Antecedentes de neoplasias urológicas previos al trasplante renal. Resultados oncológicos a largo plazo / History of urological malignancies before kidney transplantation, oncological outcome on the long term

Introducción: Nuestro objetivo ha sido informar de los resultados oncológicos de pacientes con ERET y antecedentes de neoplasias urológicas que fueron sometidos posteriormente a un trasplante renal (TR).Material y métodoEstudio retrospectivo llevado a cabo en el registro de la Fundación Puigvert (Barcelona) con 1.200 TR realizados entre 1988 y 2018. Se identificaron 85 neoplasias urológicas que recibieron tratamiento previo al TR en 81 pacientes: 15 (18%) cánceres de próstata, 49 (58%) carcinoma de células renales (CCR), 19 (22%) carcinomas uroteliales y 2 (2%) cánceres de testículo. Se registraron datos de las características basales, la estadificación del cáncer, el tratamiento y el seguimiento, y sobre la cronología del inicio de diálisis, la inscripción en la lista de espera y el TR. Los criterios de valoración fueron la recidiva del cáncer, la progresión metastásica, la muerte específica por cáncer y la supervivencia global.ResultadosEn una mediana de seguimiento de 13,1 años (2,2-32), se registraron 16/85 (19%) recidivas del cáncer, con 3 (4%) progresiones a metástasis y muerte por cáncer. La mediana de supervivencia global tras el tratamiento del cáncer fue de 25,3 años y la supervivencia por cáncer específica fue del 95% a los 25 años.La mediana de tiempo desde el tratamiento del cáncer hasta el trasplante de riñón fue de 4,8 años: 3,7 años en el cáncer de próstata, 3,9 años en el CCR y 8,8 años en el cáncer vesical. La mediana de tiempo desde el inicio de diálisis hasta el TR fue de 1,8 años en los pacientes con antecedentes de neoplasia urológica, frente a 0,5 años en la cohorte total de 1.200 trasplantes renales durante el mismo periodo. (AU)

Introduction: We aimed to report the oncological outcomes of ESRD patients with histories of urological malignancies who were subsequently submitted to kidney transplantation (KT).Material and methodRetrospective study lead in the Puigvert Foundation (Barcelona) registry of 1,200 KT performed from 1988 to 2018. Eighty-five urological malignancies that were treated before KT in 81 patients were identified: 15 (18%) prostate cancers, 49 (58%) RCC, 19 (22%) urothelial carcinomas and 2 (2%) testicular cancers. Baseline characteristics, cancer staging, treatment and follow-up were registered as well as the chronology of the start of dialysis, inscription on the waiting list and kidney transplantation. Endpoints included were cancer recurrence, metastatic progression, cancer-specific death and overall survival.ResultsIn a median follow-up of 13.1 years (2.2-32), 16/85 (19%) cancer recurrences were reported, with 3 (4%) who progressed to metastasis and died of cancer. Median overall survival after cancer treatment was 25.3 years and cancer-specific survival was 95% at 25 years.Median time from cancer treatment to kidney transplantation was 4.8 years: 3.7 years in prostate cancer, 3.9 years in RCC and 8.8 years in bladder cancer. The median time from start of dialysis to kidney transplantation was 1.8 years in patients with histories of urological malignancy versus 0.5 year in the total cohort of 1,200 renal transplanted over the same period. (AU)

History of urological malignancies before kidney transplantation, oncological outcome on the long term.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to report the oncological outcomes of ESRD patients with histories of urological malignancies who were subsequently submitted to kidney transplantation (KT). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study lead in the Puigvert Foundation (Barcelona) registry of 1,200 KT performed from 1988 to 2018. Eighty-five urological malignancies that were treated before KT in 81 patients were identified: 15 (18%) prostate cancers, 49 (58%) RCC, 19 (22%) urothelial carcinomas and 2 (2%) testicular cancers. Baseline characteristics, cancer staging, treatment and follow-up were registered as well as the chronology of the start of dialysis, inscription on the waiting list and kidney transplantation. Endpoints included were cancer recurrence, metastatic progression, cancer-specific death and overall survival. RESULTS: In a median follow-up of 13.1 years (2.2-32), 16/85 (19%) cancer recurrences were reported, with 3 (4%) who progressed to metastasis and died of cancer. Median overall survival after cancer treatment was 25.3 years and cancer-specific survival was 95% at 25 years. Median time from cancer treatment to kidney transplantation was 4.8 years: 3.7 years in prostate cancer, 3.9 years in RCC and 8.8 years in bladder cancer. The median time from start of dialysis to kidney transplantation was 1.8 years in patients with histories of urological malignancy versus 0.5 year in the total cohort of 1,200 renal transplanted over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Well-selected patients with histories of urological malignancies greatly benefit from kidney transplantation with infrequent and late cancer recurrence. Waiting time could be optimized in low-risk prostate cancer and RCC, but more robust data are needed.

History of urological malignancies before kidney transplantation, oncological outcome on the long term. / Antecedentes de neoplasias urológicas previos al trasplante renal. Resultados oncológicos a largo plazo.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to report the oncological outcomes of ESRD patients with histories of urological malignancies who were subsequently submitted to kidney transplantation (KT). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study lead in the Puigvert Foundation (Barcelona) registry of 1,200 KT performed from 1988 to 2018. Eighty-five urological malignancies that were treated before KT in 81 patients were identified: 15 (18%) prostate cancers, 49 (58%) RCC, 19 (22%) urothelial carcinomas and 2 (2%) testicular cancers. Baseline characteristics, cancer staging, treatment and follow-up were registered as well as the chronology of the start of dialysis, inscription on the waiting list and kidney transplantation. Endpoints included were cancer recurrence, metastatic progression, cancer-specific death and overall survival. RESULTS: In a median follow-up of 13.1 years (2.2-32), 16/85 (19%) cancer recurrences were reported, with 3 (4%) who progressed to metastasis and died of cancer. Median overall survival after cancer treatment was 25.3 years and cancer-specific survival was 95% at 25 years. Median time from cancer treatment to kidney transplantation was 4.8 years: 3.7 years in prostate cancer, 3.9 years in RCC and 8.8 years in bladder cancer. The median time from start of dialysis to kidney transplantation was 1.8 years in patients with histories of urological malignancy versus 0.5 year in the total cohort of 1,200 renal transplanted over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Well-selected patients with histories of urological malignancies greatly benefit from kidney transplantation with infrequent and late cancer recurrence. Waiting time could be optimized in low-risk prostate cancer and RCC, but more robust data are needed.

[Long-term follow-up of renal cell carcinomas T1a treated by percutaneous radiofrequency]. / Suivi à long terme des carcinomes à cellules rénales T1a traités par radiofréquence percutanée.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term oncological and functional results of the ablative treatment of T1a kidney malignancies by percutaneous radiofrequency (RF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study including all patients treated for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) T1a by radiofrequency, in our center, from 2005 to 2009. All patients had a tumor biopsy before treatment. The primary endpoint was local recurrence. A total of 44 RCCs in 41 consecutive patients were treated (1 patient had 3 synchronous tumors and 1 patient had 2 tumors). There were 26 clear cell RCCs, 13 papillary RCCs and 5 chromophobe RCCs. The median age at diagnosis was 70 years [48-82]. The median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 2 [1-3] and the median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 64mL/min [26-109]. Furhman grade was defined for 39 tumors (Clear cell RCC and papillary RCC), of which 82% were grade 1-2. The median tumor size was 20mm [11-40], and the median RENAL score was 4 [4-6]. Complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Overall survival, recurrence-free survival and metastasis-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 90.5 months [17.8-145.3]. Three (7%) local recurrences were reported within a median of 26 months [12-93]. All were treated by a 2nd RF. The overall 10-year survival was 70% (95% CI [56-85]). The 10-year recurrence-free survival was 72% (95% CI [57-88]). The 10-year metastasis-free survival was 87% (95% CI [74-97]). The median GFR on the date of the last news was 51mL/min [16-98] (P=0.05). Post-RFA complications consisted in 5 (11.3%) Clavien-Dindo 1-2 complications. No high grade (Clavien ≥3). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous radiofrequency for RCC T1a is an alternative. It appears to be safe with low morbidity, satisfaying long-term oncological and functional results, but a risk of reprocessing of 7%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Crioablación total o hemiglandular para el cáncer de próstata primario localizado: resultados oncológicos y funcionales a corto y medio plazo / Whole and hemi-gland cryoablation for primary localized prostate cancer: Short and medium-term oncological and functional outcomes

INTRODUCCIÓN: Comparar los resultados oncológicos, funcionales y postoperatorios de la crioablación hemiglandular (CH) vs. crioablación de toda la glándula (CT) como terapia primaria del cáncer de próstata localizado. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Se incluyeron 66 pacientes consecutivos tratados entre 2010 y 2018 con crioablación total (CT = 40) o crioablación hemiglandular (CH = 26) en un centro de referencia terciario. Todos los pacientes tenían cáncer de próstata de riesgo bajo-intermedio según criterios D'Amico. Se propuso crioablación hemiglandular en caso de cáncer de próstata unilateral comprobado por biopsia y RM. La variable principal de evaluación fue el fracaso de la crioterapia, para el que se consideraron y compararon tres definiciones: 1) fallo bioquímico (> PSA nadir + ≥ 2 ng/mL), 2) rebiopsia positiva de próstata Gleason ≥ 7, y 3) inicio de un tratamiento adicional para el cáncer de próstata. RESULTADOS: La edad media de los pacientes durante el tratamiento fue 74 [42-81] vs.76 [71-80] años en el grupo de CT vs. CH, respectivamente (p = 0,08). Los grupos de riesgo bajo e intermedio (D'Amico) fueron 15% y 85% frente a 23% y 77% (p = 0,75), respectivamente. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 41 [1,5-99,0] vs.27 [0,9-93] meses (p = 0,03). La supervivencia libre de fracaso de la crioterapia a cuatro años en CT vs. CH fue de 69% vs.53% con la definición 1 (p = 0,24), 82% vs.80% con la definición 2 (p = 0,95), y 83% vs.77% con la definición 3 (p = 0,73). La continencia urinaria postoperatoria y al año fue de 60% y 83% en CT frente a 72% y 83% en CH (p = 0,26). La impotencia de novo tras la crioterapia fue del 75% frente al 46% (p = 0,33) en CT y CH, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra cohorte de pacientes altamente seleccionados con CP unilateral de riesgo bajo-intermedio, la crioterapia hemiglandular puede proporcionar resultados oncológicos similares y menos complicaciones tempranas en comparación con la crioablación de toda la glándula

INTRODUCTION: To compare oncological, functional and post-operative outcomes of hemi (HC) vs. whole gland (WGC) cryoablation as first line treatment of localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixty-six consecutive patients undertaking whole-gland cryoablation (WGC = 40) or hemi-cryoablation (HC = 26) in a tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2018 were included. All patients had a low-intermediate risk prostate cancer according to D'Amico risk classification. Hemi-ablation was proposed in case of biopsy and prostate MRI proven unilateral prostate cancer. Primary endpoint was Cryotherapy Failure for which 3 definitions were considered and compared: 1) biochemical failure (> PSA nadir+ ≥ 2 ng/mL), 2) positive prostate re-biopsy with Gleason score ≥ 7, 3) initiation of further prostate cancer treatment. RESULTS: Median patients age at treatment was 74 [42-81] vs.76 [71-80] years in WGC vs. HC group, respectively (p=.08). Low and intermediate D'Amico risk group were 15% and 85% vs.23% and 77% (p=.75), respectively. Median follow- up time was 41 [1.5-99.0] vs.27 [0.9-93] months (p=.03). Four-years cryotherapy failure free survival in WGC vs. HC were 69% vs.53% with definition 1 (p=.24), 82% vs.80% with definition 2 (p=.95), 83% vs.77% with definition 3 (p=.73). Early and 1-year urinary continence were 60% and 83% in WGC vs.72% and 83% in HC (p=.26). De novo impotency after cryotherapy was 75% vs.46% (p=.33) in WGC vs. HC. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of highly selected patients with unilateral low/intermediate risk PCa, hemi-cryoablation may provide similar oncological outcomes and less early complications compared to whole-gland cryoablation

Whole and hemi-gland cryoablation for primary localized prostate cancer: Short and medium-term oncological and functional outcomes. / Crioablación total o hemiglandular para el cáncer de próstata primario localizado: resultados oncológicos y funcionales a corto y medio plazo.

INTRODUCTION: To compare oncological, functional and post-operative outcomes of hemi (HC) vs. whole gland (WGC) cryoablation as first line treatment of localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixty-six consecutive patients undertaking whole-gland cryoablation (WGC=40) or hemi-cryoablation (HC=26) in a tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2018 were included. All patients had a low-intermediate risk prostate cancer according to D'Amico risk classification. Hemi-ablation was proposed in case of biopsy and prostate MRI proven unilateral prostate cancer. Primary endpoint was Cryotherapy Failure for which 3 definitions were considered and compared: 1) biochemical failure (> PSA nadir+≥ 2 ng/mL), 2) positive prostate re-biopsy with Gleason score ≥ 7, 3) initiation of further prostate cancer treatment. RESULTS: Median patients age at treatment was 74 [42-81] vs. 76 [71-80] years in WGC vs. HC group, respectively (p=.08). Low and intermediate D'Amico risk group were 15% and 85% vs. 23% and 77% (p=.75), respectively. Median follow- up time was 41 [1.5-99.0] vs. 27 [0.9-93] months (p=.03). Four-years cryotherapy failure free survival in WGC vs. HC were 69% vs. 53% with definition 1 (p=.24), 82% vs. 80% with definition 2 (p=.95), 83% vs. 77% with definition 3 (p=.73). Early and 1-year urinary continence were 60% and 83% in WGC vs. 72% and 83% in HC (p=.26). De novo impotency after cryotherapy was 75% vs. 46% (p=.33) in WGC vs. HC. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of highly selected patients with unilateral low/intermediate risk PCa, hemi-cryoablation may provide similar oncological outcomes and less early complications compared to whole-gland cryoablation.