RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fetal smallness affects 10% of pregnancies. Small fetuses are at a higher risk of adverse outcomes. Their management using estimated fetal weight and feto-maternal Doppler has a high sensitivity for adverse outcomes; however, more than 60% of fetuses are electively delivered at 37 to 38 weeks. On the other hand, classification using angiogenic factors seems to have a lower false-positive rate. Here, we present a protocol for the Fetal Growth Restriction at Term Managed by Angiogenic Factors Versus Feto-Maternal Doppler (GRAFD) trial, which compares the use of angiogenic factors and Doppler to manage small fetuses at term. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to demonstrate that classification based on angiogenic factors is not inferior to estimated fetal weight and Doppler at detecting fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted in 20 hospitals across Spain. A total of 1030 singleton pregnancies with an estimated fetal weight ≤10th percentile at 36+0 to 37+6 weeks+days will be recruited and randomly allocated to either the control or the intervention group. In the control group, standard Doppler-based management will be used. In the intervention group, cases with a soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase to placental growth factor ratio ≥38 will be classified as having fetal growth restriction; otherwise, they will be classified as being small for gestational age. In both arms, the fetal growth restriction group will be delivered at ≥37 weeks and the small for gestational age group at ≥40 weeks. We will assess differences between the groups by calculating the relative risk, the absolute difference between incidences, and their 95% CIs. RESULTS: Recruitment for this study started on September 28, 2020. The study results are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences in early 2023. CONCLUSIONS: The angiogenic factor-based protocol may reduce the number of pregnancies classified as having fetal growth restriction without worsening perinatal outcomes. Moreover, reducing the number of unnecessary labor inductions would reduce costs and the risks derived from possible iatrogenic complications. Additionally, fewer inductions would lower the rate of early-term neonates, thus improving neonatal outcomes and potentially reducing long-term infant morbidities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04502823; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04502823. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/37452.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In women with a singleton pregnancy and sonographic short cervix in midgestation, vaginal administration of progesterone reduces the risk of early preterm birth and improves neonatal outcomes without any demonstrable deleterious effects on childhood neurodevelopment. In women with twin pregnancies, the rate of spontaneous early preterm birth is 10 times higher than that in singletons, and in this respect, all twins are at an increased risk of preterm birth. However, 6 trials in unselected twin pregnancies reported that vaginal administration of progesterone from midgestation had no significant effect on the incidence of early preterm birth. Such apparent lack of effectiveness of progesterone in twins may be due to inadequate dosage or treatment that is started too late in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The early vaginal progesterone for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in twins, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, was designed to test the hypothesis that among women with twin pregnancies, vaginal progesterone at a dose of 600 mg per day from 11 to 14 until 34 weeks' gestation, as compared with placebo, would result in a significant reduction in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks. STUDY DESIGN: The trial was conducted at 22 hospitals in England, Spain, Bulgaria, Italy, Belgium, and France. Women were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either progesterone or placebo, and in the random-sequence generation, there was stratification according to the participating center. The primary outcome was spontaneous birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks' gestation. Statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the significance of difference in the incidence of spontaneous birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks' gestation between the progesterone and placebo groups, adjusting for the effect of participating center, chorionicity, parity, and method of conception. Prespecified tests of treatment interaction effects with chorionicity, parity, method of conception, compliance, and cervical length at recruitment were performed. A post hoc analysis using mixed-effects Cox regression was used for further exploration of the effect of progesterone on preterm birth. RESULTS: We recruited 1194 women between May 2017 and April 2019; 21 withdrew consent and 4 were lost to follow-up, which left 582 in the progesterone group and 587 in the placebo group. Adherence was good, with reported intake of ≥80% of the required number of capsules in 81.4% of the participants. After excluding births before 24 weeks and indicated deliveries before 34 weeks, spontaneous birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks occurred in 10.4% (56/541) of participants in the progesterone group and in 8.2% (44/538) in the placebo group (odds ratio in the progesterone group, adjusting for the effect of participating center, chorionicity, parity, and method of conception, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.05; P=.17). There was no evidence of interaction between the effects of treatment and chorionicity (P=.28), parity (P=.35), method of conception (P=.56), and adherence (P=.34); however, there was weak evidence of an interaction with cervical length (P=.08) suggestive of harm to those with a cervical length of ≥30 mm (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.59) and potential benefit for those with a cervical length of <30 mm (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-1.60). There was no evidence of difference between the 2 treatment groups for stillbirth or neonatal death, neonatal complications, neonatal therapy, and poor fetal growth. In the progesterone group, 1.4% (8/582) of women and 1.9% (22/1164) of fetuses experienced at least 1 serious adverse event; the respective numbers for the placebo group were 1.2% (7/587) and 3.2% (37/1174) (P=.80 and P=.06, respectively). In the post hoc time-to-event analysis, miscarriage or spontaneous preterm birth between randomization and 31+6 weeks' gestation was reduced in the progesterone group relative to the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.69). CONCLUSION: In women with twin pregnancies, universal treatment with vaginal progesterone did not reduce the incidence of spontaneous birth between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks' gestation. Post hoc time-to-event analysis led to the suggestion that progesterone may reduce the risk of spontaneous birth before 32 weeks' gestation in women with a cervical length of <30 mm, and it may increase the risk for those with a cervical length of ≥30 mm.
