Effect of empiric antibiotic treatment on plasma endotoxin activity in septic patients.

OBJECTIVES: Efficient empiric antibiotic therapy remains the cornerstone of sepsis treatment. However, antibiotics could be responsible for the transient clinical deterioration provoked by the release of bacterial cell-wall constituents, such as endotoxin, into the blood stream. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a transient elevation of endotoxin level occurred in septic patients following antibiotic administration. METHODS: Thirty-three septic intensive care unit (ICU) patients were enrolled in this prospective trial. Four blood samples were collected from each of these patients during a 24-h period, and endotoxin activity was measured in these samples by the chemiluminescence technique. Fifteen ICU non-septic patients and 15 healthy volunteers were also observed for possible daily fluctuations in endotoxin activity. RESULTS: There was no significant increase in endotoxin levels following the initiation of empiric antibiotic therapy in septic patients. A clinical deterioration in the 4 h following antibiotic administration was observed in 14 septic patients (42 %). These patients had significantly higher endotoxin levels than stable septic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although endotoxin levels failed to increase after the administration of antibiotic(s) to critically ill patients, they were higher in the septic patients presenting a transient deterioration than in the other patients. This observation suggests that a possible release of endotoxin due to bacteria lysis by antibiotics could be responsible for the observed clinical deterioration.

A 'shock room' for early management of the acutely ill.

Our 850-bed, academic, tertiary care hospital uses a four-bed dedicated 'shock room' situated between the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Intensive Care to stabilise all acutely ill patients from outside or inside the hospital before transfer to the intensive care unit or other department. Admitted patients stay a maximum of four hours in the shock room. In this article we describe our experiences using this shock room by detailing the demographic data, including time and source of admission, diagnosis and outcome, for the 2514 patients admitted to the shock room in 2006. The most common reasons for admission were cardiac (33%) and neurological (21%) diagnoses. After diagnosis and initial treatment, 54% of patients were transferred to an intensive care unit or a coronary care unit; 2.5% of patients died in the shock room. The shock room provides a useful area of collaboration between emergency department and intensive care unit staff and enables acutely ill patients to be assessed and treated rapidly to optimise outcomes.

Non-heart-beating donors: an inquiry to ICU nurses in a belgian university hospital.

Demand for organs for transplantation continues to be greater than supply. Non-heart-beating donation (NHBD) has been reintroduced to reverse this trend. We describe the findings of a short questionnaire that determined the attitudes and feelings of nursing staff in a department of intensive care with an established NHBD program. Despite several educational sessions, only 3% of the nurses thought they were adequately informed about NHBD. Thirty-eight percent of nurses were less comfortable with NHBD than with brain death organ donation. NHBD is an ethically controversial area but one that can improve organ availability for transplantation. Adequate education, ongoing audit, and full transparency are needed in units that use NHBD.