Fostering belonging in academic anaesthesiology: faculty and department chair perspectives on supporting women anaesthesiologists.

An increasing number of global initiatives aim to address the disconnection between the increasing number of women entering medicine and the persistence of gender imbalance in the physician anaesthesiologist workforce. This commentary complements the global movement's efforts to increase women's representation in academic anaesthesiology by presenting considerations for fostering inclusion for women in academic anaesthesiology from both the faculty and departmental leadership perspectives in a US academic anaesthesiology department.

The Year in Vascular Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2018.

This special article is the second in an annual series for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia that is specifically dedicated to highlights in vascular anesthesiology published in 2018. This review begins with 2 updates in preoperative medicine in the vascular surgery population, including recent publications regarding the management of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers and antiplatelet medications in the perioperative period. The next section focuses on complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic surgery, particularly as technology advances allow for endovascular repair of more complex anatomy. The final section focuses on quality in vascular surgery and evaluates recent publications that examine the safety and feasibility of fast-track endovascular aortic surgery. Even though this is only a sampling of the literature published in 2018 relevant to the cardiovascular anesthesiologist, these themes represent some of the topics most clinically relevant to the perioperative period.

Quality Improvement in Anesthesiology - Leveraging Data and Analytics to Optimize Outcomes.

Quality improvement is at the heart of practice of anesthesiology. Objective data are critical for any quality improvement initiative; when possible, a combination of process, outcome, and balancing metrics should be evaluated to gauge the value of an intervention. Quality improvement is an ongoing process; iterative reevaluation of data is required to maintain interventions, ensure continued effectiveness, and continually improve. Dashboards can facilitate rapid analysis of data and drive decision making. Large data sets can be useful to establish benchmarks and compare performance against other providers, practices, or institutions. Audit and feedback strategies are effective in facilitating positive change.

The influence of neurophysiologic monitoring on the management of pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass.

We describe a process by which we sought to determine how the addition of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) impacted the management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during pediatric cardiac surgery. While maintaining a consistent team of surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and perfusionists, a multi-modal, IONM program was established consisting of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, Transcranial Doppler, and eight channel electroencephalography. A retrospective review of cases from 1 year before the institution of the IONM program was compared with data obtained from cases performed after neurophysiologic monitoring was established as a standard of care for pediatric patients on CPB. This comparative analysis of CPB management revealed a significant increase in the use of donor blood added to the CPB circuit prime as well as in the maintenance of a higher hematocrit during the bypass period after the implementation of IONM. These changes in the management of pediatric CPB correlated with recommendations of previous studies that examined postoperative neurophysiologic outcomes, suggesting that these changes were not only consistent with best practices, but that the presence of IONM data facilitated a transition to evidence-based practice.