Influence of hormonal functional status on survival in adrenocortical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a malignancy with a poor prognosis. Many publications in ACC report on risk factors for a poor outcome; one risk factor studied is hormonal hypersecretion (cortisol, sex-hormones, steroid precursors or aldosterone). The aim of this systematic review was to study the association between hormonal secretion and recurrence or mortality in ACC. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane library (January 2018) for cohort studies examining the association between hormonal secretion on overall or recurrence-free survival in ACC. Methods A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to obtain a weighted relative risk comparing cortisol-secreting and/or androgen-secreting ACCs to non-secreting tumours regarding overall and recurrence-free survival. Risk of bias assessment was performed for all studies included. Results Nineteen publications were included representing a total of 3814 patients. Most studies were generally considered low/intermediate risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed higher mortality risk for cortisol-secreting ACCs, weighted relative risk 1.71 (95% CI: 1.18-2.47) combining studies that adjusted for tumour stage; also a higher recurrence risk was found for cortisol producing ACCs, relative risk 1.43 (95% CI: 1.18-1.73). Androgen secretion was not clearly associated with survival (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.60-1.12). Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis show that cortisol-secreting ACCs are associated with a worse overall survival; future research is needed to establish whether this association points to negative effects of cortisol action, whether it signifies a more aggressive ACC subtype or whether cortisol is merely a prognostic marker.

Rifampin levels in daily practice: the accuracy of a single measurement.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of rifampin levels is not part of routine practice. However, low levels are associated with failure of tuberculosis treatment. The clinical relevance of serum levels in daily practice is unclear. The objective was to evaluate rifampin serum concentrations and factors associated with insufficient concentrations. METHODS: Patients with at least one rifampin concentration drawn 3 hours after intake (C3) between 2005 and 2014 were included. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including side effects and dose adjustments. Two different criteria were used to define adequate concentrations (criterion 1: C3 a nd C 6 ≥ 3 mg/l; criterion 2: C3 or C6 ≥ 5 mg/l). RESULTS: Of 63 patients, 66% and 76% had a sufficient level according to criterion 1 or 2, respectively. C3 exceeded C6 in most patients, while a late maximum was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003). A dose adjustment was made in 19% of cases, more frequently in patients with insufficient levels (p = 0.02) or with ≥ 2 side effects (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Rifampin levels varied but were mostly adequate and a single measurement at 3 hours after intake provided the required information in most cases, indicating that full AUC0-24 measurements could be limited to specific situations.