Making the invisible visible: bioelectrical impedance analysis demonstrates unfavourable body composition in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To examine differences between the assessment of body composition by body mass index (BMI) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: The body composition of RA patients was assessed during their visit to the outpatient department of a Dutch academic hospital using BMI, fat-free mass index (FFMI), and fat mass index (FMI). FFMI and FMI were determined by single-frequency BIA. RESULTS: Sixty-five consecutive RA patients (83% women, mean age 58 years, median disease duration 7 years) with moderately active disease [mean Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts (DAS28) = 3.40; mean Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) score = 3.49] and moderate disability [mean Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score = 0.87] were included. Based on BMI, 2% of our study population were underweight, 45% had a healthy body composition, and 54% were overweight or obese. Based on BIA, 18% of the patients showed a low FFMI and 74% had a high or very high FMI. Low FFMI was found in 44% of the women with a normal BMI, and high FMI was found in 40% of the women and 75% of the men with a normal BMI. CONCLUSIONS: A high frequency of unfavourable body composition, predominantly reduced FFMI and elevated FMI, was found in a cohort of RA patients with moderately active disease, turning BMI into an unreliable method for assessment of body composition in RA. BIA, however, might be the preferred method to assess FFMI and FMI in RA patients in clinical practice, as it is easy to use and relatively inexpensive.

Bomb calorimetry, the gold standard for assessment of intestinal absorption capacity: normative values in healthy ambulant adults.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal absorption capacity is considered to be the best method for assessing overall digestive intestinal function. Earlier reference values for intestinal function in healthy Dutch adults were based on a study that was conducted in an inpatient metabolic unit setting in a relatively small series. The present study aimed to readdress and describe the intestinal absorption capacity of healthy adults, who were consuming their usual (Western European) food and beverage diet, in a standard ambulatory setting. METHODS: Twenty-three healthy subjects (aged 22-60 years) were included in the analyses. Nutritional intake (energy and macronutrients) was determined with a 4-day nutritional diary. Subsequently, mean faecal losses of energy (by bomb calorimetry), fat, protein and carbohydrate were determined following a 3-day faecal collection. Finally, intestinal absorption capacity was calculated from the differences between intake and losses. RESULTS: Mean (SD) daily faeces production was 141 (49) g (29% dry weight), containing 891 (276) kJ [10.7 (1.3) kJ g(-1) wet faeces; 22.6 (2.5) kJ g(-1) dry faeces], 5.2 (2.2) g fat, 10.0 (3.8) g protein and 29.7 (11.7) g carbohydrates. Mean (SD) intestinal absorption capacity of healthy subjects was 89.4% (3.8%) for energy, 92.5% (3.7%) for fat, 86.9% (6.4%) for protein and 87.3% (6.6%) for carbohydrates. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides normative values for both stool nutrient composition and intestinal energy and macronutrient absorption in healthy adults on a regular Dutch diet in an ambulatory setting. Intestinal energy absorption was found to be approximately 90%.

Validity of nutritional screening with MUST and SNAQ in hospital outpatients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The majority of hospital outpatients with undernutrition is unrecognized, and therefore untreated. There is a need for an easy and valid screening tool to detect undernutrition in this setting. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the MUST (Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool) and SNAQ (Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire) tools for undernutrition screening in hospital outpatients. METHODS: In a large multicenter-hospital-outpatient population, patients were classified as: severely undernourished (body mass index (BMI) <18.5 (<65 years) or <20 ( ≥ 65 years) and/or unintentional weight loss >5% in the last month or >10% in the last 6 months), moderately undernourished (BMI 18.5-20 (<65 years) or 20-22 ( ≥ 65 years) and/or 5-10% unintentional weight loss in the last 6 months) or not undernourished. Diagnostic accuracy of the screening tools versus the reference method was expressed as sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: Out of the 2236 outpatients, 6% were severely and 7% were moderately undernourished according to the reference method. MUST and SNAQ identified 9% and 3% as severely undernourished, respectively. MUST had a low PPV (Se=75, Sp=95, PPV=43, NPV=98), whereas SNAQ had a low Se (Se=43, Sp=99, PPV=78, NPV=96). CONCLUSIONS: The validity of MUST and SNAQ is insufficient for hospital outpatients. While SNAQ identifies too few patients as undernourished, MUST identifies too many patients as undernourished. We advise to measure body weight, height and weight loss, in order to define undernutrition in hospital outpatients.

The SNAQ(RC), an easy traffic light system as a first step in the recognition of undernutrition in residential care.

OBJECTIVE: Development and validation of a quick and easy screening tool for the early detection of undernourished residents in nursing homes and residential homes. DESIGN: Multi-center, cross sectional observational study. SETTING: Nursing homes and residential homes. PARTICIPANTS: The screening tool was developed in a total of 308 residents (development sample; sample A) and cross validated in a new sample of 720 residents (validation sample) consisting of 476 nursing home residents (Sample B1) and 244 residential home residents (sample B2). MEASUREMENTS: Patients were defined severely undernourished when they met at least one of the following criteria: BMI or= 5% unintentional weight loss in the past month and/or >or= 10% unintentional weight loss in the past 6 months. Patients were defined as moderately undernourished if they met the following criteria: BMI 20.1-22 kg/m2 and/or 5-10% unintentional weight loss in the past six months. The most predictive questions (originally derived from previously developed screening instruments) of undernourishment were selected in sample A and cross validated in sample B. In a second stage BMI was added to the SNAQRC in sample B. The diagnostic accuracy of the screening tool in the development and validation samples was expressed in sensitivity, specificity, and the negative and positive predictive value. RESULTS: The four most predictive questions for undernutrition related to: unintentional weight loss more than 6 kg during the past 6 months and more than 3 kg in the past month, capability of eating and drinking with help, and decreased appetite during the past month. The diagnostic accuracy of these questions alone was insufficient (Se=45%, Sp=87%, PPV=50% and NPV=84%). However, combining the questions with measured BMI sufficiently improved the diagnostic accuracy (Se=87%, Sp=82%, PPV=59% and NPV=95%). CONCLUSION: Early detection of undernourished nursing- and residential home residents is possible using four screening questions and measured BMI.

Diagnosis and treatment of (disease-related) in-hospital malnutrition: the performance of medical and nursing staff.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Malnutrition continues to be an important problem in health care which is still under recognized and underrated in developed countries. This study aims to describe current practice in diagnosing and treating malnutrition by medical doctors, medical students and nurses prior, during and after hospitalisation. METHODS: Prospective analysis of current practice in assessing nutritional status and prescribing treatment by medical and nursing staff in a cohort of hospitalised patients from the general medical wards of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam. Comparison of objective identification of malnutrition by an independent observer with subjective identification by the medical and nursing staff. Quantification of diagnosing, treating and communicating malnutrition before, during and following hospital stay by medical doctors, medical students and nurses by evaluating the written information in medical and nursing charts, and referral and discharge letters. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-five women and men, aged 19-96 years, were included from June to September 2005. The prevalence of malnutrition was 31.9%. Nutritional information was not mentioned in written referrals. Medical doctors performed nutritional assessment in 15.3%, medical students in 52.8%, and nurses in 29.9% of their patients. Medical doctors were the most capable of differentiating between malnourished and well-nourished patients as a basis for undertaking nutritional assessment, although this was still inadequate. Little nutritional intervention was applied during hospital stay. Information on nutritional status was lacking in most discharge letters. Nutritional follow-up was appointed in 1.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional assessment and intervention were not sufficiently applied by any professional at any stage of the pre-, actual and post-hospitalisation period.

Screening malnutrition in hospital outpatients. Can the SNAQ malnutrition screening tool also be applied to this population?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is known from earlier studies that only 15% of the malnourished hospital outpatient population is recognized and receives nutritional treatment. To increase this number, a quick and easy malnutrition screening tool would be helpful. Because such a tool is lacking, we developed one by using the SNAQ (Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire) as a basis. The aim of this study was to develop a quick and easy malnutrition screening tool and to measure its diagnostic accuracy in malnourished hospital outpatients. METHODS: First, an optimal set of questions was selected for the preoperative outpatient population. Secondly, the diagnostic accuracy for the preoperative outpatients was determined (979 patients) and finally, the diagnostic accuracy for general hospital outpatients was established (705 patients). RESULTS: The three original SNAQ questions proved to be the best set of questions for the outpatient population as well. In the preoperative and general outpatient population the diagnostic accuracy resulted respectively in a sensitivity of 53% and 67%, a specificity of 97% and 98%, a positive predictive value of 69% and 72% and a negative predictive value of 94% and 97%. CONCLUSIONS: With an acceptable diagnostic accuracy it may be concluded that the original SNAQ malnutrition screening tool is valid for the hospital outpatient population.

The prognostic value of severe malnutrition in the development of nonthyroidal illness in head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid hormone metabolism is modulated by starvation and overfeeding but also by dietary composition. Unfortunately, little is known about the effect of malnutrition on disease-induced nonthyroidal illness (NTI). In this study, we investigated whether the degree of NTI after surgery differed between severely malnourished and well-fed patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Plasma levels of the thyroid hormones 3',5-triiodothyronine (T(3)), reverse T(3) (rT(3)), free T(4) (FT(4)), and thyrotropin (TSH) were measured on the first day before the operation and on the first, fourth, and seventh day after the operation in 16 malnourished patients who were admitted for intentional curative surgery of T1-T4 carcinomas of the head and neck. Six well-fed head and neck cancer patients eligible for surgical treatment served as a control group. RESULTS: In the malnourished group, rT(3) showed a significant increase, whereas T(3) and FT(4) decreased significantly due to the operation. TSH showed no significant change. During the postoperative course, it took 7 days until rT(3) and 4 days until T(3) and FT(4) were restored to their preoperative value. In contrast, well-fed patients did not develop NTI. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that peri- and postoperative rT(3), T(3), and FT(4) levels change significantly in malnourished patients compared with well-fed patients. Therefore, it can be concluded that nutrition status of patients undergoing major head and neck surgery should be optimized in order to prevent the development of NTI.

ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Non-surgical oncology.

Enteral nutrition (EN) by means of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) and tube feeding (TF) offers the possibility of increasing or ensuring nutrient intake in cases where normal food intake is inadequate. These guidelines are intended to give evidence-based recommendations for the use of ONS and TF in cancer patients. They were developed by an interdisciplinary expert group in accordance with officially accepted standards, are based on all relevant publications since 1985 and were discussed and accepted in a consensus conference. Undernutrition and cachexia occur frequently in cancer patients and are indicators of poor prognosis. EN should be started if undernutrition already exists or if food intake is markedly reduced for more than 7-10 days. Standard formulae are recommended for EN. Nutritional needs generally are comparable to non-cancer subjects. In cachectic patients metabolic modulators such as progestins, steroids and possibly eicosapentaenoic acid may help to improve nutritional status. EN is indicated preoperatively for 5-7 days in cancer patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. During radiotherapy of head/neck and gastrointestinal regions dietary counselling and ONS prevent weight loss and interruption of radiotherapy. Routine EN is not indicated during (high-dose) chemotherapy.

Are malnourished patients complex patients? Health status and care complexity of malnourished patients detected by the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ).

BACKGROUND: This article describes the characteristics of patients identified as malnourished using the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ) in terms of health status (quality of life, functional capacity, and body composition) and care complexity. We expected that by using the quick and easy SNAQ method of screening on malnutrition, inferences could be made about general health status and care complexity. This information can be used for optimal multi-disciplinary treatment of the malnourished patient. METHODS: The research population consisted of a group of 588 patients admitted to internal medicine and surgery wards of the VU university medical center. Patients with a SNAQ score of at least 3 points were considered malnourished. The SNAQ score was compared to the health status, which was determined by serum albumin, hand grip strength, quality of life, body composition, and estimated care complexity. RESULTS: At admission, 172 patients (29%) had a SNAQ score of at least 3 points. These patients had a significantly poorer quality of life, poorer physical functioning, a lower fat free mass index, and higher care complexity. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm our assumption that a considerable proportion of malnourished patients should be considered as complex patients and that malnutrition is an important aspect and indicator of overall health status of the patients. The SNAQ is a simple malnutrition screening tool, applicable in the current complex hospital situation, to identify these complex, malnourished patients.

Enteral (oral or tube administration) nutritional support and eicosapentaenoic acid in patients with cancer: a systematic review.

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy and potential benefits of enteral nutritional support [oral nutritional supplements (ONS) or enteral tube feeding (ETF)], and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, free acid, ethyl esters or fish oil; provided as capsules or enriched ONS or ETF) in patients with cancer. Clinical studies were identified using electronic databases, and studies were selected according to predetermined criteria. For each treatment modality (chemo/radiotherapy, surgery, and palliative care), the comparisons of interest were nutritional support vs. routine care (no nutritional support), EPA supplement (capsule or enriched ONS or ETF) vs. routine care (no supplement or standard supplement), ETF vs. parenteral nutrition (PN). The reviewed outcomes were dietary intake, anthropometry, clinical (mortality, length of hospital stay, complications, and quality of life) and haematological/biochemical (white blood cell count, serum transferrin and albumin, CD3-positive lymphocytes, and inflammatory markers). Meta-analyses were performed where possible. In patients undergoing radiotherapy, meta-analysis showed that ONS significantly increase dietary intake (381 kcal/day, 95% CI 193 to 569 in 3 RCTs) compared to routine care. In patients undergoing surgery, meta-analyses showed that ETF results in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (1.72 fewer days, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.54 in 8 RCTs), lower incidence of any complications (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.77 in 4 RCTs) and infectious complications (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82 in 11 RCTs) and lower sepsis scores (2.21 points, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.92 in 2 RCTs), but no difference in mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.29 in 7 RCTs) compared to PN. There was also no difference in mortality between ONS or ETF vs. routine care in patients undergoing chemotherapy/radiotherapy (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.62-1.61 in 4 RCTs) or surgery (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.75 to 7.95 in 4 RCTs). Individual studies of EPA supplementation as capsules showed improvements in survival, complications and inflammatory markers in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT). In palliative care patients receiving EPA-enriched ONS or capsules, there were inconsistent positive effects on survival and quality of life. In those undergoing surgery, EPA-enriched ETF had no effect. Further research is required to elucidate the clinical efficacy of enteral nutrition support, including the potential benefits of EPA supplementation, in patients with cancer.

Profile of the malnourished patient.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize malnutrition in a nonspecific group of newly admitted hospital patients. DESIGN: A prospective, descriptive study aiming to identify typical symptoms of malnutrition in a heterogeneous population of newly admitted patients to the wards of internal medicine. SETTING: The wards of internal medicine of the VU University Medical Center. SUBJECTS: A total of 106 patients were included in the study, 70 patients underwent the full interview. Next to nutritional status, the sociodemographics, underlying disease, estimated care complexity, care situation before admission, journey through the care system, nutritional intervention and nutritional follow-up after discharge were described for each patient. RESULTS: Of 70 patients 24 (34%) were malnourished. Malnourished patients suffered two chronic diseases vs one for well-nourished patients (P = 0.05). They also had a higher estimated care complexity (P = 0.035) and a trend towards longer length of hospital stay (P = 0.09). Malnourished patients did not differ from well-nourished patients in age, sex, partner status and care received at home. In all, 54% of the malnourished patients were identified correctly by the medical staff. The reasons for admission to the hospital were diverse in only four out of 24 patients malnutrition was the primary reason for admission. Discharge letters to the general practitioner (GP) contained only fragmentary information about the patients' nutritional status. At 3 months after discharge, most of the GPs were scarcely aware of any nutritional problems of their patients. CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition is difficult to recognize in a nonspecific hospital population. Patients do not present with unique symptoms indicating malnutrition. To be able to correctly identify all malnourished patients, screening of the nutritional status of all newly admitted patients seems to be necessary.

Development and validation of a hospital screening tool for malnutrition: the short nutritional assessment questionnaire (SNAQ).

OBJECTIVE: For the early detection and treatment of malnourished hospital patients no valid screening instrument for the Dutch language exists. Calculation of percentage weight loss and body mass index (BMI) by the nurse at admission to the hospital appeared to be not feasible. Therefore, the short, nutritional assessment questionnaire (SNAQ), was developed. RESEARCH, DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred and ninety one patients on the mixed internal and surgery/oncology wards of the VU University medical center were screened on nutritional status and classified as well nourished (<5% weight loss in the last 6 months and BMI>18.5), moderately malnourished (5-10% weight loss in the last 6 months and BMI>18.5) or severely malnourished (>10% weight loss in the last 6 months or >5% in the last month or BMI<18.5). All patients were asked 26 questions related to eating and drinking difficulties, defecation, condition and pain. Odds ratio, binary and multinomial logistic regression were used to determine the set of questions that best predicts the nutritional status. Based on the regression coefficient a score was composed to detect moderately (2 points) and severely (3 points) malnourished patients. The validity, the nurse-nurse reproducibility and nurse-dietitian reproducibility was tested in another but similar population of 297 patients. RESULTS: The questions 'Did you lose weight unintentionally?'. 'Did you experience a decreased appetite over the last month?' and 'Did you use supplemental drinks or tube feeding over the last month?' were most predictive of malnutrition. The instrument proved to be valid and reproducible. CONCLUSION: SNAQ is an easy, short, valid and reproducible questionnaire for early detection of hospital malnutrition.