Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and neurogenic pain may be candidates for decompression alone or short-segment fusion. In this study, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) decompression (MIS-D) and MIS short-segment fusion (MIS-SF) in patients with DLS were compared in a propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: The propensity score was calculated using 13 variables: sex, age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking status, leg pain, back pain, grade 1 spondylolisthesis, lateral spondylolisthesis, multilevel spondylolisthesis, lumbar Cobb angle, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt in a logistic regression model. One-to-one matching was performed to compare perioperative morbidity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patients was calculated based on cutoffs of percentage change from baseline: 42.4% for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 25.0% for visual analog scale (VAS) low-back pain, and 55.6% for VAS leg pain. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were included in the propensity score calculation, resulting in 31 matched pairs. Perioperative morbidity was significantly reduced for the MIS-D group, including shorter operative duration (91 vs 204 minutes, p < 0.0001), decreased blood loss (22 vs 116 mL, p = 0.0005), and reduced length of stay (2.6 vs 5.1 days, p = 0.0004). Discharge status (home vs rehabilitation), complications, and reoperation rates were similar. Preoperative PROMs were similar, but after 3 months, improvement was significantly higher for the MIS-SF group in the VAS back pain score (-3.4 vs -1.2, p = 0.044) and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) score (+10.3 vs +1.9, p = 0.009), and after 1 year the MIS-SF group continued to have significantly greater improvement in the VAS back pain score (-3.9 vs -1.2, p = 0.026), ODI score (-23.1 vs -7.4, p = 0.037), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey MCS score (+6.5 vs -6.5, p = 0.0374), and VR-12 MCS score (+7.6 vs -5.1, p = 0.047). MCID did not differ significantly between the matched groups for VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, or ODI scores (p = 0.38, 0.055, and 0.072, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DLS undergoing surgery had similar rates of significant improvement after both MIS-D and MIS-SF. For matched patients, tradeoffs were seen for reduced perioperative morbidity for MIS-D versus greater magnitudes of improvement in back pain, disability, and mental health for patients 1 year after MIS-SF. However, rates of MCID were similar, and the small sample size among the matched patients may be subject to patient outliers, limiting generalizability of these results.

Comparison of Perioperative Complications After Anterior-Posterior Versus Posterior-Anterior-Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Retrospective Review of 153 Consecutive Cases.

BACKGROUND: Although published data support the utilization of circumferential fusion to treat select cervical spine pathologies, it is unclear whether the posterior-anterior-posterior (PAP) fusion has increased risks compared with the anterior-posterior fusion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in perioperative complications between the 2 circumferential cervical fusion approaches. METHODS: One hundred fifty-three consecutive adult patients who underwent single-staged circumferential cervical fusion for degenerative pathologies from 2010 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into the anterior-posterior ( n = 116) and PAP ( n = 37) groups. The primary outcomes assessed were major complications, reoperation, and readmission. RESULTS: Although the PAP group was older ( P = .024), predominantly female ( P = .024), with higher baseline neck disability index ( P = .026), cervical sagittal vertical axis ( P = .001), and previous cervical operation rate ( P < .00001), the major complication, reoperation, and readmission rates were not significantly different from the 360° group. Although the PAP group had higher urinary tract infection ( P = .043) and transfusion ( P = .007) rates, higher estimated blood loss ( P = .034), and longer operative times ( P < .00001), these differences were insignificant after the multivariable analysis. Overall, operative time was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] 17.72, P = .042), atrial fibrillation (OR 158.30, P = .045), previous cervical operation (OR 5.05, P = .051), and lower baseline C1 - 7 lordosis (OR 0.93, P = .007). Higher estimated blood loss was associated with older age (OR 1.13, P = .005), male gender (OR 323.31, P = .047), and higher baseline cervical sagittal vertical axis (OR 9.65, P = .022). CONCLUSION: Despite some differences in preoperative and intraoperative variables, this study suggests both circumferential approaches have comparable reoperation, readmission, and complication profiles, all of which are high.

Shotgun injuries. Need for a special point of view.

BACKGROUND: Shotgun injuries (SGI) are infrequent, but due its special ballistics, are related to adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To analyze operative and administrative variables, critical for the institution. METHOD: Demographics and health-care related variables from SGI patients admitted to Military Central Hospital (Mexico City) between July 2006 and August 2019, were retrospectively studied. Statistics methods used were dispersion measures and relative occurrence frequency. RESULTS: Over a 15 months-span, 21 SGI patients were admitted. Mean age was 36.9 ± 13.6 years (range: 14-61) and male gender was dominant (n = 20; 95%). Type II SGI were the most common injuries (62%; 13/21). Mean hospital length of stay was 37.1 ± 28.7 days (range: 3-109) while stay at ICU was 20.3 ± 22.5 days (range: 3-99). Global rate of morbidity was 82% (17/21) and most frequent complications were infective. Global mortality rate was 24% (5/21). CONCLUSIONS: Once SGI cause prolonged length of stay, high rate of morbidity and of enormous consuming of material and human resources, primary prevention strategies are convenient for health-care systems compromised to the care of these cases.

ANTECEDENTES: Las lesiones por disparo de escopeta (LE) son infrecuentes, pero debido a su balística especial se relacionan con un pronóstico adverso. OBJETIVO: Analizar variables operativas y administrativas de los pacientes con LE, de interés para la institución. MÉTODO: Se estudiaron retrospectivamente variables demográficas y asistenciales de pacientes con LE admitidos al Hospital Central Militar (Ciudad de México) entre julio de 2006 y agosto de 2019. Los métodos estadísticos usados fueron medidas de dispersión y frecuencia relativa de ocurrencia. RESULTADOS: En 158 meses se admitieron 21 pacientes con LE. La edad media fue de 36.9 ± 13.6 años (rango: 14-61) y predominó el sexo masculino (n = 20; 95%). La LE tipo II fue la más frecuente (62%; 13/21). La estancia hospitalaria media fue de 37.1 ± 28.7 días (rango: 3-109) y en cuidados intensivos fue de 20.3 ± 22.5 días (rango: 3-99). La tasa global de morbilidad fue del 82% (17/21) y las complicaciones más frecuentes fueron infecciosas. La tasa gobal de mortalidad fue del 24% (5/21). CONCLUSIONES: Las LE son causa de estancia hospitalaria prolongada, alta tasa de morbilidad y un enorme consumo de recursos humanos y materiales, por lo que las estrategias de prevención primaria son convenientes para los sistemas de salud comprometidos con el cuidado de estos casos.