Respiratory Muscle Strength Is Related to Handgrip Performance in Community-Dwelling Persons Aged 80+ from the BUTTERFLY Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the association of respiratory muscle strength with sarcopenia and its indicators in the oldest old. METHODS: Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and sarcopenia-related factors (handgrip strength and appendicular lean mass) were evaluated in a cohort of n = 286 (45.5% female) non-frail, community-dwelling persons aged 83.6 ± 3.0 years (age range 80-97 years). RESULTS: The sample presented a sarcopenia prevalence of 32.2%. Sarcopenic subjects showed comparable MIP and MEP as non-sarcopenic ones (female: MIP 43.9 ± 18.9 vs. 50.3 ± 19.5, p = 0.053; MEP 63.0 ± 23.0 vs. 69.2 ± 19.1, p = 0.067; male: MIP, 65.1 ± 24.4 vs. 64.4 ± 23.9, p = 0.433; MEP 87.7 ± 33.3 vs. 93.8 ± 30.9, p = 0.124). Statistically significant but very low associations were found between grip strength and MIP (r = 0.193 for male, p < 0.05 and r = 0.257 for female participants, p < 0.01) and MEP (r = 0.200 for male, p < 0.01 and r = 0.191 for female participants, p < 0.05). Lean mass was significantly correlated to MIP and MEP in female (r = 0.253, p < 0.01 and r = 0.343, p < 0.01, respectively), whereas this association was not found in male participants. Grip strength was the only statistically significant predictor of MEP (r2 = 0.212, p < 0.001), while MIP was independently predicted by age, male sex, and grip strength (r2 = 0.177, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral muscle strength is a statistically significant, albeit weak predictor for respiratory muscle strength in well-functioning, community-dwelling persons aged 80+. When confronted to a low grip strength, one should be aware of concomitant respiratory muscle weakness, as this is a known risk factor for atelectasis and pneumonia. Given the relatively low association with handgrip strength, respiratory muscle strength testing might be indicated.

Therapeutical strategies in cavitary legionnaires' disease, two cases from the field and a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Legionnaires' Disease (LD) rarely evolves into pulmonary abscesses. The current systematic review has been designed to explore therapeutical strategies in pulmonary cavitary LD. METHODS: A research strategy was developed and applied to the databases Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science from the 1st of January 2000 to the 1st of November 2022. Original articles, case series, case reports, and guidelines written in English, French, German, Italian, and Dutch were considered. Furthermore, medical records of patients treated at the University Hospital UZ Brussel for LD cavitary pneumonia, between the 1st of January 2016 to the 1st of January 2022, were reviewed. RESULTS: Two patients were found by the UZ Brussel's medical records investigation. Through the literature review, 23 reports describing 29 patients, and seven guidelines were identified. The overall evidence level was low. RESULT OF SYNTHESIS (CASE REPORTS): The median age was 48 years and 65% were male. A polymicrobial infection was detected in 11 patients (44%) with other aerobic bacteria being the most commonly found. At diagnosis, 52% of patients received combination therapy, and fluoroquinolones were the preferred antimicrobial class. Anaerobic coverage was neglected in 33% of patients. RESULT OF SYNTHESIS (GUIDELINES): Three guidelines favor monotherapy with fluoroquinolones or macrolides, while one suggested an antimicrobial combination in case of severe LD. Four guidelines recommended anaerobic coverage in case of lung abscesses. CONCLUSION: To date, the evidence supporting cavitary LD treatment is low. Monotherapy lowers toxicity and might be as effective as combination therapy. Finally, anaerobes should not be neglected.

Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the collaborative potential between artificial intelligence (AI) and pulmonologists for diagnosing pulmonary disease. We hypothesised that the collaboration between a pulmonologist and AI with explanations (explainable AI (XAI)) is superior in diagnostic interpretation of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) than the pulmonologist without support. METHODS: The study was conducted in two phases, a monocentre study (phase 1) and a multicentre intervention study (phase 2). Each phase utilised two different sets of 24 PFT reports of patients with a clinically validated gold standard diagnosis. Each PFT was interpreted without (control) and with XAI's suggestions (intervention). Pulmonologists provided a differential diagnosis consisting of a preferential diagnosis and optionally up to three additional diagnoses. The primary end-point compared accuracy of preferential and additional diagnoses between control and intervention. Secondary end-points were the number of diagnoses in differential diagnosis, diagnostic confidence and inter-rater agreement. We also analysed how XAI influenced pulmonologists' decisions. RESULTS: In phase 1 (n=16 pulmonologists), mean preferential and differential diagnostic accuracy significantly increased by 10.4% and 9.4%, respectively, between control and intervention (p<0.001). Improvements were somewhat lower but highly significant (p<0.0001) in phase 2 (5.4% and 8.7%, respectively; n=62 pulmonologists). In both phases, the number of diagnoses in the differential diagnosis did not reduce, but diagnostic confidence and inter-rater agreement significantly increased during intervention. Pulmonologists updated their decisions with XAI's feedback and consistently improved their baseline performance if AI provided correct predictions. CONCLUSION: A collaboration between a pulmonologist and XAI is better at interpreting PFTs than individual pulmonologists reading without XAI support or XAI alone.

Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in adults living with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del and heterozygous for F508del and a residual function mutation.

BACKGROUND: To examine safety and efficacy of tezacaftor-ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA) in a real-life setting in adults living with cystic fibrosis. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective observational study, including adults living with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) eligible for TEZ/IVA, with assessments at baseline, 3 months (visit3mo) and 6 months (visit6mo) after start of treatment. Outcomes included change in FEV1, LCI, FeNO, CFQ-R, estimated number of annual acute exacerbations, BMI, dosage of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) and airway microbiology. We also assessed safety. RESULTS: Forty-eight adult pwCF (mean (±SD) age 33 (±12) years; mean FEV1 65 (±19) %P) were included. Three subgroups were identified: pwCF F/F CFTR modulator-naive (n = 28; 58%), pwCF F/F previously treated with lumacaftor-ivacaftor (n = 11; 23%) and pwCF F/RF (n = 9; 19%). Adverse events were described in 3 pwCF (6%) during the 6-month observation period (in one leading to treatment interruption). At visit3mo, FEV1 had improved in all subgroups. In the entire group, mean FEV1 had increased from 66 (±2.9) %P to 72 (±2.9) %P (p < 0.0001). Similarly, LCI improved by approximately one unit at visit3mo (p = 0.02). At visit6mo mean annual acute exacerbation rate decreased significantly (p = 0.02). Only in the CFQ-R social functioning domain score, a significant improvement was observed at visit6mo (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that TEZ/IVA is safe, well tolerated and effective in terms of improvement of lung function, ventilation inhomogeneity, health-related social functioning, and reduction of estimated annual acute exacerbation rate, in adult pwCF F/F and F/RF. Results in this real-life study reflect those observed in RCTs.

Features of post-obstructive pneumonia in advanced lung cancer patients, a large retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Post-obstructive pneumonia refers to an infection of the lung parenchyma distal to a bronchial obstruction. Previous experience-based studies reported a high prevalence of this infection among patients with a medical history of advanced lung neoplasia, up to 40-55%. OBJECTIVES: The current study was designed to investigate the features of post-obstructive pneumonia in lung cancer, including its predictors and the discriminants for 30-day mortality. METHOD: Data from medical records at the tertiary University centre, UZ Brussel, were collected retrospectively between January 2016 and January 2021. Patients affected by lung cancer stages III and IV were included. A multidisciplinary team, composed of a pulmonologist, an infectious disease specialist and a chest radiologist, identified patients affected by post-obstructive pneumonia. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients were included, of which 46 (11%) were diagnosed with post-obstructive pneumonia. Multivariable logistic regression for predictors of disease onset found significant differences for squamous cell carcinoma (OR:2.46 p-value: .014) and hilar location of the tumour (OR:2.72 p-value: .021). However, no significant differences were identified with regards to age or comorbidities. Furthermore, 30-day mortality among post-obstructive pneumonia patients was 30%. Multivariable logistic regression for prediction of 30-day mortality found significant differences in CURB-65 score (OR:73.20 p-value: .001) and smoking status (OR:0.009 p-value: .015). CONCLUSIONS: Within this cohort, the prevalence of post-obstructive pneumonia in advanced lung cancer patients was lower than previously reported. Squamous cell carcinoma and a hilar tumour location were two variables associated with disease development, independent of age and comorbidities. Furthermore, a higher CURB-65 score at post-obstructive pneumonia diagnosis was correlated with mortality.

Getting the Most out of Spirometry: A Tool to Guide Dry Powder Inhaler Use.

BACKGROUND: Dry powder inhaler (DPI) use requires sufficient peak inspiratory flow over the DPI internal resistance (PIFR). OBJECTIVES: We examined whether spirometric peak inspiratory flow (PIFspiro) could serve to predict PIFR in patients with obstructive lung disease. METHOD: Thirty healthy nonsmokers and 140 stable outpatients (70 COPD, 70 asthma) performed spirometry according to the 2019 ERS/ATS spirometry update, yielding PIFspiro. Using a PIFR measurement device with varying orifices, all subjects' PIFR values were recorded for 5 predefined resistance levels, characterized by 5 orifice cross sections (SR). A test group including all healthy subjects, 30 of the asthma, and 30 of the COPD patients was used to establish the relationship between PIFR and both PIFspiro and SR by multiple regression. A validation group including the remaining 40 asthma and 40 COPD patients, served to verify whether their predicted PIFR value corresponded to the measured PIFR for each resistance level. RESULTS: The asthma (FEV1 = 78 ± 17 [SD] %pred) and COPD (FEV1 = 46 ± 17 [SD] %pred) patients under study had varying airway obstruction. In the test group, PIFR could be predicted by ln[PIFspiro] (p < 0.0001), SR (p < 0.0001), and SR2 (p = 0.006), with an adjusted R2 = 0.71. In the validation group, estimated PIFR did not significantly differ from measured PIFR (p > 0.05 for the 5 resistance levels). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a simple method to predict PIFR for a range of common DPI resistances, based on the device characteristics and on the patient's characteristics reflected in PIFspiro. As such, routine spirometry can serve to estimate a patient's specific PIFR without the need for additional testing.

Azithromycin for treatment of hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a randomised, multicentre, open-label clinical trial (DAWn-AZITHRO).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Azithromycin was rapidly adopted as a repurposed drug to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) early in the pandemic. We aimed to evaluate its efficacy in patients hospitalised for COVID-19. METHODS: In a series of randomised, open-label, phase 2 proof-of-concept, multicentre clinical trials (Direct Antivirals Working against the novel coronavirus (DAWn)), several treatments were compared with standard of care. In 15 Belgian hospitals, patients hospitalised with moderate to severe COVID-19 were allocated 2:1 to receive standard of care plus azithromycin or standard of care alone. The primary outcome was time to live discharge or sustained clinical improvement, defined as a two-point improvement on the World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale sustained for at least 3 days. RESULTS: Patients were included between April 22 and December 17, 2020. When 15-day follow-up data were available for 160 patients (56% of preset cohort), an interim analysis was performed at request of the independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board. Subsequently, DAWn-AZITHRO was stopped for futility. In total, 121 patients were allocated to the treatment arm and 64 patients to the standard-of-care arm. We found no effect of azithromycin on the primary outcome with a hazard ratio of 1.044 (95% CI 0.772-1.413; p=0.7798). None of the predefined subgroups showed significant interaction as covariates in the Fine-Gray regression analysis. No benefit of azithromycin was found on any of the short- and longer-term secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Time to clinical improvement is not influenced by azithromycin in patients hospitalised with moderate to severe COVID-19.

Lung Restriction in Patients With Breast Cancer After Hypofractionated and Conventional Radiation Therapy: A 10-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: Previous studies in patients with breast cancer have shown acute radiation therapy-induced reductions of pulmonary diffusing capacity, essentially owing to lung volume restriction. We aimed to assess the long-term effect of 2 radiation therapy regimens, which differed in terms of radiation technique and dose fractionation, on lung function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From a randomized controlled trial comparing conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (CR) and hypofractionated tomotherapy (TT), 84 patients with breast cancer (age at inclusion 54 ± 10 [standard deviation] years) could be assessed at baseline, after 3 months, and after 1, 2, 3, and 10 years. Measurements included forced vital capacity, total lung capacity (TLC), and diffusing capacity (TLco). RESULTS: Radiation therapy-induced lung function changes over 10 years (Δ) were similar for both treatment arms, and in a patient subgroup with negligible history of respiratory disease or smoking (n = 57) these averaged: Δ forced vital capacity = -13 (± 9) percent predicted; ΔTLco = -14 (± 12) percent predicted; and ΔTLC = -11 (± 9) percent predicted. The only significant correlation was between V20 (lung volume exposed to dose exceeding 20 Gy) and ΔTLco (rho = -0.36; P = .007). In this subgroup, as well as in the entire patient cohort, the incurred pulmonary restriction in terms of TLC and TLco showed a greater decline at 3 months for CR versus TT. However, at 10 years, no significant difference could be detected between CR and TT (P = .9 for TLC and P = .2 for TLco in the entire patient cohort). Of the patients with normal TLC and TLco at baseline (ie, above lower limits of normal), respectively 94% and 96% were still normal 10 years later. CONCLUSIONS: In women with breast cancer, conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and hypofractionated tomotherapy induce similar restrictive lung patterns during the course of a 10-year period, despite some treatment-dependent differences in the first 3 months. The large majority of women with normal lung function at baseline maintained a normal lung function status 10 years after radiation therapy, irrespective of treatment arm.

Correlation of symptoms and physical activity level in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: results from the observational SPACE study.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent airflow limitation and high symptom burden that interferes with physical activity and results in a vicious cycle of inactivity and symptom worsening. The aim of this multicenter, observational study was to determine the prevalence and severity of morning, daytime and night-time symptoms as well as patterns of physical activity levels (PALs) and their interrelation in Belgian COPD patients, enrolled in the multinational SPACE study (NCT03031769). METHODS: Socio-demographic, socio-economic and disease characteristics data were collected from patients' medical records as part of a routine visit to their primary care practice or pulmonologist. Dedicated questionnaires were used to evaluate respiratory symptoms for each part of the day. PAL was assessed by means of self- and interview-reported tools, and physician's judgment. Patients were also classified according to GOLD recommendations 2013 and 2017. RESULTS: Overall, 102 Belgian patients participated in the study (mean age 67 years, 60.8% males). Over 85% of patients experienced respiratory symptoms throughout the day and about one-third were considered as 'active' (PAL ≥150 minutes/week). Physician-assessed PALs were higher than self-reported PALs, categorizing fewer patients as 'inactive' (17.6% versus 42.2%, respectively). PALs and symptoms were weakly interrelated. Inactive patients were present in all GOLD classification groups. CONCLUSION: Stable Belgian COPD patients enrolled in the SPACE study presented 24-hour respiratory symptoms and insufficient PALs. Physicians tended to overestimate patients' physical activity. Inactive patients were present across all GOLD classification groups. New approaches are deemed necessary to objectively identify and activate sedentary patients.

Peripheral lung effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in adult cystic fibrosis.

Despite being an important patient group, adult cystic fibrosis patients with an FEV1 below 40%predicted have been excluded from clinical trials with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. We conducted a real-life 3 months follow-up study in 14 adult CF patients (median FEV1 34%predicted) demonstrating significant treatment effects in terms of FEV1 (an increase of 12%predicted at 4 weeks, remaining stable thereafter). Corresponding decreases in lung clearance index LCI (by 31%predicted, down from baseline 247%predicted) and ventilation heterogeneity in the acinar compartment (Sacin) (by 411%predicted, down from baseline 798%predicted) suggest a distinct peripheral lung effect. One patient had intermittent treatment interruptions because of drug-induced liver injury. Our real-life data confirm that treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is effective in severely obstructive patients, and this is the first study to show time evolution of ventilation distribution improvement, pointing to the peripheral lung as the main site of treatment effect.

Not a wild goose chase: long-lasting MRSA negative status following eradication therapy for chronic MRSA infection in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: Prevalence of MRSA in patients with CF has risen over the past decades, and chronic infection with MRSA is associated with worse outcome in this patient group. METHODS: This retrospective observational study investigated long-term eradication rate in pediatric and adult CF patients with chronic MRSA infection, using a 6-month eradication regimen containing 2 oral antibiotics, combined with topical decolonisation measures. Respiratory tract cultures were performed at least every three months, from the first MRSA-positive culture onwards. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with chronic MRSA infection were identified from our CF patient registry, of which 13 patients underwent an eradication attempt. The regimen consisted of 2 oral antibiotics: a combination of rifampicin, fusidic acid, clindamycin and co-trimoxazol, based on the sensitivity pattern of the MRSA strain. At the end of the study period (median 8.2 years), 12 out of 13 patients (92%) were MRSA negative. None of the patients interrupted treatment due to side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: Eradication of chronic MRSA infection is feasible, well-tolerated and highly successful, and can offer a long-lasting MRSA-negative status, obviating the need for patient segregation.

Evolution of lung function and chest CT 6 months after COVID-19 pneumonia: Real-life data from a Belgian University Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Most post COVID-19 follow-up studies are limited to a follow-up of 3 months. Whether a favorable evolution in lung function and/or radiological abnormalities is to be expected beyond 3 months is uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a real-life follow-up study assessing the evolution in lung function, chest CT and ventilation distribution between 10 weeks and 6 months after diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were assessed at 6 months of whom 63 had chest CT at both follow-up visits and 46 had multiple breath washout testing to obtain lung clearance index (LCI). The study group was divided into a restrictive (n = 39) and a non-restrictive subgroup (n = 40) based on TLC z-score. Restriction was associated with a history of intubation, neuromuscular blockade use and critical illness polyneuropathy. Restriction significantly improved over time, but was not resolved by 6 months (median TLC z-score of -2.2 [IQR: -2.7; -1.5] at 6 months versus -2.7 [IQR: -3.1; -2.1] at 10 weeks). LCI did not evolve between both follow-up visits. Symptoms and chest CT score improved irrespective of restriction. CONCLUSION: We observed a disconnect between the improvement of COVID-19 related symptoms, chest CT lesions, and corresponding lung function. While CT imaging is almost normalized at 6 months, a further reduction of pulmonary restriction may be hoped for beyond 6 months in those patients showing restriction at their first follow-up visit.

Peak In- and Expiratory Flow Revisited: Reliability and Reference Values in Adults.

BACKGROUND: While peak in- and expiratory flow rates offer valuable information for diagnosis and monitoring in respiratory disease, these indices are usually considered too variable to be routinely used for quantification in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to obtain reproducible measurements of maximal inspiratory flow rates and to construct reference equations for peak in- and expiratory flows (PIF and PEF). METHOD: With coaching for maximal effort, 187 healthy Caucasian subjects (20-80 years) performed at least 3 combined forced inspiratory and expiratory manoeuvres, until at least 2 peak inspiratory flow measurements were within 10% of each other. The effect on PIF preceded by a slow expiration instead of a forced expiration and PIF repeatability over 3 different days was also investigated in subgroups. Reference values and limits of normal for PIF, mid-inspiratory flow, and PEF were obtained according to the Lambda-Mu-Sigma statistical method. RESULTS: A valid PIF could be obtained within 3.3 ± 0.6(SD) attempts, resulting in an overall within-test PIF variability of 4.6 ± 3.2(SD)%. A slow instead of a forced expiration prior to forced inspiration resulted in a significant (p < 0.001) but small PIF increase (2.5% on average). Intraclass correlation coefficient for between-day PIF was 0.981 (95% CI: 0.960-0.992). Over the entire age range, inter-subject PIF variability was smaller than in previous reports, and PIF could be predicted based on its determinants gender, age, and height (r2 = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: When adhering to similar criteria for the measurement of effort-dependent portions of inspiratory and expiratory flow-volume curves, performed according to current ATS/ERS standards, it is possible to obtain reproducible PIF and PEF values for use in routine clinical practice.

A woman and her breathtaking jewelry.

We present the case of a 45-year-old woman, working as a silver polisher since 11 years, complaining of dyspnea on exertion and dry cough. Intensive diagnostic workup, including high-resolution CT scan of the chest and lung biopsy by VATS led to the diagnosis of pulmonary siderosis. Pulmonary siderosis is a benign, non-fibrotic type of pneumoconiosis caused by inhalation of iron oxide, which is generally asymptomatic (except in concurrent smoking or concurrent silicosis). Combination of relevant exposure and the typical findings on CT-imaging (centrilobular nodules without cranio-caudal gradient) usually strongly suggest the diagnosis, but this should always be discussed at a multidisciplinary consultation. This includes discussing whether to perform a lung biopsy for histological confirmation. Cessation of the causative exposure is the only-treatment one can take and then radiological features can improve and even disappear of time. Unfortunately, this treatment has an enormous impact on patient's life because it implies changing profession. Preventive measures can be taken by employers (respiratory equipment and ventilation). This case illustrates that physicians should stay vigilant about occupational exposures in clinical practice as well as the need for multidisciplinary consult in patients suspected of having interstitial lung disease.