminology among different studies. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to standardize the dermoscopic terminology and identify basic parameters to evaluate in non-neoplastic dermatoses through an expert consensus. METHODS: The modified Delphi method was followed, with two phases: (i) identification of a list of possible items based on a systematic literature review and (ii) selection of parameters by a panel of experts through a three-step iterative procedure (blinded e-mail interaction in rounds 1 and 3 and a face-to-face meeting in round 2). Initial panellists were recruited via e-mail from all over the world based on their expertise on dermoscopy of non-neoplastic dermatoses. RESULTS: Twenty-four international experts took part in all rounds of the consensus and 13 further international participants were also involved in round 2. Five standardized basic parameters were identified: (i) vessels (including morphology and distribution); (ii) scales (including colour and distribution); (iii) follicular findings; (iv) 'other structures' (including colour and morphology); and (v) 'specific clues'. For each of them, possible variables were selected, with a total of 31 different subitems reaching agreement at the end of the consensus (all of the 29 proposed initially plus two more added in the course of the consensus procedure). CONCLUSIONS: This expert consensus provides a set of standardized basic dermoscopic parameters to follow when evaluating inflammatory, infiltrative and infectious dermatoses. This tool, if adopted by clinicians and researchers in this field, is likely to enhance the reproducibility and comparability of existing and future research findings and uniformly expand the universal knowledge on dermoscopy in general dermatology. What's already known about this topic? Over the last few years, several papers have been published attempting to describe the dermoscopic features of non-neoplastic dermatoses, yet there is poor consistency in the terminology among different studies. What does this study add? The present expert consensus provides a set of standardized basic dermoscopic parameters to follow when evaluating inflammatory, infiltrative and infectious dermatoses. This consensus should enhance the reproducibility and comparability of existing and future research findings and uniformly expand the universal knowledge on dermoscopy in general dermatology.