Testing of symmetric biphasic stimulation in Vim-DBS ET patients: a randomized-controlled pilot study.

Introduction: Symmetric biphasic pulses have been shown to increase the therapeutic window compared to standard cathodic pulses in ET Vim-DBS patients. Furthermore, three hours of stimulation with biphasic pulses caused less stimulation-induced ataxia compared to cathodic pulses. Therefore, an investigation of the longer-term safety of biphasic pulses is warranted. Methods: Seven ET patients were included in a randomized double-blind, cross-over design of one week home-use of symmetric biphasic stimulation (anodic phase first) versus cathodic stimulation. Amplitude was set in a double-blinded way, at the tremor arrest threshold. The primary outcome was safety assessed by documenting the adverse events. Secondary outcome parameters were stimulation amplitude, tremor (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale) and ataxia (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale) severity, quality of life (Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire) and cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment). Three patients continued in the open-label extension phase for 3 months, during which biphasic stimulation-only was further assessed by the same outcome parameters. Results: During the 1 week testing, no adverse effects were reported. To obtain equivalent tremor control, the amplitude of the biphasic pulse was significantly higher compared to that of the cathodic pulse (p = 0.003). The other outcome parameters were not significantly different. During the open-label study, one patient used the remote control to increase the amplitude, leading to two falls caused by stimulation-induced ataxia. No other adverse effects occurred. Discussion and conclusion: In a small cohort, when tested for one week, symmetric biphasic pulses suggest to be safe, but require higher stimulation amplitudes. Further follow-up studies are needed to investigate long-term effects and safety.

Deep brain stimulation with short versus conventional pulse width in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To maximize clinical benefit and minimize stimulation-induced side effects, optimising deep brain stimulation (DBS) parameters is paramount. Recent literature suggests a potential benefit of short pulse width DBS (spDBS; ≤40 µs) over conventional pulse width DBS (cDBS; ≥60 µs) in movement disorders. OBJECTIVE: To compare therapeutic window (TW), therapeutic and side effects and energy consumption of spDBS and cDBS in movement disorders. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Appropriate paired analyses were performed. RESULTS: Nine Parkinson's disease (PD) (143 patients), 4 essential tremor (ET) (26 patients) and no dystonia studies were included in the meta-analysis. TW defined as therapeutic amplitude range was larger with spDBS vs. cDBS in PD (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.04, p < 0.001) and ET (SMD = -0.71, p < 0.001), but the TW in terms of charge per pulse (CPP) did not differ. In PD, no differences were found in therapeutic and side effects (MDS-UPDRS-III, speech and gait, dyskinesia, non-motor symptoms and quality of life). In ET, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale was lower with spDBS vs. cDBS (SMD = 0.36, p < 0.001). A qualitative analysis suggested fewer stimulation-induced side effects with spDBS. CPP was lower with spDBS vs. cDBS in PD (SMD = 0.79, p < 0.001) and ET (MD = 46.46 nC, p < 0.001), but real-world data on battery longevity are lacking. CONCLUSION: Although spDBS enlarges the TW as a wider amplitude range in both PD and ET, it does not alter TW defined by CPP. The therapeutic efficacy of spDBS is not different from cDBS in PD, but spDBS apparently induces more tremor reduction in ET.

Effects of ventro-oral thalamic deep brain stimulation in a patient with musician's dystonia: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Musician's dystonia is a task-specific focal hand dystonia characterized by involuntary contraction of muscles while playing a musical instrument. Current treatment options are often insufficient. OBSERVATIONS: We present the effects of ventro-oral thalamic deep brain stimulation in a patient with musician's dystonia. The patient was a 67-year-old pianist with musician's dystonia who underwent deep brain stimulation with the ventralis oralis anterior and posterior nuclei of the thalamus as targets. The Tubiana and Chamagne rating scale was used to evaluate the effects of stimulation. The outcome was evaluated independently by four clinicians in a blinded manner at 3 months postoperatively. There was a distinct reduction of symptoms during stimulation. At 15 months postoperatively, the beneficial effect remained. No lasting side effects were observed. LESSONS: Further studies are warranted to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of this treatment modality.

EEG-based biomarkers for optimizing deep brain stimulation contact configuration in Parkinson's disease.

Objective: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a neurosurgical therapy to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). Optimal therapeutic outcomes are not achieved in all patients due to increased DBS technological complexity; programming time constraints; and delayed clinical response of some symptoms. To streamline the programming process, biomarkers could be used to accurately predict the most effective stimulation configuration. Therefore, we investigated if DBS-evoked potentials (EPs) combined with imaging to perform prediction analyses could predict the best contact configuration. Methods: In 10 patients, EPs were recorded in response to stimulation at 10 Hz for 50 s on each DBS-contact. In two patients, we recorded from both hemispheres, resulting in recordings from a total of 12 hemispheres. A monopolar review was performed by stimulating on each contact and measuring the therapeutic window. CT and MRI data were collected. Prediction models were created to assess how well the EPs and imaging could predict the best contact configuration. Results: EPs at 3 ms and at 10 ms were recorded. The prediction models showed that EPs can be combined with imaging data to predict the best contact configuration and hence, significantly outperformed random contact selection during a monopolar review. Conclusion: EPs can predict the best contact configuration. Ultimately, these prediction tools could be implemented into daily practice to ease the DBS programming of PD patients.

Acute stimulation with symmetric biphasic pulses induces less ataxia compared to cathodic pulses in DBS for essential tremor.

BACKGROUND: Symmetric biphasic pulses have been shown to acutely increase the therapeutic window of ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation (Vim-DBS) for essential tremor (ET) compared to cathodic pulses. Acute supratherapeutic stimulation can induce ataxic side effects in Vim-DBS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect on tremor, ataxia and dysarthria of 3 h of biphasic stimulation in patients with DBS for ET. METHODS: A randomized, doubled-blind, cross-over design was used to compare standard cathodic pulses with symmetric biphasic pulses (anode-first) during a 3-h period per pulse shape. During each 3-h period, all stimulation parameters were identical, except for the pulse shape. Tremor (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), ataxia (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale) and speech (acoustic and perceptual measures) were assessed hourly during the 3-h periods. RESULTS: Twelve ET patients were included. During the 3-h stimulation period, tremor control was equivalent between the two pulse shapes. Biphasic pulses elicited significantly less ataxia than cathodic pulses (p = 0.006). Diadochokinesis rate of speech was better for the biphasic pulse (p = 0.048), but other measures for dysarthria were not significantly different between the pulses. CONCLUSION: Symmetric biphasic pulses induce less ataxia than conventional pulses after 3 h of stimulation DBS in ET patients.

Interphase Gaps in Symmetric Biphasic Pulses Reduce the Therapeutic Window in Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus-Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor.

INTRODUCTION: Symmetric biphasic pulses enlarge the therapeutic window in thalamic deep brain stimulation in patients with essential tremor. Adding an interphase gap to these symmetric biphasic pulses may further affect the therapeutic window. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients (16 hemispheres) were included in this study. Biphasic pulses (anodic phase first) with interphase gaps of 0, 10, 20, 50, and 100 µs were tested, in random order. The outcome parameters were the therapeutic threshold (TT) and side-effect threshold (SET), and thus also the therapeutic window (TW). RESULTS: Increasing interphase gaps lowered both SET and TT (linear mixed-effects model; p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Because SET decreased predominantly, increasing interphase gaps resulted in smaller TWs (linear mixed-effects model; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Introducing an interphase gap in a symmetric biphasic pulse may lead to less selectivity in fiber or neuronal activation. Our findings show that, in the context of anode-first biphasic pulses, the use of zero-interphase gaps results in the largest TW. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT05177900.

Electrophysiologic Evidence That Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Activates Distinct Neural Circuits in Patients With Parkinson Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) delivered via multicontact leads implanted in the basal ganglia is an established therapy to treat Parkinson disease (PD). However, the different neural circuits that can be modulated through stimulation on different DBS contacts are poorly understood. Evidence shows that electrically stimulating the subthalamic nucleus (STN) causes a therapeutic effect through antidromic activation of the hyperdirect pathway-a monosynaptic connection from the cortex to the STN. Recent studies suggest that stimulating the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) may improve gait. The advent of directional DBS leads now provides a spatially precise means to probe these neural circuits and better understand how DBS affects distinct neural networks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured cortical evoked potentials (EPs) using electroencephalography (EEG) in response to low-frequency DBS using the different directional DBS contacts in eight patients with PD. RESULTS: A short-latency EP at 3 milliseconds originating from the primary motor cortex appeared largest in amplitude when stimulating DBS contacts closest to the dorsolateral STN (p < 0.001). A long-latency EP at 10 milliseconds originating from the premotor cortex appeared strongest for DBS contacts closest to the SNr (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that at the individual patient level, electrical stimulation of different nuclei produces distinct EP signatures. Our approach could be used to identify the functional location of each DBS contact and thus help patient-specific DBS programming. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT04658641.

Aligning Dentato-Rubro-Thalamic Tract and Subthalamic Nucleus Targets in a Patient with Comorbid Essential Tremor and Parkinson's Disease: Case Report.

Deep brain stimulation is an established treatment option for both essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD), although typically targeting different brain structures. Some patients are diagnosed with comorbid ET and PD. Selecting the optimal stimulation target in these patients is challenging. We present a patient with comorbid ET and PD in whom we used bilaterally a single parietal trajectory to align the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract and the subthalamic nucleus. Although parietal trajectories are challenging, we reached satisfactory outcomes for both conditions without complications. Single-electrode deep brain stimulation of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract and the subthalamic nucleus through a parietal approach may represent a feasible treatment option in this patient group.

Current Steering Using Multiple Independent Current Control Deep Brain Stimulation Technology Results in Distinct Neurophysiological Responses in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective neuromodulation therapy to treat people with medication-refractory Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the neural networks affected by DBS are not yet fully understood. Recent studies show that stimulating on different DBS-contacts using a single current source results in distinct EEG-based evoked potentials (EPs), with a peak at 3 ms (P3) associated with dorsolateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation and a peak at 10 ms associated with substantia nigra stimulation. Multiple independent current control (MICC) technology allows the center of the electric field to be moved in between two adjacent DBS-contacts, offering a potential advantage in spatial precision. Objective: Determine if MICC precision targeting results in distinct neurophysiological responses recorded via EEG. Materials and Methods: We recorded cortical EPs in five hemispheres (four PD patients) using EEG whilst employing MICC to move the electric field from the most dorsal DBS-contact to the most ventral in 15 incremental steps. Results: The center of the electric field location had a significant effect on both the P3 and P10 amplitude in all hemispheres where a peak was detected (P3, detected in 4 of 5 hemispheres, p < 0.0001; P10, detected in 5 of 5 hemispheres, p < 0.0001). Post hoc analysis indicated furthermore that MICC technology can significantly refine the resolution of steering. Conclusion: Using MICC to incrementally move the center of the electric field to locations between adjacent DBS-contacts resulted in significantly different neurophysiological responses that may allow further precision of the programming of individual patients.

Anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses enlarge the therapeutic window in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

BACKGROUND: Since the inception of DBS, cathodic pulses have been used. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses on the therapeutic window (TW) in essential tremor (ET) patients. METHODS: A randomized, doubled-blinded, cross-over design was used to test the effect of cathodic, anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses (cathode-first and anode-first) on the TW in an acute clinical setting. TW was defined as the difference between the minimal stimulation amplitude provoking side effects and minimal stimulation amplitude inducing tremor arrest. RESULTS: 9 ET patients (10 hemispheres) were included. Anodic stimulation induced a significantly larger TW compared to cathodic stimulation (p = 0.008). Symmetric biphasic stimulation also widened the TW compared to cathodic stimulation for both cathode- (p = 0.047) and anode-first (p = 0.008) biphasic pulses. For both anodic and biphasic pulses, the effect on TW was mainly driven by the change in side effect threshold. The order of the phases in the biphasic pulse had a significant effect on the side effect threshold (p = 0.039), with biphasic-anode first having the highest value. All pulse shapes were safe in the acute setting. CONCLUSION: Anodic and symmetric biphasic pulses increase TW in ET patients.

Towards biomarker-based optimization of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients.

Background: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). To maximize therapeutic outcome, optimal DBS settings must be carefully selected for each patient. Unfortunately, this is not always achieved because of: (1) increased technological complexity of DBS devices, (2) time restraints, or lack of expertise, and (3) delayed therapeutic response of some symptoms. Biomarkers to accurately predict the most effective stimulation settings for each patient could streamline this process and improve DBS outcomes. Objective: To investigate the use of evoked potentials (EPs) to predict clinical outcomes in PD patients with DBS. Methods: In ten patients (12 hemispheres), a monopolar review was performed by systematically stimulating on each DBS contact and measuring the therapeutic window. Standard imaging data were collected. EEG-based EPs were then recorded in response to stimulation at 10 Hz for 50 s on each DBS-contact. Linear mixed models were used to assess how well both EPs and image-derived information predicted the clinical data. Results: Evoked potential peaks at 3 ms (P3) and at 10 ms (P10) were observed in nine and eleven hemispheres, respectively. Clinical data were well predicted using either P3 or P10. A separate model showed that the image-derived information also predicted clinical data with similar accuracy. Combining both EPs and image-derived information in one model yielded the highest predictive value. Conclusion: Evoked potentials can accurately predict clinical DBS responses. Combining EPs with imaging data further improves this prediction. Future refinement of this approach may streamline DBS programming, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04658641.