RESUMO
Early amniocentesis (EA)-before 15 gestational weeks-is not recommended because of a high rate of miscarriages. Most studies performed amniocentesis at very early stages of pregnancy (11-13 weeks of gestational age). However, amniocentesis performed at 14 gestational weeks could be an important alternative to mid-trimester amniocentesis (MA) because it shortens the time period between the screening (non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT)) and the diagnostic test (amniocentesis). This study aimed to compare the procedure-related risk of miscarriage between MA (15 + 0 to 17 + 6 weeks of gestational age) and EA (14 + 0-6 weeks of gestational age). This is a multicentric, retrospective cohort study from 1 January 2007 to 21 November 2018, comparing the MA to the EA cohort. Procedure-related fetal loss is defined as spontaneous abortion occurring within 4 weeks of the procedure. Multiple gestations, amniocenteses performed after 17 or before 14 weeks, indications other than prenatal genetic diagnoses and procedures performed by less experienced gynaecologists were excluded. Complete outcome data were available for 1107 out of 1515 women (73.1%): 809 (69.9%) in the MA and 298 (83.2%) in the EA cohort. No significant difference was found (EA 0.82% vs. MA 0.36%; p = 0.646). The difference was 0.46% (odds ratio = 0.673; 95% confidence interval = 0.123-3.699). This study found no significant difference in the procedure-related risk of miscarriage when EA was compared to MA. EA might be considered a safe alternative, though further research is necessary.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cell therapy has been evaluated pre-clinically and clinically as a means to improve wound vascularization and healing. While translation of this approach to clinical practice ideally requires the availability of clinical grade xenobiotic-free cell preparations, studies proving the pre-clinical efficacy of the latter are mostly lacking. Here, the potential of xenobiotic-free human multipotent adult progenitor cell (XF-hMAPC®) preparations to promote vascularization was evaluated. METHODS: The potential of XF-hMAPC cells to support blood vessel formation was first scored in an in vivo Matrigel assay in mice. Next, a dose-response study was performed with XF-hMAPC cells in which they were tested for their ability to support vascularization and (epi) dermal healing in a physiologically relevant splinted wound mouse model. RESULTS: XF-hMAPC cells supported blood vessel formation in Matrigel by promoting the formation of mature (smooth muscle cell-coated) vessels. Furthermore, XF-hMAPC cells dose-dependently improved wound vascularization associated with increasing wound closure and re-epithelialization, granulation tissue formation, and dermal collagen organization. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we demonstrated that the administration of clinical-grade XF-hMAPC cells in mice represents an effective approach for improving wound vascularization and healing that is readily applicable for translation in humans.
