Determining clinically important differences in health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy or surgery.

PURPOSE: Using the EORTC Global Health Status (GHS) scale, we aimed to determine minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes for older cancer patients with a geriatric risk profile, as defined by the geriatric 8 (G8) health screening tool, undergoing treatment. Simultaneously, we assessed baseline patient characteristics prognostic for HRQOL changes. METHODS: Our analysis included 1424 (G8 ≤ 14) older patients with cancer scheduled to receive chemotherapy (n = 683) or surgery (n = 741). Anchor-based methods, linking the GHS score to clinical indicators, were used to determine MCID between baseline and follow-up at 3 months. A threshold of 0.2 standard deviation (SD) was used to exclude MCID estimates too small for interpretation. Logistic regressions analysed baseline patient characteristics prognostic for HRQOL changes. RESULTS: The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Fatigue and ECOG Performance Status (PS) were selected as clinical anchors. In the surgery group, MCID estimates for improvement and deterioration were ECOG PS (5*, 11*), GDS15 (5*, 2) and VAS Fatigue (3, 9*). In the chemotherapy group, MCID estimates for improvement and deterioration were ECOG PS (8*, 7*), GDS15 (5, 4) and VAS Fatigue (5, 5*). Estimates with * were > 0.2 SD threshold. Patients experiencing pain or malnutrition (surgery group) or fatigue (chemotherapy group) at baseline showed a significantly stable or improved HRQOL (p < 0.05) after their treatment. CONCLUSION: The reported MCID for improvement and deterioration depended on the anchor used and treatment received. The estimates can be used to evaluate significant changes in HRQOL and to determine sample sizes in clinical trials.

Adherence to geriatric assessment-based recommendations in older patients with cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study in Belgium.

Background: In the general older population, geriatric assessment (GA)-guided treatment plans can improve overall survival, quality of life and functional status (FS). In GA-related research in geriatric oncology, studies mainly focused on geriatric screening and GA but not on geriatric recommendations, interventions and follow-up. The aim of this study was to investigate the adherence to geriatric recommendations and subsequent actions undertaken in older patients with cancer. Patient and methods: A prospective Belgian multicenter (N = 22) cohort study included patients ≥70 years with a malignant tumor upon oncologic treatment decision. Patients with an abnormal result on the geriatric screening (G8 ≤14/17) underwent GA. Geriatric recommendations were formulated based on GA results. At follow-up the adherence to geriatric recommendations was documented including a description of actions undertaken. Results: From November 2012 till February 2015, G8 screening was carried out in 8451 patients, of which 5838 patients had an abnormal result. Geriatric recommendations data were available for 5631 patients. Geriatric recommendations were made for 4459 patients. Geriatric interventions data were available for 4167 patients. A total of 12 384 geriatric recommendations were made. At least one different geriatric recommendation was implemented in 2874 patients. A dietician, social worker and geriatrician intervened most frequently for problems detected on the nutritional, social and functional domain. A total of 7569 actions were undertaken for a total of 5725 geriatric interventions, most frequently nutritional support and supplements, extended home care and psychological support. Conclusions: This large-scale Belgian study focuses on the adherence to geriatric recommendations and subsequent actions undertaken and contributes to the optimal management of older patients with cancer. We identified the domains for which geriatric recommendations are most frequently made and adhered to, and which referrals to other health care workers and facilities are frequently applied in the multidisciplinary approach of older patients with cancer.

A Belgian Survey on Geriatric Assessment in Oncology Focusing on Large-Scale Implementation and Related Barriers and Facilitators.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe a large-scale, Belgian implementation project about geriatric assessment (=GA) in daily oncology practice and to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing GA in this setting. Design / setting / participants: The principal investigator of every participating hospital (n=22) was invited to complete a newly developed questionnaire with closed- and open-ended questions. The closed-ended questions surveyed how GA was implemented. The open-ended questions identified barriers and facilitators for the implementation of GA in daily oncology practice. Descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: Qualifying criteria (e.g. disease status and cancer type) for GA varied substantially between hospitals. Thirteen hospitals (59.1%) succeeded to screen more than half of eligible patients. Most hospitals reported that GA data and follow-up data had been collected in almost all screened patients. Implementing geriatric recommendations and formulating new geriatric recommendations at the time of follow-up are important opportunities for improvement. The majority of identified barriers were organizational, with high workload, lack of time or financial/staffing problems as most cited. The most cited facilitators were all related to collaboration. CONCLUSION: Interventions to improve the implementation of GA in older patients with cancer need to address a wide range of factors, with organization and collaboration as key elements. All stakeholders, seeking to improve the implementation of GA in older patients with cancer, should consider and address the identified barriers and facilitators.

Relevance of a systematic geriatric screening and assessment in older patients with cancer: results of a prospective multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the large-scale feasibility and usefulness of geriatric screening and assessment in clinical oncology practice by assessing the impact on the detection of unknown geriatric problems, geriatric interventions and treatment decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients who had a malignant tumour were ≥70 years old and treatment decision had to be made. Patients were screened using G8; if abnormal (score ≤14/17) followed by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). The assessment results were communicated to the treating physician using a predefined questionnaire to assess the topics mentioned above. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred and sixty-seven patients were included in 10 hospitals. Of these patients, 70.7% had an abnormal G8 score warranting a CGA. Physicians were aware of the assessment results at the time of treatment decision in two-thirds of the patients (n = 1115; 61.3%). The assessment detected unknown geriatric problems in 51.2% of patients. When the physician was aware of the assessment results at the time of decision making, geriatric interventions were planned in 286 patients (25.7%) and the treatment decision was influenced in 282 patients (25.3%). CONCLUSION: Geriatric screening and assessment in older patients with cancer is feasible at large scale and has a significant impact on the detection of unknown geriatric problems, leading to geriatric interventions and adapted treatment.

Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a phase II study of the EORTC GastroIntestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

The aim of the study was to assess the response rate and toxicity of high-dose 24 h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Patients with measurable disease, performance status 0-2, and no prior chemotherapy were registered to receive cycles of leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 (or l-LV 250 mg/m2 over 1 h followed by 5FU 2.6 g/m2 over 24 h, weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The main endpoints were the response rate and toxicity. From 37 patients, 36 were the analysed for toxicity, and 33 were eligible and analysed for response. The median age was 59 years (range 28-74 years), and the median performance status was 1. Partial response was observed in three patients (9%) (95% Confidential Interval (CI): [2-24]%). Main grade 3/4 National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria toxicities (patients) were diarrhoea (n = 3), vomiting (n = 2) and hand-foot syndrome (n = 5). Median time to progression was 7 weeks (95% CI: [6.4-11.7] weeks) and median survival 19 weeks (95% CI: [12-35] weeks). In conclusion, high-dose 5FU and folinic acid is well tolerated, but has only modest activity in pancreatic cancer.

Cisplatin, doxorubicin and ifosfamide in carcinosarcoma of the female genital tract. A phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC 55923).

Carcinosarcomas of the female genital tract are highly malignant tumours composed of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. In the past, these tumours were frequently treated as sarcomas. However, a number of arguments, including the sensitivity of these tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy, suggest that these tumours behave more like poorly differentiated carcinomas. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gynaecological Cancer Group therefore decided to perform a prospective phase II study in patients with advanced or metastatic carcinosarcoma with an approach such as that used in gynaecological carcinomas. Eligible patients could have primary or recurrent disease, but prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy was not allowed. The treatment plan recommended upfront debulking, followed by chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and doxorubicin. Patients who could be debulked to non-measurable disease remained eligible for the study, but the response assessment was restricted to patients who had measurable disease before the start of chemotherapy. A total of 48 patients (39 primary disease, 9 recurrent disease) were registered, 41 of them being eligible. In 9 patients, all macroscopic lesions could be removed, 32 patients were left with residual disease and were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 56%: a complete response (CR) was observed in 11 (34%) patients and partial response (PR) in 7 (22%) patients. No change occurred in 5 patients and progression in 2 patients. In 7 patients, response could not be assessed. Median survival for all of the 41 eligible patients was 26 months. Severe leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were common and necessitated dose reductions or delays in 60% of patients. From a clinical point of view, the most severe non-haematological toxicity was renal dysfunction, and one patient died of this complication in the absence of disease progression. The results of this study are in-line with the hypothesis that carcinosarcomas are chemosensitive, in particular for the currently investigated regimen. The treatment also included upfront cytoreduction when feasible. Considering the observed toxicities, alternative platinum-based regimens with more favourable toxicity profiles should be explored.

Dose-finding and pharmacological study of ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in resistant small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To find the maximum tolerated dose for ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in small-cell lung cancer patients (SCLC), who are resistant to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (CDE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Different dose schedules of ifosfamide were combined with fixed doses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml min. Included were 30 patients, with a median age of 60 years, and median time off prior cytotoxic treatment of 8 weeks. All patients were previously treated with CDE and 11 had received re-induction CDE. RESULTS: Dose limiting toxicity of our schedule was persistent thrombocytopenia. None of the patients developed neutropenic fever. Non-haematological toxicity was mild, although two treatment-related deaths occurred. Fifty-four percent of patients had a partial response and median survival time was twenty-five weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of this combination for patients with resistant SCLC is ifosfamide 2000 mg/m2 in combination with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml min administered on the first day of a 21-day cycle.

Modulation of the cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of ifosfamide by ketoconazole and rifampin.

BACKGROUND: The autoinducible metabolic transformation of the anticancer agent ifosfamide involves activation through 4-hydroxyifosfamide to the ultimate cytotoxic ifosforamide mustard and deactivation to 2- and 3-dechloroethylifosfamide with concomitant release of the neurotoxic chloroacetaldehyde. Activation is mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and deactivation by CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. The aim of this study was to investigate modulation of the CYP-mediated metabolism of ifosfamide with ketoconazole, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, and rifampin (INN, rifampicin), an inducer of CYP3A4/CYP2B6. METHODS: In a double-randomized, 2-way crossover study a total of 16 patients received ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) per 24 hours intravenously, either alone or in combination with 200 mg ketoconazole twice daily (1 day before treatment and 3 days of concomitant administration) or 300 mg rifampin twice daily (3 days before treatment and 3 days of concomitant administration). Plasma pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of ifosfamide, 2- and 3-dechloroethylifosfamide, and 4-hydroxyifosfamide were assessed in both courses. Data analysis was performed with a population pharmacokinetic model with a description of autoinduction of ifosfamide. RESULTS: Rifampin increased the clearance of ifosfamide at the start of therapy at 102%. The fraction of ifosfamide metabolized to the dechloroethylated metabolites was increased, whereas exposure to the metabolites was decreased as a result of increased elimination. The fraction metabolized and the exposure to 4-hydroxyifosfamide were not significantly influenced. Ketoconazole did not affect the fraction metabolized or the exposure to the dechloroethylated metabolites, whereas both parameters were reduced with 4-hydroxyifosfamide. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of ifosfamide with ketoconazole or rifampin did not produce changes in the pharmacokinetics of the parent or metabolites that may result in an increased benefit of ifosfamide therapy.

Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women.

A substantial proportion of all women dying from gynaecological malignancies are aged >75 years. Many reports have indicated that the survival of these patients is decreased compared with younger patients. Differences in biological behaviour, stage of the disease at presentation, and reluctance to undergo aggressive treatment with its associated morbidity are among the factors thought to be responsible for this difference in outcomes. However, investigations also indicate that elderly patients may receive less surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment without obvious clinical rationale. This overview is aimed at providing a guideline of chemotherapy appropriate for patients with epithelial ovarian, uterine (corpus and cervix), and vulvar cancer, aged 70 to 75 years and over. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of drug treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients aged between 70 and 75 years with a good performance status can be treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Carboplatin, either in combination or as a single-agent, may offer advantages in patients aged >75 years and in those with a poor performance status. For patients with early recurrence there is no standard treatment, but several cytostatic and hormonal agents can be used with palliative intent. Patients with a late recurrence are probably best retreated with a platinum-based regimen. In metastatic endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy is the first choice in tumours expressing a progesterone receptor. Poorly differentiated tumours infrequently respond to endocrine therapy. In this situation, and for patients with tumours that have become resistant to hormonal manipulation, platinum-based chemotherapy may be used. The use of carboplatin-based regimens seems preferable in elderly patients, particularly in those with a decreased performance status. The usefulness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with cervical cancer is limited. In case of recurrent or metastatic disease, the use of single agent (low-dose) cisplatin should be balanced against best supportive care. Although overall chemoradiation seems superior than radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, the feasibility of this approach in elderly patients needs further investigation. Chemoradiation might also be considered in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. However, treatment-related morbidity can be considerable and randomised studies are lacking to prove a survival benefit. Our understanding of the tolerance and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients is still incomplete due to a paucity of trials that specifically focus on this subset of patients. However, there appears no argument to withhold chemotherapy based purely on age.

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: 1998 consensus statements.

BACKGROUND: During an international workshop held in September 1998, a group of specialists in the field of ovarian cancer reached consensus on a number of issues with implications for standard practice and for research of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Five groups of experts considered several issues which included: biologic factors, prognostic factors, surgery, initial chemotherapy, second-line treatment, the use of CA 125, investigational drugs, intra-peritoneal treatment and high-dose chemotherapy. The group attempted to arrive at answers to questions such as: Are there prognostic factors, which help to identify patients who will not do well with current therapy? What is the current best therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma? What directions should research take in advanced ovarian cancer? These issues were discussed in a plenary meeting. RESULTS: One of the major conclusions drawn by the consensus committee was that in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer, cisplatin plus paclitaxel has been shown to be superior to previous standard therapy with cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide (level I evidence). However, for many patients, carboplatin plus paclitaxel is a reasonable alternative because of toxicity and convenience considerations. Most participants felt that the benefits in terms of toxicity for the paclitaxel-carboplatin are such that its widespread adoption at this stage is justified. Until mature survival data are available a minority of investigators would recommend continued use of cisplatin plus paclitaxel, specifically for those patients with advanced disease with the best prognostic characteristics. For future clinical research in this area, new end points for randomised clinical trials, together with a new Trials Network, are proposed.

Experience with intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide and i.v. sodium thiosulphate protection in ovarian cancer patients with either pathologically complete response or minimal residual disease.

BACKGROUND: High-dose platinum-based regimens can produce responses in patients not responding to standard chemotherapy. As in many ovarian cancer patients the disease remains confined to the peritoneal cavity, intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy has been applied as an alternative approach to increase drug exposure. The delivery of cytotoxic agents to the peritoneal cavity can lead to high drug concentrations intraperitoneally with less systemic toxicity. This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose i.p. cisplatin plus etoposide and intravenous sodium thiosulphate protection in ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with either a pathologically complete response (pCR) after first-line treatment or with persistent disease after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy or abdominal recurrences were eligible. All intraabdominal lesions had to be < 2 cm at the start of i.p. treatment. The treatment consisted of etoposide 350 mg/m2 i.p. followed by cisplatin 200 mg/m2 i.p. with intravenous sodium thiosulphate (4 g/m2 bolus, followed by 12 g/m2 over six hours) protection. Four courses of i.p. treatment were administered in case of pCR and 6 courses otherwise, at four-weekly intervals. RESULTS: The study comprised 29 patients, six patients with pCR, 17 patients with persistent disease and six patients with abdominal recurrences. They received a total of 105 courses of treatment (65% of the scheduled number of courses). Twelve patients completed scheduled treatment, illustrating its feasibility. In 17 patients treatment had to be prematurely stopped because of inflow obstruction (seven patients), bowel perforation (two patients), renal toxicity (two patients), neurotoxicity (two patients), or malaise and vomiting (four patients). One patient with bowel perforation died of this complication. Severe nausea and vomiting occurred in 51% of cycles. Leukopenia and thrombopenia grade 3 and 4 occurred in 30% and 6% of cycles, respectively. Ototoxicity of cisplatin was measured by serial tone audiography in 23 patients: only eight patients (35%) showed significant audiographic changes, although none of them developed clinical hearing loss. Fifteen patients were evaluable for response: four pCR, five PR, two SD, four PD. The median duration of freedom from progression was 616 days and the median overall survival 1065 days from the start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose i.p. treatment with cisplatin and etoposide can be associated with significant toxicities. Major clinical problems are nausea, vomiting, and the formation of intraabdominal adhesions. Intravenous sodium thiosulphate effectively reduces the systemic toxicity of high-dose cisplatin. The value of high-dose i.p. treatment is uncertain and its routine use cannot be recommended.

Effect of suramin on adenylate cyclase and protein kinase C.

The trypanocidal drug, suramin, has been shown to possess antitumour activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Its mechanism of action, however, remains unclear although an effect on signal transduction has been proposed. We therefore studied the in vitro effect of suramin on protein kinase C (PKC), on adenylate cyclase and on the intracellular calcium concentrations [Ca2+]i in human cancer cell lines. Ca(2+)- and phospholipid-dependent PKC was isolated from a normal rat spleen, and compared with that of the human cancer cell lines MCF-7 (breast cancer) and PC3 (prostate cancer). PKC was inhibited by 50% at 55, 40 and 27 microM suramin in the three PKC sources, respectively, while 300 microM of suramin gave 97, 95 and 99% inhibition. With 50 nM staurosporine, a known PKC inhibitor, we observed 80, 99 and 96% inhibition in these three different sources of PKC. Six day exposure of these cell lines to suramin, causing 50% growth inhibition, decreased the Ca(2+)- and phospholipid-dependent PKC activity in MCF-7 cells to 52% of the control and in PC3 cells to 48% at equitoxic concentrations (45 and 150 microM suramin, respectively). These concentrations of suramin slightly increased (approximately 2-fold) the adenylate cyclase activity in MCF-7 cells, but not in PC3 cells. In MCF-7 and PC3 cells, we measured the [Ca2+]i using Fura-2 fluorescence and observed a decrease in MCF-7 cells from 126 to 99 nM when the cells were exposed for 6 days to 45 microM suramin. In PC3 cells, [C2+]i decreased from 131 to 117 nM after exposure to 150 microM suramin. In conclusion, suramin inhibited the Ca(2+)- and phospholipid-dependent PKC activity in both cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. Only in the more sensitive MCF-7 cell line was a significant effect of suramin on intracellular Ca2+ and adenylate cyclase observed, indicating that one of the mechanisms of action of suramin could be mediated by perturbations of intracellular signalling pathways.

The effect of chemotherapy on the different components of advanced carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed mesodermal tumors) of the female genital tract.

The effect of chemotherapy on the different components of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma is largely unknown. This report describes six patients with advanced carcinosarcoma, five of whom received 4 cycles of doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI) directed at the sarcomatous component of the tumor. Responses in these five patients at second-look laparotomy were: one complete response, two partial responses (persistence of only the carcinomatous component), one stable disease, and one progressive disease (both components still present in both cases). Thereafter 4 cycles of a cisplatin-based regimen were scheduled. Response to the cisplatin-containing regimen was only evaluated clinically. The sixth patient (with no macroscopic disease left after initial surgery) received 6 cycles of a cisplatin-based chemotherapy from the onset and was found to be in complete response at relaparotomy. Median progression-free survival for all patients was 15 months and median survival 21 months. A literature survey showed that carcinosarcoma differs from adult soft tissue sarcomas with respect to responsiveness to chemotherapy. Cisplatin and ifosfamide are active as single agents, whereas the response to single-agent doxorubicin seems to be lower. The data suggest, however, that superior response rates and increased survival times are achieved with cisplatin/doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The sensitivity of carcinosarcoma to cisplatin supports the recent view that carcinosarcoma of the female genital tract is possibly a high grade carcinoma with metaplastic sarcomatous elements.

The synergistic and antagonistic effects of cytotoxic and biological agents on the in vitro antitumour effects of suramin.

Suramin has shown antitumour activity in vitro and in vivo. At plasma levels higher than 200 microM there is, however, excessive toxicity. We have, therefore, attempted to improve the antitumour effects of suramin in vitro by combining it with several other antitumour agents. The MCF-7 mammary carcinoma and PC3 prostate cancer cell lines were exposed continuously to suramin and the other agents for 6 days. The sulphorhodamine B (SRB) assay was used for the assessment of growth inhibition. The dose-response interactions were evaluated using the median-effect analysis with the Chou and Talalay computer programme. In the MCF-7 cell line, the combination of suramin plus doxorubicin (DXR), cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or tumour necrosis factor (TNF) resulted in synergistic growth inhibition, whilst its combination with miltefosine (HPC) was antagonistic. In the PC-3 cell line, suramin plus CDDP or TNF was synergistic, whilst its combination with DXR, 5-FU and HPC was antagonistic. All tested combinations with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and with the combination of both IFN-alpha+IFN-gamma were not synergistic. The synergistic effect of suramin with DXR was schedule dependent. Pretreatment (addition of DXR on day 1 and suramin on days 2-5) was additive at the IC50 level, in both cell lines. Addition of DXR at day 5 was more effective than simultaneous exposure. We found a synergistic effect for the combination of suramin with CDDP and TNF in both cell lines. In addition the combination with DXR and 5-FU was synergistic in MCF-7. Sequential administration of DXR-suramin or suramin-DXR increased the growth inhibition.

A double-blind randomized crossover study to compare the antiemetic efficacy of 250 mg with 500 mg methylprednisolone succinate (Solu-Medrol) as a single intravenous dose in patients treated with noncisplatin chemotherapy.

A double-blind randomized crossover study was performed in 56 chemotherapy-naive patients, all receiving non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy, to compare the antiemetic effects of 2 doses of a single administration of methylprednisolone succinate (Solu-Medrol): 250 versus 500 mg. Among the 39 patients who satisfactorily completed both parts of the study, complete and major protection from emesis (0 and 1 emetic episode or only retching) was observed in 79% during the first course and in 69% during the second course. Treatment failure (> or = 6 episodes of vomiting) was observed in 18% during the first course and 21% during the second course. There was no significant difference between the two dose levels neither in terms of antiemetic protection nor in terms of the occurrence of side effects nor in patient preference. Most important side effects were facial flushing (45%), headache (22%) and facial edema (18%). It is concluded that, although a comparison with lower dosages cannot be made, within the dose range studied no clear dose-response relationship could be found.