Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 13(4): 391-396, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715801

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Research indicates that the simulated learning tools known as virtual patients (VPs) are valued by pharmacy students and impact students' knowledge and confidence. However, research is needed to understand how students can be supported to make intended connections between VP cases and real-life clinical scenarios. The purpose of this study was to examine whether and how VP cases influence students' clinical reasoning skills, confidence, thought processes, and preparedness for their experiential practicums. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Third-year entry-to-practice doctor of pharmacy students who had completed at least one VP case in second year prior to their experiential practicums were surveyed in fall 2018 after having completed their experiential practicums. Surveys were structured to solicit student perceptions related to how students bridged VP cases and real-life clinical scenarios and were analyzed using a mixed-methods design. FINDINGS: Forty-three students completed the survey. Students perceived that VP cases most significantly impacted their clinical reasoning skills due to the opportunity cases afforded them to explore patient data and navigate relevant information. The largest limitation of VP cases to students' learning was that the cases differed from their experiences. Students' suggestions included opportunities for more practice using VP cases and an expanded repertoire of medical conditions offered through case exposure. SUMMARY: More research is needed to understand how to help students connect VP cases to their experiential practicums to make them more effective learning tools.


Assuntos
Simulação de Paciente , Estudantes de Farmácia , Competência Clínica , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Resolução de Problemas
2.
Front Psychol ; 7: 1942, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28018276

RESUMO

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate self- and parent-rated quality of life (QoL) in children with a reading disability (RD) and the impact of comorbid psychopathology, with special focus on age and gender differences. Methods: Using the Dyslexia Differential Diagnosis Maastricht-Hungarian standard test, 127 children (aged < 18) were included in the RD group and 81 in the control group. To measure comorbid psychopathology, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was administered. To evaluate the children's QoL self- and parent-rated versions of the Measure of Quality of Life for Children and Adolescents (ILK) were used. Group differences in QoL and psychopathology were assessed using Mann-Whitney U-tests. Moderated mediational models were tested in which comorbid psychopathology mediated the relationship between group membership and self- and parent-rated QoL, which was dependent on gender. Child's age and parents' level of education were included as covariates. Results: The RD group showed lower QoL than the controls in several domains, according to the parent-report, while no differences between the two groups were found, according to self-report. In boys, results revealed conditional and indirect effects of group membership on self- and parent-rated QoL through comorbid psychopathology (-0.046, BCa 95% CI: -0.135 to 0.043 and 0.064, BCa 95% CI: 0.024-0.111, respectively) as well as a conditional direct effect of group membership on parent-reported (-0.098, BCa 95% CI: 0.012-0.184), but not self-rated, QoL. No relationship was found for girls. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of measuring QoL and comorbid psychopathology in children with RDs from more sources and accounting for gender and age differences.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...