Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Allergy ; 63(12): 1593-6, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19032231

RESUMO

The Health Council of the Netherlands published a report in which the best procedure and method for recommending health-based occupational exposure limits (OELs) for inhaled allergens were identified by evaluating the scientific state of the art. Many respiratory disorders in the workplace arise from inhalation of substances which can cause allergy. To protect workers against respiratory allergy, various preventive measures are taken, one of them being reduction of exposure by setting legally binding standards. These are based on health-based OELs that specify a level of exposure to an airborne substance, a threshold level, below which it may reasonably be expected that there is no risk of adverse health effects. The Council is of the opinion that an OEL should prevent against allergic sensitization, as sensitization plays a crucial biological role and is a prerequisite for the development of allergy. Furthermore, the Council considers it most likely that the exposure level below which no allergic sensitization develops for most allergens is so low, that OELs are difficult to set with the current knowledge and technical feasibilities. An alternative approach is to accept exposure, which carries a small predefined risk in developing allergic sensitization. In addition, it is worth considering periodic screening of exposed workers on allergic sensitization, because timely intervention can prevent worse. The feasibility of periodic screening and what else is needed to comply with the most important criteria, should however be judged case-by-case.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Diretrizes para o Planejamento em Saúde , Doenças Profissionais/imunologia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Respiratória/prevenção & controle , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Brônquios/imunologia , Brônquios/metabolismo , Humanos , Concentração Máxima Permitida , Países Baixos , Níveis Máximos Permitidos
2.
Vision Res ; 36(24): 3913-23, 1996 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9068844

RESUMO

In the isolated goldfish retina, 700 nm background illumination increases the horizontal cell receptive field size, as measured with 565 nm slits of light, but decreases the receptive field size, when measured with 660 nm slits. These background-induced changes in receptive field size are absent when the depolarizing responses in bi- and triphasic horizontal cells are blocked by lowering the [Ca2+] in the Ringer's solution from 1.0 to 0.1 mM. These results cannot be explained by the linear properties of the horizontal cell layers, nor by slow adaptational processes, but are consistent with the concept that feedback from horizontal cells to cones modifies the horizontal cell receptive field properties.


Assuntos
Adaptação Ocular/fisiologia , Carpa Dourada/fisiologia , Retina/efeitos da radiação , Animais , Cálcio/farmacologia , Técnicas de Cultura , Retroalimentação/efeitos dos fármacos , Retroalimentação/fisiologia , Estimulação Luminosa , Retina/citologia , Retina/fisiologia , Células Fotorreceptoras Retinianas Cones/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...