Impact of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure as a marker for diastolic dysfunction on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) as an indicator of diastolic function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and its implication in predicting long-term mortality. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively collected data on 3328 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR in our institution between July 2009 and June 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on invasive post-procedural LVEDP measurements: normal (<15 mmHg) vs. elevated (≥15 mmHg) LVEDP. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 81.6 years, and 53.3% were female. Elevated post-procedural LVEDP was identified in 2408 (72.3%) patients. The 5-year mortality rates were higher in the group with elevated LVEDP compared with the group with normal LVEDP (27.4% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.01; hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.41). A multivariate model revealed the following independent predictors of mortality after TAVR: post-procedural elevated LVEDP (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.53), pre-procedural significant tricuspid regurgitation (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.52) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.26-1.86). In the present study, a significant paravalvular leak after TAVR was not associated with higher mortality (HR 1.45, 95% CI-0.95-2.19, p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Elevated post-procedural LVEDP in patients who undergo TAVR is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality. Furthermore, PH and tricuspid regurgitation were also identified as predictors of mortality. These data confirm that diastolic dysfunction is an important predictor of mortality in TAVR and should be considered to guide procedure timing, favoring an early interventional approach and management in aortic stenosis patients.

Beneficial effects of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with angina pectoris and coronary sinus reducer.

Limited data exists about the effectiveness of the coronary sinus reducer (CSR) device in patients with angina pectoris and atrial fibrillation (AF). This case demonstrates beneficial effects of AF ablation in a patient with CSR. We report four major findings: Rhythm control has a relevant effect on angina pectoris symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease and AF. In these patients, AF ablation should be considered at an early stage. Patients with persistent angina pectoris and CSR may require sinus rhythm for an optimal effect of the device. Selected coronary sinus (CS) interventions can still be performed through the mesh of the CSR device.

Randomized Control of Sympathetic Drive With Continuous Intravenous Esmolol in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The BEtA-Blocker Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (BEAT-AMI) Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the role of esmolol-induced tight sympathetic control in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Elevated sympathetic drive has a detrimental effect on patients with acute STEMI. The effect of beta-blocker-induced heart rate mediated sympathetic control on myocardial damage is unknown. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial involving patients with STEMI and successful percutaneous intervention (Killip class I and II). Patients were randomly allocated to heart rate control with intravenous esmolol for 24 h or placebo. The primary outcome was the maximum change in troponin T release as a prognostic surrogate marker for myocardial damage. A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between patients allocated to placebo and those who received sympathetic control with esmolol in terms of maximum change in troponin T release: the median serum troponin T concentration increased from 0.2 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 0.1 to 0.7 ng/ml) to 1.3 ng/ml (IQR: 0.6 to 4.7 ng/ml) in the esmolol group and from 0.3 ng/ml (IQR: 0.1 to 1.2 ng/ml) to 3.2 ng/ml (IQR: 1.5 to 5.3 ng/ml) in the placebo group (p = 0.010). The levels of peak creatine kinase (CK), CK subunit MB (CK-MB), and n-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were lower in the esmolol group compared with placebo (CK 619 U/l [IQR: 250-1,701 U/l] vs. 1,308 U/l [IQR: 610 to 2,324 U/l]; p = 0.013; CKMB: 73.5 U/l [IQR: 30 to 192 U/l] vs. 158.5 U/l [IQR: 74 to 281 U/l]; p = 0.005; NT-proBNP: 1,048 pg/ml (IQR: 623 to 2,062 pg/ml] vs. 1,497 pg/ml [IQR: 739 to 3,318 pg/ml]; p = 0.059). Cardiogenic shock occurred in three patients in the placebo group and in none in the esmolol group. CONCLUSIONS: Esmolol treatment statistically significantly decreased troponin T, CK, CK-MB and NT-proBNP release as surrogate markers for myocardial injury in patients with STEMI. (Heart Rate Control After Acute Myocardial Infarction; DRKS00000766).

Outcome of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-octreotate in advanced grade 1/2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

PURPOSE: The clinical benefit of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNET) has not yet been well described and defined in its full extent due to limited data in this tumour subgroup. This study was intended to obtain robust, comparative data on the outcome and toxicity of standardized PRRT with (177)Lu-octreotate in a well-characterized population of patients with advanced pNET of grade 1/2 (G1/2). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 68 pNET patients with inoperable metastatic disease consecutively treated with (177)Lu-octreotate (four intended cycles at 3-monthly intervals; mean activity per cycle 8.0 GBq). Of these 68 patients, 46 (67.6 %) had documented morphological tumour progression during the 12 months before initiation of treatment, and PRRT was the first-line systemic therapy in 35 patients (51.5 %). Response was evaluated according to modified Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria and additionally with Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model for univariate and multivariate analyses. Toxicity was assessed by standard follow-up laboratory work-up including blood count, and liver and renal function, supplemented with serial (99m)Tc-DTPA clearance measurements. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 58 months (range 4 - 112). Reversible haematotoxicity (grade 3 or more) occurred in four patients (5.9 %). No significant nephrotoxicity (grade 3 or more) was observed. Treatment responses (SWOG criteria) consisted of a partial response in 41 patients (60.3 %), a minor response in 8 (11.8 %), stable disease in 9 (13.2 %), and progressive disease in 10 (14.7 %). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 34 (95 % CI 26 - 42) and 53 months (95 % CI 46 - 60), respectively. A G1 proliferation status was associated with longer PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.044) in the multivariate analysis. Variables linked to impaired OS, on the other hand, were a reduced performance status (Karnofsky score ≤ 70 %, p = 0.007), a high hepatic tumour burden (≥ 25 % liver volume, p = 0.017), and an elevated plasma level of neuron-specific enolase (NSE >15 ng/ml, p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: The outstanding response rates and survival outcomes suggest that PRRT is highly effective in advanced G1/2 pNET when compared to data of other treatment modalities. Independent predictors of survival are the tumour proliferation index, the patient's performance status, tumour burden and baseline plasma NSE level.