When the p Value Doesn't Cut It: The Fragility Index Applied to Randomized Controlled Trials in Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The American Statistical Association, among others, has called for the use of statistical methods beyond p ≤ 0.05. The fragility index is a statistical metric defined as the minimum number of patients for whom if an event rather than a nonevent occurred, then the p value would increase to ≥0.05. Previous reviews have demonstrated that many randomized controlled trials have a low fragility index, suggesting they may not be robust. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the fragility indices of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search was performed. STUDY SELECTION: Colorectal surgery randomized controlled trials with a dichotomous primary outcome p ≤ 0.05 and publication between 2016 and 2018 were systematically identified. INTERVENTIONS: All procedural interventions related to colorectal surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main measures were the fragility index and the number of patients lost to follow-up for each trial. The percentage of trials with the number of patients lost to follow-up greater than the fragility index was calculated. RESULTS: In total, 712 abstracts were reviewed, with 90 trials meeting the inclusion criteria. The median fragility index was 3 (interquartile range of 1 to 10). In 51 of the 90 trials (57%), the number of patients lost to follow-up was greater than the fragility index. LIMITATIONS: The fragility index is only one measure of the robustness of a randomized clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: Most colorectal surgery randomized controlled trials have a low fragility index. In 57% of trials, more patients were lost to follow-up than would be required to change the outcome of the trial from "significant" to "nonsignificant" based on the p value. This emphasizes the importance of assessing the robustness of clinical trials when considering their clinical application, rather than relying solely on the p value. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B741.CUANDO EL VALOR-P ES INSUFICIENTE: ÍNDICE DE FRAGILIDAD APLICADO EN ESTUDIOS ALEATORIOS CONTROLADOS EN CIRUGÍA COLORECTAL. ANTECEDENTES: La Sociedad Estadounidense de Estadística, entre otros, ha pedido el uso de métodos estadísticos más allá de p <0,05. El índice de fragilidad es una medida estadística definida como el número de desenlaces que podrían cambiar para revertir, o conseguir, la significación estadística, así el valor p aumentaría a ≥ 0,05. Las revisiones anteriores han demostrado que muchos estudios aleatorios controlados tienen un índice de fragilidad bajo, lo que sugiere que pueden poco sólidos. OBJETIVO: El propósito de la présente investigación fué de revisar los índices de fragilidad de los estudios aleatorios controlados en cirugía colorrectal. FUENTES DE DATOS: PubMed. SELECCIN DE ESTUDIOS: Se identificaron sistemáticamente estudios aleatorios controlados de cirugía colorrectal con un resultado primario dicotómico, valor de p ≤ 0,05 y publicados entre 2016-2018. INTERVENCIONES: Se incluyeron todas aquellas intervenciones con procedimientos relacionados con la cirugía colorrectal. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Las principales medidas fueron: el índice de fragilidad y el número de pacientes perdidos durante el seguimiento en cada estudio. Se calculó el el índice de fragilidad en porcentaje de estudios con el mayor número de pacientes perdidos durante el seguimiento mas prolongado. RESULTADOS: En total, se revisaron 712 resúmenes con 90 ensayos que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. La mediana del índice de fragilidad fue de 3 (rango intercuartíl de 1 a 10). En 51 de los 90 estudios (57%), el número de pacientes perdidos durante el seguimiento fue mayor que el índice de fragilidad. LIMITACIONES: El índice de fragilidad es solo una medida de la robustez de un estúdio clínico aleatorio. CONCLUSIONES: La mayoría de los estudios aleatorios y controlados en cirugía colorrectal tienen un índice de fragilidad bajo. En el 57% de los estudios, se perdieron más pacientes durante el seguimiento de los que se necesitarían para cambiar el resultado del estudios de grado "significativo" a un grado "no significativo" según el valor-p. Este concepto enfatiza la importancia de evaluar la robustez de los estudios clínicos al considerar su aplicación verdadera aplicación clínica, en lugar de depender únicamente del valor-p. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B741. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Use of Sodium Hyaluronate/Carboxymethylcellulose Bioresorbable Membrane in Loop Ileostomy Construction Facilitates Stoma Closure.

BACKGROUND: Loop ileostomy is a common adjunct to surgical procedures for low rectal cancers and inflammatory bowel disease. Ileostomy closure through a limited incision can be technically challenging. We hypothesized that placing a sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose (SH/CMC) bioresorbable membrane at loop ileostomy creation would decrease stoma closure time without increasing morbidity. METHODS: In a retrospective review at a single institution with 6 board-certified colorectal surgeons, patients with loop ileostomy creation and closure between September 1999 and December 2011 were grouped based on SH/CMC placement at ileostomy creation. Data were abstracted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), primary diagnosis, length of surgery, staff surgeon, interval between surgeries, and postoperative morbidity. The primary endpoint was the length of the surgery for ileostomy closure. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay, wound infection rate, and other complications. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were identified. Group 1 (with SH/CMC) included 146 patients, and Group 2 (without SH/CMC) included 147 patients. The groups were matched according to age, sex, BMI, interval between creation and closure, and indication for surgery. The average surgical time for closure was significantly shorter in Group 1 (46.4 minutes ± 2.7) compared to Group 2 (60 minutes ± 2.3) (P=0.0001). We found no difference between the groups in length of stay, wound infection rate, or complication rate. CONCLUSION: The use of SH/CMC in loop ileostomy creation significantly decreases the operative time required for stoma closure with no increase in the complication rate.

Current State of Colorectal Surgery Training: A Survey of Program Directors, Current and Recently Matched Colorectal Residents, and Recent Colorectal Graduates.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal residency has become one of the more competitive postgraduate training opportunities; however, little information is available to guide potential applicants in gauging their competitiveness. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the current trends colorectal residency training and to identify what factors are considered most important in ranking a candidate highly. We hypothesized that there was a difference in what program directors, current and recently matched colorectal residents, and recent graduates consider most important in making a candidate competitive for a colorectal residency position. DESIGN: Three 10-question anonymous surveys were sent to 59 program directors, 87 current and recently matched colorectal residents, and 119 recent graduates in March 2015. SETTINGS: The study was conducted as an anonymous internet survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current trends in applying for a colorectal residency, competitiveness of recent colorectal residents, factors considered most important in ranking a candidate highly, and what future colorectal surgeons can expect after finishing their training were measured. RESULTS: The study had an overall response rate of 43%, with 28 (47%) of 59 program directors, 46 (53%) of 87 current and recently matched colorectal residents, and 39 (33%) of 119 recent graduates responding. The majority of program directors felt that a candidate's performance during the interview process was the most important factor in making a candidate competitive, followed by contact from a colleague, letters of recommendation, American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores, and number of publications/presentations. The majority of current and recently matched colorectal residents felt that a recommendation/telephone call from a colleague was the most important factor, whereas the majority of recent graduates favored letters of recommendation as the most important factor in ranking a candidate highly. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to the study include its small sample size, selection bias, responder bias, and misclassification bias. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in what program directors and current/recent residents consider most important in making an applicant competitive for colorectal residency.

An Abundance of Polyps: An Intriguing Case of Lymphomatous Polyposis.

Multiple lymphomatous polyposis (MLP) is a rare condition in which non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), typically mantle cell lymphoma, presents as multiple mucosal polyps of the intestine. We present the case of a 66-year-old man who presented with newly acquired polyps throughout the colon, detected by endoscopy. Endoscopic biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma. The patient underwent treatment on a research protocol. Our case illustrates the importance of considering MLP or other forms of NHL in elderly patients found to have multiple gastrointestinal polyps, especially those who have a history of clear colonoscopy within the previous one to two years.

Longer operative time: deterioration of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy.

BACKGROUND: As laparoscopic surgery is applied to colorectal surgery procedures, it becomes imperative to delineate whether there is an operative duration where benefits diminish. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to determine whether benefits of a laparoscopic right colectomy compared with an open right colectomy are diminished by prolonged operative times. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic right and open right colectomy for colon cancer with operative duration of less than and greater than 3 hours. SETTINGS: This study was based on data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. PATIENTS: We queried the database for patients with laparoscopic and open right colectomy with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were stratified by operative technique and duration. Forward multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for mortality, cerebrovascular/cardiovascular complications, and infectious complications. Predictors of operative time >3 hours in the laparoscopic cohort were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 4273 patients, operative duration was >3 hours for 18.4% of patients with a laparoscopic right colectomy and 11.3% with an open right colectomy. There was no benefit of the laparoscopic right colectomy with an operative duration >3 hours over open right colectomy with respect to mortality and cardiopulmonary and cerebrovascular complications. An operative duration >3 hours was an independent risk factor for infectious complications in patients undergoing a laparoscopic right colectomy. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study and not an intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: At an operative duration of ≥3 hours, laparoscopic right colectomy has higher infectious complications than open right colectomy. Reduced mortality and less cardiopulmonary and cerebrovascular complications seen in the laparoscopic cohort with shorter operative duration were lost with an operative duration >3 hours. In patients at risk for prolonged laparoscopic right colectomy, early conversion to an open technique may be warranted.

Selection criteria for combined resection of synchronous colorectal cancer hepatic metastases: a cautionary note.

PURPOSE: Combined resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous hepatic metastases has been shown to be safe and associated with acceptable oncologic outcomes in selected patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if selection criteria for combined resection could be identified using major morbidity or mortality as an avoidable outcome. METHODS: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program dataset from 2005 to 2010 for combined liver and colorectal resections for colorectal cancer using procedure and diagnosis codes. These patients were compared to colorectal cancer patients receiving colectomy alone and patients receiving liver-directed surgery for secondary liver cancer. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,641 (53.1 %) of patients underwent colectomy alone, 1,113 (36 %) underwent liver-directed surgery alone, and 334 (10.9 %) underwent combined colectomy and liver-directed surgery for colorectal cancer. The combined patient population had statistically significant increases in American Society of Anesthesiologists class, preoperative ascites, preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome/sepsis, weight loss, functional dependence, and decreased serum albumin compared to the other cohorts. While major hepatectomy was less frequent in the combined cohort, the rate of rectal resection was similar to the colectomy-alone cohort. These selection disparities resulted in a subsequent increase in composite major morbidity, return to operating room, infectious complications, and length of stay in combined patients. CONCLUSIONS: While combined resection in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer hepatic metastases may be feasible, it is associated with considerable increase in morbidity without application of stringent selection criteria. We recommend only patients without known risk factors for perioperative morbidity and infectious complications be considered for this approach.

Restorative proctocolectomy: the current ochsner experience.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a technically demanding procedure to treat ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Since its initial description almost 30 years ago, the operation has undergone technical and perioperative modifications to improve the patient's experience. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the records of patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation Hospital from 2008 to 2012 and compared data from that period to data from 1989-1995 (prior to laparoscopic pouch surgery) to determine factors associated with patient outcome. RESULTS: Ileal pouch-anal procedures were performed in 77 patients. The 30 male and 47 female patients ranged in age from 13 to 63 years (mean, 34.5 years). The indications for the procedure were ulcerative colitis in 62 patients, polyposis coli in 12 patients, and Crohn disease in 3 patients. Forty patients (52%) had laparoscopic-assisted procedures. The overall hospital length of stay for pouch creation averaged 6.9 days (range 3-29) and for ileostomy closure averaged 4.3 days (range 1-15). No perioperative deaths occurred within 30 days. Complications occurred in 37.7% of patients. Compared to a previous report of 72 patients from 1989 to 1995, the recent group had more laparoscopic procedures, shorter hospital stays, a smaller percentage of 3-stage procedures, and fewer general and pouch-related complications. Pouch failures were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: Advances in operative techniques and perioperative management have improved the outcome of restorative proctocolectomies.

Morbid obesity and diverticulitis: results from the ACS NSQIP dataset.

BACKGROUND: We examined the relationship between morbid obesity, clinical presentation, and perioperative outcomes in patients offered surgery for diverticulitis. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the ACS NSQIP dataset from 2005 to 2010 for patients undergoing surgery for nonhemorrhaging diverticulitis. Univariate comparisons were made between normal weight (NL) and morbidly obese (MO) patients in terms of demographics, clinical presentation, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes variables using chi-square or rank tests. Multivariable regression was used to adjust for age in assessing the impact of MO on the likelihood of emergent surgery (ES), ostomy creation, open surgery, and undergoing procedures without an anastomosis. RESULTS: We identified 10,952 patients undergoing surgery for diverticulitis; morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m(2), n = 592, 5.7%), normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 25 kg/m(2), n = 2,530, 24.2%). Morbidly obese patients were younger than NL patients by an average of 9.4 years (p < 0.001). Morbidly obese patients underwent ES more frequently than NL patients (19.3% vs 15.4%; p = 0.025). Multivariable regression identified morbid obesity as an independent risk factor for ES (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.24, p < 0.001), ostomy creation (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.08, p < 0.001), undergoing procedures without an anastomosis (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.42 to 2.24, p < 0.001), and open surgery (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.72 to 2.53, p < 0.001). Morbidly obese patients undergoing ES had more preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome/sepsis/septic shock than NL patients (72.8% vs 57.7%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Morbidly obese patients undergoing surgery for diverticulitis are nearly 10 years younger than NL patients and are more likely to require ES, ostomy creation, open surgery, and to undergo procedures without an anastomosis. Morbidly obese patients undergoing ES also have more preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome/sepsis/septic shock.

Abdominal versus perineal approach for treatment of rectal prolapse: comparable safety in a propensity-matched cohort.

Abdominal operations for rectal prolapse are associated with lower recurrence rates than perineal procedures but presumed higher morbidity. Therefore, perineal procedures are recommended for patients deemed unfit for abdominal repair. Consequently, bias confounds retrospective comparisons of the two approaches. To clarify the impact of operative approach on outcomes, we analyzed abdominal and perineal procedures in a propensity score-matched analysis. We selected patients undergoing surgery for rectal prolapse from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set from 2005 to 2010. We grouped procedures as abdominal or perineal. We identified preoperative variables predictive of complications and regressed against operative approach. The resulting propensity score was used to select a matched cohort with similar clinical risk. We identified 2188 patients (848 abdominal [38.8%]; 1340 perineal [61.2%]). Patients undergoing the perineal approach had higher rates of most risk variables. Propensity matching resulted in 563 matched pairs (1126 patients) with similar clinical risk. In this matched cohort, no significant difference was found in the rate of any complication between the operative approaches; mortality was 0.9 per cent in each group (P = 1.0). Relative risk for major morbidity after abdominal approach was 1.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 2.10; P = 0.15). Although many patients with rectal prolapse are high risk for abdominal surgery, our study indicates that many patients treated by perineal repair could be safely treated with a more durable operation.

Obesity and laparoscopic colectomy: outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports comparing outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy in obese vs nonobese patients from small, single-institution series have included few obese patients and have shown variable results, some suggesting that obesity has no impact on outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether any intraoperative or short-term postoperative outcome of laparoscopic colectomy is affected by obesity, independent of other variables. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective study comparing outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy grouped by BMI. PATIENTS: We queried American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data Files for patients undergoing nonemergent, laparoscopic colectomy from 2005 through 2008. Cases with a secondary procedure (with the exception of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, rigid proctosigmoidoscopy, or laparoscopic splenic flexure takedown) were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed operative time, length of stay, transfusion requirement, reoperation within 30 days, wound complications, pulmonary complications, sepsis/septic shock, deep venous thrombosis, renal failure/insufficiency, and death. We tested for differences in outcomes using χ tests or analyses of variance, and when differences between BMI classes were found, we performed multivariable regression to adjust for preoperative and intraoperative variables. RESULTS: In an analysis of 9693 patients (30% with BMI ≥30), significant differences were found among BMI classes for length of stay, operative time, and wound complication. Operative time correlated with BMI class independent of other variables; length of stay did not. After adjustment of all available variables, obesity remained an independent risk factor for wound complication, and the odds ratios increased with increasing obesity class. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and standardized outcome measures prevent examination of procedure-specific outcomes; therefore, this is not an intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that, in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy, obesity is an independent risk factor for wound complications. Although obesity also increases operative time, the effect of obesity on wound complications remains after adjustment for this and other risk factors.

Timing and perioperative risk factors for in-hospital and post-discharge venous thromboembolism after colorectal cancer resection.

INTRODUCTION: We postulated that the risk of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) may persist after discharge and tested this hypothesis in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing colorectal resections for cancer from 2005 to 2009. The outcome analyzed was a 30-day deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). Multivariable forward stepwise regression was used to identify independent predictors of VTE. RESULTS: The database contained 21 943 colorectal cancer resections. The 30-day DVT rate was 1.4% (306 of 21 943), 29% (89 of 306) were diagnosed post-discharge. The 30-day PE rate was 0.8% (180 of 21 943), 33% (60 of 180) was diagnosed post-discharge, the combined DVT/PE rate was 2.0% (446 of 21 943). The median time to diagnosis of VTE was 9 days (interquartile range 4-16) after surgery. Post-discharge VTE rates in patients with length of stay (LOS) less than 1 week (0.6%) were similar to patients with LOS greater than 1 week (0.7%, Fisher exact P not significant). Independent risk factors for post-discharge VTE were preoperative steroid use for chronic condition (odds ratio [OR] 2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-5.57, P = .001) and preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.24-4.10, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of almost one third of postoperative VTE in this patient population occurred after discharge. The duration of the prothrombotic stimulus of surgery is not well defined, and patients with malignancy are at high risk of VTE; thromboprophylaxis after discharge should be considered for these patients.

Advances and challenges in the management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ogilvie syndrome).

Although acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), also known as Ogilvie syndrome, is a well-known clinical entity, in many respects it remains poorly understood and continues to challenge physicians and surgeons alike. Our understanding of ACPO continues to evolve and its epidemiology has changed as new conditions have been identified predisposing to ACPO with critical illness providing the common thread among them. A physician must keep ACPO high in the list of differential diagnoses when dealing with the patient experiencing abdominal distention, and one must be prepared to employ and interpret imaging studies to exclude mechanical obstruction. Rapid diagnosis is the key, and institution of conservative measures often will lead to resolution. Fortunately, when this fails pharmacologic intervention with neostigmine often proves effective. However, it is not a panacea: consensus on dosing does not exist, administration techniques vary and may impact efficacy, contraindications limit its use, and persistence and or recurrence of ACPO mandate continued search for additional medical therapies. When medical therapy fails or is contraindicated, endoscopy offers effective intervention with advanced techniques such as decompression tubes or percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy providing effective results. Operative intervention remains the treatment of last resort; surgical outcomes are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a surgeon should be aware of all options for decompression-conservative, pharmacologic, and endoscopic-and use them in best combination to the advantage of patients who often suffer from significant concurrent illnesses making them poor operative candidates.

Association of blood transfusion and venous thromboembolism after colorectal cancer resection.

INTRODUCTION: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common event in the perioperative course of patients undergoing surgery. Transfused blood can disrupt the balance of coagulation factors and modulates the inflammatory cascade. Since inflammation and coagulation are tightly coupled, we postulated that RBC transfusion may be associated with the development of venous thromboembolic phenomena. We queried the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database to examine the relationship between intraoperative blood transfusion and development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data from 2005 to 2009 for patients undergoing colorectal resections for cancer based on the primary procedure CPT-4 code and operative ICD-9 diagnosis code. The primary outcome was 30-day deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). Intraoperative transfusion of RBC's was categorized as: none, 1-2 units, 3-5 units and 6 units or more. DVT/PE occurrences were analyzed by multivariable forward stepwise regression (p for entry<.05, for exit>.10) to identify independent predictors of DVT. RESULTS: The database contained 21943 colorectal cancer resections. The DVT rate was 1.4% (306/21943) and the PE rate was 0.8% (180/21943). Patients were diagnosed with both only 40 times and the combined DVT or PE rate (VTE) was 2.0% (446/21943). After adjusting for age, gender, race, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class, emergency procedure, operative duration and complexity of the procedure (based on Relative Value Units, RVU's), along with six clinical risk factors, intraoperative blood transfusion was a significant risk factor for the development of VTE and the risk increased with increasing number of units transfused. Preoperative hematocrit did not enter the multivariable model as an independent predictor of VTE, nor did open versus laparoscopic resection or wound class. CONCLUSION: In this study of 21943 patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer, blood transfusion is associated with increased risk of VTE. Malignancy and surgery are known prothrombotic stimuli, the subset of patients receiving intraoperative RBC transfusion are even more at risk for VTE, emphasizing the need for sensible use of transfusions and rigorous thromboprophylaxis regimens.

Autoimmune enteropathy with a CD8+ CD7- T-cell small bowel intraepithelial lymphocytosis: case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Adult onset autoimmune enteropathy (AIE) is a rare condition characterized by diarrhea refractory to dietary therapy diagnosed in patients with evidence of autoimmune conditions. Auto-antibodies to gut epithelial cells and other tissues are commonly demonstrated. Despite increasing awareness, the pathogenesis, histologic, immunologic and clinical features of AIE remain uncertain. There remains controversy regarding the diagnostic criteria, the frequency and types of auto-antibodies and associated autoimmune conditions, and the extent and types of histologic and immunologic abnormalities. CD4+ T-cells are thought to at least responsible for this condition; whether other cell types, including B- and other T-cell subsets are involved, are uncertain. We present a unique case of AIE associated with a CD8+CD7- lymphocytosis and review the literature to characterize the histologic and immunologic abnormalities, and the autoantibodies and autoimmune conditions associated with AIE. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of immune mediated enteropathy distinguished by the CD8+CD7- intra-epithelial and lamina propria lymphocytosis. Twenty-nine cases of AIE have been reported. The majority of patients had auto-antibodies (typically anti-enterocyte), preferential small bowel involvement, and predominately CD3+ CD4+ infiltrates. Common therapies included steroids or immuno-suppressive agents and clinical response with associated with histologic improvement. CONCLUSIONS: AIE is most often characterized (1) IgG subclass anti-epithelial cell antibodies, (2) preferential small bowel involvement, and (3) CD3+ alphabeta TCR+ infiltrates; there is insufficient evidence to conclude CD4+ T-cells are solely responsible in all cases of AIE.

Human rRNA gene clusters are recombinational hotspots in cancer.

The gene that produces the precursor RNA transcript to the three largest structural rRNA molecules (rDNA) is present in multiple copies and organized into gene clusters. The 10 human rDNA clusters represent <0.5% of the diploid human genome but are critically important for cellular viability. Individual genes within rDNA clusters possess very high levels of sequence identity with respect to each other and are present in high local concentration, making them ideal substrates for genomic rearrangement driven by dysregulated homologous recombination. We recently developed a sensitive physical assay capable of detecting recombination-mediated genomic restructuring in the rDNA by monitoring changes in lengths of the individual clusters. To prove that this dysregulated recombination is a potential driving force of genomic instability in human cancer, we assayed the rDNA for structural rearrangements in prospectively recruited adult patients with either lung or colorectal cancer, and pediatric patients with leukemia. We find that over half of the adult solid tumors show detectable rDNA rearrangements relative to either surrounding nontumor tissue or normal peripheral blood. In contrast, we find a greatly reduced frequency of rDNA alterations in pediatric leukemia. This finding makes rDNA restructuring one of the most common chromosomal alterations in adult solid tumors, illustrates the dynamic plasticity of the human genome, and may prove to have either prognostic or predictive value in disease progression.

Private practice for the colon and rectal surgeon.

Autonomy and independence as a surgeon represent the pinnacle of our training model, and private practice offers the trainee in colon and rectal surgery an opportunity to realize such goals as both a clinical surgeon and a business owner. Personalized care of patients and the immense gratification from providing such expert surgical care continue to be the ultimate reward for us as surgeons. However, private practice ultimately involves responsibilities of functioning as a small business owner. The health care environment in which we find ourselves provides great challenges to the viability and financial success of the private practitioner. Rising overhead expenses, malpractice, reduced reimbursement, and others factors confront the private practitioner as business owner. A career in private practice mandates acquisition of business acumen to preserve the privilege to practice our profession in this very challenging and changing economic environment. The opportunities for such a career vary considerably according to the scope of practice, hospital sophistication, geographic locale, and size of practice.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: rational evolution for diverticulitis.

Laparoscopic technique has proved to be a revolutionary advance in the surgical treatment of disease. However, limits exist regarding its application to colorectal resection as evidenced by the higher conversion rate and longer learning curve seen with colectomy. Conversion remains a complex issue related to multiple factors. One of the factors, inflammatory disease such as diverticulitis, exposes limitations of laparoscopic technique, specifically the absence of tactile sensation and use of one's hand as a surgical instrument. Nonetheless, the clinical benefits of smaller incisions, decreased pain, decreased ileus, and reduced hospitalization and disability make laparoscopic colectomy a compelling surgical option for the treatment of diverticulitis. Hand-assisted technique offers surgeons a practical and rational innovation for conventional laparoscopic colectomy and offers promise for improved feasibility and efficacy for the treatment of diverticulitis.

Acute intestinal pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome).

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO), also known as Ogilvie's syndrome, is a condition characterized by massive colonic distension in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Patients presenting with Ogilvie's syndrome have underlying medical and surgical conditions predisposing them to the syndrome. Ogilvie's syndrome can often be managed by conservative therapy. However, unrecognized and untreated, the continued distension associated with Ogilvie's syndrome can lead to perforation that is associated with a high mortality rate. In this article, the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and treatment options are reviewed.