Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 62
Filtrar
2.
World J Urol ; 37(10): 2109-2117, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30652213

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy in histologic grading of MRI/US image fusion biopsy by comparing histopathology between systematic biopsies (SB), targeted biopsies (TB) and the combination of both (SB + TB) with the final histopathologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, multicentric study of 443 patients who underwent SB and TB using MRI/US fusion technique (Urostation® and Trinity®) prior to radical prostatectomy between 2010 and 2017. Cochran's Q test and McNemar test were conducted as a post hoc test. Uni-multivariable analyses were performed on several clinic-pathological variables to analyze factors predicting histopathological concordance for targeted biopsies. RESULTS: Concordance in ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade between SB, TB and SB + TB with final histopathology was 49.4%, 51.2%, and 63.2% for overall prostate cancer and 41.2%, 48.3%, and 56.7% for significant prostate cancer (ISUP grade ≥ 2), respectively. Significant difference in terms of concordance, downgrading and upgrading was found between SB and TB (ISUP grade ≥ 2 only), SB and SB + TB, TB and SB + TB (overall ISUP grade and ISUP grade ≥ 2) (p < 0.001). Total number of cores and previous biopsies were significant independent predictive factors for concordance with TB technique. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, combination of SB and TB significantly increased concordance with final histopathology despite a limited additional number of cores needed.


Assuntos
Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Imagem Multimodal , Gradação de Tumores , Prostatectomia/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Prog Urol ; 28(8-9): 434-441, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29789234

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) at radical prostatectomy (RP) are generally recognized as a surrogate of poor or difficult dissection of the prostatic gland. In open RP cohorts, obesity seems to be associated to an increased risk of PSMs, probably due to the technical challenge that obese men pose to surgical access. Minimally invasive RP has been claimed to possibly reduce PSM rate. Aim of the study was to explore the impact of obesity and body habitus on PSM risk and their localisation during laparoscopic and robotic-assisted RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 539 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted RP with pT2 prostate cancer. The outcome measured was rate of PSM according to the BMI and surgical approach (laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted). Patients were categorized in BMI<25kg/m2, BMI 25-29.9kg/m2 and BMI >30kg/m2 groups respectively and compared using Kruskall-Wallis or χ2 test, as appropriate. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to assess the impact of BMI and surgical technique on PSM risk. RESULTS: Overall, 127 (24%) of men had PSMs detected at final specimen evaluation. Mean PSM length was 3.9±3.4mm, and 30 (6%) men presented significant margins ≥4mm. Analysing the rate of PSMs across BMI categories, no significant association between increased BMI and PSM was detected (all P>0.48). On uni- and multivariate logistic regression BMI was not a statistically significant risk factor for PSM (P=0.14), nor was the minimally invasive technique (laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) (P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: In this study obese men do not appear to have a significant increase in risk of PSMs at RP compared to lean and overweight men when operated by a minimally invasive approach. The magnified vision and increased access to the pelvis allowed by a laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approach may be accountable for our findings. Larger studies are needed to validate our results. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Margens de Excisão , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Neoplasia Residual , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/patologia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Sobrepeso/complicações , Sobrepeso/patologia , Sobrepeso/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Magreza/complicações , Magreza/patologia , Magreza/cirurgia
4.
Prog Urol ; 28(1): 18-24, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29203158

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: MRI-guided targeted biopsies are advised in patients who have undergone an initial series of negative systematic biopsies, in whom prostate cancer (PCa) suspicion remains elevated. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether, in men with prior negative prostate biopsies, systematic cores are also warranted at the time of an MRI-targeted repeat biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing real time MRI/TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy at our institute between 2014 and 2016. Patients with at least one index lesion on multiparametric MRI were included. All eligible patients underwent both systematic random biopsies (12-14 cores) and targeted biopsies (2-4 cores). RESULTS: The study included 74 men with a median age of 65 years, PSA level of 9.27ng/mL, and prostatic volume of 45ml. The overall PCa detection rate and the clinically significant cancer detection rate were 56.7% and 39.2%, respectively. Targeted cores demonstrated similar clinically significant PCa detection rate compared to systematic cores (33.8% vs. 28.4%, P=0.38) with significantly less tissue sampling. Indeed, a combination approach was significantly superior to a targeted-only in overall PCa detection (+16.7% overall detection rate, P=0.007). Although differences in clinically significant PCa detection were statistically non-significant (P=0.13), a combination approach did allow detecting 7 extra clinically significant PCas (+13.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with elevated PSA and prior negative biopsies, concurrent systematic sampling may be needed at the time of targeted biopsy in order to maximize PCa detection rate. Larger studies are needed to validate our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Assuntos
Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Prog Urol ; 27(4): 244-252, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27939417

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Data evaluating risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI) and quality of life (QoL) after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy are scarce. The objective of our study was to explore the impact of age and body mass index (BMI) on postoperative incontinence, and the impact of such incontinence and urinary symptoms on QoL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and seventy two patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy answered the questionnaires ICIQ-UI short-form (evaluating UI) and EORTC QoL PR25 (evaluating QoL) in the preoperative setting, then at 1, 3, 12 et 24 months after surgery. Data regarding bother due to UI and urinary symptoms were extrapolated and calculated from the EORT PR25 questionnaire. The modification of ICIQ, of the bother from UI and of urinary symptoms was compared between the preoperative and the early (1-3 months) and late postoperative period (12-24 months). Differences of these scores were explored across non-obese and obese patients, as well as across different age groups. Chi-squared and logistic regression models were performed to test the association between BMI, age and ICIQ score, the bother from UI and urinary symptom score. RESULTS: Median age was 64 years and median BMI was 26.4kg/m2. After surgery, all scores (ICIQ, bother from UI and urinary symptoms) were significantly modified and worsened compared to preoperative values; in particular, median ICIQ passed from 1 to 10, 20% of patients were highly bothered by their urinary symptoms (compared to 2% in the preoperative setting) and the urinary score symptom passed from 8% to 33%. We observed a progressive amelioration of all scores of late controls (12-24 months), with a significantly improved QoL. Across BMI groups, we did not observe any significant difference in terms of modification of ICIQ, of the bother from UI or of urinary symptoms. Moreover, on multivariate logistic regression, BMI was not a risk factor for UI at neither 1 month (P>0.35) nor 12 months (P=0.35). On the other hand, age was significantly associated to an increased risk of UI in the immediate postoperative period on multivariate analysis (P<0.001). Indeed, the rate of patients with an ICIQ≥1 in the immediate postoperative period was higher in men>60 years old compared to younger men<60 years (96% vs 78%, P<0.001). When exploring the QoL scores, we did not observe any significant association between age and QoL, with the exception of an inversion correlation between age and urinary symptoms at 1 month after surgery (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, older men appear to be at increased risk of immediate postoperative incontinence when compared to their younger counterparts, although their QoL is less likely to be bothered. BMI instead was not significantly associated to either urinary incontinence nor to QoL scores as bother form UI and urinary symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Prostatectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia
6.
World J Urol ; 35(5): 695-701, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27637908

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To codify the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the interrogation of prostate neoplasia (PCa) in clinical practice and focal therapy (FT). METHODS: An international collaborative consensus project was undertaken using the Delphi method among experts in the field of PCa. An online questionnaire was presented in three consecutive rounds and modified each round based on the comments provided by the experts. Subsequently, a face-to-face meeting was held to discuss and finalize the consensus results. RESULTS: mpMRI should be performed in patients with prior negative biopsies if clinical suspicion remains, but not instead of the PSA test, nor as a stand-alone diagnostic tool or mpMRI-targeted biopsies only. It is not recommended to use a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner without an endorectal or pelvic phased-array coil. mpMRI should be performed following standard biopsy-based PCa diagnosis in both the planning and follow-up of FT. If a lesion is seen, MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies should be performed for FT planning. Systematic biopsies are still required for FT planning in biopsy-naïve patients and for patients with residual PCa after FT. Standard repeat biopsies should be taken during the follow-up of FT. The final decision to perform FT should be based on histopathology. However, these consensus statements may differ for expert centers versus non-expert centers. CONCLUSIONS: The mpMRI is an important tool for characterizing and targeting PCa in clinical practice and FT. Standardization of acquisition and reading should be the main priority to guarantee consistent mpMRI quality throughout the urological community.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Técnicas de Ablação , Biópsia , Criocirurgia , Técnica Delphi , Eletroquimioterapia , Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade , Humanos , Terapia a Laser , Masculino , Patologistas , Fotoquimioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Radiologistas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Urologistas
7.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 19(1): 79-83, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26597660

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Focal therapy is an emerging mini-invasive treatment modality for localized prostate cancer aimed to reduce the morbidity associated with radical therapy while maintaining optimal cancer control. We report the mid-term oncological and functional results of primary hemiablation high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in a prospective cohort of patients. METHODS: Over 8 years, hemiablation HIFU was primarily performed in 50 selected patients with biopsy-proven clinically localized unilateral, low-intermediate risk prostate cancer in complete concordance with the prostate cancer lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging with precise loci matching on multimodal approach. Post-treatment follow-up included regular serial PSA measurements. Biochemical recurrence was reported using Stuttgart and Phoenix criteria. The latter was used as a threshold to offer whole-gland biopsies. RESULTS: Complete follow-up was available for all patients and the median follow-up was 39.5 months (range: 6-94). Mean nadir PSA value was 1.6 ng ml(-1), which represents 72% reduction compared with initial PSA pre-treatment value (P<0.001). Median time to achieve PSA nadir was 3 months. Biochemical recurrence, according to Phoenix and Stuttgart definition, occurred in 28 and 36% of patients, respectively. The 5-year actuarial metastases-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates were 93, 100 and 87%, respectively. Out of the eight patients undergoing biopsy, six patients had a positive biopsy for cancer occurring in the untreated contralateral (n=3) or treated ipsilateral lobe (n=1) or bilaterally (n=2). A Clavien-Dindo grade 3b complication occurred in two patients. Complete continence (no pads) and erection sufficient for intercourse were documented in 94 or 80% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hemiablation HIFU therapy, delivered with intention to treat, for carefully selected patients affords mid-term promising functional and oncological outcomes. The effectiveness of this technique should be now compared with whole-gland radical therapy.


Assuntos
Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Terapia de Salvação , Idoso , Biópsia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata/efeitos da radiação , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Prog Urol ; 2015 Nov 19.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26776826

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Radical hysterectomy represents the cornerstone in the management of localized cervical cancer. Despite its oncologic efficacy, radical hysterectomy is associated with a significant amount of complications and a negative impact on quality of life. Surgical technique seems to influence the functional outcomes. AIM OF THE STUDY: A systematic review to provide an update on the lower urinary tract dysfunction following nerve sparing radical hysterectomy. METHODS: An initial search was carried out to identify articles for further review, using Cochrane reviews and PubMed and Embase databases. The search terms used were: "nerve sparing" and "cervical cancer" or "radical hysterectomy". The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses process for reporting included and excluded studies was followed, with the recommended flowchart showing the numbers of papers identified and included or excluded at each stage. RESULTS: Twenty-nine clinical studies were included. The absence of a standardized surgical technique for nerve sparing radical hysterectomy and the poor methodological quality of the studies assessing lower urinary tract dysfunction after such intervention limited clear conclusions. However, all studies reported lower incidence of urinary tract dysfunction, urodynamic abnormalities and clean intermittent catheterization following nerve sparing radical hysterectomy compared to conventional technique. CONCLUSION: Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy is associated with reduced lower urinary tract dysfunction. A standardization of the surgical technique for nerve sparing radical hysterectomy, tailored to each individual is necessary to allow its wide spread diffusion.

10.
Rev Med Brux ; 34(4): 311-9, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24195246

RESUMO

Prostate cancer detection is mainly based on PSA serum levels and digital rectal examination. The wide use of PSA with time led to increased prostate cancer incidence in the highest ressources countries worldwide with less mortality rates compared to less developed regions of the world. Screening for prostate cancer is among the most controversial topics in the field of urology. US Preventive Services Task Force recently finalized a crisp recommendation that routine PSA-based screening should be stopped. Results from the ERSPC study of screening for prostate cancer reported the impact of PSA testing in reducing cancer-specific mortality but with a higher rate of localized tumour detection with better prognostic factors. Scientific societies have elaborated their recommendations in favour of a share decision making with patients with at least 10 to 15 years of life expectancy. In view of the unsatisfactory accuracy of the two diagnostic exams, strategies to reduce PSA-driven prostate cancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment seem to be necessary. Research has focused on novel markers to improve pre-biopsy prostate cancer detection, such as prostate health index (phi) and PCA3. In patients with a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml, phi and PCA3 seem to be the strongest predictors of prostate cancer at initial biopsy and are significantly more accurate than total PSA and percentage free PSA.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Exame Retal Digital , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia
11.
World J Urol ; 30(5): 573-80, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22790450

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) are the next steps in the evolution of laparoscopic surgery, promising reduced morbidity and improved cosmetic result. The inconsistent terminology initially used led to confusion. Understanding the technical evolution, the current status and a unified and simplified terminology are key issues for further acceptance of both approaches. OBJECTIVE: To present LESS and NOTES in its historical context and to clarify the associated terminology. METHOD: Extensive literature search took place using the PubMed. Several hundred publications in general surgery and urology regarding LESS are present including the expert opinion of members the European Society of Uro-technology (ESUT). RESULTS: The increasing interest on NOTES and LESS is reflected by a raising number of publications during the last 4 years. The initial confusion with the terminology of single-incision surgery represented a significant issue for further evolution of the technique. Thus, consortiums of experts searched a universally acceptable name for single-incision surgery. They determined that 'laparoendoscopic single-site surgery' (LESS) was both scientifically accurate and colloquially appropriate, the term being also ratified by the NOTES working group (Endourological Society) and the ESUT. For additional use of instruments, the terms hybrid NOTES and hybrid LESS should be used. Any single use of miniaturized instruments for laparoscopy should be called mini-laparoscopy. DISCUSSION: The evolution of LESS and most likely NOTES to a new standard of minimally invasive surgery could represent an evolutionary step even greater than the one performed by the establishment of laparoscopy over open surgery.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/tendências , Miniaturização/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/tendências , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/tendências , Nefrectomia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/tendências
12.
Urologe A ; 51(5): 671-8, 2012 May.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22532364

RESUMO

Although the technical feasibility of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has been proven and the procedure has been accepted in the EAU guidelines 2011 as a valid alternative, its actual position has to be determined. On the one hand the advantages of LRC (less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, shorter analgesia time) have been proven in retrospective studies; however, the technical difficulties of purely laparoscopic urinary diversion result in very long operating times and in cases of a laparoscopic-assisted creation of a neobladder, the question of the advantage of this approach remains doubtful. Despite case reports of port metastases and peritoneal carcinosis following laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy, there is no difference in terms of oncological long-term data (up to 10 years) between laparoscopy and open surgery performed at centres of excellence. Evidently, the curative options for the patients do not depend on the type of surgery (open versus minimally invasive) but on the efficacy of adjuvant treatment strategies (polychemotherapy). Currently it is believed that LRC should be considered for patients with low risk of progression (pT1-2). The final position of laparoscopic radical cystectomy can only be evaluated in a multicentric randomized controlled trial.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/tendências , Laparoscopia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/tendências , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/tendências , Robótica/tendências , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/tendências , Humanos
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17365677

RESUMO

Laparoscopic surgery is rapidly expanding among urologists as a minimally invasive treatment with surgical procedures becoming increasingly challenging. Accurate haemostatis is of utmost importance in laparoscopy, as bleeding can rapidly impair the working environment conditions. We subsequently reviewed the different haemostatic tools used in laparoscopy with the focus on ultrasonic dissectors and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS). Briefly, there is a wide variety of haemostatic tools currently available in laparoscopy, all with their inherent advantages and limitations. The comparison of ultrasonic dissectors and EBVS shows that both systems are very attractive with similar physical properties concerning thermal spread and bursting pressure of vessels sealed. It has to be noted, however, that EBVS can handle vessels of up to 7 mm. In conclusion, haemostatic tools constitute a rapidly evolving domain with devices being developed which cause less thermal spread, while being more precise and faster. This evolution should finally allow more complex laparoscopic surgical procedures.


Assuntos
Eletrocoagulação , Hemostasia Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Laparoscopia , Ultrassom , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/instrumentação
14.
J Endourol ; 20(1): 69-73, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16426137

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For a simulation to be valid, it has to be close to reality, correlate with the performance in a real case, and be able to discriminate between individuals with different degrees of experience. We explored the construct validity (ability to discriminate between experienced and inexperienced subjects) of a simulation for the urethrovesical anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dead chickens were used. After partial emptying of the corporal cavity, an 18F catheter was placed through the esophagus to the stomach. In the Pelvic Trainer, a laparoscopic section of the esophago-glandular-stomach junction and a suture between the two edges were performed in the same fashion as for a urethrovesical suture in LRP. Five subjects with different levels of experience in laparoscopy, ranging from nil to more than 250 LRPs, tested two types of suture. One-way ANOVA was used to detect differences in suturing time among the operators. A multiple comparison test was used to detect specific differences between operators. RESULTS: Although suturing time had a strong negative correlation with the operator's experience, significant statistical differences in suturing time were found only between the least experienced operator and the other ones. Qualitative differences in the suture were found among operators. CONCLUSION: This simulation correlates well with the laparoscopic (LRP) subject's experience. It can discriminate between inexperienced and experienced subjects, exhibiting moderate construct validity, but failed to reflect the different levels of experience among the most experienced subjects.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Doenças Prostáticas/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentação , Suturas , Animais , Galinhas , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Curr Urol Rep ; 6(2): 93-100, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15717964

RESUMO

Remaining the gold standard treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and high-risk superficial tumors, the radical cystectomy has been translated into a fully laparoscopic protocol, actually gaining more and more acceptance worldwide. In this article, a transperitoneal antegrade laparoscopic protocol is described for radical cystectomy performed in both genders. After removal of the specimen, generally through a mini-laparotomy, most of the teams perform the maneuvers for urinary diversion through an ileal conduit as an open procedure, although a completely laparoscopic procedure has been successfully achieved. Laparoscopic cystectomy will face the proof of time if oncologic rules about surgical management of transitional cell carcinoma are carefully respected to avoid any cell spillage. When obvious laparoscopic advantages for the patients are encountered with laparoscopic cystectomy, it seems unlikely that a full laparoscopic protocol, including the diversion, may gain wide acceptance; in that case, the true laparoscopic benefits would be wasted by unjustified lengthening of operative time and by compromising the quality of uretero-ileal anastomoses.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Cistectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
17.
Eur Urol ; 47(3): 346-51, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15716199

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT) conducted a survey in order to assess the application of laparoscopy and the facilitation of training programs within Europe. METHODS: A total of 430 urologists and residents from European countries answered the ESUT survey during the XVIIIth Annual EAU Meeting in Madrid in 2003. The survey constituted of 11 questions of which nine with dual response (Y/N) options. Two questions, evaluating the importance of different training methods and different reasons not to be involved in laparoscopy, were assessed by means of a Likert type scale. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was performed in 71% of urological departments. The majority (85%) of departments where no laparoscopy was performed, intended to establish it in the future. Two thirds of respondents believed laparoscopy would replace open surgery in the next 5 to 10 years. The access to training facilities was insufficient for 44%. Different methods of training were considered to be of equal importance. Among the reasons for not being involved in laparoscopic surgery a high variability was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is performed in the majority of urological departments in Europe. While there is a strong believe in the prominent role of laparoscopy in the mid-long future, access to training is still needed.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologia/educação , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação Médica Continuada/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Motivação , Avaliação das Necessidades
19.
Eur Urol ; 45(1): 103-9; discussion 109, 2004 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14667525

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present work is to describe the surgical technique and to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy in a pilot study. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients in whom an open adenomectomy was planned were operated on in a laparoscopic extraperitoneal fashion. In all patients indication was based on objective signs of obstruction. The laparoscopic approach was standard in all cases as follows: creation of a preperitoneal workspace, haemostatic control of lateral venous vesicoprostatic pedicles, transversal anterior incision of the prostate capsule, progressive enucleation of the adenoma with the help of an harmonic scalpel, suture of the posterior bladder neck to the prostate fossa, closure of the prostate capsule, and retrieval of the specimen. Feasibility was assessed by objective operative parameters (reconversion, operating time, and blood loss and transfusion requirements) and per operative complications. Data on short term follow-up are also available. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 67.8 years (S.D. 6.2) and mean prostatic weight calculated by TRUS 95.1cm(3) (S.D. 28.1). Mean maximal flow (Q(max)) was 4.3ml/s (S.D. 3.4) with four patients (22.2%) presenting in retention. Mean duration of intervention was 145min (S.D. 32.5) and mean blood loss 192ml (S.D. 178). Mean excised tissue was 47.6g (S.D. 30). Neither conversions to open prostatectomy nor transfusions were required. The urethral catheter remained in place an average of 3.0 days (S.D. 2.4) in 14 patients, while 4 needed a re-catheterization. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.9 days (S.D. 5.5). Five patients (27.7%) presented complications during follow-up, mild in most of the cases but one who required a secondary intervention for persistent obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy (Millin's procedure) is feasible with a reasonable complication rate. Although comparison with open adenomectomy is not yet available, this technique might have potential advantages in terms of blood loss and postoperative catheter time.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Transtornos Urinários/cirurgia , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Transtornos Urinários/etiologia
20.
Urology ; 57(4): 712-6, 2001 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11306388

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a two-step strategy for the detection of prostate cancer within the context of serial screening and compare this strategy with other screening strategies. The optimal combination of tests proposed for prostate cancer screening remains undetermined, particularly when screening is repeated over time. METHODS: A prospective serial prostate cancer screening study with follow-up to 55 months was performed in a general community screening clinic. One thousand seven hundred seven self-referred men, 50 to 75 years old, without a history of prostate cancer agreed to undergo screening for prostate cancer on an annual basis. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement was the first-step screening test. If the serum PSA test was positive, a standard urologic evaluation was performed. Biopsy was recommended only if a test other than serum PSA was suspicious for cancer. The outcome measures were the biopsy rate and prostate cancer detection rate. The comparisons with other studies were age-standardized to correct for differences in age distribution. RESULTS: The biopsy and cancer detection rates after the first test were 7.0% and 2.0%, respectively. After 4 years of the study, the cumulative biopsy rate and cumulative cancer detection rate per enrolled man was 12% and 4.1%, respectively. The comparisons between studies revealed that screening strategies using serum PSA as a first-line test had similar detection rates but lower biopsy rates than strategies performing biopsy when one of several screening tests was positive. CONCLUSIONS: A two-step screening strategy using serum PSA alone as the initial test seemed able to detect as many cancers as when all screening tests were used at the same time but reduced the number of unnecessary biopsies.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Idoso , Biópsia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...