Myocardial tagging and strain analysis at 3 Tesla: comparison with 1.5 Tesla imaging.

PURPOSE: To determine whether imaging at 3 T could improve and prolong the tag contrast compared to images acquired at 1.5 T in normal volunteers, and whether such improvement would translate into the ability to perform strain measurements in diastole. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Normal volunteers (N = 13) were scanned at 1.5 T (GE Signa CV/i) and 3.0 T (GE VH/i). An ECG-triggered, segmented k-space, spoiled-gradient-echo grid-tagged sequence was used during cine acquisition. Tag contrast was determined by the difference of the mean signal intensity (SI) of the tagline to the mean SI of the myocardium divided by the standard deviation (SD) of the noise (CNR(tag)). Matched short-axis (SA) slices were analyzed. Strain measurements were performed on images using a 2D strain analysis software program (harmonic phase (HARP)). RESULTS: The average CNR(tag) over the cardiac cycle was superior at 3 T compared to 1.5 T for all slices (3 T: 23.4 +/- 12.1, 1.5 T: 9.8 +/- 8.4; P < 0.0001). This difference remained significant at cycle initiation, end-systole, and the end R-R interval (at cycle termination: 3 T = 14.0 +/- 11.0 vs. 1.5 T = 4.4 +/- 3.5; P < 0.01). Strain measures were obtainable only in early systole for 1.5 T images, but were robust throughout the entire R-R interval for 3 T images. CONCLUSION: Imaging at 3 T had a significant benefit for myocardial tag persistence through the cardiac cycle. The improvement allowed strain analysis to be performed into diastole.

3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses.

PURPOSE: To compare myocardial enhancement during first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla (T) and 1.5T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First-pass myocardial perfusion imaging was performed on twelve normal subjects at 3T and 1.5T using an interleaved notched saturation recovery gradient echo pulse sequence. Subjects received either 0.10 mmol/kg for both scans (group 1), 0.075 mmol/kg for both scans (group 2), or 0.075 mmol/kg for the 3T scan and 0.10 mmol/kg for the 1.5T scan (group 3). RESULTS: Contrast enhancement was significantly greater at 3T than at 1.5T for the 12 subjects whether enhancement was normalized to baseline signal intensity (2.58 +/- 0.76 vs. 1.52 +/- 0.37, p < 0.0001) or to noise (57.6 +/- 19.7 vs. 14.7 +/- 7.8, p < 0001). For each of the three groups, contrast enhancement was significantly greater at 3T versus 1.5T (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001, p < 0.008 when normalized to baseline signal; p < 0.0001 for all groups when normalized to noise). CONCLUSION: 3T improves contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at either 0.10 mmol/kg or 0.075 mmol/kg.