Clinical Efficacy of Temocillin Standard Dosing in Patients Treated with Outpatient Antimicrobial Therapy.

In 2020, EUCAST introduced breakpoints for temocillin. Based on these guidelines, reporting of temocillin susceptibility of Enterobacterales in the context of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) implicates the use of a high dose of temocillin (2 g q8h) constantly. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with the standard dose (4 g/day) of temocillin in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (tOPAT). Demographics, clinical and treatment parameters, and late clinical cure (at day 30 after tOPAT completion) were recorded. Univariate generalised estimating equation analyses, with clinical cure as outcome variable, were performed to evaluate covariate associations. Fifty-seven tOPAT episodes in 50 patients were included with a median antimicrobial treatment duration of 21 (range 10-228) days, and cUTI was the main indication (87.7%). Late clinical cure was achieved in 85.7% of the tOPAT episodes. Non-disseminated infections and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values ≤ 8 mg/L were associated with good late clinical outcome. In conclusion, a standard temocillin dose (4 g/day) results in good clinical outcomes in the treatment of cUTIs in tOPAT patients. Therefore, our centre concluded that the use of standard temocillin dosing should be continued instead of the high dose for cUTI in non-critically ill patients infected with Enterobacterales with an MIC ≤ 4 mg/L.

Offering Guidance and Learning to Prescribers to Initiate Parenteral Nutrition using a Validated Electronic Decision TREE (OLIVE TREE).

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is recommended in patients nutritionally at risk and unable to receive oral or enteral nutrition. A standardized electronic PN order format could enhance appropriate PN prescribing. We developed the OLIVE TREE (Offering guidance and Learning to prescribers to Initiate PN using a Validated Electronic decision TREE), embedded in our electronic health record. We aimed to evaluate its validity and impact on physicians' prescribing behavior. A non-randomized before-after study was carried out in a tertiary care center. The OLIVE TREE comprises 120 individual items. A process validation was performed to determine interrater agreement between a pharmacist and the treating physician. To estimate the proportion of patients for whom the OLIVE TREE had an effective and potential impact on physicians' prescribing behavior, a proof of concept study was conducted. The proportion of patients for whom PN was averted and the proportion of decisions not in line with the recommendation were also calculated. The process validation in 20 patients resulted in an interrater agreement of 95.0%. The proof of concept in 73 patients resulted in an effective and potential impact on prescribing behavior in 50.7% and 79.5% of these patients, respectively. Initiation of PN was not averted and recommendations of the OLIVE TREE were overruled in 42.5% of the patients. Our newly developed OLIVE TREE has a good process validity. A substantial impact on prescribing behavior was observed, although initiation of PN was not avoided. In the next phase, the decision tree will be implemented hospital-wide.